Wellington Phoenix Men

What is this obsession with a target man?

76 replies · 3,400 views
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago

I think it's good that we're packing our midfield with talented players, as I said before I reckon it's better to have 5 players scoring 8 goals each than one scoring 20.

This said, we still need someone who can hold the ball up front and connect with Leo's crosses.


We seem to be packing it with right sided midfield players. Ifill, Troy and Leo, although Leo can play both sides he is happier on the right.
Agree that we need more people on the score sheet this year and we seem to be getting more firepower.
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Any of our wingers can play either side, but yeah, like most teams most are right footed.
You know we belong together...

Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
I wish we could somehow get Fabiano. Honestly is the best at winning headers from long balls and he sits on the bench at Melb most of the time. Is a more complete striker than either Archie or Allsopp.

a.haak

Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
This said, we still need someone who can hold the ball up front and connect with Leo's crosses.
 
but we have people who can hold the ball upfront and connect with Leo's crosses.  Just because our players are not 6 foot 6, does not mean that they are going to be unable to control a play or get on the end of crosses.

All I do is make the stuff I would've liked
Reference things I wanna watch, reference girls I wanna bite
Now I'm firefly like a burning kite
And yousa fake fuck like a fleshlight

Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Boro4eva wrote:
I still believe with our style of play of short passing going forward till we get to the 18 yard box and then going sideways that we need someone who can then get the ball..or be given it and hold and lay off that final pass..or turn and lay it on for Greenacre or Ifill.  When MV come to town I look at their big plaers and think where are all the Phoenix..oh there they are around the oppositions knees.  We need height which to me partly means target and we need the ability to hold the ball once we get it into the business end of the field.
 
I don't agree with this to be honest.  The reason we get to the edge of the area and then run out of ideas has been because of a lack of invention and movement - nothing to do with not having a big lump standing still who can lay the ball off to other players.
 
I think that the AW's problem in the confed cup was the fact that we had 2 target men (Killen and Smeltz) and neither of them could be found because they were too stationary and easy to block off.  I still think a bigger area of concern is the lack of creativity, but like 15 goal a season strikers, they are rarer than rocking horse sh*t. 
 
I actually think that a target man is counter-productive to a team - when they get to 30 or 40 yards out it is an easy option to lump it into the mixer to see what they can do.
 
Regarding the problem with height, it did not seem to hinder Barcelona at all last season.  I realise that it is a bit pointless comparing us to them, but I hate this obsession with physical attributes over skill and talent.

All I do is make the stuff I would've liked
Reference things I wanna watch, reference girls I wanna bite
Now I'm firefly like a burning kite
And yousa fake fuck like a fleshlight

Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Frankie Mac wrote:
I hate this obsession with physical attributes over skill and talent.


Its just the trend in the premier league right now. Premier league gets the most exposure, so more people jump on the bandwagon. how things might be different if Spanish football got more coverage here! (or Italian, i wonder what premier league club woulda picked short stuff Cannavaro as a world-class central defender when he was young!)
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Coveny was tall..

Founder

Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Sign him up! quick, before Gold Coast try and take him.
WillyB2009-07-23 21:31:04
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Feverish wrote:
Coveny was tall..
 
can we get him back then?

All I do is make the stuff I would've liked
Reference things I wanna watch, reference girls I wanna bite
Now I'm firefly like a burning kite
And yousa fake fuck like a fleshlight

Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Frankie Mac wrote:
This said, we still need someone who can hold the ball up front and connect with Leo's crosses.
 
but we have people who can hold the ball upfront and connect with Leo's crosses.  Just because our players are not 6 foot 6, does not mean that they are going to be unable to control a play or get on the end of crosses.
Just out of interest, who? Apparently Ifill isn't great in the air, neither is Costa (although TBF his onlt A-League goal was a headder). Not sure about Greenacre...
You know we belong together...

Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Oska wrote:
Frankie Mac wrote:
This said, we still need someone who can hold the ball up front and connect with Leo's crosses.
 
but we have people who can hold the ball upfront and connect with Leo's crosses.  Just because our players are not 6 foot 6, does not mean that they are going to be unable to control a play or get on the end of crosses.
Just out of interest, who? Apparently Ifill isn't great in the air, neither is Costa (although TBF his onlt A-League goal was a headder). Not sure about Greenacre...
 
