Wellington Phoenix Men

R3 vs Jets Sunday 5pm McLean Park SS2

503 replies · 40,736 views
over 12 years ago
Mainland FC wrote:
Tegal wrote:

So "Lia" had little impact, while "Huysegems" "Hernandez" and "Cunningham" had a big impact. 


... and Brockie was invisible....
His name is 7 letters, making him more than twice as much impact as Lia did. 

Allegedly

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago


Had a great time in Napier great crowd, great pub, great weather but glad its only a short drive can't afford to travel to other home games sorry. One gate entry was a bit appallling lucky we got there early, was also hard to get food and watered so just had beer?

 

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago

I thought good teams go through the midfield and then in the last third, you choose left or right flank? You boss the midfield with and then left and right backs do overlap runs and create the space. If you go through the midfield as long as possible you automaticly create more options than going over the flanks where you only can pass to the middle, make sense to me. So we are doing it right, except the part we suck at the final third. 

Jets are doing wrong, it may look better on those graphs, but they did not had a single goal in three games. Maybe the Jets had to go over the flanks because the Nix forced them to that, if that is the case, we are doing that right, see theory above. Maybe that is why get get the point.

Ernie's said he will work this week on the midfield and the attack, he sees the problem. It's not that the players individual suck (or the occasional <insert scapegoat here> bad pass), they just need more time to learn and execute Ernie's game plan.

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
number8 wrote:

I thought good teams go through the midfield and then in the last third, you choose left or right flank? You boss the midfield with and then left and right backs do overlap runs and create the space. If you go through the midfield as long as possible you automaticly create more options than going over the flanks where you only can pass to the middle, make sense to me. So we are doing it right, except the part we suck at the final third. 

Jets are doing wrong, it may look better on those graphs, but they did not had a single goal in three games. Maybe the Jets had to go over the flanks because the Nix forced them to that, if that is the case, we are doing that right, see theory above. Maybe that is why get get the point.

Ernie's said he will work this week on the midfield and the attack, he sees the problem. It's not that the players individual suck (or the occasional <insert scapegoat here> bad pass), they just need more time to learn and execute Ernie's game plan.

I'm not so sure that's the correct statement and I say that because the way they played forced us to make a change in the midfield. On TV, it looked like they owned the middle of the pitch. The graphs paint a different story but either way, they got a result and looked better than they had in the previous 2 games. I don't think they are a flash football side (and we were not exactly stunning ourselves on Sunday) but after 3 games, we are drawing some long bows. I think the problem lies more in the execution of the game plan and the personnel/formation being used.

Grumpy old bastard alert

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago · edited over 12 years ago · History
Mainland FC wrote:

Huysegems is so slow and labored to turn, run, make decisions. Makes the transition bloody hard work. And his total reliance on his left peg is also irritating. Amazing he played a dozen or so games for Belgium.

Huysegems had good quality players next to him in the Belgian team which allowed him to do reasonably well in that particular setup. He simply was not the top player of the Belgian national team. Ditto Cunningham for Costa Rica.

Consider the aging but classy Alessandro Del Piero - he won quite a few games for Sydney FC singlehandedly last season, but can't win them all (and is of course well into his late thirties). Shinji Ono is younger, fitter, and certainly one of the top Japanese players of the previous 5-7 years. Our (WPX) imports are not their respective national teams top players. So I would not overestimate the qualities people like Huysegems or Cunningham (or Hernandez) brought to the Nix. They are good players but not good enough to turn a match by themselves. In his prime, Hernandez was probably good enough to turn a game around for Melbourne Victory, until he got slow and overweight and went to India. In his prime, Ifill could turn the game around for the Nix, and is an example of a key national team player (like ADP or Ono), it's just that Trinidad and Tobago are not in the class of Costa Rica let alone Belgium, Japan or Italy.

You don't have to be a "key" player for a national team to do well in the A-League which is perhaps English League One standard (certainly not Championship level). A decent but not outstanding player playing at a reasonable level (e.g. Ifill who was certainly no star at his clubs in England)  often does well in the A-League.


