First Team Squad
530
·
1K
·
almost 11 years

TV wrote:
Sign Thomas Broich on a 1 year deal?
 

Marquee
1.3K
·
5.3K
·
almost 17 years

Sigurðsson wrote:

TV wrote:
Sign Thomas Broich on a 1 year deal?
 

I really like Broich (have the DVD doco of him), but we have Finkler and WeeMac signed up already with Kosta and Krishna also able to play on the wings.

Marquee
1.3K
·
5.3K
·
almost 17 years

patrick478 wrote:

Nelfoos wrote:

2ndBest wrote:

Nelfoos wrote:

I have it on reasonably good authority that no offers are on the table for either Vinnie or Mossy, but they're not willing to sit on their hands and wait for new coaches to decide whether they're worth a new contract or not, so they're both looking further afield to get some certainty on their futures.

Same person also said that Moss to South Africa was 100% fabricated and there's no basis to it and that Tratt is home simply because he's "homesick" and is likely to join another A-League team ASAP.

I'm not convince this is true.

Yeah there may have been more to it that they didn't want to tell me but they certainly indicated that they didn't think he'd acted in good faith and said he hadn't enjoyed living in Wellington. There could well be more to it but the person definitely knows what they're talking about.

The reason why Tratt has left will likely rule him out of top level football for at least the next season, perhaps longer. That said, he deserves a level of privacy, so beyond saying that Tratt had no issues with the club, city, players or staff there's not much more than should be stated publically.

That's a shame, if true, that he may not be able to play top level football. I would have nothing against him if he had signed for a NSW HAL team, actually hoped he would be able to, if that allowed him to take care of whatever personal issue he has.

Marquee
1.3K
·
5.3K
·
almost 17 years

Mark Birighitti on loan from Swansea?

Starting XI
2.7K
·
2.5K
·
over 8 years

patrick478 wrote:

Nelfoos wrote:

2ndBest wrote:

Nelfoos wrote:

I have it on reasonably good authority that no offers are on the table for either Vinnie or Mossy, but they're not willing to sit on their hands and wait for new coaches to decide whether they're worth a new contract or not, so they're both looking further afield to get some certainty on their futures.

Same person also said that Moss to South Africa was 100% fabricated and there's no basis to it and that Tratt is home simply because he's "homesick" and is likely to join another A-League team ASAP.

I'm not convince this is true.

Yeah there may have been more to it that they didn't want to tell me but they certainly indicated that they didn't think he'd acted in good faith and said he hadn't enjoyed living in Wellington. There could well be more to it but the person definitely knows what they're talking about.

The reason why Tratt has left will likely rule him out of top level football for at least the next season, perhaps longer. That said, he deserves a level of privacy, so beyond saying that Tratt had no issues with the club, city, players or staff there's not much more than should be stated publically.

Fair enough, I've obviously been misinformed on that point.

Opinion Privileges revoked
4.9K
·
9.9K
·
over 14 years

patrick478 wrote:

The reason why Tratt has left will likely rule him out of top level football for at least the next season, perhaps longer.

Wow, nutmeg addiction really IS one hell of a drug.

Marquee
7.4K
·
9.5K
·
almost 14 years

Bullion wrote:

Sigurðsson wrote:

TV wrote:
Sign Thomas Broich on a 1 year deal?
 

I really like Broich (have the DVD doco of him), but we have Finkler and WeeMac signed up already with Kosta and Krishna also able to play on the wings.

I'd also expect him to chase a big pay day somewhere and probably price himself out of the A-League. Considering 25% of his wages could be outside the cap I'd think the only team that could make it work with the prices he'd want is Brisbane, even if it's as a player off the bench.

By the reports Brisbane haven't even made an offer and the fans are up in arms about it.

Marquee
4.4K
·
6.8K
·
almost 14 years

valeo wrote:

TV wrote:
Sign Thomas Broich on a 1 year deal?

No. We already have had one aging star who already had his best years at another A-League club.

fixed

And yet I would not be surprised if Ernie turns up coaching at Newcastle Jets next season.

