National League / OCL

Auckland City FC - Thanks a Trillion

3775 replies · 869,710 views
over 12 years ago
Jerzy Merino wrote:
Leggy wrote:
Jerzy Merino wrote:
Jerzy Merino wrote:

PS If you're so hot on 'Kiwi born' players JV, Leggy, why aren't you both pushing Clapham's case for the Nix instead of the very opposite? You telling me he's not up to Australian journeyman standard?

Repeat post.



I think that you misunderstood what I said. I merely  mentioned  that certain players were not born in NZ, which was true, and all of a sudden it was like touching a raw nerve. I say, get a life.  I have always been a supporter of NZ football regardless of where the players are born.I'm not anti at all. I know some of the players already mentioned. I would like to see more locally developed players but if we had made the WC finals I would have been over the moon. Half of my friends were not born in NZ-- it does not bother me one bit.
In the 82 WC campaign more than 10 of the squad were not NZ born. So what.

You're right. Apologies. Tell Vader to back off.



JV is his own person and the one thing we both definitely have in common is our passion for the game.

If you are old and wise you were probably young and stupid

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago · edited over 12 years ago · History
alireggae wrote:
Jeff Vader wrote:

I have 2 points Ali which I will lay out now we have finally gotten somewhere with it.

1: (which is mainly more about where your angle is Ali) You are a massive proponent of the ASBP and supporting what is in your backyard (the search function is great for that kind of thing) I can respect that but how can you get people along to a team that people cannot identify with because there is no local players? I know that exact same argument can be thrown at the Phoenix and fair enough but the difference is exposure and media - exactly what the ASBP does not have. People can identify with the Sigmunds, Brockies etc (AWs if you like) because its an 'NZ team' and those players have profiles being AWs. Now you are essentially trying to get people down to watch that are football people already (cause no one else knows what's going on because of lack of media) so why do the people from Mangere, Western Springs, Mt Albert, Ellerslie etc (and Chopah has mentioned this too in a round about way) want to go along and support a team of players they don't even know or have any buy in with. Because of good football? They can get that on TV for free and its better football. The CWC game, there was only 3 Kiwis starting I think (Tamati, Ivan and Danko). Ivan is a beacon for the club in that respects but that's it. Why should these football people whom have time on their hands, go and support a team of what is effectively imports that get paid when they shouldn't. If you are looking at local supporters, people have to generally identify with the club. Most people don't identify with ACFC because a: Its Central in disguise (just like Waitakere is as well) and b: No one knows these players. I understand that you can say 'well why do people support Man U etc' - because of exposure. Would exposure fix the problem? In some respects Yes (for getting people along to the ASBP in general but then you have to fight the quality of football offered too) but probably not to supporting your team because again, other than Ivan, there really is no players that are identifiable or can relate to. Understand that this is not a 'you need to find a solution to this Ali' but more a 'here is the problem and why I think the import situation does not help it'

 

2: (and more the general one) The Phoenix were accused by ACFC supporters of being an Aussie club in an Aussie league and doing nothing for NZ football because they bought in Aussie journeyman. The supporters were quite vocal on going and watching a team of Kiwis that were local etc. Looking at ACFC, how does what they are doing, help provide pathways to Kiwi footballers when there are so many imports? Lets forget the cash into the ASBP because the competition is that fucked it relies on an NZ team going to CWC to survive on that payout. If what the Phoenix was doing for so long was wrong, how does a ACFC, a team that is arguable in a more realistic competition to aim at for most footballers with talent in NZ, (ASBP being easier to get into than HAL) help provide those pathways that when its obvious you can't get in because of the amount of imports? You club has a fantastic coach and coaches a fantastic style (relative to what traditionally happens in NZ) Would it not be better for football in NZ to have Kiwis playing and learning to play that way than stacking a side full of imports?

 

The bullshit point I wanted to make is out of the way and finally its been acknowledged because while I can see positives to imports, what's going on at ACFC is not good for the game in terms of pathways for Kiwi players, local support etc. If you feel that you disagree with that, that's fine, but then you can't throw stones at the Phoenix for doing the same thing.


Disclaimer: I'm going to regret this because I don't give a shit if the Penix have 100% imports and have never complained about them being full of Aussie Journeymen.


The current Phoenix squad has 41% kiwi born players - the minority.


Answer me this: If Phoenix supporter find they cannot identify with their local ASBP team, whether that be Auckland TW or whoever, how can you identify with the Phoenix?


Again for the record although undoubtedly this will be ignored entirely...

Disclaimer: I'm going to regret this because I don't give a shit if the Penix have 100% imports and have never complained about them being full of Aussie Journeymen.

 See now you are twisting the argument to suit your point of view (as per normal)

We are talking about imports and I have listed them, and you have acknowledged them. We are not talking about people like Danko or James Pritchett who while born in other countries, are considered Kiwis. We are not getting into race and hate crimes against people that are or are not born here (which oddly enough, you guys raised as a distraction point to try attack me rather than the point, which I don't really give a shit about but it proves you lads have no point) so stop with the subterfuge and keep it exactly where it is at - imports in football.

