Wellington Phoenix Men

Player ratings v Marquee Players United

20 replies · 1,336 views
about 13 years ago · edited about 13 years ago · History

Um, no I don't think I will. Too painful.

Oi Oi Edgecumbe... lets have a clean sheet

Permalink Permalink
about 13 years ago · edited about 13 years ago · History

Phoenix - 1

for getting the kit on.

Thread closed.



Permalink Permalink
about 13 years ago · edited about 13 years ago · History

Paston would get a rating, but the rest.......no

Permalink Permalink
about 13 years ago · edited about 13 years ago · History

Paston ?  (didn't do much wrong but conceded 7 so I really don't know what to give him)

Lochhead 0

Sigmund 1 (Scored a goal)

Durante 0

Bertos 0

Invisible Midfield 0

Brockie 0

Huysegems 0

Whoever was the third forward 0

Ifill 6.5 (looked good when he came on, set up goal, hit the bar)

Totori 0 

Fenton 0

Permalink Permalink
about 13 years ago · edited about 13 years ago · History

Paston 4 - conceded 7 goals

Bertos 5 - still not a right back

Durante 4 - not the most inspiring captain's performance

Sigmund 5 - got a goal

Lochhead 3 - was he playing?

Lia 3 - just rubbish

Smith 2 - useless

Sanchez 3 - a 'mare by his usual standards

Brockie 1 - lazy and casual performance IMO

Boyd 4 - tried hard but didn't do much

Huysegems 3 - missed too many chances

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qe_B5CzbTJo - Caceres winning penalty v Perth - footage from the Fever Zone

Permalink Permalink
about 13 years ago · edited about 13 years ago · History

boyd my best - simply because he kept on trying til the end unlike some who didnt seem to try from the start.

ricki should try playing some midfielders.. oh wait


Permalink Permalink
about 13 years ago · edited about 13 years ago · History


Zero for everyone except Ifill a 6 for an assist and hitting the bar. Paston a 6. He pulled off a couple of top saves again and there wasn't much he could do about most of those goals to be honest.

Permalink Permalink
about 13 years ago · edited about 13 years ago · History

Extra half point for Ifill's volley on the fulltime whistle into the crowd. Great contact!

Permalink Permalink
about 13 years ago · edited about 13 years ago · History

playwithFire wrote:

boyd my best - simply because he kept on trying til the end unlike some who didnt seem to try from the start.

ricki should try playing some midfielders.. oh wait

Yeah I thought Boyd was easily our best player too. Not exactly stiff competition though

People like Coldplay and voted for the Nazis. You can't trust people.

Permalink Permalink
about 13 years ago

Steve-O wrote:

Paston 4 - conceded 7 goals

Bertos 5 - still not a right back

Durante 4 - not the most inspiring captain's performance

Sigmund 5 - got a goal

Lochhead 3 - was he playing?

Lia 3 - just rubbish

Smith 2 - useless

Sanchez 3 - a 'mare by his usual standards

Brockie 1 - lazy and casual performance IMO

Boyd 4 - tried hard but didn't do much

Huysegems 3 - missed too many chances


Seriously? We're lucky to only give up 7 and 3 of the best 4 marks for the outfield players go to defenders?
Permalink Permalink
about 13 years ago

Steve-O wrote:

Paston 4 - conceded 7 goals

Bertos 5 - still not a right back

Durante 4 - not the most inspiring captain's performance

Sigmund 5 - got a goal

Lochhead 3 - was he playing?


I really do not understand this at all... the defenders were far more woeful than Paston, but only one of them gets a worse rating?

Yellow Fever - Misery loves company

Permalink Permalink
about 13 years ago

Paston 6.5 - Conceded 7 goals, but several good saves.  Questions about his organisation of defence, otherwise higher.

Bertos 4 - Still not a right back, got reamed by dP, but got little help or direction on the night.  Work in progress.  

Durante 4 - Failed to provide the leadership and direction for his back 5/6 and positionally poor a few times.  Not his best game.

Sigmund 3.5 - sure he got a goal but he was out of the line frequently, beaten badly by Griffiths, organisation and communication as bad as the rest of the back 5.  Mess.

Lochhead 3.5 - no impression on the game.  

