National League / OCL

The WaiBOP United Thread

1997 replies · 271,691 views
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Hi never surprised,
 
I can accept the argument that there is a lesser case, on geographic grounds, for BOP players to be levied.
 
However for better or for worse, we have been lumbered with an organisational configuration where federation boundaries are what they are.
 
It's swings and roundabouts. On some things you gain, on others not so much.
 
Personally I would certainly have no problems if BOP was, within NZ structures to choose not be part of federation 3.
 
But if we accept the federation's business plan addresses development of football across the whole region, and establishment of pathways (such as those which have led to a number of former BOP juniors playing for Waikato) I think there is also a case for them also belonging in a contribution sense. It's something that has been introduced in other areas, it's not like it's a radical new idea.
 
Secondly, coaches, like players, move on for all sorts of reasons.
 
Using your argument, Waikato should never have appointed Roger wilkinson or dave edmondson either, because they have subsequently moved on.
 
If you can't see that developing good elite young players is a fundamental positive for the game here, nothing i say will convince you.
 
UK Kiwi, I don't think Declan is lobbying to have your son on his academy, so it shouldn't be an issue. It's not like he is actively hawking for business out there in the football marketplace.
 
 
https://www.facebook.com/groups/nzsportsprogrammes

Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
i have to disagree bruce, i thought we all toilled against the odds to develop quality footballers and to try and garner a bit of respect for the region in our own ways.  as i've said i find declans coaching knowledge to be class and being exposed to this 20 hours a week cant be harming the young lads at all and fair play players like younger heerschap and thomas crawford have player NRFL and a few of the other bay lads did really well last year in the youth team last year, so i would concede that properly managed yep the whole federation should conrtibute the the regions national team.

i do not doubt that every single coach waikato has or ever will apoint will use the role as a line on their cv to move on to bigger and better things but my poorly made point is that by subcribing to Declans criteria that he only wants players who can train as much as his academy you are alienating a decent portion of current, future and potential players from the team and as has been said also current players that get to the age where life gets in the way.

so when declan and the best of his crop move on to bigger and better things (as we all do from time to time), what then for the franchise? you will be left with a group of players who have been alienated by the current set up and should you be successful with changing cameron's mind you will end up alienating a large part of the football comunity as they will have donated approx $50k a year and Waikato FC will be in the same position as they where 2 years ago.

Hence i dont see how it benefits Waikato/Bay of Plenty Football longterm
never_surprised2012-01-17 14:40:25
Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago

Almost half the players in the Waikato squad are not in his academy. equally, a lot of players in his academy are not in the Waikato squad.

Nobody is "alienated". In one of the programmes this season he gave an open invitation for aspiring players to attend Waikato trainings. some have taken him up on that.
 
If and when he moves on - or is sacked - the new coach will select a squad of his choosing.
 And players who feel they fit, will play.
 
A levy would bring in about $20,000 a year, at $2 a head. If people feel alienated over $2, the game has far bigger problems.
 
 
 
 
https://www.facebook.com/groups/nzsportsprogrammes

Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Hi never surprised,
 
I can accept the argument that there is a lesser case, on geographic grounds, for BOP players to be levied.
 
However for better or for worse, we have been lumbered with an organisational configuration where federation boundaries are what they are.
 
It's swings and roundabouts. On some things you gain, on others not so much.
 
Personally I would certainly have no problems if BOP was, within NZ structures to choose not be part of federation 3.
 
But if we accept the federation's business plan addresses development of football across the whole region, and establishment of pathways (such as those which have led to a number of former BOP juniors playing for Waikato) I think there is also a case for them also belonging in a contribution sense. It's something that has been introduced in other areas, it's not like it's a radical new idea.
 
Secondly, coaches, like players, move on for all sorts of reasons.
 
Using your argument, Waikato should never have appointed Roger wilkinson or dave edmondson either, because they have subsequently moved on.
 
If you can't see that developing good elite young players is a fundamental positive for the game here, nothing i say will convince you.
 
