Wellington Phoenix Men

Wellington Phoenix vs Roar (Bad language)

450 replies · 6,084 views
over 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Wolfben wrote:
Wolfben wrote:
its heinaldo cos brazilians pronouce Rs as Hs hence Honaldinho and Heinaldo is correct pronunciation, but reinaldo is a KUNT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


When you say paris do you say par-ee? No.

Reinaldo = sh*t. Couldnt score in a brothel. unless the ref helps him>

w**ker
Err
 
where was the ref for his back heel?

By sending off our player, Reinaldo cant score against a fully equipped defence.


It was a striker that got sent off.

Permalink Permalink
over 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
I told you Andy with a 'Y' Harper is the A-League's Tommy Smyth with a 'Y'...
 
Just ask Hay Naldo.
Permalink Permalink
over 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Theres the problem. ONE Forward. Its the game about scoring goals? Does the nix have another forward in there squad?
Permalink Permalink
over 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Arsenal wrote:
Wolfben wrote:
Wolfben wrote:
its heinaldo cos brazilians pronouce Rs as Hs hence Honaldinho and Heinaldo is correct pronunciation, but reinaldo is a KUNT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


When you say paris do you say par-ee? No.

Reinaldo = sh*t. Couldnt score in a brothel. unless the ref helps him>

w**ker
Err
 
where was the ref for his back heel?

By sending off our player, Reinaldo cant score against a fully equipped defence.


It was a striker that got sent off.

Your point being... our midfield had to push on to support Smeltz due to no Elrich.
Permalink Permalink
over 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
LOL.You can try and blame the ref for that goal if you want but I think you're taking the piss personally. Perhaps you're just drunk and worked up, so I'll leave it for now and bid you good night.

Permalink Permalink
over 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Jake_144 wrote:
Wolfben wrote:
[QUOTE=Black Plague]its heinaldo cos brazilians pronouce Rs as Hs hence Honaldinho and Heinaldo is correct pronunciation, but reinaldo is a KUNT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
Yes I would agree with you but it is a french R not a straight out H. I wouldn't mind him saying rhhrhreinaldo and hanaldo is too far.
 
A French R???? Its portuguese man..... I know I speak it, eu sei porque eu falo.

Botafogo - Rio de Janeiro and Wellington Phoenix, my two teams til death do us part.

Permalink Permalink
over 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
auskiwi wrote:
Theres the problem. ONE Forward. Its the game about scoring goals? Does the nix have another forward in there squad?


Prior to the weekend we were one of the leaders in the goals scored category for the league, so your point is somewhat undermined.

We generally play with 2, sometimes 3 attacking players supporting the loan striker.  If we played more defensively then maybe we wouldn't be leading the goals conceded column.

How's my driving? - Whine here

Permalink Permalink
over 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
My point being always start with one forward obviously doesnt work. Maybe they should try 4-4-2 or wow even 3-3-4. score goals .Smeltz is a easy target for any defence.
Permalink Permalink
over 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
auskiwi wrote:
My point being always start with one forward obviously doesnt work. Maybe they should try 4-4-2 or wow even 3-3-4. score goals .Smeltz is a easy target for any defence.


Err we did start with 2 strikers until Elrich got red-carded.

Permalink Permalink
over 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Arsenal wrote:
LOL.You can try and blame the ref for that goal if you want but I think you're taking the piss personally. Perhaps you're just drunk and worked up, so I'll leave it for now and bid you good night.

Hey Ive been caught out and my argument is flawed... but its a great flawed argument. I think im arguing very well seeing as Im talking utter sh*t.

And Im not drunk - Im still typing actual words - you will knosow when I am pisssed as you wnt understnad a thing.
Permalink Permalink
over 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Arsenal wrote:
auskiwi wrote:
My point being always start with one forward obviously doesnt work. Maybe they should try 4-4-2 or wow even 3-3-4. score goals .Smeltz is a easy target for any defence.


Err we did start with 2 strikers until Elrich got red-carded.

Elrich seemed to play a little behind Smeltz
Permalink Permalink
over 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago

a lone striker. thats the problem. one of the leading goals scorers in the league is not relevant N.B. were. One sticker is negative. Sure have attacking midfielders supporting TWO strikers. Who wants to play defensive?

Permalink Permalink
over 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Wolfben wrote:
Arsenal wrote:
LOL.You can try and blame the ref for that goal if you want but I think you're taking the piss personally. Perhaps you're just drunk and worked up, so I'll leave it for now and bid you good night.

Hey Ive been caught out and my argument is flawed... but its a great flawed argument. I think im arguing very well seeing as Im talking utter sh*t.

And Im not drunk - Im still typing actual words - you will knosow when I am pisssed as you wnt understnad a thing.


Fairplay mate, no offence intended.