I have noted that other supporters of your ilk will defend the likes of Burfoot and Browne as being Kiwis but label Danny Robinson as an import. For me, Danny is an import (has he lived here 5 years continuously? I'm not sure). I look to the definition that FIFA provide for being an import or if you like, part of any leagues foreign quota. In fact, they use that same definition for the A League in that to not be classified as an import or naturalised, you have to have 5 years continuous living in the country. You can call them what you like but until they satisfy that criteria, they are defined as imports. I am sure you will somehow find a way to make FIFAs definition that I have just used as a race and hate crime... Just don't.

The Phoenix have 5 imports. ACFC have 9 (Dickinson, Tade, Krisna, Bale, Iwata, Irving, Berlanga, Billen, Marquez) and you could argue more if you want to get picky but I'm taking the obvious ones here.

With regards to your disclaimer, as I noted in the very 1st line and you conveniently choose to ignore, I shall paste it for you again Ali

"(which is mainly more about where your angle is Ali) You are a massive proponent of the ASBP and supporting what is in your backyard (the search function is great for that kind of thing)"

Because I did go back and search your posts to find out what your angle is and you are right, its being a proponent of the ASBP and I acknowledged that. You should read everything in front of you and not selective bits of it to suit your argument. I notice when you choose to use the quote function, you only choose the bits that suit your argument too...

Whats my issue with this volume of imports? Well the best thing about having not posted for about 20 hours is that others got in and kinda validated what I was saying - that they can't relate to the team (again thats not the issue I was address as such but in the case for some people, causation and effect are related). I asked this about 4 months ago and someone said that they didn't really care who was wearing the shirt for ACFC, it was more about the club and the shirt. Thats not something that I had thought about because for me, I actually care who wears the shirt and represents any clubs I support (I have the same issue with Alex Pledger in the Breakers in that he is a fucking donkey and does not deserve to wear that shirt) For you guys, well that makes it interesting because you say you are passionate supporters but only so far as in not caring about who wears your teams shirt. I would have thought, if you placed a lot of value in that, then you would care EXACTLY who wears the shirt for your club.

I guess you could ask the question that would I be more of a supporter if there were less imports? Absolutely because then I see a team trying to win a competition in the same manner and spirit as everyone else (with probably Waitakere as a noted exception as well) and there are footballers that are local. I want to see local footballers shine through because that also gives a larger selection pool for potential AWs and also getting those guys out of here into pro leagues. I recall Alan Jones first year he fielded a team of locals and turned a prima donna like Liam Mulrooney into looking like a bloody good footballer (you had Shane Pascoe, Joel Matthews PV, Ulhman, Liam, Pritch, Johnathan Smith, Rosco and thats just off the top of my head...) As Smithy said, he has no love for TW this year because of the lack of local lads and also 'deathy uninteresting'

I  do see imports being good for the league - 3 per team would do it but then with the volume you guys have, how does that help grow the talent level of New Zealand footballers when they can't play? People argue you could have a 3rd team in Auckland cause of the talent here - How about getting those players into the 2 teams that are here first rather than trying to have a 3rd team. 9 imports improves the standard of the play in the league - no it makes 1 team lopsided. If you put Juventus in the league and they thrashed every team 10-0, that would provide no benefit for any team or the league. I see what Ramon does coaching wise and feel every team should be looking to emulate that. The problem is, that the NZ footballers in that team never get a chance to play it, only exposure at training. Is it an ACFC issue to grow the level of talent in the country and skill of the players? I guess that depends on where you sit on the issue and I think there is a league wide responsibility towards that because some teams and games are absolutely fucking awful as illustrated on TV last year prior to the Phoenix games.

To answer your specific point you raised (and I wont ignore it) "If Phoenix supporter find they cannot identify with their local ASBP team, whether that be Auckland TW or whoever, how can you identify with the Phoenix?"

The answer is, its an NZ team in an Australian competition. As a New Zealander, everyone can identify with sticking one up an Australian. Its actually a part of our culture to Aussie bash whether we are calling them 'Same old Aussies, always cheating/racist/whatever' to gloating over our hold on the Bledisloe Cup to hating Jimmy Spithall for being a smarmy Aussie in a boat to being not being Australian to laughing at politicians like Pauline Hanson to not liking them for stealing Pavlova, Crowded House, Phar Lap, Russell Crowe (hmmmm). Thats why I support them. They may well be the Wellington Phoenix but I see an NZ team in an Australian competition like I do with the Breakers and the Warriors.

Grumpy old bastard alert

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
Leggy wrote:
Jerzy Merino wrote:
Leggy wrote:
Jerzy Merino wrote:
Jerzy Merino wrote:

PS If you're so hot on 'Kiwi born' players JV, Leggy, why aren't you both pushing Clapham's case for the Nix instead of the very opposite? You telling me he's not up to Australian journeyman standard?

Repeat post.