UK Kiwi, I don't think Declan is lobbying to have your son on his academy, so it shouldn't be an issue. It's not like he is actively hawking for business out there in the football marketplace.
 
 
 
If he is not Hawking for bussinesss then it appears the academy is a one off progression for family and close associates. As the group age, they will finally peak where there ability sits, whether it be professionally in England, Europe, Asia, ASB Championship or local club footy.
Does he have the intention of bring through the next age group, I very much doubt it.
 
Only half of the Waikato team come from his Academy !!
Isn`t he taking advantage of Waikato for his own gains?
 
His academy isn`t based on a bussiness plan that will benefit Waikato in the long term but experimenting with a theory that may help or hinder a small crop of players over the next few years.
 
Shouldn`t an elite academy system based on a 5-10 year plan be a more appropriate pathway for the young players in the region.
 
I indicated my son had modest ability, I may be wrong he may be the ugly duckling waiting to come of age. Shouldn`t Waikato have their house in order to asist in his development instead of backing a rogue academy where he is not wanted.
 
All I can say is that I`m worried about the basket you have put your eggs in 
 
 
 
 
Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Kiwi, declan has chosen to work with a group of players and "bring them through" as many have done before him. It is based on his own theories of development and coaching.
 
Nobody is forced to be in it.
 
Players or their parents are welcome to frequent whichever pathway they like. Over the years we have had Mike groom doing his Brazilian thing, we have had Rufer's  Wynnrs group, I understand Shane Comber is working with a younger group again. these are essentially 'private sector' operations.
 
Further back in time we had Ray pooley doing his "School of excellence", we had Roger wilkinson doing his elite age group work (which my boys did and found fantastic).
 
Players and parents can choose what they think best fits.
 
Then there is the federation system through which we all essentially pay a prior charge through affiliation levies for "public system" of player development. I am niot aware of any federation coaching regime having got the results of the more specialist outfits however.
 
 
Waikato is not" backing" his academy in any way. The academy is linked with Melville United. (Though Waikato FC has been using training facilities at melville's base, so you could argue his academy is backing Waikato.
 
His academy is based upon a 10,000 hour apprenticeship... much like you suggest 5-10 years.
 
Declan is not being paid anything for a significant amount of work over the course of a season with waikato. He also has a nil budget to work with. When people start pumping money in, I reckon then they can call the tune.
 
His duties involve team selection. That is his perogative.
 
I haven't put my eggs in any basket. I'm in favour of all such inititaitves.
 
 I say good luck to anyone prepared to work so hard in a specialist area of the game.
 
The only thing that disappoints me is we having someone striving for excellence with young players while it seems we have so many out there desperately arguing for mediocrity.
 
Hope this helps.
 
 
https://www.facebook.com/groups/nzsportsprogrammes

Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Bruce I don't think anyone is actually arguing for mediocrity and probably quite the opposite. If no one wanted Waikato to succeed, there would not be a relative robust football discussion taking place (and to be fair it is a good discussion around football). I respect your opinion and the fact you put your name to it. I think the key question if I could sum up the mood of the posters would be this.

'The accusation against Declan is that he is only in it for his sons. Declan is on record as saying thats not the case. When its all said and done, and his sons have been through his system and moved on, is he still going to be there for Waikato FC or is this just a vehicle in the here and now?'

In my opinion, and I respect I do not know him as well as you or others do, I honestly do not believe he will be. I respect he did it 7-8 years ago, but I think back then, being a new league, everyone wanted to be involved. Now its in its 8th year and it is largely predictable with its finish and also run in a shambolic state by Glyn Taylor (who should never be allowed to run a lottery wheel at a gala in my opinion but thats a different issue), a number of players choose to skip the summer league for other reasons, the finances is not really there and we are in the situation that Waikato are in. I honestly want to see them succeed and see them produce a brand of football akin to what Auckland are doing now (I will not use a Brisbane or a Barcelona comparison) and it would be a credit to Declan if he does. I just keep coming back to the long term benefit to Waikato and I don't see it. I think once Declans sons are done, he is too.
Jeff Vader2012-01-17 20:29:16

Grumpy old bastard alert

Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
You also mention that when people put money in, they can call the tune. Fair enough that no one is and Declan has the right to pick who he wants. If someone ponies up cash, is he going to allow others to have a say in how his team is run?

