Normo's coming home

I'll be a Millionaire by then so it'll be fiiiine.

If New Zealand joins Asia, and the Phoenix qualify for the ACL and are successful there, then there will be huge opportunities open up for an ambitious owner. Bones2009-11-27 17:19:27
Not saying that 20,000 members owned the club (it is an 'option' though) but yeah, think about the future direction you want the club to take.
That's the purpose of this thread.
If not, I hope another "wealthy philanthropist" type with a Wellington loyalty would take it on.
The current structure, from all accounts,has resulted in a well run club,with the players relatively happy with their lot. The results (excluding yesterday perhaps!) are reasonably good, placed at halfway point in top six with surely more potential to do better than previous years.
As I've indicated in earlier discussions here I love the idea of having a share, however small, in Wellington Phoenix.
But...how workable would such an arrangement be?
It would all come down to an effective board and structure to ensure the resultant company was soundly run.
Another biggie: Profitability.Terry generously loses $2 million or so a season to keep us captivated.
Maybe its a healthy tax write-off against other areas of his business empire.
There's no way any sensible investors would buy into a loss-making venture like Wellington Phoenix, in its current form, is... is there?

Before any other structure than the current one was possible new income streams would have to be identified and developed.
One likely opportunity....Asia perhaps.
Do you think Terry and Tony are onto it? I think so.
I would hazard a guess that the negotiating of Jiang Chen's loan to us from Tianjen Tida FC has provided them opportunities,the pre-season tour and marketing in China (including shirt front sponsor) wasn't accidental. As pointed out by Midfielder and many others in posts on these threads Asia is the biggest growth area in football globally.Caution is essential but potential is amazing.
RedGed2009-11-30 23:57:30
Improving,,on the up, a work in progress from Italiano and the Nix. Bring on the bathroom bling in '24! COYN!
If not, I hope another "wealthy philanthropist" type with a Wellington loyalty would take it on.
The current structure, from all accounts,has resulted in a well run club,with the players relatively happy with their lot. The results (excluding yesterday perhaps!) are reasonably good, placed at halfway point in top six with surely more potential to do better than previous years.
As I've indicated in earlier discussions here I love the idea of having a share, however small, in Wellington Phoenix.
But...how workable would such an arrangement be?
It would all come down to an effective board and structure to ensure the resultant company was soundly run.
Another biggie: Profitability.Terry generously loses $2 million or so a season to keep us captivated.
Maybe its a healthy tax write-off against other areas of his business empire.
There's no way any sensible investors would buy into a loss-making venture like Wellington Phoenix, in its current form, is... is there?

Before any other structure than the current one was possible new income streams would have to be identified and developed.
One likely opportunity....Asia perhaps.
Do you think Terry and Tony are onto it? I think so.
I would hazard a guess that the negotiating of Jiang Chen's loan to us from Tianjen Tida FC has provided them opportunities,the pre-season tour and marketing in China (including shirt front sponsor) wasn't accidental. As pointed out by Midfielder and many others in posts on these threads Asia is the biggest growth area in football globally.Caution is essential but potential is amazing.
Asia is good for football development, but ain't the pot of gold yet (I'm talking investment wise here), aside from trade of players, no Asian money (yet) has invested into an A-League club. The money from the Gulf goes to Europe, and Japan and Korea, besides player trades, haven't directly bought into an A-League club yet.
Is Terry the richest man in Wellington? To get another 'cash donour' with his wallet would be hard as a guess.
What happens if a member-elected board was appointed to run the club? They're the types of questions I want you guys to consider here. After 5 years the MVFC board is still largely unknown to me.
Think about it.
diego's son2009-12-01 03:54:26
If not, I hope another "wealthy philanthropist" type with a Wellington loyalty would take it on.
The current structure, from all accounts,has resulted in a well run club,with the players relatively happy with their lot. The results (excluding yesterday perhaps!) are reasonably good, placed at halfway point in top six with surely more potential to do better than previous years.
As I've indicated in earlier discussions here I love the idea of having a share, however small, in Wellington Phoenix.
But...how workable would such an arrangement be?
It would all come down to an effective board and structure to ensure the resultant company was soundly run.
Another biggie: Profitability.Terry generously loses $2 million or so a season to keep us captivated.
Maybe its a healthy tax write-off against other areas of his business empire.
There's no way any sensible investors would buy into a loss-making venture like Wellington Phoenix, in its current form, is... is there?

