The only reason some other clubs have a rivalry is because they are close to each other geographically. Why wouldn't the complete opposite warrant one too? We have a lot in common and have plenty of history to support a rivalry.
· Perth are the only team we beat in all three games in season 1. Since then, we have only earned 9 points out of 9 against one club twice; against Newcastle Jets in 2011-12, and against Sydney FC also in 2011-12.
· Our first home win was against Perth (won 4-1)
· Our first ever clean sheet was also our first away clean sheet and it was against Perth. Our first home clean sheet was also against Perth.
· They were our first ever finals opponents, the first team we had to play in extra time and the first (and only) team we have faced in penalties. And of course it means they were the first team we beat in a penalty shootout.
· Of all the foundation teams, no other has a head-to-head record as evenly matched as ours; 10 wins, 6 draws, 10 losses. 34 goals for, 30 against. The only teams that have a smaller overall goal difference and similar WDL record are two newer teams (Melbourne City and Western Sydney Wanderers).
And then there's our performances each season. I posted this in the "Long Season Beckons" thread last season after the first match:
Anyone noticed that we seem to always have similar results to Perth every year (apart from one season)?
(Points and position each season, WPX first, PG second)
2007/08 --- 20 (8th) -- 20 (7th)
2008/09 --- 26 (6th) -- 22 (7th)
2009/10 --- 40 (4th) -- 39 (5th)
2010/11 --- 41 (6th) -- 23 (10th)
2011/12 --- 40 (4th) -- 43 (3rd)
2012/13 --- 27 (10th) -- 32 (6th)
2013/14 --- 28 (9th) -- 28 (8th)
So
losing the opening game to Perth was actually in our best interest, and
since they're doing well, that must mean we will do well this season
too... That's sound logic, right?
If you take their points tally from last season (and ignore the cheating part) we are once again very close (Perth had 50 points to our 46).
So what more could you want in a rivalry?