National League / OCL

You've got to be kidding

167 replies · 19,517 views
about 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Fantastic post Daikiwi. That is the number one reason why the Nix should be lobbying the FFA to partake in the ACL. If they are successful and win that tournament they can match up against the OFC representative in Japan.
Permalink Permalink
about 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Are The Phoenix New Zealand or Australian?
Certainly the club is domiciled here in NZ and NZF will confirm they were formed under there umbrella.

However, all their players are registered through the Australian Federation. For those players that might filter down to the NZFC on completion of the A League - Draper, Costa, Spoonley etc they will require an International clearance. If they were transferring from a NZ club to an NZ club why do you need an international clearance?

NZF recently changed the dates for which international transfers were available. The first is at the commencement of the NZFC. I don't know when the second one is it used to be prior to the commencement of the winter league.

NZF will presumably move their international transfer windows yet again to accommodate The Phoenix. If they then do that does that mean that NZFC teams in a play off with The Phoenix will also be able to recruit players from off shore and the A League for the play offs?

Appears to me then they are effectively Australian.

To include them in the O League requires their players to be registered with the National Association that they represent. Clearly this is not the case.

Will The Phoenix also be restricted to NZF rules regarding "Guest Players" and only be allowed to field three such players.

Should The Phoenix end up at the CWC and it is in Japan again it is possible that three of the seven teams at the tournament will have their players registered with the National Association of an Asian Conferederation member. That being the Hosts - JFA, AFC winner and Phoenix from Australia. All a bit mickey mouse really.

Inclusion of the Phoenix this year adds another set of issues. All competing teams in this year's O League had to name their squad on 1 October 2007. Clearly the Phoenix did not. If they enter late presumably other O League teams will want ot strengthen / replace players in their current squad.

Plenty of regulations at NZF and Oceania to amend. Still I'm sure they will manage that and then wonder why the rest of the game is in such a state

Permalink Permalink
about 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
City Fan raises probably the most valid point: All competing teams in this year's O League had to name their squad on 1 October 2007. Clearly the Phoenix did not. If they enter late presumably other O League teams will want ot strengthen / replace players in their current squad.

That is part of the issue that is challengable by law. IF the Phoenix is allowed in, under the existing rules then WU and ACFC are not allow to bring any further players in. They could argue legitimately that they should be able to recruit for the finals. Other countries could appeal they weren't given that option due to the Oct 30 player deadline.

This could be a total unholy legal mess.
Permalink Permalink
about 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago

Substance over form absolutely City Fan. The Nix have to be an Aussie club to play in the A-League. Their route to the CWC lies through Asia, and as explained above look at how many rules and regs have to be bent and broken for them to "disguise" themselves as an Oceania club. Piece of jigsaw puzzle that doent fit in OFC...

Permalink Permalink
about 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago

Substance over form absolutely City Fan. The Nix have to be an Aussie club to play in the A-League. Their route to the CWC lies through Asia, and as explained above look at how many rules and regs have to be bent and broken for them to "disguise" themselves as an Oceania club. Piece of jigsaw puzzle that doent fit in OFC...

 
so it's better for NZ football that the nix aren't allowed into the o-league you say. Then a NZFC club qualifies for the CWC again, performs sub-par and in two years there is no oceania team able to qualify for the CWC..? This is better how?
 
If your argument is around the benefit of the NZ game then allowing the phoenix to be oceania's representative seems the only logical view in improving the state of football in NZ (ignoring all the other issues obviously).
 
It seems though this is not your argument at all and you are simply dark on a NZ team competing in an australian comp.. you must hate the breakers and warriors as well then. Are they too australian teams?
Permalink Permalink
about 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago

 The Nix have to be an Aussie club to play in the A-League.



Under whose definition? Can you produce anything official from the FFA or FIFA saying that the A-League is restricted to Australian teams? Or any official view from the FFA, FIFA, NZF, the AFC, the OFC or the Phoenix themselves that they are an Australian team?
Permalink Permalink
about 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago

Well how about starting with where the players are registered...generally a pretty good indicator as to the domicility of a club RobbWatson...

