Wellington Phoenix Men

R2 vs Brisbane Roar | Sun 28th Oct | 7:00pm | SS3 | Four Kings

342 replies · 37,342 views
over 7 years ago

I think we're a little harsh on Burns- he's not going to beat a defence that's set with 5-6 back. I feel he, Krishna and the others- Mikey, Roly etc profited on fast breaks, balls in behind and defenders retreating and dragged out of position.  

We've gotta be more realistic- fast breaks 3 on 3 or better is better odds than 3-4 on 6 or 7 defenders



Permalink Permalink
over 7 years ago

martinb wrote:

I think we're a little harsh on Burns- he's not going to beat a defence that's set with 5-6 back. I feel he, Krishna and the others- Mikey, Roly etc profited on fast breaks, balls in behind and defenders retreating and dragged out of position.  

We've gotta be more realistic- fast breaks 3 on 3 or better is better odds than 3-4 on 6 or 7 defenders

I was stunned how easily he got dispossessed by Papadopoulos late in the game, and basically stayed on the deck for a while.

If it was anything but a clean tackle, Papa would have been worried, being on an early yellow and all. 

Actually, getting outplayed quite a bit these days

Permalink Permalink
over 7 years ago

Looking back at both Steven Taylors attempts in the long goal challenge promotional video earlier in the week, they both hit the post and stayed out https://twitter.com/WgtnPhoenixFC/status/1055614551285059585.  Should we be surprised :-) 

Permalink Permalink
over 7 years ago

Interesting it only has Taylor's chance at less than 0.5

Permalink Permalink
over 7 years ago · edited over 7 years ago · History

valeo wrote:

Nelfoos wrote:

Doloras wrote:

I always thought that the "waste of an import spot" line was really a suggestion that goalkeepers aren't important. I only watched the second half of the first game but surely Kurto's got it in spades over Smith, Italiano, Sail or Tandoori Flappy.

Yeah I never understood how getting a visa keeper could possibly be construed as a waste, especically given the alternatives. Probably the piosition we've improved on the most from last year and badly needed.

There is generally less of a difference in skill levels between Aussie/NZ keepers v International keepers (who would bother to come to NZ) in comparison to players across the rest of the pitch - there is still a dearth of players in CM with good technique in NZ, for example, and a dearth of true goal scorers (except for Wood)

Also, where can I watch Rudan's post match presser?

He's only the 3rd Visa keeper to play in the A-League, so how can you say there's not normally a gap? Just cos other teams haven't done it doesn't mean they are correct not to do it. Yeah Warner was shark but Sorensen was pretty bloody good. Looks to be a massive gap between Kurto and Italiano as well but it is early days. Everything you say about CMs and goalscorers is equally applicable to GKs and vice versa.

Good thing we get 5 visa spots so we can address those issues in different positions on the pitch. Goalkeeper isn't any less important than any other.

Valley FC til I die?

Permalink Permalink
over 7 years ago

martinb wrote:

I think we're a little harsh on Burns- he's not going to beat a defence that's set with 5-6 back. I feel he, Krishna and the others- Mikey, Roly etc profited on fast breaks, balls in behind and defenders retreating and dragged out of position.  

We've gotta be more realistic- fast breaks 3 on 3 or better is better odds than 3-4 on 6 or 7 defenders

Burns needs a real fluky one to go in somehow - he's a bit at sea I think and low on confidence

Normo's coming home

Permalink Permalink
over 7 years ago

Sancho wrote:

Sancho wrote:

From the post match, the GK coach comments to the Roar coach was interesting to hear as I'm sure a similar thing occured when the All Whites played Mexico at the confederations cup. 

Sorry, can you please explain.

Not really I wasn't there to witness either incidences but Rudan touched on it a bit in the post match how Aloisi was a bit upset by one of his staff. The nix GK coach must have said or done something to really piss-off one of the Aloisi bros. If he was the previous All Whites GK coach then it could be a similar situation to when he said or done something to piss-off the Mexican coach. Still have no idea what it is that was done or said though. 

Yes it's the same guy who was AW GK coach in that match against Mexico - Paul Gothard. Loves a bit of niggle!

Rudan outlines what happens in the press conference.

All Whites | Phoenix | Baggies

Permalink Permalink
over 7 years ago

Nelfoos wrote:

valeo wrote:

Nelfoos wrote:

Doloras wrote:

I always thought that the "waste of an import spot" line was really a suggestion that goalkeepers aren't important. I only watched the second half of the first game but surely Kurto's got it in spades over Smith, Italiano, Sail or Tandoori Flappy.

