Wellington Phoenix Men

R7 vs Sydney Sat 23rd 7:30pm

573 replies · 24,970 views
over 12 years ago · edited over 12 years ago · History
Midfielder wrote:

rjmiller

Your 2010 link was a one off and a final I think ... http://www.throng.co.nz/2010/03/tv-ratings-7-march-2010/

There is a weekly crowd and ratings thread ... has  been running weekly for Hal's 8 & 9 to date ...  http://www.yellowfever.co.nz/categories/news-discussion-and-football-blogging/topics/attendances-2012-13-season

If you can get the rating please please post them... it's not like they have not been requested or it is a thread with no one reading... 



The Phoenix have been playing on Sky Sports 4 which doesn't seem to be tracked.

Regardless a market of over 4 million isn't something to be sneezed over, that's 20% of the domestic Australian market, unlike Rugby League the NZ public didn't have much exposure to Australian football before there were NZ teams in the market so I would imagine the ratings would be abysmal without the Phoenix.

The main problem we have is that there is a sea in the way and therefore we don't have many away fans to boost our attendance, and vice versa when we travel. Things would be improved both with attendance and TV if there was another NZ team so that we could have a local derby and competition between fans.
Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago

Are there any NZ ratings in there at all? I didn't see any over two pages I read.

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago · edited over 12 years ago · History
rjmiller wrote:

Are there any NZ ratings in there at all? I didn't see any over two pages I read.


Yes there are some NZ ratings in there ... but very few ... if you can find them please post ... the suggestion is by some on YF that if you don't rate in the top 20 you are not shown... this appears to be correct so you will need to look at media twitter feeds or something local...

However the screaming story is the rating of the Nix in NZ are under the top 20 almost every time ... I am not trying to either stir or Trol ... but the NZ ratings appear less than the fall off when you play Australian based teams... SFC on a Saturday night against most teams 90K + against MV or WSW 110 + ...  

BTW read all 10 pages and you will find some NZ ratings the highest I think was around 24K tho I could be wrong...  we have not even talked about how say AU V PG may rate ... just Nix's ratings... 

In closing the thread has over 11.5 K reads so its not that folks have not been out looking for NZ ratings ... they are hard to find...

Socceroo/ Mariner / Whangarei

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
Ryan wrote:
Midfielder wrote:

rjmiller

Your 2010 link was a one off and a final I think ... http://www.throng.co.nz/2010/03/tv-ratings-7-march-2010/

There is a weekly crowd and ratings thread ... has  been running weekly for Hal's 8 & 9 to date ...  http://www.yellowfever.co.nz/categories/news-discussion-and-football-blogging/topics/attendances-2012-13-season

If you can get the rating please please post them... it's not like they have not been requested or it is a thread with no one reading... 



The Phoenix have been playing on Sky Sports 4 which doesn't seem to be tracked.

Regardless a market of over 4 million isn't something to be sneezed over, that's 20% of the domestic Australian market, unlike Rugby League the NZ public didn't have much exposure to Australian football before there were NZ teams in the market so I would imagine the ratings would be abysmal without the Phoenix.

The main problem we have is that there is a sea in the way and therefore we don't have many away fans to boost our attendance, and vice versa when we travel. Things would be improved both with attendance and TV if there was another NZ team so that we could have a local derby and competition between fans.

Ryan
No one is doubting the potential NZ brings the A-League ... however at some point potential must start to show itself or at least a North heading curve is important ... remember this is Hal 9 ... I also have no doubt if you had a winning team and more media it would be different ... 
I seriously do not wanta get into a doom day thread or prediction ... so I won't ... I am simply saying what the facts are ... 

Socceroo/ Mariner / Whangarei

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago

Midfielder, I'm not quite sure what you are trying to say here to be honest..

Having a football team in New Zealand expands the A-league market to an audience of over 4 million people. There is absolutely no doubt in my mind that having a NZ team in the A-league has helped grow the league and produce more revenue from tv deals and sponsorship. The Phoenix have the third highest facebook following in the A-league with 60,000 fans. (I see you're a Mariners fan?? CCM have the lowest fan base of all A-league teams.) This is a big audience by Australian standards and the league would be crazy to get rid of the Phoenix and lose this audience. When the Nix start playing good football and win games again, hopefully we will be drawing crowds of 10,000+ to our home games (if we actually start playing our games at home which is another issue in its own entity) and this can only be good for the game over here and in Australia. 

