National League / OCL

Auckland City FC - Thanks a Trillion

3775 replies · 869,710 views
over 12 years ago

I'm going to prepare for a backlash from the regulars on this forum for what i'm about to say but forgive me thinking that Ramon hasnt proved himself enough to be th AWs coach.

He's yet to win an ASBP with the biggest budget and a team of pros playing in an amatuer league. Is that supposed to be disregarded for any reason?.....To me there must be more proven applicants out there.

And still talking about Ivan as a concievable option for the AWs anymore is rediculous even as a mediator between players and coaching staff. These players are professional and deal with new managers all the time. The best option for the AWs is to remove any bias or favouritism and have players fight for positions.

Just my 2 cents

 


 

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago

fair points i reckon - but i think Ramon could be important just for a transition of style for the all whites more than anything else?

I was thinking give Ramon the job for a 2 year period - then look to see if there is enough money in the kitty to bring in a more "experienced" coach to work with Ramon (or someone else if Ramon tanks over the first two years) to try and qualify for Russia - there isn't any point trying to get a high profile guy to come and work with the AW's for the next two years imo.

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago

fair points lee germon.  this place is for discussion, not for forming the one representative view that everyone has to subscribe to (well that applies to most on here anyway).

personally, i'm reluctant for new zealand to enter the revolving door circus ring that is the international coaching circuit, especially when we may have the solution on our own door step.  for every guus hiddink, there are a hundred pim verbeeks.

i think vader's point is that a young coach needs allies, especially if he planning on avoiding the age old trap of only selecting young players because he feels intimidated by the veterens


360footballnews.com

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago

speaking of which, here's a little story for you that may be of interest

several years ago ricki herbert hit the press proclaiming the end of simon elliott's international career.  he stated that it was time to blood new players.

little did herbert know that elliott was on trial at fulham at the time and shortly afterwards he became a premier league footballer

to credit herbert, i think he learned from this and has been willing to go cap in hand to players who he knew had no time for him in order to get the best players on the field

i think sometimes we are too quick to write off the older dudes

360footballnews.com

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago

AlanFord wrote:

Funny that you mention (again) full time professional team versus amateur outfit. Auckland City had trainings five times a week and each player was given free gym membership card.

the very definition of professional. 

Apparently Yaya Toure is on 4 gym memberships a week at Manchester City

All I do is make the stuff I would've liked
Reference things I wanna watch, reference girls I wanna bite
Now I'm firefly like a burning kite
And yousa fake fuck like a fleshlight

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
reg22 wrote:

fair points lee germon.  this place is for discussion, not for forming the one representative view that everyone has to subscribe to (well that applies to most on here anyway).

personally, i'm reluctant for new zealand to enter the revolving door circus ring that is the international coaching circuit, especially when we may have the solution on our own door step.  for every guus hiddink, there are a hundred pim verbeeks.

i think vader's point is that a young coach needs allies, especially if he planning on avoiding the age old trap of only selecting young players because he feels intimidated by the veterens

that's what I am getting at Reg. Why should Reid, Smith... In fact the majority of the national team not playing in an NZ league give the time of day to a new coach whom coaches far below a level they play at. Emblen came in as an assistant but I think even he realises where he is at and doing it the right way. He would get respect by showing his wares in the team environment - if he talks bollocks, he'll get tuned out. For Ramon to come into that environment where the players are far above a level he coaches (and let's remember, if he was that bloody good, he would be in a better league for all the style that he does coach) Ivan would be an ally for him and also one to be able to be a link between both players and team both ways while Ramon establishes himself in that role. Maybe not as a player but as a 'manager' type person or what ever

Grumpy old bastard alert

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
Jeff Vader wrote:
reg22 wrote:

fair points lee germon.  this place is for discussion, not for forming the one representative view that everyone has to subscribe to (well that applies to most on here anyway).

personally, i'm reluctant for new zealand to enter the revolving door circus ring that is the international coaching circuit, especially when we may have the solution on our own door step.  for every guus hiddink, there are a hundred pim verbeeks.