Huysegems was a very good player in his prime and played for very good sides in Belgium (Lierse) and the Dutch Eredivisie (over 100 games for Feyenoord, Alkmaar and Twente). At AZ Alkmaar they were a top-three side at the time and made the UEFA Cup semis. He was signed by Feyenoord after they lost Kuyt and Kalou, to stiffen the attack. FC Twente finished as high as second in the Eredivisie in his time there and made the Dutch Cup Final.

However he's been dogged by serous injuries for a few years which saw him struggling to start games on returning to his original club Lierse in Belgium and so ended up here. The A-League would suit his attempt to regain fitness with the long off-season and fewer games then Europe. He didn't play 15 times for Belgium by accident, and sure, he was never its star player, but it was not a period when Belgium had a lot of good players.

Ifill showed early promise in England but was never a star player for any teams such as Millwill or Sheffield United, and though he played at a decent level, mostly in the Championship, by the time he caught the flight to Wellington, had been struggling with injuries and not getting game time for Crystal Palace.

By the way, Ifill was a Barbadoes international (somewhat inferior team to Trinidad and Tobago you have him playing for) and probably was their star player - although that wouldn't be hard (they lost 9-0 on aggregate to the USA in 2010 World Cup qualifying). He made intermittent appearances in only three years, 2004, 2006, 2008, mostly against the likes of St Kitts and Anguilla.

Kenny Cunningham and Hernandez were amongst the best players in the Costa Rican league when they played there and deserved their national team call-ups. Lets remember Cunningham played as recently as June in competitive matches for a Costa Rica side that finished second in CONCACAF WC qualifying.

Hernandez is certainly the only import we've had with a decent international pedigree for his country, and certainly was a major player for them. His international CV is impressive:

Costa Rica: 35 apps, 7 goals

The stats for him on Wikipedia are very incomplete - rather check out his page on FIFA.com here:

http://www.fifa.com/worldfootball/statisticsandrecords/players/player=182587/index.html

including: 2001 FIFA U-20 World Cup, Argentina (all four games incl. vs. Netherlands, Ethiopia, Ecuador and Czechs in the round of 16)

2004 Athens Olympic Games (all four games vs. Morocco, Iraq, Portugal and Argentina in the quarter-final).

2006 FIFA World Cup, Germany (2 apps in finals vs. Poland & Ecuador))

World Cup qualifying:  9 apps in 2006 qualifying incl. against Mexico, USA, Trinidad, Canada, Honduras, Panama, Guatamala

(Costa Rica qualified directly as third place side in CONCACAF behind USA, & Mexico);

4 apps in 2010 qualifying vs. Mexico, USA, Honduras, El Salvador (called-up for the final round of qualifying & Costa Rica made it to play-off vs. Uruguay as fourth team  in CONCACAF). Missed the play-offs due to injury.

International goals include in two World Cup qualifiers against the USA 2006, and  a winner against France in a friendly  in 2010.

His most recent appearances for Costa Rica were in three friendlies in 2011.

Shinji Ono is one of the top Japanese players of the last 15 years, rather than 5-7 as you say - appeared for Japan way back at the 1998 World Cup, signed for Feyenoord 2001 and would have played against Huysegems in the Netherlands. And like him, probably opting for the A-League's less strenuous demands after his career has been blighted by injuries for many years since his time at Feyenoord. Last played for Japan 2008 and would have more than his 56 appearances since his debut 15 years ago but for injuries.


Big Pete 65, Christchurch

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago

A couple of moans the club / McLean park need to take on board if the fixture happens again:


1) Only one gate open and about eight young kids collecting tickets at the gate and about three or four security staff doing bag checks. I got to the ground at around 4:20 and only just got inside to see teams coming onto the pitch. It would have been a lot worse if Thundersticks had not opened another gate for those you had "physical tickets". Those with self printed tickets had to wait.