I think that you misunderstood what I said. I merely  mentioned  that certain players were not born in NZ, which was true, and all of a sudden it was like touching a raw nerve. I say, get a life.  I have always been a supporter of NZ football regardless of where the players are born.I'm not anti at all. I know some of the players already mentioned. I would like to see more locally developed players but if we had made the WC finals I would have been over the moon. Half of my friends were not born in NZ-- it does not bother me one bit.
In the 82 WC campaign more than 10 of the squad were not NZ born. So what.

You're right. Apologies. Tell Vader to back off.



JV is his own person and the one thing we both definitely have in common is our passion for the game.
Pretty much except I think your period might last a little longer than mine :o)

Grumpy old bastard alert

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago

Back to the game at WCC...Both Kiwis and imports did not have a good game at WCC.

In summary, very average performance by Auckland City versus average home team. The way how Auckland City played is similar to the last WCC. The team played more not to concede goal/s, rather than to win. City created two half chances for 95 minutes of the game. They couldn't put three passes together, struggled at the back, in the mid field and Dickinson was invisible up front (not his fault, he is not the striker and never was, although he scored one goal at WCC with his shin-pad and became  ACFC hero "striker").

Even players from the bench had no impact. Tade lost the ball 5-6 time committed 4-5 fouls and that was his contribution to the game. Krishna scored the goal described by the commentator as " three defenders disaster", but the finish was calm and composed. Apart from that, he tried to do too much and play individually. Midfield (Danko, Bale, Bilen, spanish guy) completely lost the battle in the midfield.

I am not sure how Ramon can say that he is disappointed because he thinks ACFC deserved more out of this game??? Although, overall host team was pretty ordinary, they still created a number of chances and deserved to win.

Interesting that ACFC players went down in the penalty box a few times, where in Kiwitea the ref would most likely give them penalty, but not at the WCC...

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
AlanFord wrote:

Back to the game at WCC...Both Kiwis and imports did not have a good game at WCC.

In summary, a) very average performance by Auckland City versus average home team. The way how Auckland City played is similar to the last WCC. b) The team played more not to concede goal/s, rather than to win. City created two half chances for 95 minutes of the game. c) They couldn't put three passes together, struggled at the back, in the mid field and Dickinson was invisible up front (not his fault, he is not the striker and never was, although he scored one goal at WCC with his shin-pad and became  ACFC hero "striker").

Even players from the bench had no impact. Tade lost the ball 5-6 time committed 4-5 fouls and that was his contribution to the game. Krishna scored the goal described by the commentator as " three defenders disaster", but the finish was calm and composed. Apart from that, he tried to do too much and play individually. Midfield (Danko, Bale, Bilen, spanish guy) completely lost the battle in the midfield.

I am not sure how Ramon can say that he is disappointed because he thinks ACFC deserved more out of this game??? Although, overall d)host team was pretty ordinary, they still created a number of chances and deserved to win.

Interesting that ACFC players went down in the penalty box a few times, where in Kiwitea the ref would most likely give them penalty, but not at the WCC...

You seem to have been watching a rather different game to the one I saw. Although I am an ACFC supporter and of course you're not, which certainly makes for viewing difference - though not wth everybody.

a) Average performance? Compared to what? To City's usual game? To the EPL? To Barcelona? Average home team. Again, compared to what? To your average African club outfit? To the EPL? To Barca?

b) You mean they should have thrown three strikers on from the beginning? They shouldn't have played not to concede? They shouldn't have saved breath and legs until the 2nd half? They shouldn't have been cautious waiting to see what they were up against?

c) I counted quite a few times when they strung MORE than three passes together. Watch the replay. You're saying this from biased recollection.

d) The host team was pretty ordinary. Again, compared to what? (see above) I wonder if the Morrocan supporters would agree with you? But of course you're an far off commentator judging them from the educated Kiwi footballing fraternity's high standards. Are you not? Or perhaps, heaven forbid, you're a COACH!

 

And your last point gives the game away - Ramon of course coaches ACFC players to dive. Interesting. Of course he does. He's the ACFC coach after all.

"At the end of the drive the lawmen arrive...

I'll take my chance because luck is on my side or something...

Her name is Rio, she don't need to understand...

Oh Rio, Rio, hear them shout across the land..."

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
Jerzy Merino wrote:
AlanFord wrote:

Back to the game at WCC...Both Kiwis and imports did not have a good game at WCC.

In summary, a) very average performance by Auckland City versus average home team. The way how Auckland City played is similar to the last WCC. b) The team played more not to concede goal/s, rather than to win. City created two half chances for 95 minutes of the game. c) They couldn't put three passes together, struggled at the back, in the mid field and Dickinson was invisible up front (not his fault, he is not the striker and never was, although he scored one goal at WCC with his shin-pad and became  ACFC hero "striker").

Even players from the bench had no impact. Tade lost the ball 5-6 time committed 4-5 fouls and that was his contribution to the game. Krishna scored the goal described by the commentator as " three defenders disaster", but the finish was calm and composed. Apart from that, he tried to do too much and play individually. Midfield (Danko, Bale, Bilen, spanish guy) completely lost the battle in the midfield.

