All Whites, Ferns, and other international teams

World Cup Squad Discussion

983 replies · 21,546 views
almost 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Kiwi Jambo wrote:
Leo always plays better when the chips are down!


I beg to differ. He gets a bit one tracked mind and tries to dribble past everyone when there is a lack of support from his teammates because he is under pressure. I.e., he is trying too much. He needs to be even more creative when the chips are down not fall down to a one track thinking.

He is a confidence player, so he needs others to lift him up as well as him lifting others up. He and Ifill are similarin many ways like that, but his teammates need to know that and encourage him to try odd different things on the back of simple things. I wouldn't want him to be a 60:40 player, but rather a 70:30 player with least error working toward a 80:20 player.
Permalink Permalink
almost 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
lol
You know we belong together...

Permalink Permalink
almost 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Kiwi Jambo wrote:
Leo always plays better when the chips are down!


I beg to differ. He gets a bit one tracked mind and tries to dribble past everyone when there is a lack of support from his teammates because he is under pressure. I.e., he is trying too much. He needs to be even more creative when the chips are down not fall down to a one track thinking.

He is a confidence player, so he needs others to lift him up as well as him lifting others up. He and Ifill are similarin many ways like that, but his teammates need to know that and encourage him to try odd different things on the back of simple things. I wouldn't want him to be a 60:40 player, but rather a 70:30 player with least error working toward a 80:20 player.
Chips -chip shop,Mirimar , Bertos, two scoops and one fish  !
nevermind it was another lame attempt at humour !
Ill get my coat !

The answer to life's problems are rarely found at the bottom of a beer glass - but it's always worth a look.

Permalink Permalink
almost 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
I expect Leo tobe way better come the OZ game, he plays better when fresh after some time off.
Permalink Permalink
almost 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Kiwi Jambo wrote:
Kiwi Jambo wrote:
Leo always plays better when the chips are down!
I beg to differ. He gets a bit one tracked mind and tries to dribble past everyone when there is a lack of support from his teammates because he is under pressure. I.e., he is trying too much. He needs to be even more creative when the chips are down not fall down to a one track thinking. He is a confidence player, so he needs others to lift him up as well as him lifting others up. He and Ifill are similarin many ways like that, but his teammates need to know that and encourage him to try odd different things on the back of simple things. I wouldn't want him to be a 60:40 player, but rather a 70:30 player with least error working toward a 80:20 player.

Chips -chip shop,Mirimar , Bertos, two scoops�and one fish �!

nevermind it was another lame attempt at humour !

Ill get my coat !


Oh I see, local humour.

Less chips and fish and more salads and beans makes a player gleam. . . .
Permalink Permalink
almost 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
I think Mulligan is going to make it to the cup, even though he hasn't had much game time. Versitle, and has played a number of internationals.

I know he hasn't had any game time in a long time... but i think he will get in. wait and see..
hockeycam2010-04-15 18:58:23
Permalink Permalink
almost 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Story on Claphams WC aspirations on ONE news tonight I believe.
Permalink Permalink
almost 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
hockeycam wrote:
I think Mulligan is going to make it to the cup, even though he hasn't had much game time. Versitle, and has played a number of internationals.

I know he hasn't had any game time in a long time... but i think he will get in. wait and see..


It makes me sick hes in the team and Oughton isn't.
Permalink Permalink
almost 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
CboZ wrote:
hockeycam wrote:
I think Mulligan is going to make it to the cup, even though he hasn't had much game time. Versitle, and has played a number of internationals.

I know he hasn't had any game time in a long time... but i think he will get in. wait and see..


It makes me sick hes in the team and Oughton isn't.
 
 
Could not agree more....
Ricki had absolutely no faith in Mully at the Nix. He could not even get on the bench when we were short of defenders through injuries or suspensions. How he could even be considered for the WC squad is beyond me.
Surely that spot would be better going to someone who at least has been playing games in the last 6 months!!!
Permalink Permalink
almost 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
To be at the World Cup the player must be one of the top two players in each position available to play all games at time of naming deadline.
This is 22 players plus 1 for extra GK cover.
It is not a holiday for Ricki's mates. Moss should be told you Fd.up.
Hard cheese son.

Alf Ramsey didn't give a sh*te that Greaves was his number one striker in 66. He took a knock in a game and was left out after that. Geoff Hurst took his chance in the next game and we know what he went onto do.
Permalink Permalink
almost 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Football NZ are as much to blame as Mossy for the last two matches of his 4 game ban

but agree with your main point - not sure if having Moss available for game 3 only makes him worth taking
Permalink Permalink
almost 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
tbh a suspended Moss may still be better than the other options. 

We've got a shortage of good keepers in this country, particularly when Phil Imray isn't available for NZ and for some reason Jake Gleeson has never even been looked at.

How's my driving? - Whine here

Permalink Permalink
almost 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
How could a suspended player be better than one that is available HN?  That's non-sensical (just like taking a 3rd keeper who is unavailable when you're No. 1 is coming off 4 months out)

Normo's coming home

Permalink Permalink
almost 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
I think you may have missed the tongue-in-cheek nature intended in that line JD - although the points about a shortage of keepers stand.

How's my driving? - Whine here

Permalink Permalink
almost 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
that Gleeson will be our top keeper in 3 or 4 years. looks the goods.
Permalink Permalink
almost 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
tigers wrote:
Football NZ are as much to blame as Mossy for the last two matches of his 4 game ban

but agree with your main point - not sure if having Moss available for game 3 only makes him worth taking


Like it or not Mossy deserves to get one game of a lifetime and in the team environment and dressing room, every player knows that he should be there by right. I don't think there is much opposition in the squad to his inclusion especially when NZF stuff up the appeal.