i think vader's point is that a young coach needs allies, especially if he planning on avoiding the age old trap of only selecting young players because he feels intimidated by the veterens

that's what I am getting at Reg. Why should Reid, Smith... In fact the majority of the national team not playing in an NZ league give the time of day to a new coach whom coaches far below a level they play at. Emblen came in as an assistant but I think even he realises where he is at and doing it the right way. He would get respect by showing his wares in the team environment - if he talks bollocks, he'll get tuned out. For Ramon to come into that environment where the players are far above a level he coaches (and let's remember, if he was that bloody good, he would be in a better league for all the style that he does coach) Ivan would be an ally for him and also one to be able to be a link between both players and team both ways while Ramon establishes himself in that role. Maybe not as a player but as a 'manager' type person or what ever


Ricki Herbert was in a similar  coaching position when he took over the AWs.

If you are old and wise you were probably young and stupid

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
Frankie Mac wrote:

AlanFord wrote:

Funny that you mention (again) full time professional team versus amateur outfit. Auckland City had trainings five times a week and each player was given free gym membership card.

the very definition of professional. 

Apparently Yaya Toure is on 4 gym memberships a week at Manchester City


And your point is???
Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago

That your probably very obtuse ...

Permalink Permalink
about 12 years ago
Leggy wrote:
Jeff Vader wrote:
reg22 wrote:

fair points lee germon.  this place is for discussion, not for forming the one representative view that everyone has to subscribe to (well that applies to most on here anyway).

personally, i'm reluctant for new zealand to enter the revolving door circus ring that is the international coaching circuit, especially when we may have the solution on our own door step.  for every guus hiddink, there are a hundred pim verbeeks.

i think vader's point is that a young coach needs allies, especially if he planning on avoiding the age old trap of only selecting young players because he feels intimidated by the veterens

that's what I am getting at Reg. Why should Reid, Smith... In fact the majority of the national team not playing in an NZ league give the time of day to a new coach whom coaches far below a level they play at. Emblen came in as an assistant but I think even he realises where he is at and doing it the right way. He would get respect by showing his wares in the team environment - if he talks bollocks, he'll get tuned out. For Ramon to come into that environment where the players are far above a level he coaches (and let's remember, if he was that bloody good, he would be in a better league for all the style that he does coach) Ivan would be an ally for him and also one to be able to be a link between both players and team both ways while Ramon establishes himself in that role. Maybe not as a player but as a 'manager' type person or what ever


Ricki Herbert was in a similar  coaching position when he took over the AWs.
I thought he was Mick Waitts assistant? 

Grumpy old bastard alert

Permalink Permalink
about 12 years ago

How good is that?! City held Casablanca to a draw on 90 mins. Casablanca in turn reached the final and only lost 2-0.... I love ACFC!!!

Auckland City FC

Permalink Permalink
about 12 years ago

HBU held City to a draw, CU held city to a draw. Does that mean they are could have done the same?

Grumpy old bastard alert

Permalink Permalink
about 12 years ago
Jeff Vader wrote:

HBU held City to a draw, CU held city to a draw. Does that mean they are could have done the same?


Who knows Jeff but says a hell of a lot for all three teams. What an exciting game today eh?

Auckland City FC

Permalink Permalink
about 12 years ago

Great game,  tarnished by the twat who did the aftermath MC's job for Auckland City telling Perry Cotton they can come and scrap for a result but they need to start playing technical football like Auckland City and if Hawkes Bay and the rest of the franchises could get on board NZ football would be in a better place.  This was just after Perry Cotton had given Auckland city a big thumbs up on the way they played at the club world cup.  Maybe he had a point maybe he didn't. But my point is it was not the right time or place to bring this up.  I noticed a few key Auckland city players rushing over to Perry Cotton after to apologize. No wonder people think Auckland city is full of arrogant people when the reality is its just a few with very loud voices.    The MC then moved on to honour some ex Auckland city players who played a very direct style of football under Alan Jones.  Go figure?.

Permalink Permalink
about 12 years ago

I'm actually lost for words. Any ACFC supporters care to reply?