I am not sure how Ramon can say that he is disappointed because he thinks ACFC deserved more out of this game??? Although, overall d)host team was pretty ordinary, they still created a number of chances and deserved to win.

Interesting that ACFC players went down in the penalty box a few times, where in Kiwitea the ref would most likely give them penalty, but not at the WCC...

You seem to have been watching a rather different game to the one I saw. Although I am an ACFC supporter and of course you're not, which certainly makes for viewing difference - though not wth everybody.

a) Average performance? Compared to what? To City's usual game? To the EPL? To Barcelona? Average home team. Again, compared to what? To your average African club outfit? To the EPL? To Barca?

b) You mean they should have thrown three strikers on from the beginning? They shouldn't have played not to concede? They shouldn't have saved breath and legs until the 2nd half? They shouldn't have been cautious waiting to see what they were up against?

c) I counted quite a few times when they strung MORE than three passes together. Watch the replay. You're saying this from biased recollection.

d) The host team was pretty ordinary. Again, compared to what? (see above) I wonder if the Morrocan supporters would agree with you? But of course you're an far off commentator judging them from the educated Kiwi footballing fraternity's high standards. Are you not? Or perhaps, heaven forbid, you're a COACH!

 

And your last point gives the game away - Ramon of course coaches ACFC players to dive. Interesting. Of course he does. He's the ACFC coach after all.


Mate chill out, were are all entitled to have own opinion. If you read my previous post you will see that I wished to ACFC all the best in this WCC. My disappointment is a result of my belief that ACFC had a chance to do better for the club and NZ football.
a) Average performance  based on: 
1) Number of chances created/shots on goals
2) Number of passes put together
3) Number of times that players gave the ball away with very little or no pressure  
4) Off the ball movement and shape
b) The team played more not to concede goal/s
 Way to often there was a huge gap and no linkage between midfield (who stayed closer to the back four). It look like the game plan  to utilise Krishna's speed, and Dickinson to hold the ball up and take some pressure of the defence. They looked happy to sit back and play nil all game and wait for penalties.
b) In my view the host team was pretty ordinary.
4) They had no flow if their game, way to often they play individually. Technically their team had capacity to play much better football. 
The last point has nothing to do with Ramon. You can count how many times City was given soft penalties in Kiwitea, I am not going to... 
 d) I suggest take ACFC supporter's hat off and watch the game again then comment...  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sB9N8hzEBeQ

Have a good day.

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago

Raja Casablanca 2-1 Monterray


Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago · edited over 12 years ago · History
AlanFord wrote:
Jerzy Merino wrote:
AlanFord wrote:

Back to the game at WCC...Both Kiwis and imports did not have a good game at WCC.

In summary, a) very average performance by Auckland City versus average home team. The way how Auckland City played is similar to the last WCC. b) The team played more not to concede goal/s, rather than to win. City created two half chances for 95 minutes of the game. c) They couldn't put three passes together, struggled at the back, in the mid field and Dickinson was invisible up front (not his fault, he is not the striker and never was, although he scored one goal at WCC with his shin-pad and became  ACFC hero "striker").

Even players from the bench had no impact. Tade lost the ball 5-6 time committed 4-5 fouls and that was his contribution to the game. Krishna scored the goal described by the commentator as " three defenders disaster", but the finish was calm and composed. Apart from that, he tried to do too much and play individually. Midfield (Danko, Bale, Bilen, spanish guy) completely lost the battle in the midfield.

I am not sure how Ramon can say that he is disappointed because he thinks ACFC deserved more out of this game??? Although, overall d)host team was pretty ordinary, they still created a number of chances and deserved to win.

Interesting that ACFC players went down in the penalty box a few times, where in Kiwitea the ref would most likely give them penalty, but not at the WCC...

You seem to have been watching a rather different game to the one I saw. Although I am an ACFC supporter and of course you're not, which certainly makes for viewing difference - though not wth everybody.

a) Average performance? Compared to what? To City's usual game? To the EPL? To Barcelona? Average home team. Again, compared to what? To your average African club outfit? To the EPL? To Barca?

b) You mean they should have thrown three strikers on from the beginning? They shouldn't have played not to concede? They shouldn't have saved breath and legs until the 2nd half? They shouldn't have been cautious waiting to see what they were up against?

c) I counted quite a few times when they strung MORE than three passes together. Watch the replay. You're saying this from biased recollection.

d) The host team was pretty ordinary. Again, compared to what? (see above) I wonder if the Morrocan supporters would agree with you? But of course you're an far off commentator judging them from the educated Kiwi footballing fraternity's high standards. Are you not? Or perhaps, heaven forbid, you're a COACH!

 

And your last point gives the game away - Ramon of course coaches ACFC players to dive. Interesting. Of course he does. He's the ACFC coach after all.