Grumpy old bastard alert

Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Ok summing up Edge is not Vader ad UK Kiwi's cup of tea fair enough each to there own.
 
And Bruce is very loyal and a fighter.
 
 
Good robust discussion when insults are removed!
Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Couple of good posts there, agree with you skinny

Time will tell on what Edge does, stay or go with his sons. How far away is that I wonder ?? Anyone know/care to have a guess

I applaud that he gets young men to train so hard in their chosen sport. To become very good at something you have to put the time in. Interested to know how it compares timewise to say the training at Blackburn youth or reserves

A test on Sunday as they are playing Auckland at 2.00 pm, might pop along and have a gander


Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
That is a fair point regards training. At a young age, its easy to have other focuses

I had read a book on this 10000 hour thing and they talk about it in terms of Bill Gates, the Beatles and Tiger Woods. The premise being that the time you actualise success is about the time you have done 10000 hours of practice. The Beatles did umpteen hours in clubs in Hamburg before they got big, Gates spent every waking moment outside of college programming and Woods practiced over and over as a child. They also mention that another large part of it is luck and timing. This same book looked at hockey and Canada and said that statistically, kids born in the earlier part of the year have a better chance of being successful. The rationale (and it is fascinating) is that kids are grouped by age so kids born in December are playing against/with kids born in January. At a childs age, 1 year is massive in terms of development and those kids stand out. They then go into rep teams and get better coaching so when they go back next year, they stand out even more and the cycle perpetuates. It also talked about an Asian airline and how the status system can stop success (i.e. a co-pilot never questioned the pilot because of the status culture in country)

I think its good to get this but then these kids need to be in the right place at the right time and for it all to fall into place for them to succeed.

Grumpy old bastard alert

Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
It will be a good test against Auckland. Edge has said (and I don't think its a misquote based on how he is) that Auckland teams wont beat him again. It would be a major upset to happen but even the most optimistic supporter would not pick a Waikato win.

Grumpy old bastard alert

Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
hello there.
 
I can respect the scepticism people out there have about the Declan Edge academy.
 
When Declan first approached Melville United (where I am chairman) a bit over 4 years ago I also was sceptical. You tend to be about things you don't have a good handle on (as is the case with many here, i suspect).
 
However I tried to keep an open mind, because there seemed to be a potential opportunities, and relatively low risks.
 
Even 2 years ago I was unconvinced, but accepted it was a work in progress, and it wasn't as if it was doing any harm, and Declan had a clear plan and philosophy, was pretty self-contained and well organised.
 
But particularly in the past 18 months, as i have watched the development of his kids, it became blindingly obvious that a number of them were maturing into very tidy footballers, to the extent that this year several started commanding starting line-up places in a northern premier league team (where there is an ongoing expectation that they finish in the top four.)
 
And when all these kids of a like mind all played together  it added a new dimension. They played to a pattern and a style where I saw them able to impose themselves (and beat) a national U17 team.
 
I became convinced that declan should be 'given his head' even more the explore the possibilities and thought it certainly made sense, once Dave Edmondson withdrew from the Waikato job, for declan to be appointed. I mean, it's not like you were going to get too many contenders anyway, working for no money with a nil budget.
 
If the price of that was to have a coach with the courage of his convictions to put his reputation on the line by playing in his squad a number of  kids training full time, okay, let's see what happens.
 
Our development pathways tend to be a bit hit and miss. We could argue all day on whether there should be a national curriculum, or we should be able to find solutions endemic to a club of region. But it's all a bit academic when somebody comes along and in front of your eyes, develops a group of very good homegrown players for the prcie of a few balls and the odd minibus for away trips.
 