Before any other structure than the current one was possible new income streams would have to be identified and developed.
One likely opportunity....Asia perhaps.
Do you think Terry and Tony are onto it? I think so.
I would hazard a guess that the negotiating of Jiang Chen's loan to us from Tianjen Tida FC has provided them opportunities,the pre-season tour and marketing in China (including shirt front sponsor) wasn't accidental. As pointed out by Midfielder and many others in posts on these threads Asia is the biggest growth area in football globally.Caution is essential but potential is amazing.
[/QUOTE]
Asia is good for football development, but ain't the pot of gold yet (I'm talking investment wise here), aside from trade of players, no Asian money (yet) has invested into an A-League club. The money from the Gulf goes to Europe, and Japan and Korea, besides player trades, haven't directly bought into an A-League club yet.
Is Terry the richest man in Wellington? To get another 'cash donour' with his wallet would be hard as a guess.
What happens if a member-elected board was appointed to run the club? They're the types of questions I want you guys to consider here. After 5 years the MVFC board is still largely unknown to me.
Incredible stamina. No shame. Yellow Fever.
Just to clarify, Diego's Son, the business opportunities are not necessarily just in Football, as others have said.
Terrry S has other businesses.In the process of establishing football connections via the A-League and, if Bin Hammam relents, eventually AFC, the opportunity to do business in other trade realms is immense, all through Football interaction initially. (Midfielder keeps hammering this point out,among others!)
That's probably part of the long term strategy ,first piece of the puzzle... extended long term A- League contract.
If Terry let it go and a member-elected board was appointed...who would we vote for?
EXEC MEMBER YF ..step right up!
(as if ya didn't have enough to do! ;)
If it came down to a member-elected board I would suspect Terry's money wouldn't be at risk!
Improving,,on the up, a work in progress from Italiano and the Nix. Bring on the bathroom bling in '24! COYN!
Is Terry the richest man in Wellington? To get another 'cash donour' with his wallet would be hard as a guess.
Improving,,on the up, a work in progress from Italiano and the Nix. Bring on the bathroom bling in '24! COYN!
Just to clarify, Diego's Son, the business opportunities are not necessarily just in Football, as others have said. That's right I suppose, the off-field stuff would have a lot to do with it.
Terrry S has other businesses.In the process of establishing football connections via the A-League and, if Bin Hammam relents, eventually AFC, the opportunity to do business in other trade realms is immense, all through Football interaction initially. (Midfielder keeps hammering this point out,among others!) Seems to be more 'indirect' business opportunities have resulted. e.g. a game is held and the big-wigs say 'what do you do?' that kind of jazz. Direct investment in the A-League at present (apart from buying players) from Asia has been miminal as such, or not much that I can find. Someone like Terry may look at ways to improve his lot, but in termsn of DIRECT investment, I haven't seen much to date int he A-League.
That's probably part of the long term strategy ,first piece of the puzzle... extended long term A- League contract. FFA seems to be on your side, maybe more will be said after this week when a lot of people ar ein South Africa.
If Terry let it go and a member-elected board was appointed...who would we vote for? Up to you blokes, maybe an administrator would get nominations and go from there.
EXEC MEMBER YF ..step right up! Why not.
(as if ya didn't have enough to do! ;)
If it came down to a member-elected board I would suspect Terry's money wouldn't be at risk! That's part of the reason for this thread, you have to think about whether you want a privately-owned and run club, or whether you want a member-elected board overseeing the 'public' funds the club generates. That's the whole point of this thread.
At least with the current single owner model the system of running the club seems to be effective.
It would all come down to the rules of governance and management structure laid down prior to any transfer of ownership status.
Those more versed in the ways other member-elected football clubs are run may be able to guide us with this.
Improving,,on the up, a work in progress from Italiano and the Nix. Bring on the bathroom bling in '24! COYN!
http://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/football/3195553/Apprentice-stars-cash-woes-hit-players
The future host of The Apprentice NZ, Terry Serepisos, is suffering "liquidity" issues within his Phoenix football club, with players' wages and hotel bills going unpaid.
The Wellington property magnate became owner of the city's major football club in 2007, and paid for its re-entry into the Australian A-League, saving the club from extinction. It has run at a loss since.
In The Apprentice NZ, which screens next year, he takes the role made famous by Donald Trump in the American original.
Phoenix's communications manager John Mitchell confirmed that there had been late payments. "There is a liquidity issue... it's not easy for Terry," Mitchell said.
"Players haven't been paid on time around four or five times this season. It's even impacted me but it's not something that I'm concerned about."
He said the payments usually arrived in players' bank accounts two or three days late. "For Terry, there are probably some recessionary issues going on � everyone is struggling at the moment, Terry included. He is obviously dealing with a lot of third parties so if they are delaying payment to him that affects his liquidity."
But Serepisos denied the delays were longer than one or two days.
"Paying wages late by a day is some sort of crucifixion? That is ridiculous," Serepisos said.
Phoenix chief executive Tony Pignata said he was not convinced the club was suffering what could be described as a financial crisis. "If we had `liquidity issues' that would mean players aren't being paid for a month."
He admitted some hotel bills had gone unpaid but said he was comfortable with the arrears.
This month Serepisos was left thousands of dollars out of pocket when production company South Vineyard Ltd made a last-minute cancellation at the millionaire's Century City hotel. Film crew of the $180 million movie Kingdom Come were due to stay at Serepisos's Tory St hotel.
Meanwhile, Serepisos has hit back at Mitchell for commenting to the Star-Times about the club's financial issues.
"John Mitchell wouldn't have a clue whether my club was having liquidity issues... He shouldn't be commenting on things like that; he's out of line," Serepisos said. "The reality is the club loses $1 million a year. I believe in what I've done and I believe in giving something back to the community. I've done it for the right reasons, which is to give something back to New Zealand."
The Kiwi version of The Apprentice, in which Serepisos sets competitors tasks to prove their worth in the world of business, is in production, and will screen next year on TV2. TVNZ had no comment yesterday.
Deciding on the basics is surprisingly hard e.g. don't spend more than you have, the manager has three games to get a string of wins after x losses in a season otherwise he is out, the captain is removed after x yellow cards from his players, even these are hard fought questions.edward l2009-12-28 17:21:52
Deciding on the basics is surprisingly hard e.g. don't spend more than you have, the manager has three games to get a string of wins after x losses in a season otherwise he is out, the captain is removed after x yellow cards from his players, even these are hard fought questions.
True. Barcelona would have been much more successful last season if they'd had just one man calling the shots. They might even have soared to the dizzying heights achieved by Newcastle under Mike Ashley's leadership!
every time I see him I think how is he not in jail
E's Flat Ah's Flat Too

