MOTM v Adelaide

MOTM v Adelaide

Ifill for meMichael2009-09-04 21:33:45

yep ..easily Ifill.. Daniel was good too I thought...

Take Diego out of the poll, his name doesnt deserve to be in the list. What a joke his effort was. Switch to the imaginary player on the far side, NICE

Anyone who votes diego deserves a lifetime ban. what was with that cross? 

Diego actually did well to get himself into space... but then.... it was a shocker. Like a lot of his passes last week. Colvinator2009-09-04 22:04:58

i think we are being too hard on Diego.

i mean - he only had like 5 mins to do anything.

blame Ricki's poor tactics - NO subs unlit the 80min mark ?????????

Ifill for me. Daniel has earnt his way back into the side IMO though.

Daniel got it for me this week, gave everything he had, looked absolutely f**ked at the end of the game....just what we've been asking him to do....

ifill was f**king brilliant. sorry if i'm not allowed to say f**king. he was though.

Ifill and Daniel tied

Daniel had a good first half but faded... should have played 70 mins then started next week with a view to 85 mins.. Ifil was class always looks dangerous.. was Leo marked out of the game or just drifting? I assume given the space Ifil had it was due to players on Leo..

Pretty easy decision Ifill should get 100%

I don't have a problem with no subs until late if the manager thinks the 11 on the park are the best to be there. I don't think we had a better team on the park after the subs, so I'm glad they weren't made earlier.

No brainer  Ifill...daylight second.

Ifill, and Daniel for me but Ifil takes it out for the goal.

Ifill, rides tackles and beats players with ease, good decision making, and two good goals.

Ifill was the stand out.

Daniel put in a great effort as too did Lochead. Liked Lia's effort in the midfield.

Yup, honourable mentions to Lochhead, Lia and Daniel. Leo always does well whether he is ripping up the opposition or taking defenders out of the game. He did of course get the assist.

Ifill= God. So strong on the ball beats players cracking goal as well. Thought Daniel was good also and Lochy had a better performance than usual.

Ifill was class. deserved a brace. He is so great and really looks dangerous when he gets the ball.

Daniel was also awesome. Really stepped up and hope he keeps it up and doesn't get complacent

I loved the way that Leo, Ifill and Daniel were all switching and changing. On a good day all three pose huge threats and all different qualities so will be nightmares for defenders

So you'd of subbed Diego on Early??? Maybe we should've subbed Sigmund off on the 70th so if we did score we had no defence? Or Maybe Ferrante could've shot more accurately than Brown!!Michael2009-09-05 00:42:13

Diego.

BTW I am pretty pissed I did not get to see the game, I had a job interview at the same time

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Lf4xBhIdL4

:D Pretty late job interview. Must've been a corporate position :D

Agreed, athough would be interested to see how he'd do there when he had to defend. Potentially another option in the backline?

daniel played excellent, theres one thing that makes me laugh and it is watching him go up for headers. he gets nowhere near the ball and looks like he jumps for the hell of it . great enthusiasm though. for a guy who hasnt started since god knows when he was excellent. 

Ifill had far and away his best game as did Lochead.

good to see Lia on from the top but had he have been sent off we would have had very little to complain about. Daniel did good too but I agree he looked tired last 25. Sigmund is probably our best defender now, pity about his challenge which led to the ADE goal.

Our Goal-Keeper is a major source of concern as is ratio of finished chances. But it was good to see some attempts on goal, actually making opportunities.

with hindsight 4 points from first 2 home games is a fair suck of the sav. But obviously three last night would have been the go.

Ifill

Daniel for me....... outstanding work rate and have never seen him make so many tackles......

[QUOTE=chocnut]Ifill= God. So strong on the ball beats players cracking goal as well. Thought Daniel was good also and Lochy had a better performance than usual.[/

Ifill was good, but I thought he drifted in and out of the game...especially when they got some ascedancy...some great moves though...

I thought Daniel had his best game, and was more influential...

yeh...hmmm...would be interesting to see him starting there....do you think he's got enough defensively?

if i was manager and the clocked ticked round to the 80min mark an i hadn't made a sub - i would not put anyone on.
you can't give any player less than 10mins. IT'S A WASTE OF BREATH !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

and yea, after the piss weak performance from Brown, i would have subbed him off for Ferrante after the 2min.

oh, and another thing - why the f**k do we need like 4 'vice-captions' ???????????????????

sarcastic ?

it has to be.

time after time he lost his man and he can't head the ball to save his f**king life.

Are you sure you are 22 ?

Daniel did make some nice tackles.

Daniel did some good work in the midfield. A couple of times he didn't come away with the ball as the opposition seemed to go in harder. He could work on that. Though primarily his role is to create anyway.

I've seen Alex Ferguson make substitutions after 80 minutes several times, and the player score. Manchester United should probably sack him for being such an awful manager and wasting his players breath.

are you sure you are 41 ?

Ifill for me.  Honourable mentions to Daniel who worked hard, created and tackled well, and Brown who was excellent defensively.