2) Beer stall only selling beer. If you wanted a beer and a soft drink you had to go to two seperate places.


3)No Eftpos at beer stalls


4)Do Food "Caravans" really cut it at sporting events anymore?


The little stand at the end of the pitch was great and at least the atmosphere in there sounded pretty good. Not so sure about the rest of of the ground though.


The lack of goals was a bit disappointing, but the game could have gone either way, but the game itself was not the worst I have seen. No one has mentioned the shout for a penalty we had in the second half when Manny was brought down making a run into the box. I have not yet seen a replay yet but seemed like penalty imo.


Probably pretty even overall, they had a few good efforts and took some excellent keeping from Mossy and a goal line clearance from Leo to keep them out. Carlos Carlos Carlos Hernandez hit the wood work twice and an excellent save from Birrighitti denied Stein.


Manny and Lia were probably as bad as each other in the centre of the park in terms of giving the ball away. Ifill got clattered a few times early on and never really looked likely. Leo had his hands full with Burns who was probably the biggest threat for Newcastle. Caira looked okay defensively but still to prove his worth moving forward. Riera looked good when he cam on and made a great ball and all tackle!


A long trip in a day and result a bit disappointing. Would I do it again? Better effing believe it!


Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago

Completely agree about the situation at the gate Jeff. The Fever group turned up at 4.30pm and only just had enough time to get through the line and be able to set the banner up for the start of the game.


Yellow Fever - Misery loves company

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago

love big pete's posts - the super informed, last word, bar none, on everything, always.

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago

Some good posts Pete and Jeff. The only reason I'd be ok to head back to Napier is the distance from home, Napier and Palmy are much less hassle than Hamilton or say New Plymouth. There is no way we are going to anymore away home games this season. We can't afford it.

The Stadium was a bit of a shambles, the lack of eftpos had everyone moaning. Also the gate issues were bad I'd like to know who was in charge as someone should have a word.

Do we know how the players feel about these away home fixtures? The Nix have to do a hell of a lot of traveling compared to most of the other teams I'm sure they don't like the extra travel?

I reckon if the weather had been as sunny in Welly and the Club actually put a bit more effort into looking at more innovative advertising we could have seen similar numbers at RoF.

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago

Get the impression they don't like them too much, but can hardly say as such. Extra few days away from family, additional travel and promo work on top of what they already do. 


Allegedly

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
Tegal wrote:

Get the impression they don't like them too much, but can hardly say as such. Extra few days away from family, additional travel and promo work on top of what they already do. 



Yeah I just wondered if anyone had heard this from a player? Agree they'll never be able to tweet that they don't like the travel without getting into bother.

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago

I thought it was probably our worst overall performance so far. There were some positives though. I thought Riera showed he is comfortable at this level and I would like him to start. Siggy and Durante (and Boxall for that matter) have all been solid every time.

However Ernie needs to get the attack sorted and at the moment he looks like he is still undecided on the combination. I think it is pretty obvious that you can't play Ifill, Hysugems, Hernandez and Brockie at the same time, they just don't collectively have enough energy and mobility. And I'm not convinced Cunningham should be in the team but I am tempted to stick with him for a couple of weeks. In saying that I wouldn't mind if Rufer, Ridenton or Hicks were given some/more game time.

I hope Fenton is back, I think he could add a bit to the attack from RB. I generally think Leo gets to much criticism but he struggled a lot in that game.

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
sthn.jeff wrote:

A couple of moans the club / McLean park need to take on board if the fixture happens again:


1) Only one gate open and about eight young kids collecting tickets at the gate and about three or four security staff doing bag checks. I got to the ground at around 4:20 and only just got inside to see teams coming onto the pitch. It would have been a lot worse if Thundersticks had not opened another gate for those you had "physical tickets". Those with self printed tickets had to wait.


2) Beer stall only selling beer. If you wanted a beer and a soft drink you had to go to two seperate places.


3)No Eftpos at beer stalls


4)Do Food "Caravans" really cut it at sporting events anymore?