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago · edited over 12 years ago · History
Seb wrote:

Midfielder, I'm not quite sure what you are trying to say here to be honest..

Having a football team in New Zealand expands the A-league market to an audience of over 4 million people. There is absolutely no doubt in my mind that having a NZ team in the A-league has helped grow the league and produce more revenue from tv deals and sponsorship. The Phoenix have the third highest facebook following in the A-league with 60,000 fans. (I see you're a Mariners fan?? CCM have the lowest fan base of all A-league teams.) This is a big audience by Australian standards and the league would be crazy to get rid of the Phoenix and lose this audience. When the Nix start playing good football and win games again, hopefully we will be drawing crowds of 10,000+ to our home games (if we actually start playing our games at home which is another issue in its own entity) and this can only be good for the game over here and in Australia. 


Seb

I am not trying to say anything ... OK I am I suppose ... it's no secret their some folk in Australia who would prefer an all Australian league... it's a stated aim of FFA to get a 100 million dollar media deal next time around... also no secret a large part [not the only] is increasing technical ability ie more play out from the back ... less long ball game... is seen as the way forward... 

Numbers would indicate four sides are capable of rating regularly over 100 K... MV, WSW, SFC & the Roar... these same teams will draw crowds over 15K most days...

Newcastle is also capable of averaging about 14 K and in good years in the high teens ... but as a regional side rates away from the top sides above 50 to 80 K...

The Mariners and AU crowds around 10 K with ratings around 50 to 80 away from the top sides ... The Mariners have also built or building and will be completed in under 12 months a Centre of Excellence valued somewhere between 50 & 90 million depending on who you speak too ... maybe its worth only 5 million who knows these things but it is very impressive even now ... 

PG are rebuilding after FFA stuffed them up in Hals 1 to 3 ... are showing signs of recovering... crowds 8 to 9 K

Heart HHHHMMMMMM arguably the biggest worry in the league away from there MV match  6 to 8 K crowds with TV rating 50 to 80...

Nix with a whole country ... 4 million ... rating ?????? ... crowds 8 to 9 K ....

What does it mean .... HHHMmmmm not sure ... however Frank Lowy is leaving and while he has been there the NZ position was / is never in question... when he goes if someone runs a hard line over the numbers ... will anything change TBH I have no idea but given we have a fight with the AFC over your entry [as we will] and if your figures have kinda stayed the same .... HHHHMMmmm no idea ... all I am doing is stating the facts without saying what will or won't happen ... but to pendent numbers don't matter may be foolish... the potential needs to be converted into actuals..

On the Coast ... without doubt if we had not often won and built the COE we would be out ... today there is no way the CC would get a spot if none existed...  





Socceroo/ Mariner / Whangarei

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago

whilst I agree to a point, in that the FFA and parts of aussie would prefer not to have NZ in the league, at the end of the day any TV has got to look better with an additional 4 million potential viewers. Sure not all of those will watch the telly or attend matches but I'd guess that most of the a-league wathers in NZ would watch more than just the nix games

Queenslander 3x a year.

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago

Bollocks to this "playing well" & loosing. I just want a win at this stage I dont care how ugly it is. I am tired of seeing the positives in a galant loss / draw.

Even the prettiest of team grinds out an ugly win from time to time. I am not saying stop doing what we are trying to do. We just need a win for morale of squad and fans

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago · edited over 12 years ago · History

The argument posted by Midfielder has been done to death before by many of local (Aust) fans who can't count. The argument is based on the fact that FFA allows a NZ based team while styming the local growth.

This is of course nonsense. FFA did not agree for the NSW South Coast team, and more significantly, the Canberra team, to join the league recently, and this was on the business model - basically they were unlikely to thrive long term without financial support of the federation.

Wellington Phoenix does not take a "space" away from these franchises. It lives and dies on its own income or lack of it, so it only helps the league by providing additional team to play in the comp, while requiring no funding from the FFA. All other jingoistic reasons aside, it is a win-win for both countries. The moment Australia has a league big enough to provide long meaningful season, this topic could be revisited. At the moment, it is a non-issue. And I say that as an Aust citizen living in Christchurch.