Listen here Fudgeface
3.7K
·
15K
·
over 14 years

Ryan wrote:

I'd also expect him to chase a big pay day somewhere and probably price himself out of the A-League. Considering 25% of his wages could be outside the cap I'd think the only team that could make it work with the prices he'd want is Brisbane, even if it's as a player off the bench.

By the reports Brisbane haven't even made an offer and the fans are up in arms about it.

Nah, it's 40%. It increases by 5% every year the player stays at the club beyond the 5 year threshold. 
WeeNix
380
·
710
·
about 7 years

Personally I think the managerial appointments were poor and showed a real lack of ambition from the club. Although some of the old guard (Moss, Lia, Smeltz) will present us with some gaps, it's not necessarily a bad thing. We've become so reliant on these playesr we've neglected properly looking at alternatives. 

The next manager will be the most important signing we can make as not only will it define our shape/way forward, but it may (depending on who it is) attract players who were otherwise uninterested.

Quickly judging solely by players on the first page (who are out of contract), there are plenty of players would could look at:

GK - Micahel Theo / Reddy (aside from his recent escapade he's been decent in goal)

Defence - Dylan McGowan (if he doesn't go to Europe), Rhys Williams (Rumoured Victory), Scott Neville (Rumour Glory), Risdon (Rumoured WSW) or even Alan Baro

Mid - Mitch Nichols, David Carney, Carrusca, Ninkovic 

Attack - O'Donovan or Jamie Maclaren (both are long shots I know) or Bobo

Obviously some of them are dreams, but not all are unrealisitic. 

Legend
7.4K
·
15K
·
almost 17 years

Have a 'this' for a first post! 

WeeNix
380
·
710
·
about 7 years

martinb wrote:

Have a 'this' for a first post! 

Haha cheers bud. I ghost here relatively regularly and just decided I needed to vent for a change.

Listen here Fudgeface
3.7K
·
15K
·
over 14 years

TreeFiddy wrote:

Personally I think the managerial appointments were poor and showed a real lack of ambition from the club.

What else were the club supposed to do in December?

Even Melbourne City, with all their global reach and scouting networks (and money!), appointed their assistant manager when their manager quit.

Marquee
7.4K
·
9.5K
·
almost 14 years

Theo is past it, not even the best keeper at the Roar and that's saying something considering what their reserve keeper has been like. 

O'donovan was also confirmed at Jets I thought? I'd take Mclaren in a heart beat, he'd be out of our price range I expect.

RR
·
Bossi Insider
10K
·
34K
·
almost 16 years

Ryan wrote:
O'donovan was also confirmed at Jets I thought? I'd take Mclaren in a heart beat, he'd be out of our price range I expect.

Confirmed today. I've updated the off contract players post to remove Izzo and O'Donovan as they have had moves confirmed
WeeNix
380
·
710
·
about 7 years

patrick478 wrote:

TreeFiddy wrote:

Personally I think the managerial appointments were poor and showed a real lack of ambition from the club.

What else were the club supposed to do in December?

Even Melbourne City, with all their global reach and scouting networks (and money!), appointed their assistant manager when their manager quit.

Appreciate the complexity of the situation, I just don't think it was handled as well as it should have. Appreciate as a short term fix they were put in place, but I think/wish that the club should've/would've identified potential targets to replace Ernie. A bit like how Southampton have their "Blackbox" - without (obviously) anywhere near the of the resources.

WeeNix
200
·
950
·
over 14 years

TreeFiddy wrote:

patrick478 wrote:

TreeFiddy wrote:

Personally I think the managerial appointments were poor and showed a real lack of ambition from the club.

What else were the club supposed to do in December?

Even Melbourne City, with all their global reach and scouting networks (and money!), appointed their assistant manager when their manager quit.

Appreciate the complexity of the situation, I just don't think it was handled as well as it should have. Appreciate as a short term fix they were put in place, but I think/wish that the club should've/would've identified potential targets to replace Ernie. A bit like how Southampton have their "Blackbox" - without (obviously) anywhere near the of the resources.

