NZ National League Women

369 replies · 70,918 views
over 3 years ago
The smashings the Auckland clubs are handing out makes me wonder if clubs south of Taupo like Dunedin Technical, Coastal Spirit SAS and Wellington United wouldn't do better than these thrown-together federation sides. I know the federation teams are supposed to be about giving players opportunities, but to my mind if players want to play at a higher level then they should trial with clubs that play at that level.

The mens league this year may shed some light. If the Auckland clubs pull away then it'll be clear that a strong league makes strong teams. But if totally dominant regional clubs like Christchurch United and Cashmere Technical perform well then that'll show that good club organisation and resources can make up for a weaker league.
Permalink Permalink
Endorsed by
LT01Un
over 3 years ago
problem with players trialling at clubs that have teams already at the higher level is that the big clubs get stronger and better, continuing to dominate local competitions and the lesser clubs continue to get worse to the point that everntually the lose all players and shut up shop becuase they cant compete. All the good players at one club kills clubs and leagues and future development.

Queenslander 3x a year.

Permalink Permalink
Endorsed by
RaUn
over 3 years ago
Raynor
The smashings the Auckland clubs are handing out makes me wonder if clubs south of Taupo like Dunedin Technical, Coastal Spirit SAS and Wellington United wouldn't do better than these thrown-together federation sides. I know the federation teams are supposed to be about giving players opportunities, but to my mind if players want to play at a higher level then they should trial with clubs that play at that level.

The mens league this year may shed some light. If the Auckland clubs pull away then it'll be clear that a strong league makes strong teams. But if totally dominant regional clubs like Christchurch United and Cashmere Technical perform well then that'll show that good club organisation and resources can make up for a weaker league.
Indeed - NZF is bang on the money when they talk about having the same club environment all year round. Quite how Dunedin City Royals goes to pens with Northern Rovers but Southern United gets pillared by Auckland United and Western Springs is a mighty good question...
Permalink Permalink
over 3 years ago
lthomas20
Raynor
The smashings the Auckland clubs are handing out makes me wonder if clubs south of Taupo like Dunedin Technical, Coastal Spirit SAS and Wellington United wouldn't do better than these thrown-together federation sides. I know the federation teams are supposed to be about giving players opportunities, but to my mind if players want to play at a higher level then they should trial with clubs that play at that level.

The mens league this year may shed some light. If the Auckland clubs pull away then it'll be clear that a strong league makes strong teams. But if totally dominant regional clubs like Christchurch United and Cashmere Technical perform well then that'll show that good club organisation and resources can make up for a weaker league.
Indeed - NZF is bang on the money when they talk about having the same club environment all year round. Quite how Dunedin City Royals goes to pens with Northern Rovers but Southern United gets pillared by Auckland United and Western Springs is a mighty good question...
Good question indeed.
Permalink Permalink
over 3 years ago
lthomas20
Raynor
The smashings the Auckland clubs are handing out makes me wonder if clubs south of Taupo like Dunedin Technical, Coastal Spirit SAS and Wellington United wouldn't do better than these thrown-together federation sides. I know the federation teams are supposed to be about giving players opportunities, but to my mind if players want to play at a higher level then they should trial with clubs that play at that level.

The mens league this year may shed some light. If the Auckland clubs pull away then it'll be clear that a strong league makes strong teams. But if totally dominant regional clubs like Christchurch United and Cashmere Technical perform well then that'll show that good club organisation and resources can make up for a weaker league.
Indeed - NZF is bang on the money when they talk about having the same club environment all year round. Quite how Dunedin City Royals goes to pens with Northern Rovers but Southern United gets pillared by Auckland United and Western Springs is a mighty good question...

pretty easy answer if you take a look - coach resigned late so new coaching structure in place for Southern United.  I don't have the stats but heard a bunch of players didn't want to play in the NLw this season that did play club.
I believe a couple of the players who played Southern in the shortened series last season have also moved out of the area.
Permalink Permalink
Endorsed by
LT01
over 3 years ago
Any Otago Uni students in either team? 
Getting close to exam time, and some of them likely not keen on committing anymore to football this late in the Academic year.
Permalink Permalink
over 3 years ago
Raynor
The smashings the Auckland clubs are handing out makes me wonder if clubs south of Taupo like Dunedin Technical, Coastal Spirit SAS and Wellington United wouldn't do better than these thrown-together federation sides. I know the federation teams are supposed to be about giving players opportunities, but to my mind if players want to play at a higher level then they should trial with clubs that play at that level.