Mate chill out, were are all entitled to have own opinion. If you read my previous post you will see that I wished to ACFC all the best in this WCC. My disappointment is a result of my belief that ACFC had a chance to do better for the club and NZ football.

a) Average performance  based on: 

1) Number of chances created/shots on goals

2) Number of passes put together

3) Number of times that players gave the ball away with very little or no pressure  

4) Off the ball movement and shape

b) The team played more not to concede goal/s

 Way to often there was a huge gap and no linkage between midfield (who stayed closer to the back four). It look like the game plan  to utilise Krishna's speed, and Dickinson to hold the ball up and take some pressure of the defence. They looked happy to sit back and play nil all game and wait for penalties.

b) In my view the host team was pretty ordinary.

4) They had no flow if their game, way to often they play individually. Technically their team had capacity to play much better football. 

The last point has nothing to do with Ramon. You can count how many times City was given soft penalties in Kiwitea, I am not going to... 

 d) I suggest take ACFC supporter's hat off and watch the game again then comment...  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sB9N8hzEBeQ


Have a good day.


I think those critical of ACFC's performance still don't appreciate the gap between being a part-timer and full time professionals like Casablanca, who incidently have beaten the champions of Mexico Monterrey 2-1. Despite the nonsense the ACFC-haters put out sometimes on this forum most ACFC players hold down full-time jobs and train at night. What they achieved, playing to Ramon's ball retention strategy was tremendous. Casablanca were a better fitter side but the City boys stepped up a gear and gave as good as they got. I think some of you critics need to take off your "dislike ACFC" hats as well when you look at the punch above its weight effort of this small NZ club playing in a big competition like the CWC. I doubt the Phoenix, who are professional and train full-time, could have done better.

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
Bluemagic wrote:

I think those critical of ACFC's performance still don't appreciate the gap between being a part-timer and full time professionals like Casablanca, who incidently have beaten the champions of Mexico Monterrey 2-1. Despite the nonsense the ACFC-haters put out sometimes on this forum most ACFC players hold down full-time jobs and train at night. What they achieved, playing to Ramon's ball retention strategy was tremendous. Casablanca were a better fitter side but the City boys stepped up a gear and gave as good as they got. I think some of you critics need to take off your "dislike ACFC" hats as well when you look at the punch above its weight effort of this small NZ club playing in a big competition like the CWC. I doubt the Phoenix, who are professional and train full-time, could have done better.

So who are these 'ACFC haters' that criticised the performance?

I think you are talking our your ass again.

Grumpy old bastard alert

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago

Jeff, Danny Robinson played for Waikato FC in 2006-07. Before that he was at Gisborne. Has been in NZ since mid-2005 by my reckoning.

If he could lose that Derby accent he'd be as Kiwi as me.



https://www.facebook.com/groups/nzsportsprogrammes

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago

Ah thanks Bruce and cheers for clarifying. I was not sure how long he had been here.

Grumpy old bastard alert

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
Bluemagic wrote:
AlanFord wrote:
Jerzy Merino wrote:
AlanFord wrote:

Back to the game at WCC...Both Kiwis and imports did not have a good game at WCC.

In summary, a) very average performance by Auckland City versus average home team. The way how Auckland City played is similar to the last WCC. b) The team played more not to concede goal/s, rather than to win. City created two half chances for 95 minutes of the game. c) They couldn't put three passes together, struggled at the back, in the mid field and Dickinson was invisible up front (not his fault, he is not the striker and never was, although he scored one goal at WCC with his shin-pad and became  ACFC hero "striker").

Even players from the bench had no impact. Tade lost the ball 5-6 time committed 4-5 fouls and that was his contribution to the game. Krishna scored the goal described by the commentator as " three defenders disaster", but the finish was calm and composed. Apart from that, he tried to do too much and play individually. Midfield (Danko, Bale, Bilen, spanish guy) completely lost the battle in the midfield.

I am not sure how Ramon can say that he is disappointed because he thinks ACFC deserved more out of this game??? Although, overall d)host team was pretty ordinary, they still created a number of chances and deserved to win.

Interesting that ACFC players went down in the penalty box a few times, where in Kiwitea the ref would most likely give them penalty, but not at the WCC...

You seem to have been watching a rather different game to the one I saw. Although I am an ACFC supporter and of course you're not, which certainly makes for viewing difference - though not wth everybody.

a) Average performance? Compared to what? To City's usual game? To the EPL? To Barcelona? Average home team. Again, compared to what? To your average African club outfit? To the EPL? To Barca?

b) You mean they should have thrown three strikers on from the beginning? They shouldn't have played not to concede? They shouldn't have saved breath and legs until the 2nd half? They shouldn't have been cautious waiting to see what they were up against?

c) I counted quite a few times when they strung MORE than three passes together. Watch the replay. You're saying this from biased recollection.

d) The host team was pretty ordinary. Again, compared to what? (see above) I wonder if the Morrocan supporters would agree with you? But of course you're an far off commentator judging them from the educated Kiwi footballing fraternity's high standards. Are you not? Or perhaps, heaven forbid, you're a COACH!

 

And your last point gives the game away - Ramon of course coaches ACFC players to dive. Interesting. Of course he does. He's the ACFC coach after all.