How do you know they haven't? Dome's talk about a quick appointment suggests they know wasssup.

WeeNix
380
·
710
·
about 7 years

Ryan wrote:

Theo is past it, not even the best keeper at the Roar and that's saying something considering what their reserve keeper has been like. 

Theo's ok (still better than Italiano/Sails imo), but yeah, on his way out. Was purely using him as an example based on the out of contract players on the first page. 

WeeNix
380
·
710
·
about 7 years

inafoxhole wrote:

TreeFiddy wrote:

patrick478 wrote:

TreeFiddy wrote:

Personally I think the managerial appointments were poor and showed a real lack of ambition from the club.

What else were the club supposed to do in December?

Even Melbourne City, with all their global reach and scouting networks (and money!), appointed their assistant manager when their manager quit.

Appreciate the complexity of the situation, I just don't think it was handled as well as it should have. Appreciate as a short term fix they were put in place, but I think/wish that the club should've/would've identified potential targets to replace Ernie. A bit like how Southampton have their "Blackbox" - without (obviously) anywhere near the of the resources.

How do you know they haven't? Dome's talk about a quick appointment suggests they know wasssup.

How do I know they haven't? Umm because they put Greenacre and Des in charge instead?

Marquee
2.1K
·
6.4K
·
over 14 years

patrick478 wrote:

TreeFiddy wrote:

Personally I think the managerial appointments were poor and showed a real lack of ambition from the club.

What else were the club supposed to do in December?

Even Melbourne City, with all their global reach and scouting networks (and money!), appointed their assistant manager when their manager quit.

and they werent propping up the league with only three years of a license left so perhaps they do not see the urgency that we should
Marquee
5.3K
·
9.5K
·
over 12 years

And their coach quit for personal reasons when the team was doing reasonably well, so you can see why they might want continuity. We were in a big slump so the argument for fresh ideas from outside the club was much stronger

LG
Legend
5.8K
·
24K
·
almost 17 years

TreeFiddy wrote:

inafoxhole wrote:

TreeFiddy wrote:

patrick478 wrote:

TreeFiddy wrote:

Personally I think the managerial appointments were poor and showed a real lack of ambition from the club.

What else were the club supposed to do in December?

Even Melbourne City, with all their global reach and scouting networks (and money!), appointed their assistant manager when their manager quit.

Appreciate the complexity of the situation, I just don't think it was handled as well as it should have. Appreciate as a short term fix they were put in place, but I think/wish that the club should've/would've identified potential targets to replace Ernie. A bit like how Southampton have their "Blackbox" - without (obviously) anywhere near the of the resources.

How do you know they haven't? Dome's talk about a quick appointment suggests they know wasssup.

How do I know they haven't? Umm because they put Greenacre and Des in charge instead?

We should sign old Ned, Mackie and sylla from QPR. They would be good at this level.

WeeNix
200
·
950
·
over 14 years

TreeFiddy wrote:

inafoxhole wrote:

TreeFiddy wrote:

patrick478 wrote:

TreeFiddy wrote:

Personally I think the managerial appointments were poor and showed a real lack of ambition from the club.

What else were the club supposed to do in December?

Even Melbourne City, with all their global reach and scouting networks (and money!), appointed their assistant manager when their manager quit.

Appreciate the complexity of the situation, I just don't think it was handled as well as it should have. Appreciate as a short term fix they were put in place, but I think/wish that the club should've/would've identified potential targets to replace Ernie. A bit like how Southampton have their "Blackbox" - without (obviously) anywhere near the of the resources.

How do you know they haven't? Dome's talk about a quick appointment suggests they know wasssup.

How do I know they haven't? Umm because they put Greenacre and Des in charge instead?

But they were never going to make a long-term appointment in December??? Or do you mean they should have been keeping tabs on people so they could move instantly once Ernie left? In which case, still limited options? Putting a temp duo in until season's end by far the best move, and wasn't a long way away from working.