Permalink Permalink
over 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Defensive works. We score lots, we dont defend enough.
Permalink Permalink
over 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
if Elrich played behind smeltz hes not a stiker just a 5th midfeilder.
Permalink Permalink
over 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Im starting to think this is as good as it gets.
Permalink Permalink
over 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Sorry but the nix will struggle without an attacking formation. DO THEY HAVE ANOTHER FORWARD?
Permalink Permalink
over 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Lochead pushes forward alot, I think sometimes he pushes to far forward. Makes it hard for him to get back fast enough to defend against counter attacks.
Permalink Permalink
over 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
auskiwi wrote:
Sorry but the nix will struggle without an attacking formation. DO THEY HAVE ANOTHER FORWARD?

yes, paston
Permalink Permalink
over 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
More attacking penetration from the midfield forward will provide a good attacking option. The sort of thing that resulted in Felipe's goal v Sydney for instance. I think we've underdone it considering the relative strength of the midfield.
Permalink Permalink
over 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago

THATS JUST DUMB. 4-4-2 !!!!!!!

P.S. EVERTON WILL LOSE TONIGHT.

Permalink Permalink
over 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
auskiwi wrote:
if Elrich played behind smeltz hes not a stiker just a 5th midfeilder.


Well we kept getting told we were playing 442 and I thought Elrich looked quite forward for much of while he was on, but perhaps I misjudged and it was more 4411

Permalink Permalink
over 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
DOES HE PLAY? CAN HE PLAY?
Permalink Permalink
over 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
QUITE FORWARD SOUNDS A BIT HALF ARSED.
Permalink Permalink
over 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
auskiwi wrote:
Sorry but the nix will struggle without an attacking formation. DO THEY HAVE ANOTHER FORWARD?
If we do Smeltz wishes he would put his hand up as its getting bloody lonely up there,dont really get how they can say we are playing 4-4-2 when the supposed 2nd striker is in actual fact a midfielder.Yep we have scored plenty but i do wonder what it may have been like if we did have an out an out poacher feeding off Smeltz.

GET YOUR SHIRTS OFF FOR THE BOYS

Permalink Permalink
over 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
auskiwi wrote:

P.S. EVERTON WILL LOSE TONIGHT.

 
Stuff you!
Permalink Permalink
over 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
ballane wrote:
[QUOTE=auskiwi]Sorry but the nix will struggle without an attacking formation. DO THEY HAVE ANOTHER FORWARD?
If we do Smeltz wishes he would put his hand up as its getting bloody lonely up there,dont really get how they can say we are playing 4-4-2 when the supposed 2nd striker is in actual fact a midfielder.Yep we have scored plenty but i do wonder what it may have been like if we did have an out an out poacher feeding off Smeltz.
[/QUOTTOTALLY AGREE. FINALLY SOMEONE GETS IT. THANKS
Permalink Permalink
over 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
WHAT SOME MONEY ON IT? LOL
Permalink Permalink
over 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
auskiwi wrote:
DOES HE PLAY? CAN HE PLAY?
Its going to be another couple of weeks before we find out. Have to admit apart from his goal in his first game have been a little disappointed in what he has shown so far.

GET YOUR SHIRTS OFF FOR THE BOYS

Permalink Permalink
over 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
WANT SOME MONEY ON IT? LOL
Permalink Permalink
over 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
WELL THEY NEED TO GO AND BUY A REAL STRIKER.
Permalink Permalink
over 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
we've got Royce Brownlie don't forget...

Oi Oi Edgecumbe... lets have a clean sheet

Permalink Permalink
over 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
WHO?
Permalink Permalink
over 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Great game guys.
Permalink Permalink
over 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Just staggered in from the Cambridge after watching  the game and i reckon even though im totally Brahms and List that from a team perspective and im not talking about  the result which was obviously sh*te but from the way way the team played for each other that  for once they actually were playing as a team !there was true grit and determination with a take no prisoners attitude that has so long been missing ,if we can add some real technical  ability to this during the transfer window and forget about sideshows  then i reckon we will have  team to really fear in the A league ,we can learn from this in a positive way so  onwards and upwards with then Firebird i reckon !! 
Thank God for spell check  and the Phoenix 
Good night and god bless!!
Hic!

The answer to life's problems are rarely found at the bottom of a beer glass - but it's always worth a look.

Permalink Permalink
over 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Qlder wrote:
Great game guys.


Now, now lads.  Don't beat up on him. 

It's not his fault that he has the IQ of an orange, or that his team draws significantly less per head of population than us, or that he celebrates the behaviour of Grosso at the last World Cup... it's what happens when inbreeding gets so deeply ingrained in a family.

Hard News2007-11-11 23:34:59

How's my driving? - Whine here

Permalink Permalink
over 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Jesus christ, stop being a complete moron auskiwi. Please. We have no trouble scoring goals (when we have 11 players) and I don't think Ricki Herbert needs tips from an internet coach whos only qualifications come from playing Football Manager 2007.


valeo2007-11-11 23:51:53

a.haak

Permalink Permalink
over 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Hahah! Touche.

a.haak

Permalink Permalink
over 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Whats wrong with 2007 or 2008? They've given me my qualification for expert opinions!
Proud to have attended the first 175 Consecutive "Home" Wellington Phoenix "A League" Games !!

The Ruf, The Ruf, The Ruf is on Fire!!

Permalink Permalink