Anyway, Diego cant defend
Terrible article. Basically says Knights=Phoenix.
Terrible article. Basically says Knights=Phoenix.
Botafogo - Rio de Janeiro and Wellington Phoenix, my two teams til death do us part.
VUW AFC - Victoria University Football for life
Terrible article. Basically says Knights=Phoenix.
Diego is petulent and sulky. Why would you start him again???? Whats he done to deserve that.
We have too many similar players in Bertos, Daniel, Ifill in that the player that should start (Caceres) probably wont because the other 3 are very similar. You can't ask Brown to hold the middle on his own while everyone else pushes forward. 4 players in a creative midfield role??? Not a chance.
To be honest, I don't expect much from this game as I think the players will be flat after the All White win so I'll give them the right to lose this win with a valid excuse. But only one.
Grumpy old bastard alert
I do hope I am proven absolutely wrong.
Due to the tight nature of the table, it's simply a game we've got to take points out of. Newcastle are a decent side, but very beatable, as we showed recently.
I agree JV, I think that I will give the side one flat game in the aftermath of a momentous occasion in NZ Football, but as you say, only one.
Mulligan's case is based on work in training, preseason and friendly games where he has scored and played well from a midfield position. Also that he has played well for the All Whites in the past, has a better free kick than most, if not all of the options we have and definitely has potential we haven't seen.
But not worth a start unless Brown or Lia can't.
Allegedly
a.haak

Allegedly
isnt lia suspendid if so start mulligan
14/11/09
Break would have done the rest of the team good.
We all know he has been found out both at the Nix as well as for the AWs but he is a mid who, WHEN REQUIRED plays RB.
If any of you were present at the U17 games in '99 you would have witnessed Mully playing in the mids and playing very well (he was NZs top scorer). I know thats 10 years ago but still valid point. Plus is a better setpiece taker then virtually anyone else in the AWs or the Nix
He's not been given an adequate chance to prove himself. Give him a wee run then judge... if he's still crap then, c u!
I know thats 10 years ago but still valid point
The fact its 10 years ago makes it even less of a valid point. Plenty of players show promise at U17 level and go on to be rubbish.
But from recent form in training and friendlies,i wouldnt mind him having a go in central mid. It has been a bit unfair of him to be judged on a couple of games at right of defence (and a few training games where he was rubbish too),he must be pressing for some game time by the end of the season surely.
Allegedly
Oh. So he spends 10 years of his professional career mostly as a right back who's pretty much failed to impress in most places he's been, but what really testifies to his ability is an age-grade tournament held ten years ago where he looked half-decent? If he was such a talented midfield player, wouldn't one of the professional coaches he's worked with for the past decade have recognised that talent, and given him the opportunity to express and showcase it?
Oh. So he spends 10 years of his professional career mostly as a right back who's pretty much failed to impress in most places he's been, but what really testifies to his ability is an age-grade tournament held ten years ago where he looked half-decent? If he was such a talented midfield player, wouldn't one of the professional coaches he's worked with for the past decade have recognised that talent, and given him the opportunity to express and showcase it?
his defensive a ability = 0 (to put it into FM terms)Allegedly
�his defensive a ability = 0 (to put it into FM terms)
a.haak