I personally don't think Waikato will win on Sunday (but do believe declan was badly misquoted in the press).  However I hope to see significant improvement from when they met auckland at the start of the season, and hope a couple of the kids catch the eye with their play.
 
Finally, someone here called me 'loyal". Well, my support is not uncritical or unconditional. Over the past 20 years there have been times when I have been publicly scathing of Declan.
 
But equally, when you think somebody deserves a fair suck of the sav, there is an obligation to speak up. if it's good enough to criticse someone when you think they are wrong, it's good enough to also speak up when you think they are doing a good job.
 
And on my experience of the past few years, Declan has been a bloody good club member.
He was also one of the first to put his hand in his pocket when we were collecting for our $200,000 floodlighting project (installing the old Eden Park lights).
 
Further, i would say he is one of our few football intellectuals around here, with a very deep knoweldge of the game and the discipline to properly research issues. He is a student of the game.
 
So those are among the reasons i offer support to Declan when he comes under fire from other quarters. he is one of our very few former elite players who has put more back into the game than he has taken out.
 
For many of you the jury is still out, and that's fair enough. All I would urge is that, like me, while you may harbour doubts, try and keep an open mind and be as objective as possible.
 
It doesn't happen around here very often, but now and then some of us do change our minds as we absorb the changes around us.
 
I welcome alternate points of view, but urge people to play the ball, not the man. We have to learn to seperate "the knock" from the person, in debating football ideas.
 
Dont just call someone a &%$#. It adds no value.
 
Hope this helps.
 
 
 
 
 
https://www.facebook.com/groups/nzsportsprogrammes

Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Very good post Bruce

Interested if the name of the book JV

Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Bruce
 
Believe it or not I do not have a problem with private academies. In fact I see them as a positive way forward in developing our most talent youngsters. Pooling talent together along with the financial support of their parents will only benefit our future NZ teams. (I add, as long as the parents are there for the right reasons)
After having a daughter invoved in ballet and swimming I have no issue with user pays systems
 
However I believe these academies need to stay independent and not cross over into mainstream NZ Football
Waikato have let the cross over happen and I wonder if the outer areas of the federation are feeling slightly alienated. There was some mention of levies to support the franchise, I might be wrong.
What if Wynton Rufer was appointed coach of Auckland City and all of a sudden 50% of the selected team came from the wynrs academy. There would be a massive out cry.
 
I will be at Kiwitea St in the weekend and will be very attentive to how Declan conducts himself off the field as much as much as the performance of the youngsters on the field.
 
But in this case my eye is very much on the man.
 
Alas I will be inconspicuous hiding under the cloak of the forum but I`m sure you will recognise Jeff, he`s the splitting image of his avatar
Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Hi Kiwi,
 
Had Edmondson stayed on as Waikato coach he had already indicated he was interested in having a number of Edge's lads in his squad as well.
 
If for argument's sake, he then selected all the same players, in your view would that still have triggered the dreaded 'cross-over', to use your terminology?
 
And why exactly is "crossover" a problem? If anyone feels alienated, get down to training and show you are better. There is an open invitation there.
 
When I look at the Waikato squad after recent wins against HB, Manawatu and otago, I think these lads have, by their deeds, earned their right to be default starting line-up players.
 
That they are academy players is as peripheral as whether they come from Wanderers, Melville or Ngaruwahia when they put on the Waikato shirt, as long as they continue to earn their corn in the ASB.
 
That's how I see it anyway.
 
 
 
https://www.facebook.com/groups/nzsportsprogrammes

Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Alright then. I apologize for calling Edge a c**t. Fair enough, the post was deleted for being out of line, sorry if you were offended Bruce or anyone else.

But in all fairness, i don't like the guy, nor do i need to like the guy. And no i have not spoken to him directly face to face, but yes i have listened to him indirectly and seen him (in a coaching role) on a number of occasions. I am allowed to form an opinion of the man based on this.

Now if you want me to say something nice about Waikato, then Dave Edmondson is by far the best coach you have ever had and you would have done well to keep him on board in some capacity.

Three for me, and two for them.

Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Hi Buffon, I'm not offended as such,  I just think it's inappropriate on so many levels to defame or impugn a third party like that, more-so because you never sought to substantiate your view and explain why you think that way to your audience here.
 
Indeed, I'm still not sure why you dislike Declan, but you obviously wanted us to know you do, so check, we've got that.
https://www.facebook.com/groups/nzsportsprogrammes

Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Do really expect everybody to like him.

In fact, do you also expect everyone to like every other person they come across in life?

Some people like him, good on them. I'm not going to tell them not to. Some people don't like him. That's life. Deal with it.

Three for me, and two for them.

Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
hepatitis wrote:
Very good post Bruce

Interested if the name of the book JV



I think Vadar is talking about Bounce by Mathew Seyd, if not it is very similar. Its a good read and I recommend it,  although it meanders in the 2nd half from memory.

The guts is to be world class you need 10,00 hours purposeful practice (i.e. you need to be pushed not just going through the motions). Part of that challenge in our environment is getting enough exposure at a high enough level for our young players to really push themselves. By being exposed to the NZFC at a young age these guys are getting pushed about as far as you can here.

On the weekend I was impressed with Waikato they moved the ball well without really posing a threat until Otago switched off & then had a brain implosion.

My only worry about Waikato from what I've heard from the outside is the sustainability of this system.
It seems that selection based on age more than ability, with those over 21 basically not considered.
What happens to those who inevitably don't make it,are they written of at 21/22 so the next batch can have a crack?
If this happens there could have big impact on the next tier down with senior players being denied the opportunity to play NZFC.
A few senior players could also help the development of the younger players, in my experience you can learn a lot of those you play with as well as the coach.


Achieve by Unity

Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Hi Kiwi,
 
Had Edmondson stayed on as Waikato coach he had already indicated he was interested in having a number of Edge's lads in his squad as well.
 
If for argument's sake, he then selected all the same players, in your view would that still have triggered the dreaded 'cross-over', to use your terminology?
 
And why exactly is "crossover" a problem? If anyone feels alienated, get down to training and show you are better. There is an open invitation there.
 
When I look at the Waikato squad after recent wins against HB, Manawatu and otago, I think these lads have, by their deeds, earned their right to be default starting line-up players.
 
That they are academy players is as peripheral as whether they come from Wanderers, Melville or Ngaruwahia when they put on the Waikato shirt, as long as they continue to earn their corn in the ASB.
 
That's how I see it anyway.
 
"Cross over"  in this case is a problem because the coach has a conflict of interest
 
 "Alienation"  may not necessarily only be felt by a player on the fringe of the squad, but also by the wider  membership of the federation who help support the franchise. 
 
Don`t let those eggs get too scrambled in your basket. 
 
In passing I think Buffon II and I must drink in the same pub ! 
 
 
Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Hi Yeovil,
 
Selection is on ability, not age. (waikato have squad members in their mid 20s and 30s, remember)
 
The Edge academy issue, i guess, is people being able and prepared to commit the time to football in a situation where there is no related income. That tends to be younger folk.
 
I am not aware of anyone being denied the opportunity to play NZFChere  if they are good enough  and prepared to do so for no reimbursement.
 
Having said that, there are a few fringe players who have dropped out of the squad after having not been selected in starting XIs, but their departures do not seem to have triggered major controversy, and I guess that is common at a lot of franchises, particulalry as the season progresses
 
 
 
 
 
https://www.facebook.com/groups/nzsportsprogrammes

Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Thanks for pointing that out Bruce.
I was under the impression that the only player over 22 was the keeper.
If everyone interested has had has been looked at the players selected are the best that's fair enough.
Of course who actually is the best is always a matter opinion, but in the end its the selectors opinion that matters the most

Achieve by Unity

Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
UK Kiwi has kind of jumbled up my post with his own thoughts above there.
 
But he raises a point worthy of further discussion: is there conflict of interest in having a franchise coach also involved in the game at other levels or in other spheres?
 
I guess you could call it the Ricki Herbert issue: can one coach seve two masters?
 