Grumpy old bastard alert

Permalink Permalink
about 12 years ago

theyll be on their own site , wont  they , as requested ....

Permalink Permalink
about 12 years ago

typical - dodge the question.

this is a perfect time to answer these questions and maybe help us understand that what some of dislike about ACFC actually has very little to do with on field issues and by and large most of the club.

It seems to me a few characters who say a little too much are the ones ruining the image?

Permalink Permalink
about 12 years ago
Jeff Vader wrote:

I'm actually lost for words. Any ACFC supporters care to reply?


I don't know about this - I left before the speeches so don't even know who the MC was... Sorry.

Auckland City FC

Permalink Permalink
about 12 years ago
Jeff Vader wrote:
 You should read everything in front of you and not selective bits of it to suit your argument. I notice when you choose to use the quote function, you only choose the bits that suit your argument too...

I do this for a number of reasons:

It's easier to digest - certainly for me - perhaps I have a short attention span but I have a real problem reading long posts. I have only just got round to reading your whole post that this excerpt is taken from.

Time - I really only have time to make short posts...

Selectively choosing what to answer - I may agree with the majority and I have a pet hate of "This" posts. This is illustrated when you recently asked why I was ignoring some point about imports and I answered that you were correct.

Auckland City FC

Permalink Permalink
about 12 years ago
alireggae wrote:
Jeff Vader wrote:

I'm actually lost for words. Any ACFC supporters care to reply?


I don't know about this - I left before the speeches so don't even know who the MC was... Sorry.

I think the ACFC speech was a bit of a surprise reaction to Cotton saying they came with the intention of "roughing up" City, not something I think a coach should publicly admit to even if true. Passions were high on and off the field. A great game and full credit to HBU. What the City MC was trying to get across was just how tough the assignment in Morocco was and how much it took out of the players. This included three days of flying, all sorts of difficulties placed in the way of City and even supporters who went being tear gassed and robbed. By all accounts it was now a welcoming place.

If you're finally lost for words JV, it truly is a blessing.

Permalink Permalink
about 12 years ago · edited about 12 years ago · History
alireggae wrote:
Jeff Vader wrote:
 You should read everything in front of you and not selective bits of it to suit your argument. I notice when you choose to use the quote function, you only choose the bits that suit your argument too...


I do this for a number of reasons:


It's easier to digest - certainly for me - perhaps I have a short attention span but I have a real problem reading long posts. I have only just got round to reading your whole post that this excerpt is taken from.


Time - I really only have time to make short posts...


Selectively choosing what to answer - I may agree with the majority and I have a pet hate of "This" posts. This is illustrated when you recently asked why I was ignoring some point about imports and I answered that you were correct.

We have to be selective in choosing what to answer because there's so much anti-ACFC guff from some of you that we don't have the time. Also a lot of it is too petty to justify bothering.

PS - it was a cracking game and a great advertisement for the ASBP. Eight goals, two red cards and a noisy crowd. Should have been on television and I'm sure any neutrals there would have thoroughly enjoyed themselves. I know JV - "bah humbug!".

Permalink Permalink
about 12 years ago
Jeff Vader wrote:
 I asked this about 4 months ago and someone said that they didn't really care who was wearing the shirt for ACFC, it was more about the club and the shirt. Thats not something that I had thought about because for me, I actually care who wears the shirt and represents any clubs I support (I have the same issue with Alex Pledger in the Breakers in that he is a fucking donkey and does not deserve to wear that shirt) For you guys, well that makes it interesting because you say you are passionate supporters but only so far as in not caring about who wears your teams shirt. I would have thought, if you placed a lot of value in that, then you would care EXACTLY who wears the shirt for your club.


I think that was me who said that but I'll qualify it. Yes I do care to a certain extent who wears the shirt but it has no relevance whether they are an import or not. 

I think we can all agree that Manel Exposito was probably one of the most obvious imports at ACFC and yet I couldn't be happier with Manel wearing the ACFC shirt. Manel was one who always made the effort both on and off the pitch. He always made time for signatures and photos with the kids, always thanked the fans and recently flew to see the ACFC guys when they were on their recent WCC tour. You couldn't ask for a better ambassador for the club than that. 