Yeah I never understood how getting a visa keeper could possibly be construed as a waste, especically given the alternatives. Probably the piosition we've improved on the most from last year and badly needed.

There is generally less of a difference in skill levels between Aussie/NZ keepers v International keepers (who would bother to come to NZ) in comparison to players across the rest of the pitch - there is still a dearth of players in CM with good technique in NZ, for example, and a dearth of true goal scorers (except for Wood)

Also, where can I watch Rudan's post match presser?

He's only the 3rd Visa keeper to play in the A-League, so how can you say there's not normally a gap? Just cos other teams haven't done it doesn't mean they are correct not to do it. Yeah Warner was shark but Sorensen was pretty bloody good. Looks to be a massive gap between Kurto and Italiano as well but it is early days. Everything you say about CMs and goalscorers is equally applicable to GKs and vice versa.

Good thing we get 5 visa spots so we can address those issues in different positions on the pitch. Goalkeeper isn't any less important than any other.

Disagree. There is a reason other teams never use the Visa spot on a GK. I don't look back at Sorensen and think he made such a big difference. You usually want your imports to run the game/score goals/provide excitement; I just think we were in a unique situation with a whole lot of bad NZ/Aus options.

a.haak

Permalink Permalink
over 7 years ago · edited over 7 years ago · History

valeo wrote:

Nelfoos wrote:

valeo wrote:

Nelfoos wrote:

Doloras wrote:

I always thought that the "waste of an import spot" line was really a suggestion that goalkeepers aren't important. I only watched the second half of the first game but surely Kurto's got it in spades over Smith, Italiano, Sail or Tandoori Flappy.

Yeah I never understood how getting a visa keeper could possibly be construed as a waste, especically given the alternatives. Probably the piosition we've improved on the most from last year and badly needed.

There is generally less of a difference in skill levels between Aussie/NZ keepers v International keepers (who would bother to come to NZ) in comparison to players across the rest of the pitch - there is still a dearth of players in CM with good technique in NZ, for example, and a dearth of true goal scorers (except for Wood)

Also, where can I watch Rudan's post match presser?

He's only the 3rd Visa keeper to play in the A-League, so how can you say there's not normally a gap? Just cos other teams haven't done it doesn't mean they are correct not to do it. Yeah Warner was shark but Sorensen was pretty bloody good. Looks to be a massive gap between Kurto and Italiano as well but it is early days. Everything you say about CMs and goalscorers is equally applicable to GKs and vice versa.

Good thing we get 5 visa spots so we can address those issues in different positions on the pitch. Goalkeeper isn't any less important than any other.

Disagree. There is a reason other teams never use the Visa spot on a GK. I don't look back at Sorensen and think he made such a big difference. You usually want your imports to run the game/score goals/provide excitement; I just think we were in a unique situation with a whole lot of bad NZ/Aus options.

There is a reason, and its because they had alternatives the coach was happy with. We don't - we tried to sign Gleeson/Marinovic first, they weren't interested.

You want your imports to win you games. I don't give 2 flying fudges what they bring excitement-wise, a goalkeeper is equally as important to winning a game as any other player on the pitch, we saw that in great detail last season. Kurto is arguably the biggest upgrade on any position we've made this season (further performances pending and Steven Taylor might want a word). That's more than enough reason to use a import slot. Not to mention that a goalkeeper is incredibly important to "running a game", which is one of the key #metrics you mentioned.

There's no unique situation, we bought in imports to cover weaknesses in our squad, same as every other team. We would have been remiss not to sign an import goalkeeper given the alternatives available.

Valley FC til I die?

Permalink Permalink
over 7 years ago · edited over 7 years ago · History

Nelfoos wrote:

valeo wrote:

Nelfoos wrote:

valeo wrote:

Nelfoos wrote:

Doloras wrote:

I always thought that the "waste of an import spot" line was really a suggestion that goalkeepers aren't important. I only watched the second half of the first game but surely Kurto's got it in spades over Smith, Italiano, Sail or Tandoori Flappy.

Yeah I never understood how getting a visa keeper could possibly be construed as a waste, especically given the alternatives. Probably the piosition we've improved on the most from last year and badly needed.

There is generally less of a difference in skill levels between Aussie/NZ keepers v International keepers (who would bother to come to NZ) in comparison to players across the rest of the pitch - there is still a dearth of players in CM with good technique in NZ, for example, and a dearth of true goal scorers (except for Wood)

Also, where can I watch Rudan's post match presser?