The mens league this year may shed some light. If the Auckland clubs pull away then it'll be clear that a strong league makes strong teams. But if totally dominant regional clubs like Christchurch United and Cashmere Technical perform well then that'll show that good club organisation and resources can make up for a weaker league.
It's not really surprising, you have 4 teams that have been playing together all season, same coaches etc against 4 teams that have only come together in the last few weeks and several players in those regions for whatever reason have decided not to play this season.

It's good going towards a club based league but they actually need a plan and do it properly rather than a half arsed approach like this that seems to satisfy the Auckland teams. They also need to realise that the depth in the mens and women's games are different and allow some movement of players at the end of the regional rounds

https://thejourneyfan.blogspot.co.nz/

New Zealand Football Media Association Website of the year 2015 & 2016

Permalink Permalink
Endorsed by
LT01
over 3 years ago
Smashings? Canterbury got within 1 goal of Western Springs, that's not a smashing

Ramming liberal dribble down your throat since 2009
This forum needs less angst and more Kate Bush threads



Permalink Permalink
over 3 years ago
Doloras
Smashings? Canterbury got within 1 goal of Western Springs, that's not a smashing
no its not but Southern United 0 Auckland United 7, Northern Rovers 5 Capital 0 and Eastern Suburbs 8 Central 0 are.....

https://thejourneyfan.blogspot.co.nz/

New Zealand Football Media Association Website of the year 2015 & 2016

Permalink Permalink
Endorsed by
LT01Mo
over 3 years ago
The JourneyFan
Doloras
Smashings? Canterbury got within 1 goal of Western Springs, that's not a smashing
no its not but Southern United 0 Auckland United 7, Northern Rovers 5 Capital 0 and Eastern Suburbs 8 Central 0 are.....

Also this is not what the Auckland clubs asked for - and to be honest it doesn't really benefit anyone in it's current state but it *could* be a stepping stone to a better competition. 
Permalink Permalink
over 3 years ago · edited over 3 years ago · History
I mean, the jokers on the Northern League forums are saying "bring back an all-Federation comp", but surely shifting to an all-club based comp is more sensible? I.e. Wharfies or Dunedin Tech could put up a better show

Ramming liberal dribble down your throat since 2009
This forum needs less angst and more Kate Bush threads



Permalink Permalink
Endorsed by
FeverishLT01Motheprof
over 3 years ago
Just saw the WSAFC vs Pride highlights and it seems to have been even closer than the scores indicated? Like, the Pride beat the WS keeper twice and got an unlucky bounce off the post, while WS's third goal was desperately unlucky off the crossbar and the back of the keeper's hand. I don't think WS are the weakest of the Northern sides so Canterbury could cause some real damage.

Ramming liberal dribble down your throat since 2009
This forum needs less angst and more Kate Bush threads



Permalink Permalink
over 3 years ago
coochiee
Any Otago Uni students in either team? 
Getting close to exam time, and some of them likely not keen on committing anymore to football this late in the Academic year.
A few that might have strengthened the main team and the youths I don't see in the squads.   Perhaps the few extra weeks rent they'd need to pay would be a factor as well.  If they were smart they'd use the 4 free trips to Auckland to bring suitcases home or bring gear down for next year!. 
Permalink Permalink
over 3 years ago
Southern are really missing is Shontelle Smith, hopefully she comes back into the team soon. Also don't have last years top goal scorer in Amy Hislop. Bacon and de Ronde have moved to Wgtn. 
But can't find a squad list for them anywhere so not sure what's going on. 
Permalink Permalink
Endorsed by
LT01
over 3 years ago
Ranix
Southern are really missing is Shontelle Smith, hopefully she comes back into the team soon. Also don't have last years top goal scorer in Amy Hislop. Bacon and de Ronde have moved to Wgtn. 
But can't find a squad list for them anywhere so not sure what's going on. 
Amy Hislop moved to play college soccer in the US
Permalink Permalink
over 3 years ago
Hard to say this without sounding sexist, but hopefully my intentions are sincere...

Women's football and men's football are not the same. Neither is the motivators for players in NZ.

As many have highlighted, some of the best ladies haven't turned up for the federation sides. That's because players want to play with their friends in an environment they enjoy - that environment is with their clubs. Doing summer with Feds just isn't worth it.

Likewise, we see very good player retention in Auckland, where the players get to stay with the club where their friends/coaches/environment they enjoy is.
Permalink Permalink
Endorsed by
chopahFeverishMotheprof
over 3 years ago
20 Legend
Hard to say this without sounding sexist, but hopefully my intentions are sincere...

Women's football and men's football are not the same. Neither is the motivators for players in NZ.

