One in a million
4.1K
·
9.5K
·
about 17 years
One in a million
4.1K
·
9.5K
·
about 17 years
Who gets your votes after the Portugal game?
Jenkins, Draper, Spoonley were my picks
Starting XI
0
·
2.4K
·
about 17 years
Spoonley won't come.

Phil Edgington would take 1 spot for me.
Starting XI
2.1K
·
4.8K
·
almost 17 years
Dean Keat... looks like Brockie may well be struggling to get one me thinks, especially after botching up a sitter! disco_mart2007-07-03 11:54:47
First Team Squad
270
·
1.9K
·
about 17 years
I'd say Dan Keat, but I doubt he'd come, as far as I know he's got stuff to finish in the US and from there he'd be quite hopeful of picking up an MLS contract. It's the place to be right now, with the Beckham Family Circus about to hit town. Otherwise Boxall or Draper, although I'd need to see more of Draper to be sure. And Jack Pelter is stilll available, is he not? Brockie? No thanks.
Starting XI
10
·
2.1K
·
about 17 years
I'd take Keat too, but as TheJam notes, it's not likely he'll sign. He was a real terrier in the game. Constantly making key tackles just atop the box. Invovled in every (even though there were few) forward movements. The word "tenatious" comes to mind.
Phoenix Academy
320
·
500
·
about 17 years
For me, I will wait after the world cup but PLEASE NO BROCKIE
Legend
2.1K
·
16K
·
about 17 years
I'd sign one of the Portugese. Surely one of them has a NZ born grandmother
Starting XI
10
·
2.1K
·
about 17 years
Feverish wrote:
I'd sign one of the Portugese. Surely one of them has a NZ born grandmother
 
That Pele kid grew up in Onehunga I think. . . .
Marquee
2.1K
·
8.2K
·
about 17 years
Do we just sign the two best under 20's regardless of position or are we going to be looking for them to fill up places in the squad that we need cover?  Because I don't think we need three keepers, if we get an injury we'd just bring someone in on a short term deal.james dean2007-07-03 14:04:32
Marquee
300
·
5K
·
about 17 years
Exactly james, no need for three keepers. Nembo seems to have the inside word on Spoonley.
Starting XI
10
·
2.1K
·
about 17 years
james dean wrote:
Do we just sign the two best under 20's regardless of position or are we going to be looking for them to fill up places in the squad that we need cover?  Because I don't think we need three keepers, if we get an injury we'd just bring someone in on a short term deal.
 
Good question. If we had a RM position in need of filling, but the only U20 player available for that postition was rubbsih should we still sign him? I think not. Tehre obviously has to be a balance, and this is where the Manager has to back his decision. Personally I'd still go after the strongest candidate irrespective of position (except for GK), due in part to the competition for places it would build. A classy youbng full back can still be developed into a resonalbe left, right or central defender, likewise with mid-field players. However, a rubbish RM would likely still be pretty garbage in any other position . ..
 
Of course this argument represents the extreeme, and the scenario is not likely in real life, but the implications apply, at least I think they do.
Marquee
2.1K
·
8.2K
·
about 17 years
Yeah thats my view, the fact is that not all of the guys in the squad are up to professional football.  The other thing is to look at the areas that we are weak at senior level and try and develop someone to slot in there.  Personally I'd like to grab one of the CM's and despite his misses, Brockie, purely because I think he ha the physical attributes, he's scored goals at A-League level before and NZ always needs strikers.
One in a million
4.1K
·
9.5K
·
about 17 years
They can't be too far off measuring up, remember that team beat the Phoenix squad 5 - 1 and 2 - 1.
Starting XI
1.8K
·
4.1K
·
about 17 years
we also currently have an adundance of centre forwards and attacking players.  i'd bet on 2 defenders being signed; possibly one defender and one midfielder.
Starting XI
0
·
2.4K
·
about 17 years
sanday wrote:
Exactly james, no need for three keepers. Nembo seems to have the inside word on Spoonley.
Yep as of right now if Spoonley was offered a contract he'd turn it down flat. But then again a contract hasn't been thrown his way but if it is, Hes pretty much guranteed to turn it down. He wouldnt be getting any game-time anyway so...

There was that lad from the aussie league we called in short-term last year, no need to waste another spot on a keeper.

I havn't spoke to Phil Edgington recently, but last I heard he hadn't even talked to Ricki and the last thing Ricki said about the Phoenix to the U20 lads was that he'll wait 'til they get back from Canada.
Marquee
2.1K
·
8.2K
·
about 17 years
They can't be too far off measuring up, remember that team beat the Phoenix squad 5 - 1 and 2 - 1.
 