Lia 2 - Sydney played thru and around him like he wasn't there on D, contributed little otherwise.

Smith 2 - several poor touches.  no impact. no defensive contribution.

Sanchez 3.5 - too many passes left short, don't recall him finding his front three with any significant pass.  Not his best.

Brockie 4 - got in position for a couple of chances, but his usual on again but mostly off again presence.

Boyd 4 - tried hard but didn't do much

Huysegems 4 - missed chances, but was at least there for them, no real presence in the second half.

Permalink Permalink
about 13 years ago

Geez , some of these ratings imply getting 2 or 3 points simply for lacing up boots.

Permalink Permalink
about 13 years ago

Jazzman wrote:

Geez , some of these ratings imply getting 2 or 3 points simply for lacing up boots.

sure.  if you are good enough to make an A-League squad you deserve some credit.  anything over 5 for me says pulled their weight at this level.  Anything under 5 says not good enough.
Permalink Permalink
about 13 years ago

el grapadura wrote:

Steve-O wrote:

Paston 4 - conceded 7 goals

Bertos 5 - still not a right back

Durante 4 - not the most inspiring captain's performance

Sigmund 5 - got a goal

Lochhead 3 - was he playing?

Lia 3 - just rubbish

Smith 2 - useless

Sanchez 3 - a 'mare by his usual standards

Brockie 1 - lazy and casual performance IMO

Boyd 4 - tried hard but didn't do much

Huysegems 3 - missed too many chances


Seriously? We're lucky to only give up 7 and 3 of the best 4 marks for the outfield players go to defenders?


I guess it was because it was the defence I noticed more. Take 1 or 2 off each if you like, you won't get any argument from me! (For once)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qe_B5CzbTJo - Caceres winning penalty v Perth - footage from the Fever Zone

Permalink Permalink
about 13 years ago

For those that gave Lochhead the lowest mark of the back 4, why?  Bertos got schooled by ADP twice, and most of the goals from memory came up the middle.  Obviously Lochhead was as bad as anyone there, but what did he do that stood out as him being the worst?

Permalink Permalink
about 13 years ago

 I surprised noon has really been bagging the chances we blew last night. We had 13 chance to their 4 at one point in the first half.

Queenslander 3x a year.

Permalink Permalink
about 13 years ago · edited about 13 years ago · History

IIRC a lot of our "chances" were ballooned long range shots. Stein did have a few sitters but on the whole I think the shots stats aren't entirely meaningful because they don't say where the shot was taken from, what other options were available to the player, and whether the shot itself even looked like testing the keeper. 

People like Coldplay and voted for the Nazis. You can't trust people.

Permalink Permalink
about 13 years ago

mjp2 wrote:

Paston 6.5 - Conceded 7 goals, but several good saves.  Questions about his organisation of defence, otherwise higher.

Bertos 4 - Still not a right back, got reamed by dP, but got little help or direction on the night.  Work in progress.  

Durante 4 - Failed to provide the leadership and direction for his back 5/6 and positionally poor a few times.  Not his best game.

Sigmund 3.5 - sure he got a goal but he was out of the line frequently, beaten badly by Griffiths, organisation and communication as bad as the rest of the back 5.  Mess.

Lochhead 3.5 - no impression on the game.  

Lia 2 - Sydney played thru and around him like he wasn't there on D, contributed little otherwise.

Smith 2 - several poor touches.  no impact. no defensive contribution.

Sanchez 3.5 - too many passes left short, don't recall him finding his front three with any significant pass.  Not his best.

Brockie 4 - got in position for a couple of chances, but his usual on again but mostly off again presence.

Boyd 4 - tried hard but didn't do much

Huysegems 4 - missed chances, but was at least there for them, no real presence in the second half.



I only saw the highlight package on sky so I can't say much but Smith and Sanchez both gave Huysegems perfect crosses that should have been put in the back of the net. At which point we would have been ahead. 
Was Smith really worse than all the back four?
I have no idea how Lochead gets lower the same or worse than the rest of the back from most people when he wasn't involved in any of their goals except Culina's. Siggy Durante and Bertos all got schooled by ADP.

Permalink Permalink
about 13 years ago

I dont think anyone deserves more than a 2

Permalink Permalink