Does every cross have to be in the air?
 
Apparently Greenacre has scored 97 goals in professional football since 2000.  I imagine a number of them were by getting on the end of crosses.

All I do is make the stuff I would've liked
Reference things I wanna watch, reference girls I wanna bite
Now I'm firefly like a burning kite
And yousa fake fuck like a fleshlight

Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Oska wrote:
Frankie Mac wrote:
This said, we still need someone who can hold the ball up front and connect with Leo's crosses.
 
but we have people who can hold the ball upfront and connect with Leo's crosses.  Just because our players are not 6 foot 6, does not mean that they are going to be unable to control a play or get on the end of crosses.
Just out of interest, who? Apparently Ifill isn't great in the air, neither is Costa (although TBF his onlt A-League goal was a headder). Not sure about Greenacre...
 
sauce

Founder

Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
http://www.yellowfever.co.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=9595&PN=7
RyanCPFC wrote:
Wellington Phoenix have completing the signing of former Crystal Palace winger Paul Ifill on a two-year contract.

Sky Sports.



Anyway, Hi everyone, when palace release a player who then joins an interesting club, its always good too see what the fans are expecting.

To be fair im not sure of the quality of the A-League compared to the English Championship but ill assume they are similar for your benefit.

Ifill to be honest was pretty Cack at Palace, never tried hard and looked abit overweight. However his touch is excellent and he can unleash a piledriver of a shot. He lacks Physical Strength in the air which is a shame considering hes a big lad. He can knock in the occasional good cross though. He isnt as fast as you would like and his balance is awful he developed the nickname "Ifall" at palace.

Good luck to Paul though and GoodLuck to The Phoenix Next season hope he does well. And as we all know just because his time at palace wasnt great doesnt mean hes a bad player.
You know we belong together...

Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Frankie Mac wrote:
Oska wrote:
Frankie Mac wrote:
This said, we still need someone who can hold the ball up front and connect with Leo's crosses.
 
but we have people who can hold the ball upfront and connect with Leo's crosses.  Just because our players are not 6 foot 6, does not mean that they are going to be unable to control a play or get on the end of crosses.
Just out of interest, who? Apparently Ifill isn't great in the air, neither is Costa (although TBF his onlt A-League goal was a headder). Not sure about Greenacre...
 
Does every cross have to be in the air?
 
Apparently Greenacre has scored 97 goals in professional football since 2000.  I imagine a number of them were by getting on the end of crosses.
Fair call
You know we belong together...

Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
you've convinced me Oska. Ifill is a turtle

Founder

Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
LOL
 
I said apparently, re-reading it it doesn't sound too bad.
 
Oska2009-07-23 22:19:31
You know we belong together...

Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Well there is a place for a targetman in some games because the whole idea is not just to hold the ball and lay it but to draw defenders away and make running gaps for the other players direct for goal. If a defender comes in and is drawn to the targetman with his back to the goal then a gap appears just behind that defender for someone to diagonally slip through to the goal as the defensive line is broken. If a defender does not drawn to the targetman then it leaves too much space for the targetman to turn and have a shot at goal.

On the upshot of it, when a targetman player has the ball near the edge of the box, the defence has to be organised to allow a defender to pin the targetman so he does not turn and shoot or slip a ball behind the defence but also to draw itself more central to close the gap run on by other players that he lays off or cleverly slip a ball. This means that the defence has to pull back to the establish line and becomes more central, therefore null the central attack, but then opens up the wide attack to the goal line if the ball is moved quickly enough.

What we lack last season, is mixing in some central attacks. We had plenty of wide attacks that didn't amount much as well as predictable long crosses that was defendable. We do need to mix the attack up and keep the defence guessing so a variety of attacks are needed as well as having a targetman to disrupt the defences so they are caught in two minds.

I can't see having a targetman being a problem really. However I take your point FM about having talent and skills as important in which most players can temporary find themselves as a targetman in an attacking movement. But then a decent targetman has plenty of skills to offer as well. He is not always going to be the targetman all game, he will have to be able to turn and shoot and do some different runs as well. It's just a type of default pattern to initially work from. A tall guy pulling an extra defender to mark on a free kick or getting one of the better defender to do an assignment on him can open up other types of attack for the other players. Sometimes a big guy is very tough to mark and is need to place pressure at the right area. Even for a big guy being a targetman, it still takes skill to be in the right place and time and able hold a ball and release. That is not alway physical work but also takes skill and timing and not many players can make it look easy. There are physical type defenders in the A-League so its natural to have a player that can just simply bump off a few challenges.