Actually, getting outplayed quite a bit these days

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
Ryan wrote:
Jeff Vader wrote:

To me, Ernie's systems have never relied on a back to goal guy and I think that's in part where Stein is the odd man out. When you think about Allsopp and Archie, they just relentlessly ran at the opponents and out paced them until the ass fell out of opponents and were run off the park. Carlos gave them the ball in the right places to do that. Brockie and Stein are not speed merchants but Brockie works best from open broken play and catching the defence unaware. I think that's where Kenny (and after thinking he was gonna be huge, I have egg on my face) is probably best utilised and probably what Ernie thought was a clone of Archie. Pace, ball skill, run the ass out of the opponents and Carlos slips it to him in the right place. The difference is that Archie and Allsop popped up everywhere along the front line where Kenny is glued to the flank he is put on and tries to out foot race opponents from positions where he gives himself no room to do so and probably does not have the footwork trickery other than 'I can run'. Ifill can do that but is in the body of geriatric with matching pace. If you combined Ifill and Kenny, you have the player that makes Ernie's system work - a clone of Archie.



Isn't Archie older than Ifill?
look at Archie's pace, not his age. That's the real comparison. On the ball, Ifill is one of the best in the league I think of which if there was a debate, his name would feature. He just can't do it with pace.

Grumpy old bastard alert

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
sthn.jeff wrote:

Bollocks to this "playing well" & loosing. I just want a win at this stage I dont care how ugly it is. I am tired of seeing the positives in a galant loss / draw.

Even the prettiest of team grinds out an ugly win from time to time. I am not saying stop doing what we are trying to do. We just need a win for morale of squad and fans

The wins will come. We've never played like this away from home, and it won't be long before this side can win consistently on both sides of the Tasman. It's a huge change of style, and Merrick's had to do it with some Herbert leftovers to work in. I'll be surprised if we don't go big against WSW.

   

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
Mainland FC wrote:
Mainland FC wrote:


I watched the Roar - WSW game the night before and thought it was excellent football, right up there with any lesser European league (so not EPL, Eredivisie, Bundesliga... etc level but certainly at the level of Austrian, Swedish, Swiss, Danish, etc league football). Possibly I should not have watched it, because as a result the Syd FC vs Nix game 24 hrs later made me want cut my wrists, and not because I am a Nix supporter, but because it was such crap in comparison. However, we are a work in progress, with limited resources and in transition. The same can't be said about the Bling, owned by the Zenith St Petersburg money, who can spend a bit more than we can.
that is harsh. Hernandez made some terrific passes. For instance, if brockie had put away his one on one we would all be praising Hernandez great vision. Every week he is incisive, far more so than anyone else but maybe ifill, but we don't take advantage and therefore the credit doesn't flow.

I thought we were decent away from home but a draw would have been fair based on no of chances. Moss made some good saves, esp that one with leg from del piero. Central defenders were good, caira average, Fenton ok getting forward but sloppy and lucky some of his loose passes didn't hurt. Muscat was decent defensively, lia at his mediocre best, brockie invis, huysegems mediocre. Kenny good. Ifill should always start.


OK, I take your point that maybe it is a bit harsh. Please note I did not say "we were crap" because I don't think we were. All I am saying is that Sydney and us were approximately same quality, and the luck of chances converted went their way.

The point I was making was that Sydney and The Nix were not playing at the level of WSW and Roar on the basis of what I saw on Friday night.. Both WSW and BR have lifted since the early rounds. We still have some way to go before we can get better, as we need to work out the formation first.

I happen to agree with most of the individual player assessments you made, perhaps with exception of Ifill starting, unless you are planning to sub him early in the second half. In the only game I saw him start this season I noticed he visibly faded from view as time wore on. I do not question his skills, vision and heart. I question his knees as a 90 min material.

why can't ifill start? One mediocre start v Newcastle, and some decent appearances off the bench seemed to have resigned him to a life on the pine. Maybe He'd have a better chance of getting a start if he'd been crap coming off the bench. He's one of our best players, looks good when he's on the park, knows how to unlock teams, and needs to be on the park, not watching. If he runs out of gas, sub him, but we are wasting his talent at the moment.
Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
Joey Johns wrote:

fenton was good, why all the hate? his only real mistake was at the end, plus he had to compensate our attacks lack of pace by pushing forward. Would far rather him than Caira who makes more mistakes and gives the ball away. Both certainly need to work on their crossing however.

