Wellington Phoenix Men

Terry S - why does he do it?

74 replies · 5,089 views
about 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Doloras wrote:
To be completely cynical: Terry pays $1 million a year for extremely good PR and the adoration of the likes of us. I'd call that a sound business proposition.
I doubt he'd of gotten on the apprentice if he didnt own the nix for example. But yes that is very cynical. Its still money he is chucking away to this club,so good on him. I wouldnt pay $1milliona year for the adoration of you guys  no offence.

Allegedly

Permalink Permalink
about 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago


Terry's Arse



Or Old Gregg's mangina?

Ramming liberal dribble down your throat since 2009
This forum needs less angst and more Kate Bush threads



Permalink Permalink
about 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
"There's no use earning a whole lot of money and not doing anything with it."

^^^I like this. He's really got himself a priceless experience in owning a football side in NZ. It's even better when you're team's winning.
Permalink Permalink
about 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
S.O.N wrote:
Maybe a cool idea for a fever shirt would be like mt rushmore, but with TP, TS and RH on it, dunno who the fourth would be though...


Yes, and add George onto that (as 2b suggested) and I'd pay whopping amounts of money for it!

I love Terry, despite being wealthy he comes across as a good, down to earth bloke.
loyalgunner2010-02-19 13:06:32
Permalink Permalink
about 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
+ Durante for Rushmore. Captain fantastic + signed for the next eternity.
Permalink Permalink
about 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
but the real question is...why does Tony S do it?

Allegedly

Permalink Permalink
about 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Good PR + tax breaks + genuinely loves football... I'm sure it's a combination of the three. Oh, plus: "some other tycoons might be richer than me, but has anyone else in this country got their own football team? I THINK NOT!"Doloras2010-02-19 13:43:28

Ramming liberal dribble down your throat since 2009
This forum needs less angst and more Kate Bush threads



Permalink Permalink
about 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
SiNZ wrote:

Terry's Arse

 
Que?
 
Sun shines out of .....

Apparently I'm apathetic, but I couldn't care less.

"Being a Partick Thistle fan sets you apart. It means youre a free thinker. It also means your team has no money." Tim Luckhurst, The Independent, 4th December 2003

Permalink Permalink
about 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Tegal wrote:
but the real question is...why does Tony S do it?


??? Terry S or Tony P?

Ramming liberal dribble down your throat since 2009
This forum needs less angst and more Kate Bush threads



Permalink Permalink
about 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Doloras wrote:
Good PR + tax breaks + genuinely loves football... I'm sure it's a combination of the three. Oh, plus: "some other tycoons might be richer than me, but has anyone else in this country got their own football team? I THINK NOT!"


I don't fully understand this tax break thing.  Could somebody in the know give us a vague description?  And potentially how much of that million he loses does he save from the tax breaks?
Permalink Permalink
about 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago

LAQC - Loss attributing qualifying company.

If Terry spends a dollar on the Nix he gets 39 or 30 cents back in tax benefits. Able to offset the Nix loss against taxable income.

Hope that helps, been a while since I did tax planning.

Permalink Permalink
about 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Jag wrote:
SiNZ wrote:

Terry's Arse

 
Que?
 
Sun shines out of .....
 
Ah, that's sunlight.... <penny drops> ...I thought it was... actually, never mind.
Permalink Permalink
about 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago

Terry's commitment is one reason I've bought two season tickets every year so far, I love football, and the All Whites  plus the Nix having got this far has made it all very worth while. I dreamed of the day when we would have a club side worth watching.....the only downside for me is that I wish I were in the position to have done the same as Terry, but I'm not, so ipso fatso I will take what's on offer like a man dying of thirst not questioning the motives of someone ofering a drink.

Permalink Permalink
about 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Tegal wrote:
but the real question is...why does Tony S do it?
 
 I don't know if Timmy is reading this thread, but anyone not up to play with the relevant thread is going to be confused!
Permalink Permalink
about 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Zedned wrote:

Terry's commitment is one reason I've bought two season tickets every year so far, I love football, and the All Whites  plus the Nix having got this far has made it all very worth while. I dreamed of the day when we would have a club side worth watching.....the only downside for me is that I wish I were in the position to have done the same as Terry, but I'm not, so ipso fatso I will take what's on offer like a man dying of thirst not questioning the motives of someone ofering a drink.