Mate chill out, were are all entitled to have own opinion. If you read my previous post you will see that I wished to ACFC all the best in this WCC. My disappointment is a result of my belief that ACFC had a chance to do better for the club and NZ football.

a) Average performance  based on: 

1) Number of chances created/shots on goals

2) Number of passes put together

3) Number of times that players gave the ball away with very little or no pressure  

4) Off the ball movement and shape

b) The team played more not to concede goal/s

 Way to often there was a huge gap and no linkage between midfield (who stayed closer to the back four). It look like the game plan  to utilise Krishna's speed, and Dickinson to hold the ball up and take some pressure of the defence. They looked happy to sit back and play nil all game and wait for penalties.

b) In my view the host team was pretty ordinary.

4) They had no flow if their game, way to often they play individually. Technically their team had capacity to play much better football. 

The last point has nothing to do with Ramon. You can count how many times City was given soft penalties in Kiwitea, I am not going to... 

 d) I suggest take ACFC supporter's hat off and watch the game again then comment...  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sB9N8hzEBeQ


Have a good day.


I think those critical of ACFC's performance still don't appreciate the gap between being a part-timer and full time professionals like Casablanca, who incidently have beaten the champions of Mexico Monterrey 2-1. Despite the nonsense the ACFC-haters put out sometimes on this forum most ACFC players hold down full-time jobs and train at night. What they achieved, playing to Ramon's ball retention strategy was tremendous. Casablanca were a better fitter side but the City boys stepped up a gear and gave as good as they got. I think some of you critics need to take off your "dislike ACFC" hats as well when you look at the punch above its weight effort of this small NZ club playing in a big competition like the CWC. I doubt the Phoenix, who are professional and train full-time, could have done better.


Nothing wrong with your opinion. You are entitled to have one. Interesting fact is that whoever disagrees with ACFC supporters' he/she is clearly a hater and dislikes the City. What a lot of bollocks and  narrow minded view...
Personally I don't hate any ASB club (nor Phoenix) and have fully supported  any club that represented NZ to progress as far as they can and win as many games as possible, and will continue to do so.

Interesting when you compare now the "7th best club in the world" with other clubs sounds like "poor amateur club which has done exceptionally well and we should all feel proud", but somehow you forgot the fact that this club has, and always had, a significant financial advantage over any other club in Zealand, which is close to 10 times more comparing what Southern United or WaiBop United have.

If any other club has such advantage over ACFC I am pretty sure, they would be able to do the same (i.e. bring a few overseas players win O league, participate in WCC, get beaten and say :" Well done boys, NZ should feel proud".

Funny that you mention (again) full time professional team versus amateur outfit. Auckland City had trainings five times a week and each player was given free gym membership card. In your starting line up there maybe only three players who hold day jobs (some of them part time only). All other players are focused on football only.
By the way if the gap was too big, how come that ACFC won two games at the same competition a couple of years ago?
I am not sure that you can objectively absorb this information as you are too much focused  on "ACFC versus rest of the World" scenario...
All the best in ASB competition.

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago · edited over 12 years ago · History

this thread is not the best read - too much petty bickering

anyway... well played auckland city.  and big ups to ramon who i thought set his side out well.  they tried to play football from the start and really got going in the 2nd half

much better that last year's negative effort

i wouldn't groan if ramon was the next all whites coach

360footballnews.com

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago

consider this

marquez was signed before reira left for the phoenix

ramon's 4-3-3 was always going to include bilen and marquez in the middle of the park, but who would the third player have been?  reira or bale?

would be interested to hear what you guys think

360footballnews.com

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
reg22 wrote:

this thread is not the best read - too much petty bickering

anyway... well played auckland city.  and big ups to ramon who i thought set his side out well.  they tried to play football from the start and really got going in the 2nd half

much better that last year's negative effort

i wouldn't groan if ramon was the next all whites coach


I think the interesting thing is comparing the ACFC performance in the last few CWC games and the AWs against Mexico.  

ACFC had a proper plan to stifle, and also try and score goals.  NZ under Ricki only tried to defend, no thought about trying to stop other side playing.  I think the gap is at least as big, but they've bridged the gap by a smart tactical plan which reflects pretty well on the coaching

Normo's coming home

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago · edited over 12 years ago · History


I would be more than happy for Ramon to have the AW's job personally.

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago

+1

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago

Looks like Ramon would be more than happy too.

"At the end of the drive the lawmen arrive...

I'll take my chance because luck is on my side or something...

Her name is Rio, she don't need to understand...

Oh Rio, Rio, hear them shout across the land..."

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago

It would be a good move and I think it would be a good dynamic between him and Emblen as both of them are not known as guys with egos so I think they would be prepared to listen to each other and do best by the team.

If this comes to pass, even if for just two years, we could do a hell of a lot worse....

Grumpy old bastard alert

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
Jeff Vader wrote:

It would be a good move and I think it would be a good dynamic between him and Emblen as both of them are not known as guys with egos so I think they would be prepared to listen to each other and do best by the team.