Fenton made quite a few stray passes that gave up cheap possession, just didn't really hurt us and didn't get scrutinized by the commentators. Wasn't terrible, just Needs to be tidier or it will cost us.
Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
Ryan54 wrote:


Very few of us here are blaming anything on Merrick.










I am. He's playing the wrong tactics for the players he has. And I was always on record as feeling ashamed of picking up MVFC's leftovers (same with Hernandez) - they were let go for good reasons.

Ramming liberal dribble down your throat since 2009
This forum needs less angst and more Kate Bush threads



Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago · edited over 12 years ago · History
Doloras wrote:
Ryan54 wrote:


Very few of us here are blaming anything on Merrick.











I am. He's playing the wrong tactics for the players he has. And I was always on record as feeling ashamed of picking up MVFC's leftovers (same with Hernandez) - they were let go for good reasons.


What a load of bollocks to be honest. Hernandez on form would walk into any A-league team, he is absolute class. The fans didn't want him to leave but I believe there were breakdowns in contract discussions when it was about to expire. That and internal club politics + a rare poor season for Carlos are some of the reasons why he may have left. 


The tactics that Ernie is instilling in this club is the absolute right way to play. It is the nature of modern football and if you do not adapt to the modern game (ie, very technical, possession based football) you will get left behind. If we want to develop as a club and footballing nation, we need to embrace this style of football. The amount of teams that are still playing root 1 football with unskillful defenders constantly hoofing the ball up field is dropping all the time. If you compare most top division teams in this era to the top division teams 40-50 years ago, the quality of football has increased beyond sight to be honest (not that I was around that long ago). Few people would argue with this fact. Brisbane and the Victory have already done it. We need to adapt to survive and this is what Ernie is doing. 


We are playing far better football this season than we probably ever have. I agree that some of the players may not be up to this style of football, but even these players are playing better football than they ever have. I think most of us would put our results this season down to many things including an absolutely ridiculous and absurd travel schedule (We've effectively had 6 away games and I hope he owners come to their senses and understand the impact they've had on our season so far), loss of a handful of key players during the international fixtures, adaptation to new style of play, and pretty poor luck to be honest. 


It has been a horribly disjointed start to the season and it has been completely out of Ernie's hands. Our season effectively starts now and we will probably have a far clearer reflection of where we are at in the next few games. Until then I think it is a tad unfair to blame this all on Ernie.    

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago · edited over 12 years ago · History


"Phoenix till they lose"

Posting 97% bollox, 8% lies and 3.658% genuine opinion. 

Genuine opinion: FTFFA

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
Seb wrote:
Doloras wrote:
Ryan54 wrote:


Very few of us here are blaming anything on Merrick.











I am. He's playing the wrong tactics for the players he has. And I was always on record as feeling ashamed of picking up MVFC's leftovers (same with Hernandez) - they were let go for good reasons.


What a load of bollocks to be honest.    

Its Doloras and the subject of coaching. What did you expect? 

Grumpy old bastard alert

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago · edited over 12 years ago · History
Jeff Vader wrote:
Its Doloras and the subject of coaching. What did you expect? 


+1

Three for me, and two for them.

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago · edited over 12 years ago · History
Jeff Vader wrote:
Seb wrote:
Doloras wrote:
Ryan54 wrote:


Very few of us here are blaming anything on Merrick.

I am. He's playing the wrong tactics for the players he has. And I was always on record as feeling ashamed of picking up MVFC's leftovers (same with Hernandez) - they were let go for good reasons.

What a load of bollocks to be honest.    

Its Doloras and the subject of coaching. What did you expect? 


I would resist the urge to make it personal, and rather play the ball than the person.

Not everyone likes the idea of Merrick coming to the Nix, and clearly Doloras does not think Merrick's style of play suits the players he has at his disposal. To some degree this is true. However, I would argue that the style is right, and this is what Seb has already stated. Current players will move on, but the style will be bedded in. This is the football that is played today, and one that allows countries not traditionally dominant improve beyond their previously modest limits (think Japan). Not all players can play that style. What this means is that Merrick will find the players suited for that style, for example by letting Lochhead go, but recruiting Riera from Auckland City, and so on.

