The Ruf, The Ruf, The Ruf is on Fire!!
As I understand it, Key economics for Sky are driven by News Ltd ownership. As they have invested in Rugby for hundreds of millions$$$, particularly with Rugby World Cup here in 2011,they would want maximum return on that investment.
Anything above the bare minimum Football coverage would steal more of Rugby's thunder as it builds to that.
Mind you,The All Whites qualifying for next year's Football World Cup could really put a spanner in the works!!
Improving,,on the up, a work in progress from Italiano and the Nix. Bring on the bathroom bling in '24! COYN!
Even UMR's poll clearly shows rugby remains the sport that holds most people's interest.
Of six sports tested, rugby comfortably held top spot at 60 percent followed by netball (49 percent), cricket (48), rugby league (43), rowing (41) and football (37).
12ubb3rduck3y2009-08-06 16:17:38Fixed

I for one hope the All Whites do make the World Cup, first time in too many years, but it would throw the expectations of sports fans in NZ around a bit (like the Kiwis winning the RL WC) :)
and nice work, Ard Righ!
RedGed2009-08-06 16:32:34
Improving,,on the up, a work in progress from Italiano and the Nix. Bring on the bathroom bling in '24! COYN!
ive got a song that wont take long, Adelaide are rubbish.. the second verse is same as the first.. ADELAIDE ARE RUBBISH
From what I recall, the AW's games in Fiji were on free to air (tv1) delayed but were on
Royal2009-08-06 18:09:41
What came through was amazing lengths that Sky went to defend rugby viewership, including "looking at live viewing figures is somewhat antiquated" and that number watching live is effectively reduced because of (I kid you not) "four full replays of key games ...".
What a contrast to the stance they have taken for football!
And yes, it is true that rugby has more interest (= very + fairly interested) than Football. But it is 62% more interest, ie, less than double and well shy of the multiples of interest that is implied in various releases/letters from Sky.
And just imagine how much closer that gap could be should football get better coverage! But I suspect strongly that that is something that its NewsCorp owners are not overly concerned about.
I know, I know, its serious!
So the challenge for Football to the likes of Sky is to say (metamphorically) "f*ck em" and get it up in the sportsviewers' radars.
Two things will do that:
1. Phoenix doing well in the A-League this season (after everyone over the ditch has written us off).
"Phoenix till they lose"
Posting 97% bollox, 8% lies and 3.658% genuine opinion.
Genuine opinion: FTFFA
But not without a fight!
Everyone, get ready to tune in!
I know, I know, its serious!
Allegedly
I let my guitar speak for me
Try NZfootball.co.nz

NQF v Bling 7:30 sat Live
Jets v Nix 5:00 Sun Live
Roar v GCU 3:00 Tues delayed
AU v Glory 9:00 Tues delay
Anyone know of any changes to that?
From the guide for the first round of matches is says "The match of the first round is probably Brisbane Roar and new neighbour Gold Coast United, on Suncorp."
That must be why they are not covering it ... until Tuesday.
It beggars belief!!!Turfmoore2009-08-07 17:36:52
I know, I know, its serious!
Being bumped for Live NRL I could completely understand but for a sport virtually no-one cares about in NZ?
The Ruf, The Ruf, The Ruf is on Fire!!
You have to remember that sky isnt just for football.
The AFL game is a pretty big match up too.
You have to remember that sky isnt just for football.
The AFL game is a pretty big match up too.
People only care about AFL here in Melbourne and a bit in the West + South and a little bit in Sydney. I don't think I even met anyone who knew what AFL really was in Welly/NZ :/
a.haak