Appiah without the pace
6.7K
·
19K
·
almost 17 years

Also it's very unlikely that any other coach would suddenly get us into the top 2/3

HZA
Marquee
630
·
5.9K
·
almost 15 years

This,unfortunately

Marquee
2.1K
·
6.4K
·
over 14 years

2ndBest wrote:

Also it's very unlikely that any other coach would suddenly get us into the top 2/3

probably correct but we would not have wasted 6 months either and be dithering about signing players right now
Appiah without the pace
6.7K
·
19K
·
almost 17 years

Possibly. But again, it comes down to whether there was anyone of the right calibre at that time. Guess the trade off for delaying signings is the potential for more candidates to pop up. Either way it is a gamble. But I'd rather make sure they get the best candidate possible/available. Because there is also the potential for a December choosen coach to stink up the joint and set us back another 6 or 12 months.

Marquee
7.4K
·
9.5K
·
almost 14 years

I also think Des and Chris did a good job and wouldn't be as disappointed if one or both got the job as I would have been a few months ago.

They got a bit of a new coach bounce at the start but said that they wouldn't make too many changes to the team while they were caretakers, once they were confirmed there was a bit of a slump but towards the end of the season the team was doing pretty well. 

It's a reasonable assumption that the slump that we did have was the players adjusting to the tweaked game plan and new ideas. 

Roar had a great home record this year, yet we beat them. We also bet Victory 7-6 across the season despite having two games away to them. If we did make the finals with the form that we were in I wouldn't have been surprised if we went quite far.

WeeNix
380
·
710
·
about 7 years

Lonegunmen wrote:

TreeFiddy wrote:

inafoxhole wrote:

TreeFiddy wrote:

patrick478 wrote:

TreeFiddy wrote:

Personally I think the managerial appointments were poor and showed a real lack of ambition from the club.

What else were the club supposed to do in December?

Even Melbourne City, with all their global reach and scouting networks (and money!), appointed their assistant manager when their manager quit.

Appreciate the complexity of the situation, I just don't think it was handled as well as it should have. Appreciate as a short term fix they were put in place, but I think/wish that the club should've/would've identified potential targets to replace Ernie. A bit like how Southampton have their "Blackbox" - without (obviously) anywhere near the of the resources.

How do you know they haven't? Dome's talk about a quick appointment suggests they know wasssup.

How do I know they haven't? Umm because they put Greenacre and Des in charge instead?

We should sign old Ned, Mackie and sylla from APR. They would be good at this level.

THERE'S ONLY ONNNNNNNNEEEE JAMMMIEE MACKIE!

WeeNix
380
·
710
·
about 7 years

inafoxhole wrote:

TreeFiddy wrote:

inafoxhole wrote:

TreeFiddy wrote:

patrick478 wrote:

TreeFiddy wrote:

Personally I think the managerial appointments were poor and showed a real lack of ambition from the club.

What else were the club supposed to do in December?

Even Melbourne City, with all their global reach and scouting networks (and money!), appointed their assistant manager when their manager quit.

Appreciate the complexity of the situation, I just don't think it was handled as well as it should have. Appreciate as a short term fix they were put in place, but I think/wish that the club should've/would've identified potential targets to replace Ernie. A bit like how Southampton have their "Blackbox" - without (obviously) anywhere near the of the resources.

How do you know they haven't? Dome's talk about a quick appointment suggests they know wasssup.

How do I know they haven't? Umm because they put Greenacre and Des in charge instead?

But they were never going to make a long-term appointment in December??? Or do you mean they should have been keeping tabs on people so they could move instantly once Ernie left? In which case, still limited options? Putting a temp duo in until season's end by far the best move, and wasn't a long way away from working.

The latter. Southampton's model is that they have a list of potential candidates scouted and prepared in advance. I know we're not even remotely on a similar playing field in terms of investment, but when Ernie left, it came across as a short-term only fix putting Greenacre & Des in charge until the club could find someone more long-term. More along the lines that if it worked out great, but if it didn't no biggie.

I know they inherited a tricky job, but I would've preferred to see us get the next potential manager in as early as possible, so they could access the squad thoroughly for the remainder of the season, then at the end of the season they would know where we needed to invest/move on - as opposed to now where it feels like we're frantically trying to decide on a manager; as the quick fix didn't go as well as hoped. 