I am not expecting miracles overnight, although a win now and then would be nice. I am prepared to pay to watch my team to lose well as much as I am prepared to pay to watch them win ugly. That is football.

Actually, getting outplayed quite a bit these days

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago

doloras is right to this point - and we've discussed it when ricki tried to play technical football. The players are simply not up to it. Lia, siggy in particular are not cut out to play the style the coach wants. Fact is that Ernie has the players he has and really can't change that until next season.

Queenslander 3x a year.

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
theprof wrote:

doloras is right to this point - and we've discussed it when ricki tried to play technical football. The players are simply not up to it. Lia, siggy in particular are not cut out to play the style the coach wants. Fact is that Ernie has the players he has and really can't change that until next season.



He did what Ricki wouldn't and cut loose what dead wood he could afford to - we have to start from somewhere and this is where we are starting. Siggy and Lia are actually some of our better players at the moment.
Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
Ryan wrote:
theprof wrote:

doloras is right to this point - and we've discussed it when ricki tried to play technical football. The players are simply not up to it. Lia, siggy in particular are not cut out to play the style the coach wants. Fact is that Ernie has the players he has and really can't change that until next season.



He did what Ricki wouldn't and cut loose what dead wood he could afford to - we have to start from somewhere and this is where we are starting. Siggy and Lia are actually some of our better players at the moment.


Agreed, count the positive comments on Lia recently. I can't remember him getting anywhere near this praise under Rickie or Greenie. I wish Dolores would actually come up with some valid arguments as to what exactly Ernie is doing wrong at the moment and why he shouldn't be given a chance.


Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago · edited over 12 years ago · History

I'm giving him a chance! I'm not like some US Republican who wants failure so I can be right. Every game I tune in optimistic that Merrick has proved me wrong and he can make a silk purse out of Vinnie Lia and Steyn Huysegems. So far he has disappointed me.

As to coaching, I really think we should have got a professional from Europe who didn't have "A-League experience"; i.e. didn't have preconceptions about what had to be done and could have done a better job of working with what he had. No, I don't know who that might have been.

And I don't care whether Carlos could have walked into any other A-League team, right here right now he's been average-to-disappointing in his tenure with the Nix.


Ramming liberal dribble down your throat since 2009
This forum needs less angst and more Kate Bush threads



Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
Doloras wrote:

I'm giving him a chance! I'm not like some US Republican who wants failure so I can be right. Every game I tune in optimistic that Merrick has proved me wrong and he can make a silk purse out of Vinnie Lia and Steyn Huysegems. So far he has disappointed me.

As to coaching, I really think we should have got a professional from Europe who didn't have "A-League experience"; i.e. didn't have preconceptions about what had to be done and could have done a better job of working with what he had. No, I don't know who that might have been.

And I don't care whether Carlos could have walked into any other A-League team, right here right now he's been average-to-disappointing in his tenure with the Nix.


So what's he doing wrong? apart from being from Melbourne?
And no way in hell about Carlos; he has been our best attacking player. Decent strikers who can run onto through balls are what's missing there.
I like tautologies because I like them.
Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago

Carlos is the best player at the club. Simple as that.

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
Seb wrote:

Carlos is the best player at the club. Simple as that.


Yep
I like tautologies because I like them.
Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago

Perhaps I'm wrong (well, almost definitely I'm wrong according to the consensus here), but what I've seen out of Carlos is a whole bunch of "almosts". Free kicks that *almost* went in, or crosses or passes which *almost* found their mark, or runs which *almost* beat their last man. People pile on Vinnie Lia when his passes *almost* hit the target. This might mean he'll be great when he comes up to full speed. Or perhaps "if".