Auckland City FC

Permalink Permalink
about 12 years ago
Jeff Vader wrote:
To answer your specific point you raised (and I wont ignore it) "If Phoenix supporter find they cannot identify with their local ASBP team, whether that be Auckland TW or whoever, how can you identify with the Phoenix?"

The answer is, its an NZ team in an Australian competition. As a New Zealander, everyone can identify with sticking one up an Australian. Its actually a part of our culture to Aussie bash whether we are calling them 'Same old Aussies, always cheating/racist/whatever' to gloating over our hold on the Bledisloe Cup to hating Jimmy Spithall for being a smarmy Aussie in a boat to being not being Australian to laughing at politicians like Pauline Hanson to not liking them for stealing Pavlova, Crowded House, Phar Lap, Russell Crowe (hmmmm). Thats why I support them. They may well be the Wellington Phoenix but I see an NZ team in an Australian competition like I do with the Breakers and the Warriors.

This is interesting and I could understand it in relation to national team Vs national team but in relation to the Phoenix, Breakers etc I can't really understand it. It strikes me that an Australians reaction to this would be one of either 'don't give a fuck' or alternatively 'thanks for bringing your money/attention to our tournament'
In my mind a better way to stick it up the Aussies would be to develop our own domestic leagues and stop riding on their coat tails. 

Auckland City FC

Permalink Permalink
about 12 years ago

Back on yesterdays game - How good was Tade? - stepped up 10 notches. Was on fire.

Auckland City FC

Permalink Permalink
about 12 years ago
alireggae wrote:
Jeff Vader wrote:
To answer your specific point you raised (and I wont ignore it) "If Phoenix supporter find they cannot identify with their local ASBP team, whether that be Auckland TW or whoever, how can you identify with the Phoenix?"

The answer is, its an NZ team in an Australian competition. As a New Zealander, everyone can identify with sticking one up an Australian. Its actually a part of our culture to Aussie bash whether we are calling them 'Same old Aussies, always cheating/racist/whatever' to gloating over our hold on the Bledisloe Cup to hating Jimmy Spithall for being a smarmy Aussie in a boat to being not being Australian to laughing at politicians like Pauline Hanson to not liking them for stealing Pavlova, Crowded House, Phar Lap, Russell Crowe (hmmmm). Thats why I support them. They may well be the Wellington Phoenix but I see an NZ team in an Australian competition like I do with the Breakers and the Warriors.


This is interesting and I could understand it in relation to national team Vs national team but in relation to the Phoenix, Breakers etc I can't really understand it. It strikes me that an Australians reaction to this would be one of either 'don't give a fuck' or alternatively 'thanks for bringing your money/attention to our tournament'

In my mind a better way to stick it up the Aussies would be to develop our own domestic leagues and stop riding on their coat tails. 

yes I see where you are coming from.

I guess I'm not anti Australian but i really do like sticking one up them. Yeah we are in most of their comps because they get our cash/exposure etc but you could almost hear those great Aussie legends of NRL backflip in their grave when the Warriors made the final. The Breakers won 3 on the trot and they then changed their defensive rules to nullify the Breakers biggest leg up cause we stuck it up them.
I don't view it as riding on coat tails because (and let's use Sigmund because he was ACFC and now Phoenix) at ACFC Sigmund could not last 90 mins cause of cramp and whatever other reasons. He was an ok footballer for this level (one of the better ones) but when he made the step up, it took a while for him to adjust both physically in terms of body shape and fitness and as a footballer. He is not necessarily better as a 'footballer' in terms of on the ball but you can see him engaging the brain a little more cause at ASBP level, 'clear the decks' was a standard defensive move that does not work at HAL. I think while you can disagree with the principle of the HAL, it does help our footballers becomes better as an overall package than if they were in the ASBP. I look at Clapham and while I don't know the guy, he looks like he coasts through the league but there is a question mark about how he would be at the next level. Look at Totori. Made the ASBP look easy for him cause he just ran past everyone and any mistakes, the defenders were not good enough to capitalise on. Next level - disappears. I think in terms of our National team, I want players in a better level of comp than the ASBP.