A long trip in a day and result a bit disappointing. Would I do it again? Better effing believe it!



Edited your response briefly here. You summed it up quite well. Some fans told me they missed part of the game because the foodstalls were so busy and the wait was so long. At half time i went from the fever Zone over to see Phil the Hobbit and cutting through ques is not my favourite activity. I felt for the people in the lines and it was soooooo friggen crowded. I too, hope that the Napier organisers learn from the comments made on ehre and should they get another game, put into action plans to avoid such messes. Having entrance gates on the other side of the ground would have helped and move some of the food trollies over there would have also helped. Standing up in the fever zone and looking towards the palm trees reminded me of CCM's ground and helped banish the memory of "you've got the best windmill in any ground" chant from the Ring of Dirt - Our worst ever trip by more than a country hundred miles. I thought chicken wire was reserved for the Blue Brothers.
The Station etc, really made it such a welcome trip and i'd like to thank all of the local establishments involved for coming to the party. I hope your tills reflect it. 
Proud to have attended the first 175 Consecutive "Home" Wellington Phoenix "A League" Games !!

The Ruf, The Ruf, The Ruf is on Fire!!

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago · edited over 12 years ago · History
ForteanTimes wrote:
Tegal wrote:

Get the impression they don't like them too much, but can hardly say as such. Extra few days away from family, additional travel and promo work on top of what they already do. 



Yeah I just wondered if anyone had heard this from a player? Agree they'll never be able to tweet that they don't like the travel without getting into bother.

Not directly. Just an impression I got from fairly brief conversations - so could be wrong, and I'd take it more as speculation than truth. On the other hand a couple of them who came to the thirsty whale seemed to be enjoying themselves. 


Allegedly

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago

Usually at other events at McLean Park (cricket and rugby) they have 4 or 5 gates open. and I didn't see the food stalls but usually they have quite a few under the harris stand and behind the graeme lowe stand. So the only conclusion I can come to is the organisers were trying to save money, and cut back on the food and by limiting it to one gate. But someone must of surely known that they wouldn't of been able to get the expected crowd through the one gate in time. The one gate situation was the biggest clusterfuck I've seen at McLean Park. 

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
james dean wrote:

I don't understand how the Brockie/Huysegems "partnership" is meant to work when Hernandex is playing behind them.  It means one or both drifts wide and neither looks at all effective out there.  I think he needs to pick one and stick with it.  Huysegems has the better all round game and his movement is better but Borkcie is a better finisher.  I think if he sorts that then it all falls into place behind.  We're also getting no attacking thrust from our fullbacks at the moment which will need to change if we're to challenge


yep- Brockie and Huysegems as a pair up front might actually be a handy one, but Brockie, Huysegems and Hernandez up front isn't working.  



Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
rjmiller wrote:

I thought it was probably our worst overall performance so far. There were some positives though. I thought Riera showed he is comfortable at this level and I would like him to start. Siggy and Durante (and Boxall for that matter) have all been solid every time.

However Ernie needs to get the attack sorted and at the moment he looks like he is still undecided on the combination. I think it is pretty obvious that you can't play Ifill, Hysugems, Hernandez and Brockie at the same time, they just don't collectively have enough energy and mobility. And I'm not convinced Cunningham should be in the team but I am tempted to stick with him for a couple of weeks. In saying that I wouldn't mind if Rufer, Ridenton or Hicks were given some/more game time.

I hope Fenton is back, I think he could add a bit to the attack from RB. I generally think Leo gets to much criticism but he struggled a lot in that game.


Yep- twice Ernie's tactics have failed to fire at the start. The first time he was decisive. This time not so much and we continued being poor. I don't think it should be panic mode, but the game did seem rather like a pre-season one trying to sort out combinations and tactics and so not much of a spectacle. 
Would Fenton add a lot? Maybe a bit of difference on attack, or at least a bit of pace at times, but I think Leo is more likely to be sound defensively and is no slouch with the ball at his feet. I don't think there is a lot between them. The bonus with Fenton at right back is then Leo might actually be able to push some of the players further up the pitch for a start- Cunningham, Ifill and Huysegems I'm thinking as a wide player in the attacking formation, and he is a bit younger and fitter IMO than some of our stars.


Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
JarrodM wrote:

Usually at other events at McLean Park (cricket and rugby) they have 4 or 5 gates open. and I didn't see the food stalls but usually they have quite a few under the harris stand and behind the graeme lowe stand. So the only conclusion I can come to is the organisers were trying to save money, and cut back on the food and by limiting it to one gate. But someone must of surely known that they wouldn't of been able to get the expected crowd through the one gate in time. The one gate situation was the biggest clusterfuck I've seen at McLean Park. 


Saving money? You might have hit the nail on the head as they were looking for volunteers to help take down the advertising hordings after the game. surely that is the groundsmans' job??
Proud to have attended the first 175 Consecutive "Home" Wellington Phoenix "A League" Games !!

The Ruf, The Ruf, The Ruf is on Fire!!

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
Jeff Vader wrote:
Doloras wrote:

So. Have we reached a consensus that Ernie doesn't know what he's doing? No midfielders, a glut of forwards who don't work as forward, Kenny the dud from Costa Rica... BRING BACK RICKI time methinks?

No I don't think that's the case at all but that would be a standard 'Yellow Fever Forum' reaction. 

I don't think so, most people would be able to count off the names of those that would on the fingers of one hand.
Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago

But they'll make themselves heard every 2nd post. 


Allegedly

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago

Indeed, my contribution above is a bit "Devil's Advocate" - I just wouldn't want to think Ernie is getting a free ride for mistakes and oversights that we roasted our last coach for.


Ramming liberal dribble down your throat since 2009
This forum needs less angst and more Kate Bush threads



Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago

To be fair, I don't think ricki was roasted for them until it became evident that he wasn't learning or evolving from them. 


Allegedly

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
Doloras wrote:

Indeed, my contribution above is a bit "Devil's Advocate" - I just wouldn't want to think Ernie is getting a free ride for mistakes and oversights that we roasted our last coach for.


Well if we are being honest Doloras you always defended Ricki to the hilt, in fact you still are. So of all the people on here you should be prepared to give Merrick the benefit of the doubt. It's only fair (and consistant). 

Three for me, and two for them.

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
Buffon II wrote:
Doloras wrote:

Indeed, my contribution above is a bit "Devil's Advocate" - I just wouldn't want to think Ernie is getting a free ride for mistakes and oversights that we roasted our last coach for.


Well if we are being honest Doloras you always defended Ricki to the hilt, in fact you still are. So of all the people on here you should be prepared to give Merrick the benefit of the doubt. It's only fair (and consistant). 



Ha ha Buffy, you might have a point, but when has fair and consistent been anything to do with football.

If you are old and wise you were probably young and stupid

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
Tegal wrote:

But they'll make themselves heard every 2nd post. 

I try for every 3rd :o)

Grumpy old bastard alert

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
Leggy wrote:
Buffon II wrote:
Doloras wrote:

Indeed, my contribution above is a bit "Devil's Advocate" - I just wouldn't want to think Ernie is getting a free ride for mistakes and oversights that we roasted our last coach for.


Well if we are being honest Doloras you always defended Ricki to the hilt, in fact you still are. So of all the people on here you should be prepared to give Merrick the benefit of the doubt. It's only fair (and consistant). 



Ha ha Buffy, you might have a point, but when has fair and consistent been anything to do with football.

"We won't be anywhere near 10th spot." Sorry Leggy, but I'm also playing devil's advocate (just for the crack).

"At the end of the drive the lawmen arrive...

I'll take my chance because luck is on my side or something...

Her name is Rio, she don't need to understand...

Oh Rio, Rio, hear them shout across the land..."