It's cropped up from time to time in Waikato's history, and, i guess in other set ups.
 
Should Declan and James pamment have been appointed waikato FC coaches in 2004 when they were aligned with Tauranga City?
 
Should Dave Edmondson have been waikato coach when he was also coach of Ngaruawahia or (to draw the 'academy' comparison) when he was coaching HBHS?
 
Kevin fallon also had his Mt Albert operations functioning during his exceptionally brief reign as Waikato coach.
 
Should Rover Wilkinson/Mark Cossey have been Waikato coach and assistant when in winter they were reverse assistant and coach at Wanderers?
 
Should Willie Gerdsen have been appointed with his East Coast Bays links?
 
Should Declan be coach now when he is aligned with Melville?
 
I guess we can all see the recurring pattern here.
 
We are in a  very small fishbowl where most of the people capable of working at national league level are also doing another job - often very well - where there is scope for the dreaded 'cross-over".
 
About 4 years ago I raised this isse at a Waikato FC AGM. While I regarded Roger wilkinson as a football colleague, as Melville chairman i felt there was an obligation to ask if he was conflicted in also working at wanderers, given Melville players reported they had been told their chances of summer selection would be improved if they were at Wanderers in the winter.
 
Roger rejected that he had done any such thing, and the meeting mostly agreed that there need not be any fundamental conflict in having the summer coach active in the winter.
 
 I accepted Roger's take on things, and that there had been a misunderstanding.  The real issue was how any potential points of conflict were managed in practice and having protocols to deal with issues that may arise, given it is a small world in waikato football.
 
It's probably the same with Waikato this season. If somebody sees a specific conflict in practice, and has the courage of their convictions, this should be raised with the board and transparently investigated.
 
In a perfect world you might avoid "cross-over". But this ain't perfect, it's Waikato, where  the main challenge is survival.
 
So, to repeat my view: the key issue is how perceived conflicts of interest are managed in Waikato's objective situation.
 
The conflict charge laid here most often is nepotism. As Mr Angry points out, every time Edge junior has started, the team has won. If someone wants to lodge a complaint on that front, they may have to be more selective about picking their moment.
 
Personally I think Waikato FC - bearing in mind its financial constraints -  is a lot more competitive this season than we had any right to expect thanks largely to the emergence of genuinely talented kids from the Declan Edge academy.
 
If people feel alienated by that, well, maybe I will open a football counselling service.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Bruce Holloway2012-01-18 14:04:06
https://www.facebook.com/groups/nzsportsprogrammes

Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
hepatitis wrote:
Very good post BruceInterested if the name of the book JV



The book is 'Outliers', by Malcolm Gladwell, is great stuff
Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Yeovil wrote:


I think Vadar is talking about Bounce by Mathew Seyd, if not it is very similar. Its a good read and I recommend it,  although it meanders in the 2nd half from memory.

The guts is to be world class you need 10,00 hours purposeful practice (i.e. you need to be pushed not just going through the motions). Part of that challenge in our environment is getting enough exposure at a high enough level for our young players to really push themselves. By being exposed to the NZFC at a young age these guys are getting pushed about as far as you can here.




Mathew Sewd has 3 bounce books I notice, have ordered the likely one to have a look at. Thanks

Just noticed your post N Bomb, thanks, getting that also

Will be reading late in to the night !!  - could be good soporifics  :)


hepatitis2012-01-18 14:18:35
Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
UK Kiwi has kind of jumbled up my post with his own thoughts above there.
 
But he raises a point worthy of further discussion: is there conflict of interest in having a franchise coach also involved in the game at other levels or in other spheres?
 
I guess you could call it the Ricki Herbert issue: can one coach seve two masters?
 
It's cropped up from time to time in Waikato's history, and, i guess in other set ups.
 
Should Declan and James pamment have been appointed waikato FC coaches in 2004 when they were aligned with Tauranga City?
 
Should Dave Edmondson have been waikato coach when he was also coach of Ngaruawahia or (to draw the 'academy' comparison) when he was coaching HBHS?
 