Grumpy old bastard alert

Permalink Permalink
about 12 years ago
Jeff Vader wrote:
I look at Clapham and while I don't know the guy, he looks like he coasts through the league but there is a question mark about how he would be at the next level. Look at Totori. Made the ASBP look easy for him cause he just ran past everyone and any mistakes, the defenders were not good enough to capitalise on. Next level - disappears. I think in terms of our National team, I want players in a better level of comp than the ASBP.

By the same token, what about Riera? I haven't personally seen him play for the Phoenix but from what I've read, he has been one of your best players this season?

Auckland City FC

Permalink Permalink
about 12 years ago
Jeff Vader wrote:
 I think while you can disagree with the principle of the HAL, it does help our footballers becomes better as an overall package than if they were in the ASBP. 

I don't disagree with the principle of the HAL and have no issues with NZ players playing there just as I have no problems with them playing in EU or US etc, just not keen on putting a NZ team in there. Probably an unrealistic/idealistic view but I'd rather see our resources and efforts going into a NZ competition.

Auckland City FC

Permalink Permalink
about 12 years ago
Greyhound wrote:
 Albert Riera wouldnt make most winter sides but possibly get a game for Manawatu in summer.

I understand this quote is from 2 years ago but it is sometimes amusing to retrospectively look at posts relative to the current situation.

Auckland City FC

Permalink Permalink
about 12 years ago
alireggae wrote:
Greyhound wrote:
 Albert Riera wouldnt make most winter sides but possibly get a game for Manawatu in summer.


I understand this quote is from 2 years ago but it is sometimes amusing to retrospectively look at posts relative to the current situation.

The changes in his confidence and play since he came into the Phoenix environment is clear to see.

  Supporter For Ever - Keep The Faith - Foundation Member - Never Lets FAX Get In The Way Of A Good Yarn

Permalink Permalink
about 12 years ago · edited about 12 years ago · History


Auckland will rise once more

Permalink Permalink
about 12 years ago
Jeff Vader wrote:
Leggy wrote:
Jeff Vader wrote:
reg22 wrote:

fair points lee germon.  this place is for discussion, not for forming the one representative view that everyone has to subscribe to (well that applies to most on here anyway).

personally, i'm reluctant for new zealand to enter the revolving door circus ring that is the international coaching circuit, especially when we may have the solution on our own door step.  for every guus hiddink, there are a hundred pim verbeeks.

i think vader's point is that a young coach needs allies, especially if he planning on avoiding the age old trap of only selecting young players because he feels intimidated by the veterens

that's what I am getting at Reg. Why should Reid, Smith... In fact the majority of the national team not playing in an NZ league give the time of day to a new coach whom coaches far below a level they play at. Emblen came in as an assistant but I think even he realises where he is at and doing it the right way. He would get respect by showing his wares in the team environment - if he talks bollocks, he'll get tuned out. For Ramon to come into that environment where the players are far above a level he coaches (and let's remember, if he was that bloody good, he would be in a better league for all the style that he does coach) Ivan would be an ally for him and also one to be able to be a link between both players and team both ways while Ramon establishes himself in that role. Maybe not as a player but as a 'manager' type person or what ever


Ricki Herbert was in a similar  coaching position when he took over the AWs.
I thought he was Mick Waitts assistant? 


yes. and a knife wielding one at that.

360footballnews.com

Permalink Permalink
about 12 years ago
Blew.2 wrote:
alireggae wrote:
Greyhound wrote:
 Albert Riera wouldnt make most winter sides but possibly get a game for Manawatu in summer.


I understand this quote is from 2 years ago but it is sometimes amusing to retrospectively look at posts relative to the current situation.