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
Jerzy Merino wrote:
Leggy wrote:
Buffon II wrote:
Doloras wrote:

Indeed, my contribution above is a bit "Devil's Advocate" - I just wouldn't want to think Ernie is getting a free ride for mistakes and oversights that we roasted our last coach for.


Well if we are being honest Doloras you always defended Ricki to the hilt, in fact you still are. So of all the people on here you should be prepared to give Merrick the benefit of the doubt. It's only fair (and consistant). 



Ha ha Buffy, you might have a point, but when has fair and consistent been anything to do with football.

"We won't be anywhere near 10th spot." Sorry Leggy, but I'm also playing devil's advocate (just for the crack).



Ha ha. At least I spelt consistent correctly.

If you are old and wise you were probably young and stupid

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
Leggy wrote:
Jerzy Merino wrote:
Leggy wrote:
Buffon II wrote:
Doloras wrote:

Indeed, my contribution above is a bit "Devil's Advocate" - I just wouldn't want to think Ernie is getting a free ride for mistakes and oversights that we roasted our last coach for.


Well if we are being honest Doloras you always defended Ricki to the hilt, in fact you still are. So of all the people on here you should be prepared to give Merrick the benefit of the doubt. It's only fair (and consistant). 



Ha ha Buffy, you might have a point, but when has fair and consistent been anything to do with football.

"We won't be anywhere near 10th spot." Sorry Leggy, but I'm also playing devil's advocate (just for the crack).



Ha ha. At least I spelt consistent correctly.


Jeez,  the forums sounding like this devils avocado!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rYniD_fNUzc

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
martinb wrote:
rjmiller wrote:

I thought it was probably our worst overall performance so far. There were some positives though. I thought Riera showed he is comfortable at this level and I would like him to start. Siggy and Durante (and Boxall for that matter) have all been solid every time.

However Ernie needs to get the attack sorted and at the moment he looks like he is still undecided on the combination. I think it is pretty obvious that you can't play Ifill, Hysugems, Hernandez and Brockie at the same time, they just don't collectively have enough energy and mobility. And I'm not convinced Cunningham should be in the team but I am tempted to stick with him for a couple of weeks. In saying that I wouldn't mind if Rufer, Ridenton or Hicks were given some/more game time.

I hope Fenton is back, I think he could add a bit to the attack from RB. I generally think Leo gets to much criticism but he struggled a lot in that game.


Yep- twice Ernie's tactics have failed to fire at the start. The first time he was decisive. This time not so much and we continued being poor. I don't think it should be panic mode, but the game did seem rather like a pre-season one trying to sort out combinations and tactics and so not much of a spectacle. 

Would Fenton add a lot? Maybe a bit of difference on attack, or at least a bit of pace at times, but I think Leo is more likely to be sound defensively and is no slouch with the ball at his feet. I don't think there is a lot between them. The bonus with Fenton at right back is then Leo might actually be able to push some of the players further up the pitch for a start - Cunningham, Ifill and Huysegems I'm thinking as a wide player in the attacking formation, and he is a bit younger and fitter IMO than some of our stars.

Yep you knocked it exactly on the head - "the game did seem rather like a pre-season one trying to sort out combinations and tactics"

This is our pre-season in effect, and we have to wear it. Watched our front players from just behind the stand goal in the second half, and they had no understanding going on. But that will come once Ernie settles on his starting eleven. Was shocked pre game to hear Ifill was starting. He's our impact guy. We need speed out wide, and have a few players now who can do that. Have high hopes Fenton will provide that on the right anyway. Think Cunningham will then come in to play.

 

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago · edited over 12 years ago · History

At what point in the proceedings did we have a striker in a position to recevie the ball from our  wing backs before they had to turn and look for a mid field option. ( most times the striker option was back to goal ) Our was I at a different game after having to consume  rugby beer!