It was something that we couldn't pull out much last year with some confidence.

Having said that, I think we have recruited enough to allow creatively in the central midfield that allows better use of the targetman this season compare to last season. A targetman does not always have to be at an end of a long cross form the wide attack. but also the short passes through the centre. His purpose is not necessary to be the end of the attack but the link in the attack rather. Occasionally, a targetman finds himself at the end of an attack so he gets to have a shot at goal, but really he is fairly good optional attack.
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago

What we lack last season, is mixing in some central attacks. We had plenty of wide attacks that didn't amount much as well as predictable long crosses that was defendable. We do need to mix the attack up and keep the defence guessing so a variety of attacks are needed.
 
that much is true..fell asleep during the rest

Founder

Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Feverish wrote:

What we lack last season, is mixing in some central attacks. We had plenty of wide attacks that didn't amount much as well as predictable long crosses that was defendable. We do need to mix the attack up and keep the defence guessing so a variety of attacks are needed.[/QUOTE]
 
that much is true..fell asleep during the rest
 
That seems to be way further than me - I gave up after the first line:
 
[QUOTE=AllWhitebelievr]
Well there is a place for a targetman in some games because the whole idea is not just to hold the ball and lay it but to draw defenders away and make running gaps for the other players direct for goal.
 
Can a centre forward not do this?  Does this player have to be of a certain physical condition? 
 
A part of every centre forward's game  is spent with the back to goal (except Harry Potter when I used to play midfield behind him) - that does not make you a target man.

All I do is make the stuff I would've liked
Reference things I wanna watch, reference girls I wanna bite
Now I'm firefly like a burning kite
And yousa fake fuck like a fleshlight

Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
A targetman does not a big lad. For an example Peter Beardsley for Liverpool in the 80s did a wonderful job and he was a small runt with vision, passing skills and a bit of dribbling when needed. His main job was as a targetman.

However for many teams, when there was not enough players with such skill factor that a big targetman was found to be able to fill that basic requirement to set balls up for other in a physical way without losing the ball.

A big player usually has long legs compare to most. And long legs can drag the ball a long sideways on the second touch to shoot in such amount of space with a long stride, making it hard for a defender that is right on him to react to defend. Plus a big player does dominate a slightly larger than normal personal space, that it is difficult to get right around the player as a defender without fouling the guy. In a crowded space, it is easier for the passer of the ball to give him the ball because of this.

A centre forward can have that role of course, but a big player does offer that physical dominance, trying to cover a big boy with long stride takes a bit of initial acceleration for smaller guys to cover.

It is a cheaper way to get the same results. Any player that has the skill factor to achieve the same if not more attack options, then they would be realistically out of our price range, tbh.
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
A targetman does not a big lad. For an example Peter Beardsley for Liverpool in the 80s did a wonderful job and he was a small runt with vision, passing skills and a bit of dribbling when needed. His main job was as a targetman.

 
Beardsley was never a target man - he played in the Jonesy behind a main striker.
 
Again I haven't bothered to read the rest of what you have to say, but I am sure it is really interesting.
 
What I was arguing against (and I have the slight feeling that you are to, just in one million words more) is that we do not need what everyone seems to be screaming out for on here - a big ox up front to win headers and lay the ball off.  The game has changed in the last 20 years, so for a player to provide that kind of option, they do not need to be built like Brad Thorne.
Frankie Mac2009-07-23 23:32:40

All I do is make the stuff I would've liked
Reference things I wanna watch, reference girls I wanna bite
Now I'm firefly like a burning kite
And yousa fake fuck like a fleshlight

Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
The game has changed in the last 20 years...
 
You wot?  You mean it's not hopeful long balls from one's own half...

"Phoenix till they lose"

Posting 97% bollox, 8% lies and 3.658% genuine opinion. 