Permalink Permalink
about 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Phoenix is a NZ club, the club is based, registered owned and operated in NZ, the players are registered in an Aus comp, but the club is an NZ org, just playing in an aus comp. Happens all over the place. Get over it and move on!

Queenslander 3x a year.

Permalink Permalink
about 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Why do they need an international clearance to join an NZ club if they are an NZ club?
Permalink Permalink
about 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
The Phoenix are barred from entering the Asian Champions League by the Asian Confederation because they are a New Zealand team and therefore an Oceania team. End of story.
 
Permalink Permalink
about 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago

Well how about starting with where the players are registered...generally a pretty good indicator as to the domicility of a club RobbWatson...

 
You're at it again Uli, picking and choosing which fragments of a debate you're going to respond to in order to keep advancing your blinkered agenda.
 
Player registrations are ONE indicator that could lead to conclusions about a club's nationality, but I listed a host of others previously that you have conveniently decided to ignore (and you have the nerve to keep banging on about "substance over form" - you clearly don't even begin to understand the concept).
 
You still haven't answered my question about whether the Kinghts and the Kingz were also "Aussie" clubs and whether if Ba were invited to compete in the NZFC they would no longer be a Fijian club?
 
As Hard News points out I would also love to see you go into any pub in Cardiff and try and tell their fans that their club was actually English. In fact, I would pay to see that!
 

Permalink Permalink
about 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
But for any other club to sign a Phoenix player will require an international transfer and NZ Clubs are subject to only 3 guest players (except for Marquee Players in the NZFC) under NZF rules.

Why don't we just have a set of rules for the Phoenix and to make them more competitive allow them to play with 12 players this would shore up the defence.

All entrants in any competition need to play by the same set of rules.

As has been pointed out the welsh teams cometing in the Football League are essentially "English" in that they can not take part in Welsh competitions.

Similarly Berwick Rangers don't get to enter both the FA Cup and Scottish FA Cup.

If you want to take the argument to an international level Israeli teams play in European competitions because Isreal has been put in to Uefa. Despite being part of the Asian continent geographically the clubs can't choose to play in the ACL.

You are what you are. If you play in an Aussie League you are ultimately an Asian club side no matter where you are based geographically. If you have accepted as part of your entry not to be able to compete in the ACL then I don't know why the rest of NZ needs to find a solution for you. Go and argue your case with the Aussies and the Asians.

Alternatively if your holy grail is the Club World Cup apply for a NZFC Franchise and qualify like every one else.

At the end of the day Blatter's comments are politically based. Inclusion of the Phoenix would not necessarily achieve his aim. While they are a "professional club" if they have finished last in the A League every other club in the world would want to know why they have qualified for a Champions Tournament.

Still this could lead any where. From memory Northern Spirit were part owned by Rangers. Maybe european clubs will buy into or set up their own Nz based clubs abd shuttle down their reserve teams to play in the O League and qualify for CWC.The opportunities are endless. One big pandora's box
Permalink Permalink
about 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago

Substance over form absolutely City Fan. The Nix have to be an Aussie club to play in the A-League. Their route to the CWC lies through Asia, and as explained above look at how many rules and regs have to be bent and broken for them to "disguise" themselves as an Oceania club. Piece of jigsaw puzzle that doent fit in OFC...

 
Rules and regulations should always be there to create a desired outcome. They are not sacrosanct and if they don't produce the required outcome they should be changed. That's why we no longer have laws that require car drivers to get out and wave a red flag before they enter an intersection. And that's why you will probably find that Oceania are prepared to do whatever is necessary to allow the Phoenix into the O-League either this season or next, rather than be be the victims of a FIFA regulation change themselves (ie. no more Oceania teams at the CWC).
 
 

Permalink Permalink
about 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
As always this whole arguement/discussion is based on speculation around one very politcally motivated statement. Noone can really know whats going to happen cos its never going to be discussed in the open until a decision is habded out.

Queenslander 3x a year.