We should've already had a successor lined up  and in place so that when the season came to a close, we could focus solely on new transfer targets... instead of trying to do everything all at once. 

Appiah without the pace
6.7K
·
19K
·
almost 17 years

Can we keep manager stuff in the approprate thread please.

Appiah without the pace
6.7K
·
19K
·
almost 17 years

I was saying the other day that it's a shame Leo Villa from Teedubs isn't 5 years younger. Reckon he might have been able to do a Riera. 

Marquee
1.1K
·
7.6K
·
almost 13 years

2ndBest wrote:

I was saying the other day that it's a shame Leo Villa from Teedubs isn't 5 years younger. Reckon he might have been able to do a Riera. 

 Or Joel Stevens did not fill out - gain height a little during his time with Nix.
WeeNix
200
·
950
·
over 14 years

TreeFiddy wrote:

inafoxhole wrote:

TreeFiddy wrote:

inafoxhole wrote:

TreeFiddy wrote:

patrick478 wrote:

TreeFiddy wrote:

Personally I think the managerial appointments were poor and showed a real lack of ambition from the club.

What else were the club supposed to do in December?

Even Melbourne City, with all their global reach and scouting networks (and money!), appointed their assistant manager when their manager quit.

Appreciate the complexity of the situation, I just don't think it was handled as well as it should have. Appreciate as a short term fix they were put in place, but I think/wish that the club should've/would've identified potential targets to replace Ernie. A bit like how Southampton have their "Blackbox" - without (obviously) anywhere near the of the resources.

How do you know they haven't? Dome's talk about a quick appointment suggests they know wasssup.

How do I know they haven't? Umm because they put Greenacre and Des in charge instead?

But they were never going to make a long-term appointment in December??? Or do you mean they should have been keeping tabs on people so they could move instantly once Ernie left? In which case, still limited options? Putting a temp duo in until season's end by far the best move, and wasn't a long way away from working.

The latter. Southampton's model is that they have a list of potential candidates scouted and prepared in advance. I know we're not even remotely on a similar playing field in terms of investment, but when Ernie left, it came across as a short-term only fix putting Greenacre & Des in charge until the club could find someone more long-term. More along the lines that if it worked out great, but if it didn't no biggie.

I know they inherited a tricky job, but I would've preferred to see us get the next potential manager in as early as possible, so they could access the squad thoroughly for the remainder of the season, then at the end of the season they would know where we needed to invest/move on - as opposed to now where it feels like we're frantically trying to decide on a manager; as the quick fix didn't go as well as hoped. 

We should've already had a successor lined up  and in place so that when the season came to a close, we could focus solely on new transfer targets... instead of trying to do everything all at once. 

Southampton also has the advantage of having Europe next door, where only a handful of jobs can be realstically considered 'bigger' than their one.

Trialist
18
·
110
·
over 7 years

patrick478 wrote:

Nelfoos wrote:

2ndBest wrote:

Nelfoos wrote:

I have it on reasonably good authority that no offers are on the table for either Vinnie or Mossy, but they're not willing to sit on their hands and wait for new coaches to decide whether they're worth a new contract or not, so they're both looking further afield to get some certainty on their futures.

Same person also said that Moss to South Africa was 100% fabricated and there's no basis to it and that Tratt is home simply because he's "homesick" and is likely to join another A-League team ASAP.

[/quote]

I'm not convince this is true.

Yeah there may have been more to it that they didn't want to tell me but they certainly indicated that they didn't think he'd acted in good faith and said he hadn't enjoyed living in Wellington. There could well be more to it but the person definitely knows what they're talking about.