  Supporter For Ever - Keep The Faith - Foundation Member - Never Lets FAX Get In The Way Of A Good Yarn

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
Lonegunmen wrote:
sthn.jeff wrote:

A couple of moans the club / McLean park need to take on board if the fixture happens again:


1) Only one gate open and about eight young kids collecting tickets at the gate and about three or four security staff doing bag checks. I got to the ground at around 4:20 and only just got inside to see teams coming onto the pitch. It would have been a lot worse if Thundersticks had not opened another gate for those you had "physical tickets". Those with self printed tickets had to wait.


2) Beer stall only selling beer. If you wanted a beer and a soft drink you had to go to two seperate places.


3)No Eftpos at beer stalls


4)Do Food "Caravans" really cut it at sporting events anymore?


A long trip in a day and result a bit disappointing. Would I do it again? Better effing believe it!



Edited your response briefly here. You summed it up quite well. Some fans told me they missed part of the game because the foodstalls were so busy and the wait was so long. At half time i went from the fever Zone over to see Phil the Hobbit and cutting through ques is not my favourite activity. I felt for the people in the lines and it was soooooo friggen crowded. I too, hope that the Napier organisers learn from the comments made on ehre and should they get another game, put into action plans to avoid such messes.

Always makes me laugh when people complain about the food at the stadium. If you want decent food, thats what restaurants and takeaway places are for. There's plenty of time for a feed before the game. I left the stadium after the game and drove to Dickens Street in town and had probably the best kebab I've ever had. I never buy food at the ground due to its crapness and that I can go two hours without food.

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
Lonegunmen wrote:
sthn.jeff wrote:

A couple of moans the club / McLean park need to take on board if the fixture happens again:


1) Only one gate open and about eight young kids collecting tickets at the gate and about three or four security staff doing bag checks. I got to the ground at around 4:20 and only just got inside to see teams coming onto the pitch. It would have been a lot worse if Thundersticks had not opened another gate for those you had "physical tickets". Those with self printed tickets had to wait.


2) Beer stall only selling beer. If you wanted a beer and a soft drink you had to go to two seperate places.


3)No Eftpos at beer stalls


4)Do Food "Caravans" really cut it at sporting events anymore?


A long trip in a day and result a bit disappointing. Would I do it again? Better effing believe it!



Edited your response briefly here. You summed it up quite well. Some fans told me they missed part of the game because the foodstalls were so busy and the wait was so long. At half time i went from the fever Zone over to see Phil the Hobbit and cutting through ques is not my favourite activity. I felt for the people in the lines and it was soooooo friggen crowded. I too, hope that the Napier organisers learn from the comments made on ehre and should they get another game, put into action plans to avoid such messes.

Always makes me laugh when people complain about the food at the stadium. If you want decent food, thats what restaurants and takeaway places are for. There's plenty of time for a feed before the game. I left the stadium after the game and drove to Dickens Street in town and had probably the best kebab I've ever had. I never buy food at the ground due to its crapness and that I can go two hours without food.

Agreed completely. Truly excellent kebabs!

Nostalgia isnt what it used to be...........

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
Doloras wrote:

Indeed, my contribution above is a bit "Devil's Advocate" - I just wouldn't want to think Ernie is getting a free ride for mistakes and oversights that we roasted our last coach for.



Christ almighty, there is playing the Devil's Advocate role in a reasoned debate, then there just being silly. As Tegal pointed out Ricki had 2 seasons which was pretty much a free ride on here. I recall only at that really poor start to 2009-2010 he started really copping it, even though we ended up having a good season. The majority of the forum, (apart from the usual suspects), was still behind him up until his last couple of seasons, even though would could criticize we still supported him as coach.

Unlike Ricki, Ernie has inherited a squad that finished last. In a league that has improved hugely from what Ricki had to deal with when he began. Take the amazing buzz around Wellington when The Nix arrived, (hell we used to get an average of 10000 fans) compared to now that was a massive lift for the team. Those early days the YF was considered some of the best fans in the league.

Arguably Ernie has a harder job starting out as there were no expectations on Ricki's shoulders that first season;  we were just glad to have a team.