Kevin fallon also had his Mt Albert operations functioning during his exceptionally brief reign as Waikato coach.
 
Should Rover Wilkinson/Mark Cossey have been Waikato coach and assistant when in winter they were reverse assistant and coach at Wanderers?
 
Should Willie Gerdsen have been appointed with his East Coast Bays links?
 
Should Declan be coach now when he is aligned with Melville?
 
I guess we can all see the recurring pattern here.
 
We are in a  very small fishbowl where most of the people capable of working at national league level are also doing another job - often very well - where there is scope for the dreaded 'cross-over".
 
About 4 years ago I raised this isse at a Waikato FC AGM. While I regarded Roger wilkinson as a football colleague, as Melville chairman i felt there was an obligation to ask if he was conflicted in also working at wanderers, given Melville players reported they had been told their chances of summer selection would be improved if they were at Wanderers in the winter.
 
Roger rejected that he had done any such thing, and the meeting mostly agreed that there need not be any fundamental conflict in having the summer coach active in the winter.
 
 I accepted Roger's take on things, and that there had been a misunderstanding.  The real issue was how any potential points of conflict were managed in practice and having protocols to deal with issues that may arise, given it is a small world in waikato football.
 
It's probably the same with Waikato this season. If somebody sees a specific conflict in practice, and has the courage of their convictions, this should be raised with the board and transparently investigated.
 
In a perfect world you might avoid "cross-over". But this ain't perfect, it's Waikato, where  the main challenge is survival.
 
So, to repeat my view: the key issue is how perceived conflicts of interest are managed in Waikato's objective situation.
 
The conflict charge laid here most often is nepotism. As Mr Angry points out, every time Edge junior has started, the team has won. If someone wants to lodge a complaint on that front, they may have to be more selective about picking their moment.
 
Personally I think Waikato FC - bearing in mind its financial constraints -  is a lot more competitive this season than we had any right to expect thanks largely to the emergence of genuinely talented kids from the Declan Edge academy.
 
If people feel alienated by that, well, maybe I will open a football counselling service.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
I will still argue that Declan`s "conflict of interest"  is different to the examples you raised
 
In the cases of Herbert, Wilkinson, Edmondson etc, they were associated with the federation and had to abide by the rules and constituion of NZ football and FIFA
 
They were not involved in clubs where membership was exclusive
 
Fallon is different, but did he bring a lot of school boys to Waikato??
 
I`m assuming Declan doesn`t have a direct formal relationship with Melville as either a member or coach and his academy is totally private.
As you indicated in a previous post I shouldn`t worry about my son as Declan wasn`t actively recruiting.
It`s that exclusive nature of his academy and his relationship with Waikato that concerns me.    
 
Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Since we are reminiscing about the past did anyone happen to catch the 2010 Waikato U19s squad play Declans academy side at Melville? Was a preseason game for Waikato,  when Peter Smith was coaching the side. Declan played his usual side (his sons, tyler boyd, ryan thomas etc..) and they lost 3 nil i think it was. And that Waikato squad was a bunch of nobodys who trained twice a week with half the team being from the BOP who everyone rips on. And im pretty sure in the last 10mins Jesse edge started playing long balls to tyler boyd, something Declan takes digs at other teams for doing against him.
 And also Bruce when did Declans side defeat the u17s? i dont remember any such game. I herd they got raped by both the u17s and u20s training squads.
ASUS2012-01-18 15:03:03
Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
UK Kiwi,
 
I don't understand what you are getting at when you say the other coaches were "associated with the federation and had to abide by the rules and constituion of NZ football and FIFA".
 
Declan is no less beholden to rules than other coaches when his teams play in compitition.
 
And equally, he is no more beholden to rules when he engages in academy coaching work than say, Mark Cossey, or Mike Groom.
 
And I can't draw much distinction between Roger's tremedous  Premier Skills courses that my sons attended and declan's academy, except that declan's is of a more sustained period.
 