Ipso fatso Is that a Freudian slip?
Permalink Permalink
about 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Dino10 wrote:

LAQC - Loss attributing qualifying company.

If Terry spends a dollar on the Nix he gets 39 or 30 cents back in tax benefits. Able to offset the Nix loss against taxable income.

Hope that helps, been a while since I did tax planning.



So while he loses a million he makes $390 000 (or $300 000 depending on which one) so his loss is effectively thirded.

Or do you think the tax break he gets brings the total Phoenix loss down to a million?

loyalgunner2010-02-19 14:03:29
Permalink Permalink
about 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
loyalgunner wrote:
Dino10 wrote:

LAQC - Loss attributing qualifying company.

If Terry spends a dollar on the Nix he gets 39 or 30 cents back in tax benefits. Able to offset the Nix loss against taxable income.

Hope that helps, been a while since I did tax planning.



So while he loses a million he makes $390 000 (or $300 000 depending on which one) so his loss is effectively thirded.

Or do you think the tax break he gets brings the total Phoenix loss down to a million?


I dont think you can have a LAQC for a football club. We've been over it a $million times, it is not much of a break at all, it is real money that Terry puts in, and I love that he does that.

Get a bit pissed off with people trying to minimise this and downplay his generous nature
hepatitis2010-02-19 14:06:42
Permalink Permalink
about 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
SiNZ wrote:
Tegal wrote:
but the real question is...why does Tony S do it?
 
 I don't know if Timmy is reading this thread, but anyone not up to play with the relevant thread is going to be confused!

I thought of Timmy immediately when I read that

 

Apparently I'm apathetic, but I couldn't care less.

"Being a Partick Thistle fan sets you apart. It means youre a free thinker. It also means your team has no money." Tim Luckhurst, The Independent, 4th December 2003

Permalink Permalink
about 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
hepatitis wrote:
loyalgunner wrote:
Dino10 wrote:

LAQC - Loss attributing qualifying company.

If Terry spends a dollar on the Nix he gets 39 or 30 cents back in tax benefits. Able to offset the Nix loss against taxable income.

Hope that helps, been a while since I did tax planning.



So while he loses a million he makes $390 000 (or $300 000 depending on which one) so his loss is effectively thirded.

Or do you think the tax break he gets brings the total Phoenix loss down to a million?


I dont think you can have a LAQC for a football club. We've been over it a $million times, it is not much of a break at all, it is real money that Terry puts in, and I love that he does that.

Get a bit pissed off with people trying to minimise this and downplay his generous nature
 
Don't be so sensitive. It's not really minimising to suggest he can claim back a third any more than it is berating someone who makes a charitable donation and claims the tax back as being ungenerous.
 
For LAQC, it doesn't have to be a defined LAQC as I understand it. Losses can be offset between group companies, whereas a LAQC has a specific meaning and status. However, I qualified in the UK and I'm also rusty, so the specific nuances of NZ tax law are lacking - so I stand to be corrected.
Permalink Permalink
about 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago

Hepatitis, A slight over reaction.

Just answering a question not giving an opinion.
Permalink Permalink
about 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Reason number #724: He gets a free Hurricanes jersey.
E + R + O

Permalink Permalink
about 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
 
^^^^
 
 
 
 
 ...
 
 
 
cronus2010-02-19 15:08:05
Permalink Permalink
about 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
I do side a bit with hepatitis. There may be some tax benefits and other benefits, but this is a SIGNIFICANT philanthropic gesture and extremely generous to our sport.

"Phoenix till they lose"

Posting 97% bollox, 8% lies and 3.658% genuine opinion. 

Genuine opinion: FTFFA

Permalink Permalink
about 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Rich people don't pay tax, Fact!
Permalink Permalink
about 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Junior82 wrote:
I do side a bit with hepatitis. There may be some tax benefits and other benefits, but this is a SIGNIFICANT philanthropic gesture and extremely generous to our sport.