He's only the 3rd Visa keeper to play in the A-League, so how can you say there's not normally a gap? Just cos other teams haven't done it doesn't mean they are correct not to do it. Yeah Warner was shark but Sorensen was pretty bloody good. Looks to be a massive gap between Kurto and Italiano as well but it is early days. Everything you say about CMs and goalscorers is equally applicable to GKs and vice versa.

Good thing we get 5 visa spots so we can address those issues in different positions on the pitch. Goalkeeper isn't any less important than any other.

Disagree. There is a reason other teams never use the Visa spot on a GK. I don't look back at Sorensen and think he made such a big difference. You usually want your imports to run the game/score goals/provide excitement; I just think we were in a unique situation with a whole lot of bad NZ/Aus options.

There is a reason, and its because they had alternatives the coach was happy with. We don't - we tried to sign Gleeson/Marinovic first, they weren't interested.

You want your imports to win you games. I don't give 2 flying fudges what they bring excitement-wise, a goalkeeper is equally as important to winning a game as any other player on the pitch, we saw that in great detail last season. Kurto is arguably the biggest upgrade on any position we've made this season (further performances pending and Steven Taylor might want a word). That's more than enough reason to use a import slot. Not to mention that a goalkeeper is incredibly important to "running a game", which is one of the key #metrics you mentioned.

There's no unique situation, we bought in imports to cover weaknesses in our squad, same as every other team. We would have been remiss not to sign an import goalkeeper given the alternatives available.

I don't disagree with this; I am just saying that there is a reason, in the 14 years the A-League has existed, that there have only been 3 import keepers.  You even said yourself that we tried to sign two Kiwis first - the only reason we got an import in was because we literally had no other choice.

Anyway, no matter the reason - I am happy he's here, I just think that ideally you would want a good Aussie/NZ goalkeeper so we could get a striker or another DM.

a.haak

Permalink Permalink
over 7 years ago

valeo wrote:

Nelfoos wrote:

valeo wrote:

Nelfoos wrote:

valeo wrote:

Nelfoos wrote:

Doloras wrote:

I always thought that the "waste of an import spot" line was really a suggestion that goalkeepers aren't important. I only watched the second half of the first game but surely Kurto's got it in spades over Smith, Italiano, Sail or Tandoori Flappy.

Yeah I never understood how getting a visa keeper could possibly be construed as a waste, especically given the alternatives. Probably the piosition we've improved on the most from last year and badly needed.

There is generally less of a difference in skill levels between Aussie/NZ keepers v International keepers (who would bother to come to NZ) in comparison to players across the rest of the pitch - there is still a dearth of players in CM with good technique in NZ, for example, and a dearth of true goal scorers (except for Wood)

Also, where can I watch Rudan's post match presser?

He's only the 3rd Visa keeper to play in the A-League, so how can you say there's not normally a gap? Just cos other teams haven't done it doesn't mean they are correct not to do it. Yeah Warner was shark but Sorensen was pretty bloody good. Looks to be a massive gap between Kurto and Italiano as well but it is early days. Everything you say about CMs and goalscorers is equally applicable to GKs and vice versa.

Good thing we get 5 visa spots so we can address those issues in different positions on the pitch. Goalkeeper isn't any less important than any other.

Disagree. There is a reason other teams never use the Visa spot on a GK. I don't look back at Sorensen and think he made such a big difference. You usually want your imports to run the game/score goals/provide excitement; I just think we were in a unique situation with a whole lot of bad NZ/Aus options.

There is a reason, and its because they had alternatives the coach was happy with. We don't - we tried to sign Gleeson/Marinovic first, they weren't interested.

You want your imports to win you games. I don't give 2 flying fudges what they bring excitement-wise, a goalkeeper is equally as important to winning a game as any other player on the pitch, we saw that in great detail last season. Kurto is arguably the biggest upgrade on any position we've made this season (further performances pending and Steven Taylor might want a word). That's more than enough reason to use a import slot. Not to mention that a goalkeeper is incredibly important to "running a game", which is one of the key #metrics you mentioned.

There's no unique situation, we bought in imports to cover weaknesses in our squad, same as every other team. We would have been remiss not to sign an import goalkeeper given the alternatives available.

I don't disagree with this; I am just saying that there is a reason, in the 14 years the A-League has existed, that there have only been 3 import keepers.  You even said yourself that we tried to sign two Kiwis first - the only reason we got an import in was because we literally had no other choice.

Anyway, no matter the reason - I am happy he's here, I just think that ideally you would want a good Aussie/NZ goalkeeper so we could get a striker or another DM.