Permalink Permalink
about 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
But if Ba did enter the NZFC (the inclusion of a Fijian team in the NZ National League has previously been mooted) do you think they would qualify for the O League as Fiji's representative without having played in the Fiji National League?

I would expect NZF would hold the registration of the Ba players just as they do for all NZFC teams or at least the Federations do on their behalf.

The Phoenix are ultimately an Aussie club. sometimes you just have to acdept that iif it looks like a duck, walks like a duck and quacks like a duck then for all intensive purposes it is a duck even if you give it a different name.

That's not to say we don't all want them to do well (apart from Happy Ted) as they are our local team in that competition.

When it comes to the O League there are clear eligibility and competition standards that the Phoenix clearly do not conform to.

I will ask one last question which will confirm everyones motivation. If there was no CWC would the Phoenix still be pushing to play in the O League. I suspect not.
Permalink Permalink
about 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
City Fan wrote:
If you want to take the argument to an international level Israeli teams play in European competitions because Isreal has been put in to Uefa. Despite being part of the Asian continent geographically the clubs can't choose to play in the ACL.
 
But that's just the point. Israel are a member of the UEFA Federation so their national team and their clubs teams play in UEFA competitions. The Phoenix are an exception to that general rule in Oceania because they play in a competition outside their federation. But that is the only exception to the rule that you have illustrated above with the Israel example. In all other respects they are a club based in New Zealand, and NZ Football remain affiliated to the Oceania Federation. Otherwise you are arguing that because the Phoenix play in the A-League by default all NZ football moves across to the Asian Federation.
 
At the end of the day a section of you ACFC fans basically have a problem with a team in Wellington being New Zealand's representative in the A-League. New Zealand was offered a spot in the A-League by the Aussies primarily for commercial reasons but Oceania and FIFA agreed to it because they could see it was good for the A-League, good for professional football in NZ and presumably good for football in Oceania. And none of this mattered to you while the team was based in Auckland. Now that the team is in Wellington it is suddenly an "Aussie" team out to crush the ambitions of your precious ACFC. Which is sad really.
 
 

Permalink Permalink
about 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
 
. And none of this mattered to you while the team was based in Auckland. Now that the team is in Wellington it is suddenly an "Aussie" team out to crush the ambitions of your precious ACFC. Which is sad really.
  
At the end of the dayt they were happy while it was Auckland cos it was guaranteed to fail on so many levels, on and off the field - they don't like it now cos in wellington the franchise will work.

Queenslander 3x a year.

Permalink Permalink
about 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
City Fan wrote:
.....I will ask one last question which will confirm everyones motivation. If there was no CWC would the Phoenix still be pushing to play in the O League. I suspect not.
 
.....and what if that was the reason?
 
Are you trying to suggest that it's wrong for a business which sees an opportunity to increase it's exposure, gain extra revenue and potentially increase it's customer numbers by introducing their product to a new group of consumers, to examine any avenue open to them to exploit that potential.
 
Hmm........
 
 

Apparently I'm apathetic, but I couldn't care less.

"Being a Partick Thistle fan sets you apart. It means youre a free thinker. It also means your team has no money." Tim Luckhurst, The Independent, 4th December 2003

Permalink Permalink
about 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
City Fan wrote:
I will ask one last question which will confirm everyones motivation. If there was no CWC would the Phoenix still be pushing to play in the O League. I suspect not.
 
I expect they would evaluate the opportunity on the same basis as every other club in Oceania - what are the benefits of entering versus the costs? It could fit very well as pre or post season tournament, chance to give squad players a run etc. Would ACFC approach the same situation any differently?
 
It's a funny question coming from a supporter of the one club in NZ who have benefited more than any other from the spoils of the CWC. I don't remember ACFC making any noble gesture to spread the prize money from the tournament more evenly to help ensure the long-term viability and competitiveness of the NZFC. You are quite happy to accept the spoils when it benefits ACFC but then you start moralising about others motivations when that might be under threat.
 

Permalink Permalink
about 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
same old Auckland - always pilfering $$$$$$
 
oh and We're not Auckland anymore!

Queenslander 3x a year.

