Wellington Phoenix Men

Man of the Match vs Bling

29 replies · 252 views
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Man of the Match vs Bling

Grumpy old bastard alert

Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago

Grumpy old bastard alert

Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
"Benaldo" had a massive game and wracked up even more intercepts. Left winger now too. There's nothing he can't do on a football pitch.
Proud to have attended the first 175 Consecutive "Home" Wellington Phoenix "A League" Games !!

The Ruf, The Ruf, The Ruf is on Fire!!

Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Disagree. The marking from both him and Durante on Cazarine was poor. We may not have conceded but that was more Paston than SigmUnd/Durante.

Grumpy old bastard alert

Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
If tis is going to be the official MoM poll, please get rid of the supporters choice, as it will mean votes are wasted on that option.

Yellow Fever - Misery loves company

Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
patrick478 wrote:
If tis is going to be the official MoM poll, please get rid of the supporters choice, as it will mean votes are wasted on that option.
 
Not if they were the best on show
Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
auskiwi wrote:

patrick478 wrote:
If tis is going to be the official MoM poll, please get rid of the supporters choice, as it will mean votes are wasted on that option.

�
Not if they were the best on show


They are ineligible to win Fever player of the Year, so therefore should not be able to be voted for.

Yellow Fever - Misery loves company

Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
the voting doing the talking as usual

siggie i'll turn for you
Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
patrick478 wrote:
auskiwi wrote:

patrick478 wrote:
If tis is going to be the official MoM poll, please get rid of the supporters choice, as it will mean votes are wasted on that option.

 
Not if they were the best on show


They are ineligible to win Fever player of the Year, so therefore should not be able to be voted for.
 
You're taking this way to seriously
Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
^this

Grumpy old bastard alert

Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Lonegunmen wrote:
"Benaldo" had a massive game and wracked up even more intercepts. Left winger now too. There's nothing he can't do on a football pitch.


*RackedBuffon II2012-02-25 22:16:01

Three for me, and two for them.

Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
SigmUnd for sure.

who are the two c**ts that voted for Lochhead ?


Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
youknow wrote:
SigmUnd for sure.who are the two c**ts that voted for Lochhead ?



You can't tell someone how they should be voting, it's a right to be able to choose who you want.

Yellow Fever - Misery loves company

Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
patrick478 wrote:
If tis is going to be the official MoM poll, please get rid of the supporters choice, as it will mean votes are wasted on that option.


If that's the case, you can probably take off half of our team.


Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
patrick478 wrote:
youknow wrote:
SigmUnd for sure.who are the two c**ts that voted for Lochhead ?



You can't tell someone how they should be voting, it's a right to be able to choose who you want.


mate, clearly these guys are blind.

Lochhead for MOM ??????

are you serious ?

ffs. What a waste of time.

IBTL.
Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago

Yellow Fever - Misery loves company

Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
youknow wrote:
patrick478 wrote:
youknow wrote:
SigmUnd for sure.who are the two c**ts that voted for Lochhead ?



You can't tell someone how they should be voting, it's a right to be able to choose who you want.


mate, clearly these guys are blind.

Lochhead for MOM ??????

are you serious ?

ffs. What a waste of time.

IBTL.
Who put the cross in for the goal.

  Supporter For Ever - Keep The Faith - Foundation Member - Never Lets FAX Get In The Way Of A Good Yarn

Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Blew.2 wrote:

youknow wrote:

patrick478 wrote:
youknow wrote:
SigmUnd for sure.who are the two c**ts that voted for Lochhead ?



You can't tell someone how they should be voting, it's a right to be able to choose who you want.
mate, clearly these guys are blind.Lochhead for MOM ??????are you serious ?ffs. What a waste of time.IBTL.

Who put the cross in for the goal.


So one good thing in 90min gives you MOM.

If you are old and wise you were probably young and stupid

Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Who scored the goal ? Ifill.

Who defended his heart out ? SigmUnd.

Who made countless saves ? Paston.

Who made one cross ? Lochhead.


see what i'm saying ???????




Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
That will be some peoples opinion, the same as the crowd for others

  Supporter For Ever - Keep The Faith - Foundation Member - Never Lets FAX Get In The Way Of A Good Yarn

Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
 
youknow wrote:
SigmUnd for sure.who are the two

mate, clearly these guys are blind.

Lochhead for MOM ??????

are you serious ?

ffs. What a waste of time.

IBTL.

you're aware that IBTL stands for 'in before the lock', right? I don't see mods locking the poll thread because you feel like trolling.

I personally thought Lochhead had a good game, much better than last week. Offered far more going forward than Bertos or Sanchez and successful attacks by Sydney down our left were fairly limited. In fact I'm going to vote him MoM just to spite you.
djtim30002012-02-25 23:48:17
Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
SigmUnd and Paston are at a tie for me.. Though I do like comedy...

We will never fully decide who has won the football.

Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Surely has to be Paston, his late dodgy moment notwithstanding.

Surprised Siggy's leading the vote - he was a walking disaster in the first half, and only some terrible Sydney finishing and a some good work from Paston saved us from being 3-4 down at halftime.
Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Please make vote based only on objective facts and weighted statistical analysis. we need to clamp down on subjectivity and opinion on this forum. Its rife if anybody else has noticed.
Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
el grapadura wrote:
Surely has to be Paston, his late dodgy moment notwithstanding.

Surprised Siggy's leading the vote - he was a walking disaster in the first half, and only some terrible Sydney finishing and a some good work from Paston saved us from being 3-4 down at halftime.


Thats because people vote with their heart rather than their head.

If you are old and wise you were probably young and stupid

Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Unfortunately every week somebody votes for Pav, Brown or someone else that's not really been in the game.   Can't do much about it.

Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
That followup block that Paston pulled off in the first half was fantastic. Didn't get the credit it deserved from the commentators at the time.
Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
I agree, that was easily his best save of the game.
Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
where's the the "ref" option. that man should be awarded the ball for his non penalty decision.

Queenslander 3x a year.

Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Please make vote based only on objective facts and weighted statistical analysis. we need to clamp down on subjectivity and opinion on this forum. Its rife if anybody else has noticed.
 
I'd like to see some evidence to back up this point of yours...

Permalink Permalink