I guess I'm meaning we need to grab the best players in the squad if we can which kind of goes without saying
james dean2007-07-03 18:52:36
First Team Squad
0
·
1.8K
·
about 17 years

Boxall looked good, and evil at the same time... the boys huge so physically could match it, and he read the game quite well.

 
Was disapointed with keat, gave the ball away alot, as did most of the boys, panicked when simple options avaliable.
 
 
Spoonley could get picked up by an overseas club... arguebly he is our best player.
WeeNix
51
·
930
·
about 17 years

Take into account both Moss and Paston will be away on international duty so we need a third keeper or are you planning on geting some half wit part timer to leak goals??

Attempt to sign Spoonley and kill two birds with 1 stone and if he rejects then grab another promising keeper maybe Phil Imray.
WeeNix
21
·
860
·
almost 17 years

Did Spoonley really play that well? Did he make some great saves that i missed. Not including the ones that were hit within a foot of him.

I couldn't see much of the game. But of what i saw it was either hit or miss for the strikes and he didnt really have that much influence on the game.
Legend
2.4K
·
17K
·
about 17 years
Draper
 
Looked the goods when he was on.
Phoenix Academy
0
·
290
·
about 17 years
First Team Squad
270
·
1.9K
·
about 17 years
I can't believe those who are criticising Keat. I thought he was superb, sure he gave the ball away on occasion but who didn't? He gave it away far less than the others, and considering it was kind of up to him to assume the role Chris James would have played he did an excellent job.
And agree on Spoonley, he didn't have a lot to do, and when he was called into actiopn it was nearly always routine. He did everything confidently, but that's about all. He didn't have a chance to do much more. The jury's out.
I still say sign Boxall.
Trialist
0
·
120
·
almost 17 years
I'm not saying we should sign Spoonley but I am saying you under estimate the impact a goalie can have on a team.  Yes he did everything confidently and everything routine and didn't have to make any flashy saves.  He came and took all of the crosses in his area and that would have given his back four plenty of confidence.  who knows how much talking and direction he gave on the field.  My point his he looked the goods and would have installed confidence in others.  Anyway as far as signing players goes I think Keat, Draper, Boxall and Edgington are the ones to look at.
Starting XI
0
·
2.4K
·
about 17 years
Skinny B wrote:

Take into account both Moss and Paston will be away on international duty so we need a third keeper or are you planning on geting some half wit part timer to leak goals??

Attempt to sign Spoonley and kill two birds with 1 stone and if he rejects then grab another promising keeper maybe Phil Imray.
Some of you don't read - He won't sign.
Legend
2.4K
·
17K
·
about 17 years
Starting XI
0
·
2.4K
·
about 17 years
He wants to go to the US via scholorship, and that means he cant sign a professional contract. Plus,even if he did, he'd only play 2 games at most
First Team Squad
0
·
1.8K
·
about 17 years
I still think he'd gp tp Europee if offered
First Team Squad
13
·
1.7K
·
about 17 years
Europe is a completely different kettle of fish TM...the money and the academies will set most players for life, but at the same time college football in the US is a big drawcard. gings2007-07-04 22:50:30
Phoenix Academy
0
·
360
·
almost 17 years
Was funny seeing brockie have such a bad game, I've played against him loads in nelson club games and he used to carve up everybody.
WeeNix
21
·
860
·
almost 17 years
After watching the Gambia game. My views on player to sign:
 
Keats: He is better off staying in the US- may improve in time.
 
Keats gave the ball away so many times again, his shooting was rubbish, he got pushed off the ball and couldn't tackle very well. His header on goal at the end should have been directed across the goal for the two kiwis in the middle, at that level he would never score from there. 
The good things about Keats was, some of his long balls into the area where effect and accurate, good vision. He also ran around alot.
 
Brockie: Leave him in the National League to start again and prove himself.
Saying his name makes me cringe. He is everything we don't need from a striker.
Not quite quick enough. Can't quite beat players, First touch is not quite there, can't quite get to the ball in time to get a shot off. Isn't quite accurate enough.
His good points. Considering his bad points; he actually seems quite confident. You need a little arrogance as a striker. He is solid enough. Has enough vision.
 
Draper: Worth looking at a bit more
He had energy, spark, confidence. A bit of pace and vision. Still needs to be worked on a bit more. get a bit sharper and experience. Nothing exceptional about him, but for some reason gives me hope.
 
Boxall: Sign him
He has the goods of a Centre back. the build , he seemed pretty calm and cool headed. He pushed up a couple of times, so has the confidence. he was pretty consistent compared to the others in the team. He is no super star, but Central defenders are not supposed to be. There would be no harm in signing him as one of the last 2 spots.
 
