Daniel always brings life to a game, look at Perth, it was boring untill Daniel came on and set up the first goal and against an in form Queensland team who we have like never beaten, we need Daniel to start and create oppotunities.
You seemed to understand with the first part and then lost the plot at the end.
No one seems to get it do they??????
Daniel doesn't make a difference at the start of a game and can't last. He comes on in the 70th when there's space and creates.
Do you just might think here that Ricki is very astute and knows how the heck to use his players properly? All these Ricki bashers at the start have gone quiet because we've found our strengths and are playing to them nicely. Why go and f**k that all up? Sure one or two performers get a crack here and there and there is competition at the back but the core and the strategies are in place. You don't take away Daniels strength by doing the opposite with him. I for one was wanting him to start in the first half of the season, but I get it now.
Sorry Stop Out, I can see Ricki starting Hearfield or Kwasnik before Daniel because both can be dragged when they can't cope, Daniel can then do his thing. It just doesn't work the other way around.
....Now watch Ricki start Daniel
. We've had our trial and error now it's business time!