As many have highlighted, some of the best ladies haven't turned up for the federation sides. That's because players want to play with their friends in an environment they enjoy - that environment is with their clubs. Doing summer with Feds just isn't worth it.

Likewise, we see very good player retention in Auckland, where the players get to stay with the club where their friends/coaches/environment they enjoy is.

100% spot on.  
Permalink Permalink
Endorsed by
Un
over 3 years ago
It's not necessarily a sexist thing to say, but I'm interested to hear that the motivations are different for men?

Ramming liberal dribble down your throat since 2009
This forum needs less angst and more Kate Bush threads



Permalink Permalink
over 3 years ago
Doloras
It's not necessarily a sexist thing to say, but I'm interested to hear that the motivations are different for men?

It's not exclusively motivations - it's also core numbers, there are probably heaps of Men who don't want to play in the NL section but because there is just more numbers it's not noticed as much.

Also I don't have the link on me but they did a voice of the participant survey a couple of years ago between Men and Women and there was a lot of questions about why they play and there was some big core differences.
Permalink Permalink
over 3 years ago
Is this from talking to players in the South Island, mainland or Southern??
20 Legend
Hard to say this without sounding sexist, but hopefully my intentions are sincere...

Women's football and men's football are not the same. Neither is the motivators for players in NZ.

As many have highlighted, some of the best ladies haven't turned up for the federation sides. That's because players want to play with their friends in an environment they enjoy - that environment is with their clubs. Doing summer with Feds just isn't worth it.

Likewise, we see very good player retention in Auckland, where the players get to stay with the club where their friends/coaches/environment they enjoy is.
Permalink Permalink
over 3 years ago
20 Legend
Hard to say this without sounding sexist, but hopefully my intentions are sincere...

Women's football and men's football are not the same. Neither is the motivators for players in NZ.

As many have highlighted, some of the best ladies haven't turned up for the federation sides. That's because players want to play with their friends in an environment they enjoy - that environment is with their clubs. Doing summer with Feds just isn't worth it.

Likewise, we see very good player retention in Auckland, where the players get to stay with the club where their friends/coaches/environment they enjoy is.
You're dead right. Having spent a fair amount of time around women's football and knowing a few players at NL level I can definitely say that in my experience their motivations are completely different to men's. 

From what I can see the social element is a massive factor and having fun almost goes past everything else. That's fine but it does limit the competitive potential of the football they play. It's one of the things that annoys my missus as she's a super competitive person and cares less about fun and more about winning.
Permalink Permalink
Endorsed by
Un
over 3 years ago
With fed teams you don’t have any choice about who your coaching staff is going to be. If they don’t like it they don’t play. 

Southern have picked up some non southern players this week.

Founder

Permalink Permalink
Endorsed by
Mo
over 3 years ago
Feverish
With fed teams you don’t have any choice about who your coaching staff is going to be. If they don’t like it they don’t play. 

Southern have picked up some non southern players this week.
Who?
Permalink Permalink
over 3 years ago
lthomas20
Feverish
With fed teams you don’t have any choice about who your coaching staff is going to be. If they don’t like it they don’t play. 

Southern have picked up some non southern players this week.
Who?
There's no squad list anywhere so who knows?
Permalink Permalink
over 3 years ago
Predicting:
Auckland Utd 2-2 Western Springs (both look pretty impressive atm)
Central 0-8 Northern Rovers (probably the best team against the worst)
Pride 3-2 Eastern Suburbs (Pride should get up at home)
Capital 3-0 Southern (surely Capital won't continue to underperform so much)
Permalink Permalink
Endorsed by
Feverish
over 3 years ago
Bit tough for AU today (as well as for Springs) having to head over to Ellerslie after Keith Hay Park flooded. New pitch for the women's world cup training ground can't come soon enough, and the Council needs to clear the bloody pipe. 
Permalink Permalink
over 3 years ago
lthomas20
Feverish
With fed teams you don’t have any choice about who your coaching staff is going to be. If they don’t like it they don’t play. 

Southern have picked up some non southern players this week.
Who?
Kennedy Bryant & Sarah Morton

https://thejourneyfan.blogspot.co.nz/

New Zealand Football Media Association Website of the year 2015 & 2016

Permalink Permalink
over 3 years ago
More like phone a friend (sister) after their 7-0 loss against Auckland or they would have been with them from the start
The JourneyFan
lthomas20
Feverish
With fed teams you don’t have any choice about who your coaching staff is going to be. If they don’t like it they don’t play. 