If this comes to pass, even if for just two years, we could do a hell of a lot worse....

Agree.

"At the end of the drive the lawmen arrive...

I'll take my chance because luck is on my side or something...

Her name is Rio, she don't need to understand...

Oh Rio, Rio, hear them shout across the land..."

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
reg22 wrote:

consider this

marquez was signed before reira left for the phoenix

ramon's 4-3-3 was always going to include bilen and marquez in the middle of the park, but who would the third player have been?  reira or bale?

would be interested to hear what you guys think

You after Ramon's job, Reg? Once he's gone to the AW's.

"At the end of the drive the lawmen arrive...

I'll take my chance because luck is on my side or something...

Her name is Rio, she don't need to understand...

Oh Rio, Rio, hear them shout across the land..."

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago

I also think that you might get another year out of Ivan. Follow me here for a bit of pie in the sky thinking.

Ramon is pretty much unknown to the AWs team when you think about who is likely to start. The same could be said of any outside candidate as well but that's where having Ivan for 1 more year would help start that relationship between the coach and players. Some coaches come in and the relationship is offside straight away but with the club relationship between him and Ivan, even as a squad guy, he could help that dynamic a bit.

41 is young for a head coach but you can't argue his style of football which it would seem is the path we want to take for the talent we have and that he can coach it. I think his style relies on a ball playing deep lying DM (think Mulligan, Ki-Hung Lee) vs a traditional ball winning DM (think Manny) which is the one glaring weakness we have so that would be interesting how he adapts around that (granted it would be tailor made for Chris James). It would bring more from Keat and Payne whom tend to be ball players than ball winners.

Grumpy old bastard alert

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
Jeff Vader wrote:

I also think that you might get another year out of Ivan. Follow me here for a bit of pie in the sky thinking.

Ramon is pretty much unknown to the AWs team when you think about who is likely to start. The same could be said of any outside candidate as well but that's where having Ivan for 1 more year would help start that relationship between the coach and players. Some coaches come in and the relationship is offside straight away but with the club relationship between him and Ivan, even as a squad guy, he could help that dynamic a bit.

41 is young for a head coach but you can't argue his style of football which it would seem is the path we want to take for the talent we have and that he can coach it. I think his style relies on a ball playing deep lying DM (think Mulligan, Ki-Hung Lee) vs a traditional ball winning DM (think Manny) which is the one glaring weakness we have so that would be interesting how he adapts around that (granted it would be tailor made for Chris James). It would bring more from Keat and Payne whom tend to be ball players than ball winners.

And Bill T. ^ Sounds good.

"At the end of the drive the lawmen arrive...

I'll take my chance because luck is on my side or something...

Her name is Rio, she don't need to understand...

Oh Rio, Rio, hear them shout across the land..."

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago

James strikes me as being a bit stronger on the ball and that's having seen Bill in NRFL and the 1 AWs game at LB. I personally like him at LB and I think at the moment, its his spot to lose with the only other candidate being Hogg as far as I can see.

Grumpy old bastard alert

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
Jeff Vader wrote:

James strikes me as being a bit stronger on the ball and that's having seen Bill in NRFL and the 1 AWs game at LB. I personally like him at LB and I think at the moment, its his spot to lose with the only other candidate being Hogg as far as I can see.

Olympique Marseilles see BT's future as a (deep-lying?) DM (see Austin10's latest on Kiwis overseas thread).

"At the end of the drive the lawmen arrive...

I'll take my chance because luck is on my side or something...

Her name is Rio, she don't need to understand...

Oh Rio, Rio, hear them shout across the land..."

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
reg22 wrote:

consider this

marquez was signed before reira left for the phoenix

ramon's 4-3-3 was always going to include bilen and marquez in the middle of the park, but who would the third player have been?  reira or bale?

would be interested to hear what you guys think

4 - 3 (Bilen, Bale, Riera) - 1 (Marquez) - 2 (Krishna, Dicko)

"At the end of the drive the lawmen arrive...

I'll take my chance because luck is on my side or something...

Her name is Rio, she don't need to understand...

Oh Rio, Rio, hear them shout across the land..."

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago

I think Ramon and Emblen would be good combination for the AWs. It's nice to read some positive things on this thread about ACFC for a change. I think Ramon's overall strategic thinking and game plan, compared with the dour and stubborn Herbert, would be refreshing. I was impressed with how Emblen had the Olympic squad playing. An important thing, considering the new head of NZF is bizarrely a British rugby banker type, is both know the local football scene well - and care.

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago

Raja Casablanca just qualified for the final after beating Mexico champs and Brazil champs.

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago

Raja casablanca in final jeez

Ramon and emblen would be best combo


Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
2ndBest wrote:

Raja Casablanca just qualified for the final after beating Mexico champs and Brazil champs.

They beat the Brazilian champs by 3-1 which makes ACFC holding Casablanca to 1-1 at 90 minutes as a fantastic effort.