Fallon was primed to sign several of his former pupils, Prince etc, in pre-season games, but that is neither here nor there in the bigger picture.
 
Declan has been a member of Melville United's coaching personnel for four seasons. He is subject to the rules of the club.
 
Could you more fully explain the perceived problem with an exclusive academy? Some lads come and go from what i have observed and seem to have a looser tie than the full-timers. But I don't understand  why it would make any difference to your point (I'm not sure quite what your point is here) whether he was seeking to recruit another batch or working with those players he has.
 
ASUS: They played the U17s about 5 times last year. The stand-out result was a 5-2 win, and a 1-0 win from memory (though i also saw them lose 1-2 at North Shore from 2 corners having dominated possession).
 
They also lost a couple of matches last year playing in northern reserves. That's football for you, but it doesn't alter the basic fact that through this development programme we now have a handy bunch of young players who continue to improve and work on them game.
 
I'm not sure what has happened to your team of nobodys who trained twice a week, but hopefully they have also continued to improve and make their mark somewhere in the game. 
 
 
 
 
https://www.facebook.com/groups/nzsportsprogrammes

Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Bruce
 
I will just go an have a drink with Buffon because I think we will find some common ground.
But do expect some further comments following the weekends game.
Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
conflicts of interest, by structure, not by practice, are inevitable in a volunteer sport within a small country with limited coaching talent.

it's in football's best interests to have the best coaches involved. if they have to take 5 different jobs to sustain their involvement then so be it.

those griping at edge need to accept that he was selected by legitimate means to a job that not many wanted.

results would seem to indicate that he is doing a good job, especially considering he took over this team at the last minute.

those questioning his commitment to the sport vs his commitment to his sons need to consider his long standing involvement in the game; his impressive international and professional career and his long-standing senior coaching involvement which kicked off well and truly before his sons could be in a position to 'benefit'reg222012-01-18 22:16:48

360footballnews.com

Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
The book is indeed 'Outliers', by Malcolm Gladwell

Grumpy old bastard alert

Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Otago should have sealed it in the first half.
Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
May go up for a look v Auckland, last time I went on a road trip we got hammered by Waitak while still playing well, so my hopes aren't high. 3 goal loss is probably respectable
Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Good luck to Waikato, quote from Auckland city coach about Declan and future for nz football, what a  hypocrite, gives once coach credit for doing something he has the opportunity to do, but all he does is gives his spandards and Croations opportunities, good on Declan, we may not all like him but he does the right thing by his nz born youth players who are the future.

�Their coach deserves a lot of credit for playing a different style and giving the young players a chance to develop their game. It is definitely the way of the future for New Zealand football.�
Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Thats probably not really a fair assessment Otto. Would Declans team win the Premiership, O League and go to Japan? No. That's the motivation of ACFC, not Waikato (if they were honest with themselves about where they currently are at this point in time).

At ACFC, coaches do not last long with a record like Declan has at Waikato so I do not think it is the same.

Grumpy old bastard alert

Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Fair Comment, results are very important, but that was not my point, my point was to give young nz players opportunites. ACFC do not have to have a whole squad of young players like Declan but 1 or 2 younger players per game and not just sit them on the bench, give them some actual game time eg 20 minutes, they have young players in the squad who are very capable of stepping up but they are not given a chance even when some of the seniors are quite obviously not performing on the odd game.
Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Yeah thats a fair point too.

I'm not one to defend ACFC but it was pointed out earlier in the year that they have quite a young team in Feneridis, Milne, Hogg, McGeorge, Morgan and Campbell all under 22. Throw in Spoonley at 24 I think and its not as old as you think. I've seen young Steven Carmichael get runs off the bench.

Grumpy old bastard alert

Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Waikato 0 Auck 0  !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  Supporter For Ever - Keep The Faith - Foundation Member - Never Lets FAX Get In The Way Of A Good Yarn

Permalink Permalink
about 14 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Well, that humble pie just doesn't fill me up. I'll take an extra large slice thanks. Cue Mr Angry in 3...2...1...

Grumpy old bastard alert

Permalink Permalink