The changes in his confidence and play since he came into the Phoenix environment is clear to see.


that's quite a stunning quote from greyhound, who i seem to remember as someone who was a bit controversial, but had a clue.  am i wrong?

anyway, riera has made the a-league look easy.  there are flaws in his game, but none more than the majority of others in the league

i am of the view that the a-league is getting better every year, but the asb prem standard has gone through the roof over the last 3 seasons

360footballnews.com

Permalink Permalink
about 12 years ago · edited about 12 years ago · History

let me qualify that by saying that it was awesome in the first 2-3 years, then got crap and is now better than ever

360footballnews.com

Permalink Permalink
about 12 years ago
alireggae wrote:
Jeff Vader wrote:
I look at Clapham and while I don't know the guy, he looks like he coasts through the league but there is a question mark about how he would be at the next level. Look at Totori. Made the ASBP look easy for him cause he just ran past everyone and any mistakes, the defenders were not good enough to capitalise on. Next level - disappears. I think in terms of our National team, I want players in a better level of comp than the ASBP.


By the same token, what about Riera? I haven't personally seen him play for the Phoenix but from what I've read, he has been one of your best players this season?



clapham is a real enigma to me.  it mystified me why herbert didn't sign both him and andy barron in the first season.  i assumed at the time that my perception of the standard of the a-league vs nzfc must have been off.  looking back, i'm now stunned that they weren't signed

now it appears that merrick doesn't want too many all whites because of the inevitable interruptions, which is a pity

totori i always felt sorry for.  he always played in a front 2 or 3 at waitak and youngheart, but was asked to play deeper and wider for the phoenix.  waitak played early and in front of both him and allan pearce.  the phoenix built up slowly and hit high balls into the box, which didn't suit him at all.  i thought he was harshly judged by his phoenix stint.

merrick was never going to have him because he wanted to play slow and to feet, but if allan jones or chris milicich were to suddenly appear in the a-league, i'm sure he would do better

360footballnews.com

Permalink Permalink
about 12 years ago
reg22 wrote:
alireggae wrote:
Jeff Vader wrote:
I look at Clapham and while I don't know the guy, he looks like he coasts through the league but there is a question mark about how he would be at the next level. Look at Totori. Made the ASBP look easy for him cause he just ran past everyone and any mistakes, the defenders were not good enough to capitalise on. Next level - disappears. I think in terms of our National team, I want players in a better level of comp than the ASBP.


By the same token, what about Riera? I haven't personally seen him play for the Phoenix but from what I've read, he has been one of your best players this season?



clapham is a real enigma to me.  it mystified me why herbert didn't sign both him and andy barron in the first season.  i assumed at the time that my perception of the standard of the a-league vs nzfc must have been off.  looking back, i'm now stunned that they weren't signed

now it appears that merrick doesn't want too many all whites because of the inevitable interruptions, which is a pity

totori i always felt sorry for.  he always played in a front 2 or 3 at waitak and youngheart, but was asked to play deeper and wider for the phoenix.  waitak played early and in front of both him and allan pearce.  the phoenix built up slowly and hit high balls into the box, which didn't suit him at all.  i thought he was harshly judged by his phoenix stint.

merrick was never going to have him because he wanted to play slow and to feet, but if allan jones or chris milicich were to suddenly appear in the a-league, i'm sure he would do better

Pretty sure Barron would have been signed if he'd actually wanted to play in the A-league - I think he'd have been a better player than Tim Brown for us, although he probably wouldn't have scored as many goals.
I never understood the fascination with Clapham that some people have - he's a pretty average footballer, and don't really think he'd bring any value to the Phoenix (in fact, I'm semi-outraged that you put him and Barron in the same category :-)).
Totori's biggest problem was that he doesn't really play like a footballer - he always looked to me like a Sunday footballer who relied heavily on his physical attributes to get his success at the ASB Prem level, where they were enough to get him plenty of opportunities. At a better level, you need to have more than that, and a better appreciation of the tactical concepts of the game. To me he always looked like he hadn't received enough quality coaching early enough in his career.
Permalink Permalink
about 12 years ago

Remember some players have bigger ego's than a $ will cover . 