The reason why Tratt has left will likely rule him out of top level football for at least the next season, perhaps longer. That said, he deserves a level of privacy, so beyond saying that Tratt had no issues with the club, city, players or staff there's not much more than should be stated publically.

do you actually know this reason patrick
Legend
7.4K
·
15K
·
almost 17 years

token wrote:

patrick478 wrote:

Nelfoos wrote:

2ndBest wrote:

Nelfoos wrote:

I have it on reasonably good authority that no offers are on the table for either Vinnie or Mossy, but they're not willing to sit on their hands and wait for new coaches to decide whether they're worth a new contract or not, so they're both looking further afield to get some certainty on their futures.

Same person also said that Moss to South Africa was 100% fabricated and there's no basis to it and that Tratt is home simply because he's "homesick" and is likely to join another A-League team ASAP.

[/quote]

I'm not convince this is true.

Yeah there may have been more to it that they didn't want to tell me but they certainly indicated that they didn't think he'd acted in good faith and said he hadn't enjoyed living in Wellington. There could well be more to it but the person definitely knows what they're talking about.

The reason why Tratt has left will likely rule him out of top level football for at least the next season, perhaps longer. That said, he deserves a level of privacy, so beyond saying that Tratt had no issues with the club, city, players or staff there's not much more than should be stated publically.

do you actually know this reason patrick

Obvious from his comments he knows or at least has a very different, but equally reputable source to Nelfoos.

LG
Legend
5.8K
·
24K
·
almost 17 years

Someone email or facebook Tratt and ask. Might try it myself.

Listen here Fudgeface
3.7K
·
15K
·
over 14 years

token wrote:

patrick478 wrote:

Nelfoos wrote:

2ndBest wrote:

Nelfoos wrote:

I have it on reasonably good authority that no offers are on the table for either Vinnie or Mossy, but they're not willing to sit on their hands and wait for new coaches to decide whether they're worth a new contract or not, so they're both looking further afield to get some certainty on their futures.

Same person also said that Moss to South Africa was 100% fabricated and there's no basis to it and that Tratt is home simply because he's "homesick" and is likely to join another A-League team ASAP.

[/quote]

I'm not convince this is true.

Yeah there may have been more to it that they didn't want to tell me but they certainly indicated that they didn't think he'd acted in good faith and said he hadn't enjoyed living in Wellington. There could well be more to it but the person definitely knows what they're talking about.

The reason why Tratt has left will likely rule him out of top level football for at least the next season, perhaps longer. That said, he deserves a level of privacy, so beyond saying that Tratt had no issues with the club, city, players or staff there's not much more than should be stated publically.

do you actually know this reason patrick

yes. But out of privacy and respect, I won't be sharing.

There's absolutely nothing fishy going on though, I can assure you.

Headocunt
460
·
990
·
almost 10 years

patrick478 wrote:

token wrote:

patrick478 wrote:

Nelfoos wrote:

2ndBest wrote:

Nelfoos wrote:

I have it on reasonably good authority that no offers are on the table for either Vinnie or Mossy, but they're not willing to sit on their hands and wait for new coaches to decide whether they're worth a new contract or not, so they're both looking further afield to get some certainty on their futures.

Same person also said that Moss to South Africa was 100% fabricated and there's no basis to it and that Tratt is home simply because he's "homesick" and is likely to join another A-League team ASAP.

[/quote]

I'm not convince this is true.

Yeah there may have been more to it that they didn't want to tell me but they certainly indicated that they didn't think he'd acted in good faith and said he hadn't enjoyed living in Wellington. There could well be more to it but the person definitely knows what they're talking about.

The reason why Tratt has left will likely rule him out of top level football for at least the next season, perhaps longer. That said, he deserves a level of privacy, so beyond saying that Tratt had no issues with the club, city, players or staff there's not much more than should be stated publically.

do you actually know this reason patrick

yes. But out of privacy and respect, I won't be sharing.

There's absolutely nothing fishy going on though, I can assure you.


I guess the main question is. Is he ok or going to be ok?
Opinion Privileges revoked
4.9K
·
9.9K
·
over 14 years

I'm reminded of Mirjan Pavlovic and his "illness that prevents him playing pro football". Pretty clear what that meant in retrospect, but hopefully not a similar problem with Tratt. Best of luck to him.

You’ll need an account to join the conversation!

Sign in Sign up