imo, beckham won't have much effect; 12,000 people didn't turn up to adelaide, even though they had complementary tickets (might be ticketecs (sp?) fault though)
Like you though i think we are headed in the right direction, and the Phoenix phenomenon has taken many Wellingtonians by surprise.
For me , despite my mistrust of our celebrity obsessed culture, i thought from the minute it was announced that Beckham's appearance was an inspired marketing decision. I think Terry and Tony are more than sharp enough to have plans in place to build on the audience it delivered. agred that will benefit Wellington and surroundings (including Edgecumbe
) more than NZ
as a whole.As to Auckland, well it's hard to feel to generous towards the people who never turned up to the Kingz/Nightz. For those that dropped off, I can imagine it would take a hardy soul to turn up in the middle of last season. To be honest I find it hard to conjure up an image of a decent crowd ever watching an Auckland A-league game (and I am usually rabidly optimistic when it comes to football). So, despite the smaller market I can't help think Christchurch might make a better go of it.
Two A-league NZ teams? -yep that's a must for NZ football. But Auckland, whew - the scars will take a while to heal.
Anyway , thought provoking stuff - but there's a kid in our house who should be in bed - so it's back to 'reality' for me.
The Ruf, The Ruf, The Ruf is on Fire!!
) more than NZ as a
whole.Oi Oi Edgecumbe... lets have a clean sheet
actually, attempting to be sensible for a minute, a possible answer to ML's long term view, is for Terry. Tony and Ricki to get a contract from FNZ to run a Phoenix/FNZ youth academy
shame that egos and politics mean it's never likely to happen, and even if it did, that those bastard aussies won't let us into their 'A-league' youth league (i wonder if we could get fifa to kick their arse for restraint of trade - or some such)
Thats because of the A-League's one club per city policy.
a.haak

There is no question Sydney and melbourne could support second teams, but the risk of the rivalry between those sides degenerating into an ethnic brawl is a real one and something that would threaten the tremendous product the FFA has worked so hard to create. Not to say it won�t happen, but it will need to be managed incredibly carefully and cleverly.
I suspect there would be bedlam in both Melbourne and Sydney if Auckland got reinstated before Sydney or Melbourne got a second team or even before a Townsville. So, the reality is it won�t happen soon, but that does not change my view that it is critical to NZ football long term to have multiple franchises and greater geographic spread of professional football. I�m also convinced that, if done well, its perfectly viable. If the Phoenix can crack the playoffs in next couple of years and maintain profile and support, that will help massively.
http://www.yellowfever.co.nz/about.asp
3rd name down.
Hard News2007-12-03 15:38:52
Feverish is easily bullied. He�s a pushover. In fact, he cleans my boots. Plus I can�t do descriptive. Never could. Your article was quality.
We do need a good stable of contributors and it would be good to build up the content aspect of the website. PM me for further discussions re your mandateJ. Happy to expand.
http://www.yellowfever.co.nz/about.asp
3rd name down.


things change, what appears to be fantasy to some today, could well occur in 10-15 years time etc etc
tigers2007-12-05 16:43:15
things change, what appears to be fantasy to some today, could well occur in 10-15 years time etc etc
things change, what appears to be fantasy to some today, could well occur in 10-15 years time etc etc
suits me!!, i just figured that if Barber 21's profile is accurate an he is 25, then 10-15 years would be a sufficiently incomprehensible time-frame to thwart any counter argument

like a few of us optimists on the board i think football is finding it's way into the Australasian mindset
u heard IT here first.
and yes i am 25! as of a couple of weeks ago....closer to 30 than 20 now :(
(but, you didn't hear that here
)u heard IT here first.
and yes i am 25! as of a couple of weeks ago....closer to 30 than 20 now :(
Barber, I think the FFA are more strategic than that. Growth of the game in Australasia is good for them and good for football in Australia. If not, why didn�t they bin the NZ franchise when the Knights fell over.
But yeah, Akl wont be first cab off the rank, that�s for sure.
The Ruf, The Ruf, The Ruf is on Fire!!

I would prefer if Nix games were $20 flat on the gate, we'd get more people then.
Regarding the next NZ franchise, it shouldn't happen next season when 2 more teams get added (I hope).
When the league goes up to 12 teams would be the soonest time to consider a new NZ franchise.
I'm ambivalent between Christchurch and Auckland, either one would be OK.Bevan2007-12-09 22:08:21
There's a catch though - you have to watch LEAGUE

/grew up following the ARL... football is better
Hey - just reading another part of this site and there are more likely ways of getting our derby than getting another NZ A league team.