Ramming liberal dribble down your throat since 2009
This forum needs less angst and more Kate Bush threads



Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
Doloras wrote:

Perhaps I'm wrong (well, almost definitely I'm wrong according to the consensus here), but what I've seen out of Carlos is a whole bunch of "almosts". Free kicks that *almost* went in, or crosses or passes which *almost* found their mark, or runs which *almost* beat their last man. People pile on Vinnie Lia when his passes *almost* hit the target. This might mean he'll be great when he comes up to full speed. Or perhaps "if".


apart from Moss, you could say that about anyone.
I like tautologies because I like them.
Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
Doloras wrote:

Perhaps I'm wrong (well, almost definitely I'm wrong according to the consensus here), but what I've seen out of Carlos is a whole bunch of "almosts". Free kicks that *almost* went in, or crosses or passes which *almost* found their mark, or runs which *almost* beat their last man. People pile on Vinnie Lia when his passes *almost* hit the target. This might mean he'll be great when he comes up to full speed. Or perhaps "if".

Vinnies passes are rarely almost on target - most of them are wildly off target much like the header on goal. I do agree that Carlos hasn't set the world on fire since his arrival - this could be down to the lack of prep he had beforehand or simply touble adjusting back into the a-league from india - I have hope that he is coming right and we'll see a massive step up in the coming weeks.

Queenslander 3x a year.

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago

Prof.... take your Vinnie hating glasses off next time you watch a match, you might actually see he is doing some good things. Yes he makes mistakes but he has been one of our most consistent this year and has outperformed Manny on most occasions

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago · edited over 12 years ago · History

So now Vinnie is good. *Yellow Fever Forum pendulum* 

I like tautologies because I like them.
Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago

All I have said all season in relation to Vinnie is to Judge him on what he does, see the good with the bad and look at someone the reasons why the bad things happen. Of course it's far easier to just say he is shit

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago

Vinnie was good against SFC. Or, at least, he was better than usual.


Ramming liberal dribble down your throat since 2009
This forum needs less angst and more Kate Bush threads



Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
Doloras wrote:

Vinnie was good against SFC. Or, at least, he was better than usual.


agreed
I like tautologies because I like them.
Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
theprof wrote:
Doloras wrote:

Perhaps I'm wrong (well, almost definitely I'm wrong according to the consensus here), but what I've seen out of Carlos is a whole bunch of "almosts". Free kicks that *almost* went in, or crosses or passes which *almost* found their mark, or runs which *almost* beat their last man. People pile on Vinnie Lia when his passes *almost* hit the target. This might mean he'll be great when he comes up to full speed. Or perhaps "if".

Vinnies passes are rarely almost on target - most of them are wildly off target much like the header on goal. I do agree that Carlos hasn't set the world on fire since his arrival - this could be down to the lack of prep he had beforehand or simply touble adjusting back into the a-league from india - I have hope that he is coming right and we'll see a massive step up in the coming weeks.


Really? The stats would suggest otherwise. So far this season I believe Vinnie's pass completion rate has been over 75% every single game. So effectively he only misses 1 in 5 passes that he attempts. This is not such a bad statistic for a central midfielder. I think his problem is that he is susceptible to making 2 or 3 terrible mistakes during a game and in the eyes of many here, it outdoes all the good work that he can contribute. I'm not really a huge fan of Vinnie, he's obviously not the best midfielder in the world, but I do think he often cops a lot of criticism that is maybe slightly unfair. Such is the life of professional football though. I think he's a good A-league squad player, but is he a starting A-league player? That's a debatable question.     
Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago · edited over 12 years ago · History

perhaps, he seems to make the howlers very early on in the game which pretty much sets the tone for the rest of the game. He may not be the worst in the league - I'd wager he'd be close - but for mine he should not be starting - his errors this season have been costly ie usually infront of the box, and the ball going to the oppostion.

Queenslander 3x a year.

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago

Lia is rubbish, Carlos is class. That is obvious every week.

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago

Lia is rubbish, Carlos is class. That is obvious every week.



You will have Patrick on your case????????????????

If you are old and wise you were probably young and stupid

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago

We have two genuinely classy players who have both ball skills and can read the game. The rest are journeymen or young apprentices.

"Phoenix till they lose"

Posting 97% bollox, 8% lies and 3.658% genuine opinion. 

Genuine opinion: FTFFA

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
Junior82 wrote:

We have two genuinely classy players who have both ball skills and can read the game. The rest are journeymen or young apprentices.



You should just name them. Carlos and Paul.

If you are old and wise you were probably young and stupid

Permalink Permalink