Permalink Permalink
about 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
 
It's a funny question coming from a supporter of the one club in NZ who have benefited more than any other from the spoils of the CWC. I don't remember ACFC making any noble gesture to spread the prize money from the tournament more evenly to help ensure the long-term viability and competitiveness of the NZFC. You are quite happy to accept the spoils when it benefits ACFC but then you start moralising about others motivations when that might be under threat.
 
 
 
well put terminator
Permalink Permalink
about 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
We are in the fifth edition of the O League / Champions Tournament.

The Kingz / Knights never played or attempted to even when Australia were part of Oceania because you qualify from the league you play in.

The Phoenix want direct entry simply because they are the only "professional club" in the country and think it is a easy cash cow having realised how expensive it is to run a club.

Take away the CWC and the Phoenix couldn't give a toss about the O League. However, for all the other teams throughout the Pacific it will still hold value as it is the next step up the ladder in terms of competition.

The Phoenix will surely kill the O League. Why will the island nations contemplate entering and spending scarce funds if they are playing an Aussie team? The O League will continue with or with out the CWC. Add the Phoenix and it will die.

If Dave Wilson signs a team of players from the A League to play in the winter competition and by everyones assessment is better than the NZFC teams should he also have a crack at the O League / CWC?

Let this not be a discussion based on geography - Auck v Wgtn - when you can't debate the thread no doubt you will result to a slanging match.

For you info I have no connection to any NZFC club but have watched many games.

As for Auckland City my understanding is they gave nearly $60k to each of the seven other franchises at the start of the year and were left with around $200k. This filled the hole created by competing in Tahiti the year before which cost close to $150k for no return.

So on a cash basis they are no further ahead from the CWC than any other franchise in NZ.

Presumably as a New Zealand club you would like to see the Phoenix enter the Chatham Cup this year. I guess this is also on the cards.

Accept that the duck is an aussie duck just as The Kingz and The Knights were.

I would love The Phoenix to win the A League and have 15 kiwis in the squad I just don't agree that they qualify for the O League.

But almost as another thread I can see Happy Ted's perspective. The Phoenix are not necessarily good for grassroots football.

Just as the NZFC has killed winter club football the Phoenix are surely killing the NZFC. The best NZFC was year one when there was no A League. There were bigger crowds, more even competition and certainly more press coverage including its own TV show.

As punters we like to be asssociated with the biggest and the brightest. You can get 11,500 to the average home game of the Phoenix and less than 1000 to Team Wellington. Because the perception is the football is second rate no one turns up.

Once we have killed off both the NZFC and winter clubs where will the young players come from to go to the Phoenix? Don't tell me the Federation Academy coaching programmes - as they are somewhat laughable. You wouldn't let most of those coaches near a senior womens team let alone a NZFC team.
Permalink Permalink
about 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago

Do Phoenix supporters believe their route to the CWC should be through Asia or Oceania? It is a simple question...

 

Permalink Permalink
about 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
currently as a Phoenix supporter I'm not fussed what champions league we play in if at all. At this point I'd like to see us play well in the A-League! pure and simple.

Queenslander 3x a year.

Permalink Permalink
about 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago

Do Phoenix supporters believe their route to the CWC should be through Asia or Oceania? It is a simple question...

 

 
whatever federation NZ is in

Founder

Permalink Permalink
about 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
You make some great points there City Fan...
 
City Fan wrote:
The Phoenix want direct entry simply because they are the only "professional club" in the country and think it is a easy cash cow having realised how expensive it is to run a club. [/QUOTE]
 
The Phoenix didn't initiate this debate but I'm sure will jump at any opportunity offered. The debate really picked up steam with FIFA's (Blatter's) threat to deny Oceania entry to the CWC. You can't pin that on the Phoenix.

City Fan wrote:
Take away the CWC and the Phoenix couldn't give a toss about the O League. However, for all the other teams throughout the Pacific it will still hold value as it is the next step up the ladder in terms of competition.