Australia produces good keepers; the best ones play abroad including EPL.  They are also happy to see their domestic scene as a good outlet. On a much smaller scale this applies to NZ also, except that Phoenix is only one option out of many and clearly not seen by the good keepers as the best option at present. This was not the case even 5 years ago, but clearly is now.

Actually, getting outplayed quite a bit these days

Permalink Permalink
over 7 years ago

Mainland FC wrote:

valeo wrote:

Nelfoos wrote:

valeo wrote:

Nelfoos wrote:

valeo wrote:

Nelfoos wrote:

Doloras wrote:

I always thought that the "waste of an import spot" line was really a suggestion that goalkeepers aren't important. I only watched the second half of the first game but surely Kurto's got it in spades over Smith, Italiano, Sail or Tandoori Flappy.

Yeah I never understood how getting a visa keeper could possibly be construed as a waste, especically given the alternatives. Probably the piosition we've improved on the most from last year and badly needed.

There is generally less of a difference in skill levels between Aussie/NZ keepers v International keepers (who would bother to come to NZ) in comparison to players across the rest of the pitch - there is still a dearth of players in CM with good technique in NZ, for example, and a dearth of true goal scorers (except for Wood)

Also, where can I watch Rudan's post match presser?

He's only the 3rd Visa keeper to play in the A-League, so how can you say there's not normally a gap? Just cos other teams haven't done it doesn't mean they are correct not to do it. Yeah Warner was shark but Sorensen was pretty bloody good. Looks to be a massive gap between Kurto and Italiano as well but it is early days. Everything you say about CMs and goalscorers is equally applicable to GKs and vice versa.

Good thing we get 5 visa spots so we can address those issues in different positions on the pitch. Goalkeeper isn't any less important than any other.

Disagree. There is a reason other teams never use the Visa spot on a GK. I don't look back at Sorensen and think he made such a big difference. You usually want your imports to run the game/score goals/provide excitement; I just think we were in a unique situation with a whole lot of bad NZ/Aus options.

There is a reason, and its because they had alternatives the coach was happy with. We don't - we tried to sign Gleeson/Marinovic first, they weren't interested.

You want your imports to win you games. I don't give 2 flying fudges what they bring excitement-wise, a goalkeeper is equally as important to winning a game as any other player on the pitch, we saw that in great detail last season. Kurto is arguably the biggest upgrade on any position we've made this season (further performances pending and Steven Taylor might want a word). That's more than enough reason to use a import slot. Not to mention that a goalkeeper is incredibly important to "running a game", which is one of the key #metrics you mentioned.

There's no unique situation, we bought in imports to cover weaknesses in our squad, same as every other team. We would have been remiss not to sign an import goalkeeper given the alternatives available.

I don't disagree with this; I am just saying that there is a reason, in the 14 years the A-League has existed, that there have only been 3 import keepers.  You even said yourself that we tried to sign two Kiwis first - the only reason we got an import in was because we literally had no other choice.

Anyway, no matter the reason - I am happy he's here, I just think that ideally you would want a good Aussie/NZ goalkeeper so we could get a striker or another DM.

Australia produces good keepers; the best ones play abroad including EPL.  They are also happy to see their domestic scene as a good outlet. On a much smaller scale this applies to NZ also, except that Phoenix is only one option out of many and clearly not seen by the good keepers as the best option at present. This was not the case even 5 years ago, but clearly is now.

Yeah, unfortunately it seems like our keepers see MLS as the best destination currently and it's hard to disagree with them.

a.haak

Permalink Permalink
over 7 years ago

Nelfoos wrote:

Iooks to be a massive gap between Kurto and Italiano as well but it is early days.

not sticking your neck out too far there, are you, lol. 
Permalink Permalink
over 7 years ago

Fenix wrote:

Nelfoos wrote:

Iooks to be a massive gap between Kurto and Italiano as well but it is early days.

not sticking your neck out too far there, are you, lol. 

I reckon there's also a gap between Kurto and Keegs but don't tell anyone

Valley FC til I die?

Permalink Permalink
over 7 years ago

I am sorry for Keegan Smith and I hope that he does well in the HandyPrem and goes on from there.


Ramming liberal dribble down your throat since 2009
This forum needs less angst and more Kate Bush threads



Permalink Permalink
over 7 years ago

2ndBest wrote:

Interesting it only has Taylor's chance at less than 0.5

Does xg take into account goalkeeper position as well?
Permalink Permalink
over 7 years ago

Actually, that's a good point. Guess it assumes the keeper is in a more central location.

Permalink Permalink