If the 5,000 YFites were the members it would cost you $1,200 each per year. Not sure we would always agree.
For the rest of the world without a massive fan base, we need to rely on benevolent capitalism to see us through I.e. Rich families paying to keep the local club afloat.
For those who are interested in how we arrived at our current structure , it goes back to the Bradford stadium fire and the Popplewell report which gave clubs about five years to start building all seater, safe grounds. Then along came pay tv with an income stream and banks would only lend to companies with formal structures. Prior to that clubs were just regular clubs. Only two or three made a profit in the English league. Players were really badly paid. It wasn't uncommon to read of fans being crushed, trampled, burned alive.
We've come a long way in twenty years.
If the 5,000 YFites were the members it would cost you $1,200 each per year. Not sure we would always agree.
For the rest of the world without a massive fan base, we need to rely on benevolent capitalism to see us through I.e. Rich families paying to keep the local club afloat.
For those who are interested in how we arrived at our current structure , it goes back to the Bradford stadium fire and the Popplewell report which gave clubs about five years to start building all seater, safe grounds. Then along came pay tv with an income stream and banks would only lend to companies with formal structures. Prior to that clubs were just regular clubs. Only two or three made a profit in the English league. Players were really badly paid. It wasn't uncommon to read of fans being crushed, trampled, burned alive.
We've come a long way in twenty years.
As for the recession, it hits members and companies.
But who is best placed to ride the economy
? The capitalist because they have built up capital over time to fall back on. A bit like families buying a house over time and passing that wealth from generation to generation.
Either you pay for it personally or you get real.
As a season ticketholder for the Knights, let me tell you how fast the membership collapses when you have poor results. Would you really pay for it?
Until then it's one man, one direction.
"Phoenix till they lose"
Posting 97% bollox, 8% lies and 3.658% genuine opinion.
Genuine opinion: FTFFA
As for the recession, it hits members and companies.
But who is best placed to ride the economy
? The capitalist because they have built up capital over time to fall back on. A bit like families buying a house over time and passing that wealth from generation to generation.
Either you pay for it personally or you get real.
As a season ticketholder for the Knights, let me tell you how fast the membership collapses when you have poor results. Would you really pay for it?
Until then it's one man, one direction.
no, no. just this one.