The Phoenix will surely kill the O League. Why will the island nations contemplate entering and spending scarce funds if they are playing an Aussie team? The O League will continue with or with out the CWC. Add the Phoenix and it will die. [/QUOTE]
 
I think we agree. I've consistently advocated solving the problem posed by FIFA by sending the Phoenix direct to the CWC and by-passing the O-League altogether. I see putting the Phoenix into the O-League as a half-arsed compromise that dilutes what would other be a sensible solution to a problem. I even think that the Phoenix should be prepared to pass all, or at least most, of the prize-money back to NZF or Oceania for the development of the game (or as O-League prize-money). The Phoenix could possibly cover the costs of competing at the CWC by leveraging other commercial opportunities in a way that other Oceania club sides just aren't able to because of size. Under this solution the only thing the O-League Champions would lose is the actual game time at the CWC - which Blatter is threatening to take away anyway.

City Fan wrote:
If Dave Wilson signs a team of players from the A League to play in the winter competition and by everyones assessment is better than the NZFC teams should he also have a crack at the O League / CWC? [/QUOTE]
 
Not possible under current NZF competition structures but if the Oceania Federation thought it would increase their chances of retaining the CWC spot then they may well consider another invitation to compete in the O-League (like the one they are considering for the Phoenix). It's their competition, they write the rules.
 
Realistically Dave Wilson would never do this though, right?. He could (and may yet) invest in an NZFC franchise that gives him a direct route to the O-League without the arsing around.
 

City Fan wrote:
As for Auckland City my understanding is they gave nearly $60k to each of the seven other franchises at the start of the year and were left with around $200k. This filled the hole created by competing in Tahiti the year before which cost close to $150k for no return.

So on a cash basis they are no further ahead from the CWC than any other franchise in NZ.
 
They didn't "give" the other franchises anything - that was the formula for splitting the prize-money right from the start. As for their financial position, I don't know whether they've made any money off the exercise but statements by the Chairmen of both Auckland City and Waitakere would lead you to believe that there is some profit to be made.

[QUOTE=City Fan]Presumably as a New Zealand club you would like to see the Phoenix enter the Chatham Cup this year. I guess this is also on the cards.
 
That's a great question! It's definitely not going to happen before we let NZFC sides compete. Once again, the real question is really about what we want to get from these competitions in terms of outcomes?

[QUOTE=City Fan]Accept that the duck is an aussie duck just as The Kingz and The Knights were.
 
At least you agree that under your own analysis the Kingz and Knights were Aussie clubs. How many other fans of those teams agree with this?

[QUOTE=City Fan]But almost as another thread I can see Happy Ted's perspective. The Phoenix are not necessarily good for grassroots football.

Just as the NZFC has killed winter club football the Phoenix are surely killing the NZFC. The best NZFC was year one when there was no A League. There were bigger crowds, more even competition and certainly more press coverage including its own TV show.

As punters we like to be asssociated with the biggest and the brightest. You can get 11,500 to the average home game of the Phoenix and less than 1000 to Team Wellington. Because the perception is the football is second rate no one turns up.

Once we have killed off both the NZFC and winter clubs where will the young players come from to go to the Phoenix? Don't tell me the Federation Academy coaching programmes - as they are somewhat laughable. You wouldn't let most of those coaches near a senior womens team let alone a NZFC team.
 
Great point, but do we cut off all elite football at the club level? Surely a proper pyramid structure with professional football at the top gives players the clearest pathways to excel. Playing in front of 11,500 must be more inspiring than 3,000 or 1,000 or whatever. In your view of the world it seems that only want grassroots football and nothing else?

By the way, I think you're right that this a good topic for a new thread. To what extent does the presence of an A-League franchise, and also the NZFC, help or hinder the development of grassroots football in NZ? I suppose it depends on what you consider to be critical success factors for grassroots football but let's not get into that here.

 
terminator_x2008-01-17 19:50:24

Permalink Permalink
about 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Brilliant T-X, this is clearly not going to be a simple fix, there is far too many factions involved. Either way it has highlighted the mess that NZ football is in due to a huge lack of funds to strighen up what potentially could be an awesome competition in the national league. I'm sure Team Wellington, Waitakere etc would love to play in front of 11500, but is it going to happen when NZ football can't/won't put any money towards making the comp meaningful for the Joe blogs football fan??