  Supporter For Ever - Keep The Faith - Foundation Member - Never Lets FAX Get In The Way Of A Good Yarn

Permalink Permalink
about 12 years ago
el grapadura wrote:
reg22 wrote:
alireggae wrote:
Jeff Vader wrote:
I look at Clapham and while I don't know the guy, he looks like he coasts through the league but there is a question mark about how he would be at the next level. Look at Totori. Made the ASBP look easy for him cause he just ran past everyone and any mistakes, the defenders were not good enough to capitalise on. Next level - disappears. I think in terms of our National team, I want players in a better level of comp than the ASBP.


By the same token, what about Riera? I haven't personally seen him play for the Phoenix but from what I've read, he has been one of your best players this season?



clapham is a real enigma to me.  it mystified me why herbert didn't sign both him and andy barron in the first season.  i assumed at the time that my perception of the standard of the a-league vs nzfc must have been off.  looking back, i'm now stunned that they weren't signed

now it appears that merrick doesn't want too many all whites because of the inevitable interruptions, which is a pity

totori i always felt sorry for.  he always played in a front 2 or 3 at waitak and youngheart, but was asked to play deeper and wider for the phoenix.  waitak played early and in front of both him and allan pearce.  the phoenix built up slowly and hit high balls into the box, which didn't suit him at all.  i thought he was harshly judged by his phoenix stint.

merrick was never going to have him because he wanted to play slow and to feet, but if allan jones or chris milicich were to suddenly appear in the a-league, i'm sure he would do better


Pretty sure Barron would have been signed if he'd actually wanted to play in the A-league - I think he'd have been a better player than Tim Brown for us, although he probably wouldn't have scored as many goals.

I never understood the fascination with Clapham that some people have - he's a pretty average footballer, and don't really think he'd bring any value to the Phoenix (in fact, I'm semi-outraged that you put him and Barron in the same category :-)).

Totori's biggest problem was that he doesn't really play like a footballer - he always looked to me like a Sunday footballer who relied heavily on his physical attributes to get his success at the ASB Prem level, where they were enough to get him plenty of opportunities. At a better level, you need to have more than that, and a better appreciation of the tactical concepts of the game. To me he always looked like he hadn't received enough quality coaching early enough in his career.



fair enough, esp in regards to totori

barron was definitely keen, but was never approached

360footballnews.com

Permalink Permalink
about 12 years ago

Just to complete the cycle of every forum turning into a debate about Aaron Clapham - I think Clapham's ability is hard to question when you look at Canterbury this season. They were absolutely pants until he came back into their squad, and now they've picked up some very decent results, based hugely off his abilities in the centre of the park, they had absolutely no go-forward there, and now he's tied for the lead of the golden boot.

I think its hard to dispute that he is one of the top five players in the ASBP, probably not A-League standard - but you could do far worse. Calling him "average" seems a bit harsh El Grap!

Anyway, I think the forum as a whole is now 95/96 for discussing Clapham completely off-topic, we may have to start a Clapham for Nix debate in the Trophy Manager or Off Topic threads to really set the record.

Permalink Permalink
about 12 years ago

how do you guys rate john irving?

n-bomb was raving about him pre-season, and now we have had half a season to assess, is he up to a-league standard?

360footballnews.com

Permalink Permalink
about 12 years ago
N-Bomb wrote:

Just to complete the cycle of every forum turning into a debate about Aaron Clapham - I think Clapham's ability is hard to question when you look at Canterbury this season. They were absolutely pants until he came back into their squad, and now they've picked up some very decent results, based hugely off his abilities in the centre of the park, they had absolutely no go-forward there, and now he's tied for the lead of the golden boot.

I think its hard to dispute that he is one of the top five players in the ASBP, probably not A-League standard - but you could do far worse. Calling him "average" seems a bit harsh El Grap!

Anyway, I think the forum as a whole is now 95/96 for discussing Clapham completely off-topic, we may have to start a Clapham for Nix debate in the Trophy Manager or Off Topic threads to really set the record.



you're quite right bro.  i tried starting an 'asb prem players of a-league standard' thread, but it was trashed by some of the faithful (i sulked)

360footballnews.com

Permalink Permalink