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
Bluemagic wrote:
2ndBest wrote:

Raja Casablanca just qualified for the final after beating Mexico champs and Brazil champs.

They beat the Brazilian champs by 3-1 which makes ACFC holding Casablanca to 1-1 at 90 minutes as a fantastic effort.

+1 
and if Raja Casablanca win the final it would be a nice gesture on their part to head down this part of the world for their next pre season tour. 
Yeah I know dream on.
Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
Jerzy Merino wrote:
Jeff Vader wrote:

James strikes me as being a bit stronger on the ball and that's having seen Bill in NRFL and the 1 AWs game at LB. I personally like him at LB and I think at the moment, its his spot to lose with the only other candidate being Hogg as far as I can see.

Olympique Marseilles see BT's future as a (deep-lying?) DM (see Austin10's latest on Kiwis overseas thread).

Yeah I know. I am not in agreement with them but then what do I know. I think he is a natural left half but LB would be a great role for him cause he can play and has a nice touch. Also doesn't seem to get frazzled easily and has a relaxed demeanour

Grumpy old bastard alert

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago · edited over 12 years ago · History
Bluemagic wrote:
I think Ramon and Emblen would be good combination for the AWs. It's nice to read some positive things on this thread about ACFC for a change. I think Ramon's overall strategic thinking and game plan, compared with the dour and stubborn Herbert, would be refreshing. I was impressed with how Emblen had the Olympic squad playing. An important thing, considering the new head of NZF is bizarrely a British rugby banker type, is both know the local football scene well - and care.
I know you think I/we are against ACFC but its actually not the case like you think.

I would be interested as to whom is the manager of this team. Whether they keep BT on or get another guy in. Would be interesting.

I agree on Emblen and the Olympic team. Has a knack for spotting youth talent as well.

Grumpy old bastard alert

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
Bluemagic wrote:
2ndBest wrote:

Raja Casablanca just qualified for the final after beating Mexico champs and Brazil champs.

They beat the Brazilian champs by 3-1 which makes ACFC holding Casablanca to 1-1 at 90 minutes as a fantastic effort.

Does that make ACFC champions of South America too?

 

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago


^ only if they'd scored the 1 2 3 like Casablanca have managed. Amazing!

"At the end of the drive the lawmen arrive...

I'll take my chance because luck is on my side or something...

Her name is Rio, she don't need to understand...

Oh Rio, Rio, hear them shout across the land..."

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago

Wasnt it 2-1?


Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
TV wrote:

Wasnt it 2-1?



no that d be the Nix ...
Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
Jeff Vader wrote:
Jerzy Merino wrote:
Jeff Vader wrote:

James strikes me as being a bit stronger on the ball and that's having seen Bill in NRFL and the 1 AWs game at LB. I personally like him at LB and I think at the moment, its his spot to lose with the only other candidate being Hogg as far as I can see.

Olympique Marseilles see BT's future as a (deep-lying?) DM (see Austin10's latest on Kiwis overseas thread).

Yeah I know. I am not in agreement with them but then what do I know. I think he is a natural left half but LB would be a great role for him cause he can play and has a nice touch. Also doesn't seem to get frazzled easily and has a relaxed demeanour


for new zealand i see him at left back for a while
the french never put right foooters at left back.  and the emphasis is on physique in the middle of the park, so you can see why OM want him in there

360footballnews.com

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
Jerzy Merino wrote:
reg22 wrote:

consider this

marquez was signed before reira left for the phoenix

ramon's 4-3-3 was always going to include bilen and marquez in the middle of the park, but who would the third player have been?  reira or bale?

would be interested to hear what you guys think

You after Ramon's job, Reg? Once he's gone to the AW's.



ha ha.  it would be interesting to see who ACFC do bring in

360footballnews.com

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago · edited over 12 years ago · History
Jeff Vader wrote:

I also think that you might get another year out of Ivan. Follow me here for a bit of pie in the sky thinking.

Ramon is pretty much unknown to the AWs team when you think about who is likely to start. The same could be said of any outside candidate as well but that's where having Ivan for 1 more year would help start that relationship between the coach and players. Some coaches come in and the relationship is offside straight away but with the club relationship between him and Ivan, even as a squad guy, he could help that dynamic a bit.

41 is young for a head coach but you can't argue his style of football which it would seem is the path we want to take for the talent we have and that he can coach it. I think his style relies on a ball playing deep lying DM (think Mulligan, Ki-Hung Lee) vs a traditional ball winning DM (think Manny) which is the one glaring weakness we have so that would be interesting how he adapts around that (granted it would be tailor made for Chris James). It would bring more from Keat and Payne whom tend to be ball players than ball winners.



this makes sense to me.  a coach needs good lieutenants and i assume ivan would be a good advocate for ramon

also, i am not willing to judge ivan on his performance against mexico.  the whole team was a shambles and he had not played often in the build up friendlies

(the same appplies to roux, durante, smith and tuiloma in the second game - cobbled togther back 4's don't tend to be world beaters)

360footballnews.com

Permalink Permalink