Queenslander 3x a year.

Permalink Permalink
about 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
theprof wrote:
same old Auckland - always pilfering $$$$$$
 
oh and We're not Auckland anymore!

I though from the previous threads that you were all adamant that The Phoenix
were entirely different entity to Kingz/Knights? So what  are u on about with this were not Auckland anymore?

Do you know what nemesis means

Permalink Permalink
about 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Bloody hell many of the statements made in this and some other threads  look like many of the same arguments that have troubled football in NZ for the last 20/30 years.Im afraid until some in the game in NZ change their attitude the game will never move forward.
As someone who has come back to watching football in NZ having given it away after getting thoroughly pd off with the constant me me attitude of many involved in the game.It really dosnt surprise me to see many things havnt changed.

I would suggest some of you talk to some young players on what they think of having the Phoenix around.I have some friends who have children involved in a couple of academy's  and they reckon its really given those involved an incentive to stick at it.
I would be very surprised if registrations for the coming season dont go through the roof in some areas.

Good luck to those of you with the narrow foresight and agendas fortunately i think you will find you become a minority  in the not to distant future.

Fully expect when i return to this thread or a similar one in about 3 weeks it will still sound like the crap from years ago.

GET YOUR SHIRTS OFF FOR THE BOYS

Permalink Permalink
about 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
I would think everyone but themselves and NZF would actually "deem" them to be an Australian club. Just an Aussie franchise playing in another city in the A-League. The legal registration etc is just window dressing, look at the substance over the form. The Aussies have duped NZF again, taken their commercial cream and slammed the door on Nix CWC aspirations. They are a jigsaw piece that doesnt fit as far as the CWC picture goes.


But they are not an Aussie club. Unlike the previous knights squad, we actually have New Zealanders making at least half of the squad. The FFA wanted an New Zealand team with lots of New Zealanders playing and not 2nd/3rd English Professionals with some Aussie or New Zealanders filling the gaps. Sure the FFA look over here and see 4 million people as potential A-league supporters market and they are right.

But the FFA knows that the Knight were not doing the sums right by not very little NZ players and so no real home support plus being in Auckland was a huge disadvantage with a City with two completing nzfc clubs and home ground located away from the main city central. plus Auckland full of other sports and other New Zealanders and people born outside Auckland and also non-Aucklanders and Aucklanders alike resented that "NZ" knight tag as well.

Anyway, you are wrong about the FFA stopping their CWC aspiration, they only wanted the NZ market for the A-league as much as we wanted it but we all know that we are an NZ club and the Asian Confederation ruled that NZ players are foreign players for their ACL competition (limited to 4 foreign players per squad) (whereas for the A-league, NZ players are not consider Foreign players) which would disadvantaged Wellington Phoenix since we are suppose to have home crowd support for our local players. And it limits NZ players in other A-league clubs, this year only Leo Bertos are the only NZ player outside of The Nix playing in A-league.

Also as another poster has pointed out, A-league is higher than NZFC and O-league and that we always had a NZ club in their professional league before the A-league existed and way before the FFA joined the Asian Confederation in a bid to player higher quality opposition. This was in no way suppose to slam the Nix CWC aspiration. The slamming actually comes from the NZFC clubs because these clubs wanted the the $$$$ money $$$$ for themselves. Personally I thought that it would end up having rich and poor Amateur clubs in the NZFC as the result and unbalanced the competition.

Anyway, a new agreement will soon be drawn up to allow the NIx in the O-league and possibility of a change to the NZFC in their Foreign Players Policy especially about using Australian players to be on level playing ground for the O-league against the NZFC and this would probably mean an overall increase of NZFC clubs to widen the NZ players base later on, which it fine by me. I think that Australian player should really be given non-foreign status for the time-being and see if that affect the NZFC clubs and the NZFC competition.