 
Totally agree with that. What I disagreed with was that suggesting some of the loss can be regained through tax offsets is to diminish the signficant. Whether the net outlay is $700k pa or $1m pa, it's a significant and generous thing either way.
 
(Disclaimer: Doesn't mean home games should go away though.)
Permalink Permalink
about 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
SiNZ wrote:
Zedned wrote:

Terry's commitment is one reason I've bought two season tickets every year so far, I love football, and the All Whites  plus the Nix having got this far has made it all very worth while. I dreamed of the day when we would have a club side worth watching.....the only downside for me is that I wish I were in the position to have done the same as Terry, but I'm not, so ipso fatso I will take what's on offer like a man dying of thirst not questioning the motives of someone ofering a drink.

Ipso fatso Is that a Freudian slip?
Worked with a guy some time ago who would use that phrase, brought a smile to my face when he did it, for public enjoyment now,glad you noticed Michael. NB Have been thinking of getting in contact with you re football spreadsheets....my hobby is football stats and probabilities...weird I know...how best to go from here?
Permalink Permalink
about 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Absolute f*cking legend.
 
Permalink Permalink
about 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
For the poontang
I like tautologies because I like them.
Permalink Permalink
about 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Looking at the big picture ... The LAQC regime was introduced not as a haven for property investors but as an entity that encourages entrepreneurs to develop new businesses which they (the entrepreneurs) hope will generate future profits. It still requires significant capital inputs and effort, and the risk of the venture still lies with the business owners. The idea is that IRD (and New Zealand) will benefit from the later profits.

A football club is an extremely difficult business to derive a profit from, but that doesn't make not a true business. Even if Terry is using an LAQC (or group offset) structure you can't argue that the Phoenix doesn't fit into the above category, therefore good on him for taking the opportunity and let's support the club as long as our boys can continue to take the field.
Permalink Permalink
about 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
SiNZ wrote:
Junior82 wrote:
I do side a bit with hepatitis. There may be some tax benefits and other benefits, but this is a SIGNIFICANT philanthropic gesture and extremely generous to our sport.

 
Totally agree with that. What I disagreed with was that suggesting some of the loss can be regained through tax offsets is to diminish the signficant. Whether the net outlay is $700k pa or $1m pa, it's a significant and generous thing either way.
 
(Disclaimer: Doesn't mean home games should go away though.)


Wasn't trying to play down his contribution by any means.  I was just hoping what he lost wasn't as much as I'd originally thought.  Being a real trooper and all the less he loses the better.
Permalink Permalink
about 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
SiNZ wrote:
Junior82 wrote:
I do side a bit with hepatitis. There may be some tax benefits and other benefits, but this is a SIGNIFICANT philanthropic gesture and extremely generous to our sport.

 
Totally agree with that. What I disagreed with was that suggesting some of the loss can be regained through tax offsets is to diminish the signficant. Whether the net outlay is $700k pa or $1m pa, it's a significant and generous thing either way.
 
(Disclaimer: Doesn't mean home games should go away though.)


I have seen in some threads that people believe that what he loses is totally written off, and so therefore it is not a loss to him. That is incorrect, and needs to be pointed out.

To imply that he does this because he can write some (30%) of the loss off, I believe it takes away from the whole, namely that he loves football, wants to see it played here at the highest level, loves the experience so much that he is putting his hand up for another 10 years.

Arise Sir Terry, I reckon
Permalink Permalink
about 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
At the BBQ today I went and got the remaining sigs for my kids (since they were at school and if i pulled them out they wouldn't get any homework anyway so it's best they stay in class!).

Got to shake hands with Terry, Tony, Ricki, Paul, Eugene.

My god, I felt all breathless and giggly and I was older than the players and there abouts for the Management.

"Phoenix till they lose"

Posting 97% bollox, 8% lies and 3.658% genuine opinion. 

Genuine opinion: FTFFA

Permalink Permalink
about 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Money , Glory ,all  the best reasons !
Permalink Permalink
about 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
either way its about time we gave a chant to him, ie. we love you terry we do etc
Permalink Permalink