Southern have picked up some non southern players this week.
Who?
Kennedy Bryant & Sarah Morton
Permalink Permalink
over 3 years ago
Unknwn Quantity
More like phone a friend (sister) after their 7-0 loss against Auckland or they would have been with them from the start
The JourneyFan
lthomas20
Feverish
With fed teams you don’t have any choice about who your coaching staff is going to be. If they don’t like it they don’t play. 

Southern have picked up some non southern players this week.
Who?
Kennedy Bryant & Sarah Morton
Seems to have worked with two wins on the trot?
Permalink Permalink
Endorsed by
Feverish
over 3 years ago
Sure has - for this season at least
lthomas20
Unknwn Quantity
More like phone a friend (sister) after their 7-0 loss against Auckland or they would have been with them from the start
The JourneyFan
lthomas20
Feverish
With fed teams you don’t have any choice about who your coaching staff is going to be. If they don’t like it they don’t play. 

Southern have picked up some non southern players this week.
Who?
Kennedy Bryant & Sarah Morton
Seems to have worked with two wins on the trot?
Permalink Permalink
over 3 years ago
I've noticed that after Round 4 next weekend played on Friday/Saturday, there's another round on the Monday, Labour Day. This is all well and good but can I just ask why the heck did the brainiacs that made the fixture make them literal reverse fixtures of the games only 2-3 days prior? Seems stupid. Anyone in the know?
Permalink Permalink
over 3 years ago
lthomas20
I've noticed that after Round 4 next weekend played on Friday/Saturday, there's another round on the Monday, Labour Day. This is all well and good but can I just ask why the heck did the brainiacs that made the fixture make them literal reverse fixtures of the games only 2-3 days prior? Seems stupid. Anyone in the know?
 It is what they have done the last few years.  If you look closely you will see that they are all local derbies. Central v Capital, Canterbury v South, Auckland sides playing each other.    
Permalink Permalink
over 3 years ago
Interesting Round 8. Good results for the Cantabs, Capital seem able to compete with their opponents a bit more recently but scarce improvements in results (wins against Central are a given so don't really count). Eastern Suburbs totally in control at the top now after beating Springs 4-2. AU smashed Central as expected. Southern a bit lucky to draw against Rovers in the end but another good defensive performance. 
Permalink Permalink
over 3 years ago
Well what a turn around by Southern. After being walloped 7-0 by Auckland City at home at the start of the season.
To beating them 4-1 this weekend in Auckland.
Permalink Permalink
Endorsed by
LT01
over 3 years ago
Ranix
Well what a turn around by Southern. After being walloped 7-0 by Auckland City at home at the start of the season.
To beating them 4-1 this weekend in Auckland.

I think you mean Auckland Utd not City
Permalink Permalink
Endorsed by
LT01
over 3 years ago
chopah
Ranix
Well what a turn around by Southern. After being walloped 7-0 by Auckland City at home at the start of the season.
To beating them 4-1 this weekend in Auckland.

I think you mean Auckland Utd not City
Yes sorry my bad. Auckland United.
Permalink Permalink
over 3 years ago
Western Springs 9 - 0 Central. My little girl had the honour of being a mascot and leading captain Sofia Garcia out (who scored a goal).

Final home game for Hirano and Takeda (back to Japan) and Pijnenburg (got a gig with Feyenoord).

Ramming liberal dribble down your throat since 2009
This forum needs less angst and more Kate Bush threads



Permalink Permalink
over 3 years ago
Southern United beating Suburbs, great to see. Guess they weren't playing for a lot but still... funny that the only two games ES haven't won were both against South Island opposition

As cultured as Che Bunce's left foot and as profilic as John Lammers

Permalink Permalink
Endorsed by
LT01Mo
about 3 years ago
National League expanded for 2023

4x club teams from Northern League
3x federation sides (1 Central, 2 Capital) to be delivered in partnership with clubs from the regions
2x Federation side from South Island (Canterbury United & Southern United)
1x Phoenix reserves

article here

https://thejourneyfan.blogspot.co.nz/

New Zealand Football Media Association Website of the year 2015 & 2016

Permalink Permalink
Endorsed by
LT01MoShambles
about 3 years ago · edited about 3 years ago · History
Hmmm. On one hand I'm disappointed to be moving to a single round. On the other hand, excited at the vision of moving to a fully club-based formula and the participation of the Wāhinix. On the third hand, because I'm a mutant, Capital didn't do so well last time so I shudder to see how Capital A and Capital B might perform - why not just move to two Capital clubs immediately?

Ramming liberal dribble down your throat since 2009
This forum needs less angst and more Kate Bush threads



Permalink Permalink
Endorsed by
LT01Shambles