Genuine opinion: FTFFA

Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
You dont even need a targetman anyone can do it.. pin up against the defender and then set back or foward whatever is best its as easy as that
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
I am not sure that there is that much of a scream, but it was what Ricki wants so thats what he wants. A centre forward is usually a targetman and a big guy is more likely to be seem as a bonus rather than the exception.

However, like I said, it is a cheaper option on the scale of things. If a big guy can do the basic job plus a few extra things, then there is not really much a defensive player can do, if he does a tidy job. A targetman is a pressure front player and sometimes being a big boy has it's advantages and disadvantages.

In Rugby, Jonah Lomu was targeted by the defence but it only open up the other players into the attack. [it's a different game bah bah, but you get my point] A big guy can draw more than just the one player if used well.

Again we just don't have the money to get a classy striker with the skills when a big lad can achieve as least the basic need at this level.

I have no problems either way.
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Completely subjective opinion: big centre forwards mean boring football. Get little speedy blokes on.
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
StopOut wrote:
Completely subjective opinion: big centre forwards mean boring football. Get little speedy blokes on.
 
You wouldn't by any chance be a little speedy bloke would you?
 
 

"Phoenix till they lose"

Posting 97% bollox, 8% lies and 3.658% genuine opinion. 

Genuine opinion: FTFFA

Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Junior82 wrote:
StopOut wrote:
Completely subjective opinion: big centre forwards mean boring football. Get little speedy blokes on.
 
You wouldn't by any chance be a little speedy bloke would you?
 
 
 
Exactly, if your not quick, no skill can't do anything and are just a target you might as well put Elrich out there, if you miss hitting him your sh*te
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
StopOut wrote:
Completely subjective opinion: big centre forwards mean boring football. Get little speedy blokes on.


Like Jonti Richter?


E + R + O

Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Hard News wrote:
Junior82 wrote:
You wot?  You mean it's not hopeful long balls from one's own half...


It is at Gigg Lane.
 
 
Stuck in the 70's
Proud to have attended the first 175 Consecutive "Home" Wellington Phoenix "A League" Games !!

The Ruf, The Ruf, The Ruf is on Fire!!

Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
WillyB wrote:
Frankie Mac wrote:
I hate this obsession with physical attributes over skill and talent.


Its just the trend in the premier league right now. Premier league gets the most exposure, so more people jump on the bandwagon. how things might be different if Spanish football got more coverage here! (or Italian, i wonder what premier league club woulda picked short stuff Cannavaro as a world-class central defender when he was young!)



I don't think anyone watching football after the 1970's appreciates physical attributes over skill and talent.

The lack of creative and skillful footballers has been identified by many people as the main factor in England not winning anything in recent, (almost living memory ), years.

The crappy thing is that this issue is still not being addressed.

Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago

I think the call for a target man came from the often one dimensional attack that the Phoenix used last year. The wide attack and then wack it into the middle. It was only partially successful so people thought if you had a big guy in their as a better target then you would up your percentages.

How ever you can reduce the need for a targetman by attacking with more pace. You are much more likely to be dangerous on attack when attackers and defenders are both facing the goal....i.e they are both streaming back.
 
 Too many times last year we saw play move forward then wide.....then the player puts his foot on the ball and plays it back or square. By the time it gets into the box the defenders have turned, set themselves in position, backs to goal. It becomes very difficult to break this defence down.
 
The most dangerous attacks are those that those that occur at speed. Whether we play this style depends on the coachs philosophy and/or the players skill. Do we have the players to do this?.......absolutely IMO!
 
 
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Ah, no.

The call for a tragetman came from Ricki saying after he signed Greenacre "I'm looking for a traget man to complement Greenacre".

How's my driving? - Whine here

Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
exactly. It was the coaches preference. He never said anything about size or style of play apart from he wanted someone our players can aim to give the ball to.
Well thats how I see it.
playwithFire2009-07-25 00:37:01


Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Hard News wrote:

The call for a tragetman came from Ricki saying after he signed Greenacre "I'm looking for a traget man to complement Greenacre".
 
No one seems to think that Ifill is a traditional 'target man' - big or small - but he does expect to play as an 'out-and-out-striker' according to Fred's story. 
 
So this season our attack might stand or fall on how well he complements Greenacre? 
 
What's Plan B?
 
scribbler2009-07-25 14:57:59
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Costa Barbarouses


Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Tony Pignata to fill the target man void

a.haak

Permalink Permalink