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago · edited over 12 years ago · History
Doloras wrote:

Indeed, my contribution above is a bit "Devil's Advocate" - I just wouldn't want to think Ernie is getting a free ride for mistakes and oversights that we roasted our last coach for.


that is nonsense. Ricki had 6 seasons, and most people were pro Ricki until his tactics (or lack of plan B) became tiresome. 

I like tautologies because I like them.
Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
Buffon II wrote:
Doloras wrote:

Indeed, my contribution above is a bit "Devil's Advocate" - I just wouldn't want to think Ernie is getting a free ride for mistakes and oversights that we roasted our last coach for.


Well if we are being honest Doloras you always defended Ricki to the hilt, in fact you still are. So of all the people on here you should be prepared to give Merrick the benefit of the doubt. It's only fair (and consistant). 


This is an excellent point. 
I like tautologies because I like them.
Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
ForteanTimes wrote:
Doloras wrote:

Indeed, my contribution above is a bit "Devil's Advocate" - I just wouldn't want to think Ernie is getting a free ride for mistakes and oversights that we roasted our last coach for.



Christ almighty, there is playing the Devil's Advocate role in a reasoned debate, then there just being silly. As Tegal pointed out Ricki had 2 seasons which was pretty much a free ride on here. I recall only at that really poor start to 2009-2010 he started really copping it, even though we ended up having a good season. The majority of the forum, (apart from the usual suspects), was still behind him up until his last couple of seasons, even though would could criticize we still supported him as coach.

Unlike Ricki, Ernie has inherited a squad that finished last. In a league that has improved hugely from what Ricki had to deal with when he began. Take the amazing buzz around Wellington when The Nix arrived, (hell we used to get an average of 10000 fans) compared to now that was a massive lift for the team. Those early days the YF was considered some of the best fans in the league.

Arguably Ernie has a harder job starting out as there were no expectations on Ricki's shoulders that first season;  we were just glad to have a team.


Well said! I think you summed it up quite nicely.
Proud to have attended the first 175 Consecutive "Home" Wellington Phoenix "A League" Games !!

The Ruf, The Ruf, The Ruf is on Fire!!

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago

Troll advocate.

I like tautologies because I like them.
Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
Lonegunmen wrote:
sthn.jeff wrote:

A couple of moans the club / McLean park need to take on board if the fixture happens again:


1) Only one gate open and about eight young kids collecting tickets at the gate and about three or four security staff doing bag checks. I got to the ground at around 4:20 and only just got inside to see teams coming onto the pitch. It would have been a lot worse if Thundersticks had not opened another gate for those you had "physical tickets". Those with self printed tickets had to wait.


2) Beer stall only selling beer. If you wanted a beer and a soft drink you had to go to two seperate places.


3)No Eftpos at beer stalls


4)Do Food "Caravans" really cut it at sporting events anymore?


A long trip in a day and result a bit disappointing. Would I do it again? Better effing believe it!



Edited your response briefly here. You summed it up quite well. Some fans told me they missed part of the game because the foodstalls were so busy and the wait was so long. At half time i went from the fever Zone over to see Phil the Hobbit and cutting through ques is not my favourite activity. I felt for the people in the lines and it was soooooo friggen crowded. I too, hope that the Napier organisers learn from the comments made on ehre and should they get another game, put into action plans to avoid such messes.

Always makes me laugh when people complain about the food at the stadium. If you want decent food, thats what restaurants and takeaway places are for. There's plenty of time for a feed before the game. I left the stadium after the game and drove to Dickens Street in town and had probably the best kebab I've ever had. I never buy food at the ground due to its crapness and that I can go two hours without food.


There were queues a mile long at these Caravans and due to not being able to buy soft drinks at the same place you could get a beer, the food Caravans were the only place you could buy one. 

Judging by the wait, plenty of people do buy food at a stadium. If you take kids to a match you will know this is basically seen  as part of the experience.

So while I agree with your sentiments about food quality, a large number of people do see it as part of the experience and it is something that should be addressed and not just at Napier
Permalink Permalink