To be honest, I think that it is fair to take him, it would make the defenders work that more harder when they know that they are one goal keeper down in the first two games. Common sense is not always the best option for motivation. . . .
Permalink Permalink
almost 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Paston, Spoonley, Bannatyne. That should be the three keepers Ricki takes to SA.

Three for me, and two for them.

Permalink Permalink
almost 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
your right. Apart from Spoonley, who is not up to international level. Take that Moss guy. He's good.
Permalink Permalink
almost 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
What's the point if he can only play 1 game?

Three for me, and two for them.

Permalink Permalink
almost 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
He may be eligible for 2 or 3 games though Buff, depending on how we get on in the first round. 
Permalink Permalink
almost 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
We won't make it past the first round, so one game.

Three for me, and two for them.

Permalink Permalink
almost 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
I guess one way to justify it is that the most likely time we will need our third keeper is the third game for which Moss is available for.

IF we weren't to take Moss, I would much prefer Gleeson to be taken than Spoonley - I think he is better now, and has much greater potential.
Permalink Permalink
almost 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Buffon II wrote:
We won't make it past the first round, so one game.
Says who? I remember some Aussie knob saying the Nix would finish with the wooden spoon.
Permalink Permalink
almost 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
I really hope Clapham goes over Mulligan, his awareness in the NZFC was amazing, he looked class, would fit into the A-league quite easily IMO.
Permalink Permalink
almost 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
timmymadden wrote:
Buffon II wrote:
We won't make it past the first round, so one game.
Says who? I remember some Aussie knob saying the Nix would finish with the wooden spoon.


I just said it didn't I?

Three for me, and two for them.

Permalink Permalink
almost 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Third string goalkeepers are rarely used at the world cup so its unlikely that we would need a third keeper before our third game. Given that Moss is arguably our best keeper, we should take him just for that game.

And in the unlikely event that a draw will see us into the latter stages.....wouldn't we want to play our strongest available team? And IMO that includes Moss.

Besides.....Moss really shouldn't have been suspended for the 1st two games. The punishment far outweighed the crime, even had we not qualified. We qualify for world cups rarely, and we can expect a tougher route next time. I'd take him purely on the basis that it is unjust to rob a man of his dreams unfairly.

And yeah i do think Richard Wilson should have been given some game time in Spain......
Permalink Permalink
almost 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Moss is maybe the right type keeper against Paraguay. . . . so I have no problems with that. It's a calculated risk but the odds are good still.
Permalink Permalink
almost 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
From the front page article...
"

But it might not necessarily come to that. Herbert said there was "a little bit of leeway" because the tournament's replacement policy allowed coaches to bring in a goalkeeper "straight away" as emergency cover.

That would allow him to have someone on standby in South Africa � presumably Auckland City keeper Jacob Spoonley, who made his debut in the Oceania qualifying series against Fiji � without being part of the initial 23-man squad. "

This makes it a non issue. Take Moss, Pasty and Banners and have Spoons on stand by.
Permalink Permalink
almost 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
agree
Permalink Permalink
almost 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
def agree. 
Permalink Permalink
almost 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Sweet holiday for Spooners in SA staying and training with the squad and "getting to experience the World Cup".

Its no longer a problem.

Permalink Permalink
almost 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Stand-by players don't travel with the squad, but can be included in cases of emergency.
Permalink Permalink
almost 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Yeah but 12 hr time difference and 20 odd travels hrs I'd think and "non-travelling" players would be very close buy to avoid jetlag issues. European and African players have less time difference issues so probably wouldn't travel. NZ and Aussie (maybe even other asian and possibly South American countries) I would suggest would be in SA.

Its no longer a problem.

Permalink Permalink
almost 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Toffeeman wrote:
Yeah but 12 hr time difference and 20 odd travels hrs I'd think and "non-travelling" players would be very close buy to avoid jetlag issues. European and African players have less time difference issues so probably wouldn't travel. NZ and Aussie (maybe even other asian and possibly South American countries) I would suggest would be in SA.


Well, I don't know if NZF would be keen to have extra players there sitting on their arses waiting to see if they'll be needed, especially considering the likelihood that they won't be. It does cost money.

Other than the jet-lag, there's no other advantage of flying them over straight away - they won't be allowed to train/interact with the squad, and like I said, it probably wouldn't justify the cost.
Permalink Permalink
almost 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
With a squad of 23 (and even that will be scraping the bottom of the NZ football talent barrel) then the only extra player I'd keep in camp would be Spooners. Everywhere else should be covered in the 23 and we know aboutt eh potential issue with keepers. Also, as soon as the final whistle blows in the fist game the issues will be known. If Paston is uninjured and not sent off the the issue dissapears.

Its no longer a problem.

Permalink Permalink
almost 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Worst comes to worst Me and Ali James will be around to fight it out (possibly literally )

Its no longer a problem.

Permalink Permalink
almost 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Great item on three talking to Pevs, Brockie and Ricki about this weeks camp.

Check online once it's up.

How's my driving? - Whine here

Permalink Permalink
almost 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Post a link when found anyone, ta.
Permalink Permalink
almost 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
http://www.3news.co.nz/Crunch-time-for-All-Whites-hopefuls-/tabid/415/articleID/153427/Default.aspx

The page is borked at the mo.
Permalink Permalink
almost 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago

Thanks.

Permalink Permalink