Craig Henderson: Looked ok, but he is best to stay in the US
He played well. I liked his style. He played kind of like Chris James at times. He set up the best opportunity of the match and worked hard. He held possession quite well and gave himself space.
He gave me confidence.
 
Spoonley: Decent enough keeper but people are saying he wont sign anyway.
He is good enough from what i can see.  goalie for the future i suspect for the All Whites.
 
Of the rest of the players Roydhouse should have been subbed off for wasting opportunites down the flanks, don't let him take any more corners. the fullbacks hogg and peters are a little to slow and small. Clapham seemed ok when he came on, but didn't get much time. Edginton played ok, solid enough
 
Thats about it. Overall. All the players were a little out of their league understanably. But they did enough to keep face. Lets hope we can go out against Mexico without a thrashing. Mexico seem to be the best side in the pool and with these teams having 20 or more shots against us. A 5 or6 nil thrashing would not be unlikely.
 
 
LondonChris2007-07-06 20:49:39
Legend
2.1K
·
16K
·
about 17 years
Yeah just watching game on dvd (before it ran out during the second half grr) and I'd agree with your points. They seemd to be dominated physically by the oppo with the exception of Boxall. He would get my vote if anyone. I thought we had a poor game. Our linking between midfield and strikers was poor. They needed to come shorter to get it rather than the balls they were putting through which were cut out or higly speculative. Our first touch let us down on too many occasions.
What was Elrick and De Jong going on about saying that Gambia were going to lack structure? They were bloody structed. Solid centre backs, wide midfielders who pressed high and didn't allow us to get the ball out the backline.
Feverish2007-07-06 22:16:16
Starting XI
10
·
2.1K
·
about 17 years
Feverish wrote:
What was Elrick and De Jong going on about saying that Gambiawere going to lack structure? They were bloody structed. Solid centre backs, wide midfielders who pressed high and didn't allow us to get the ball out the backline.
 
De Jong. . . we've had this conversation before . . . . lol
First Team Squad
17
·
1.2K
·
about 17 years
It seems to be that the midfield is the real weakness in NZ football at all levels, we seem to lack any spark or direction. All to often the midfield drops to far back and crowds the defence giving the opposition midfield to much room to play and when on attack there is no zip and we try to knock aimless or hopeful balls that end up going to the opposition. 
 
I am encouraged by the fact that the NZ national team coaches  are now trying to play a more fluid passing game and as the current crop of player are not really used to this it will take a while to gel. The more we try and play this style at all levels the more the midfield players will develop and the skill levels will grow.
 
We need to look at the conditioning of our players as well, they can run all day but need more general strength and speed development. 
 
I do think that Drapper could be a good player to pick up as an under 20, when he came on things seemed to liven up a bit.
 
Dissapointed with Roydhouse's hair cut can someone please tell him that the rats tail went out in the late 80's, whats next a Kevin Keegan perm?  :)
WeeNix
21
·
860
·
almost 17 years
Teza wrote:
We need to look at the conditioning of our players as well, they can run all day but need more general strength and speed development. 
Thats avery good/interesting point. Its true. I would almost say that we seemed fitter than Portugal and Gambia. We could have run all day and some more.
 
But you are right. Maybe in key areas we need to work on different physical elements and training. Get some speed in the strikers and wing backs. Bulk up the Central defenders and midfielders. 
 
Maybe we can make them a bit taller too.
 
 
WeeNix
21
·
860
·
almost 17 years
Draper and Boxall it is then. Sign em Ricki!
Phoenix Academy
0
·
380
·
about 17 years
I think Boxall might be going to play at a uni in the States so they better talk to him soon
WeeNix
21
·
860
·
almost 17 years

Might be tough for Ricki then.

Looks like he doesn't have many to choose from if most of them wouldn't even be interested in signing.
 
It will be interesting to see who he goes with.
Marquee
410
·
6.3K
·
almost 17 years
Phoenix Academy
0
·
210
·
about 17 years
To choose from the available-ish ones : Draper, Boxall, Jenkins, Edgington.
 
I think jenkins could be shaped in to a good player, especially out wide he likes to go on the outside of the defender and usuall skips past and puts in a cross.
 
I thought roydhouse was the fittest, but some of his passes and free kicks were horrible.
 
Boxall the most consistent. Draper unfortunatly reminded me of a young Zdrillic......looks and play......but id still rather him over brockie (what a shocker!!!)
 
 
I think rick will go for jenkins and boxall. Could be a totally leftfield choice though, we'll have to wait and find out! Maybe an aussie?! Who was the young travis dodd guy that lunatic was talking about a while ago???
 

You’ll need an account to join the conversation!

Sign in Sign up