"football supporters are the enemy within"
she turned on them as she did the Trade Unions and the economic and social cost of that is clear to see for anyone even remotely associated with (once) Great Britain.
as for those most likely to rebound from the recession, words fail me. Those most determined to truncate the State's role in society and to dismantle or demand any and all of our Community funded gains were first in the cue, cap in hand. The hypocrisy of the new-right is truly a staggering sight.
E's Flat Ah's Flat Too
Barcas structure has b all to do with it.
And no, it is ludicrous to think WPFC has even a fraction of Barcas nationalism or passion.
As for modernising clubs not being a health & safety thing, jeez, isn't Heysel, Hillsborough and Bradford enough? Without it we'd still be going to old wooden Victorian death traps.
In Off Topic, we need another thread for paranoid anti-capitalist nonsense for those who think the world owes them a living and are about 30 years out of date.
In off-topic, we need another thread for decietful and inaccurate free-market acoylotes to ignore everything they have was built up by the community they so shamelessly now bludge off.
E's Flat Ah's Flat Too
Yes, but I do find it intriguing
Without wanting to get too far off-topic, can I just try and understand your thinking here...
Free Market Capitalists, who like freedom, liberty, a smaller, less powerful state and fewer laws... want a government to regulate that all stadiums must be all-seater, and force clubs to pay for all this red tape, to ensure the safety of the fans?


Bagism, Madism, Dragism, Shagism, Ragism, Tagism
This-ism, that-ism
ism ism ism
"Phoenix till they lose"
Posting 97% bollox, 8% lies and 3.658% genuine opinion.
Genuine opinion: FTFFA
Barcas structure has b all to do with it.
And no, it is ludicrous to think WPFC has even a fraction of Barcas nationalism or passion.
Are you actually saying that Barcelona's owners are a pack of asses? You need to make that move in order to hold up your case. (If they are not, then we ought to conclude that democratic control of a football club is not inherently inferior to the 'one man, one vote' system of which you are so fond.)
As regards nationalism, you're again trying to shift the ground by slipping "passion" in: you claimed that Barca is popular because it is a national symbol in contrast to WPFC. This has to compete with a standard explanation for the clubs' relative popularity: that Barca plays better football, has advertising and marketing advantages, etc. Is there any evidence for the nationalist explanation? How can this accommodate Barcelona's legions of non-Catalan fans? Finally, is there any evidence for Catalan nationalism being stronger than Kiwi nationalism?
no, no. just this one.

You're missing the point then.
This may not be a bad thing, or ideology, but dressing it up as something it is not remains as intellectually dishonest as Rodney Hide's and Bill English's actions post election.
part of Barca's charm/popularity can be explained by it's relationship with Fascist Franco. It was permissible as a "harmless" outlet of Catalonia Nationalism.
E's Flat Ah's Flat Too