I firmly believe that we need to raise the NZFC into a closer footing to A-League standard and with it being still semi-professional there would not be too much Aussies coming over when there is plenty of exposure in the likes of the Semi-professional Victorican Premier League for A-League teams. But at least when it comes to O-league, the NZFC clubs have some level playing ground against the Nix. I think that oceania confederation should not be as harsh about foreign player policy against Aussie players in O-league as the Asian Confederation were to the NZ players in the ACL, simply because of the need to raise the Oceania Standard to ensure future participation in the CWC.
Permalink Permalink
about 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago

By the way, I think you're right that this a good topic for a new thread. To what extent does the presence of an A-League franchise, and also the NZFC, help or hinder the development of grassroots football in NZ? I suppose it depends on what you consider to be critical success factors for grassroots football but let's not get into that here.
 
Just an update to this. I've only recently realised that this debate is pretty much going on here:
 
I wondered where happyted had got to!
 
 

Permalink Permalink
about 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
happyted wrote:
theprof wrote:
same old Auckland - always pilfering $$$$$$
 
oh and We're not Auckland anymore!

I though from the previous threads that you were all adamant that The Phoenix
were entirely different entity to Kingz/Knights? So what  are u on about with this were not Auckland anymore?
 
Its quite simple Ted if you read the statement,
 
We (the Nix) are not Auckland anymore.
 
the licence (sp) the Nix have was once owned and lost by the Nights. Also as far as prof football in NZ we (the Nix) have picked up the mantle from the failing Auckland franchises.
 
Its works quite well if you have even the simplest knowledge of recent events in prof football history in NZ.
theprof2008-01-18 12:55:41

Queenslander 3x a year.

Permalink Permalink
about 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
I went along to the home of the broad-minded fan and "what's good for NZ football" today, Auckland City. I see the party line isn't just being repeated by the fans. The ACFC chairman has his say in the program and, surprisingly enough, states that "The Phoenix are an Australian cub playing in an Australian competition, etc, etc, blah, blah ".  

Apparently I'm apathetic, but I couldn't care less.

"Being a Partick Thistle fan sets you apart. It means youre a free thinker. It also means your team has no money." Tim Luckhurst, The Independent, 4th December 2003

Permalink Permalink
about 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
theprof wrote:
happyted wrote:
theprof wrote:
same old Auckland - always pilfering $$$$$$
 
oh and We're not Auckland anymore!

I though from the previous threads that you were all adamant that The Phoenix
were entirely different entity to Kingz/Knights? So what  are u on about with this were not Auckland anymore?
 
Its quite simple Ted if you read the statement,
 
We (the Nix) are not Auckland anymore.
 
the licence (sp) the Nix have was once owned and lost by the Nights. Also as far as prof football in NZ we (the Nix) have picked up the mantle from the failing Auckland franchises.
 
Its works quite well if you have even the simplest knowledge of recent events in prof football history in NZ.


I do have knowledge of recent pro football in NZ and good to see you have upheld the tradition
of getting the wooden spoon well done guys

Do you know what nemesis means

Permalink Permalink
about 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Jag wrote:
I went along to the home of the broad-minded fan and "what's good for NZ football" today, Auckland City. I see the party line isn't just being repeated by the fans. The ACFC chairman has his say in the program and, surprisingly enough, states that "The Phoenix are an Australian cub playing in an Australian competition, etc, etc, blah, blah ".  

Would be very interesting to get the views of the other 7 NZFC clubs as well

Do you know what nemesis means

Permalink Permalink
about 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Ted, how are you. I thought you'd have been out celebrating..

Apparently I'm apathetic, but I couldn't care less.

"Being a Partick Thistle fan sets you apart. It means youre a free thinker. It also means your team has no money." Tim Luckhurst, The Independent, 4th December 2003

Permalink Permalink
about 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
happyted wrote:
Jag wrote:
I went along to the home of the broad-minded fan and "what's good for NZ football" today, Auckland City. I see the party line isn't just being repeated by the fans. The ACFC chairman has his say in the program and, surprisingly enough, states that "The Phoenix are an Australian cub playing in an Australian competition, etc, etc, blah, blah ".  

Would be very interesting to get the views of the other 7 NZFC clubs as well

I've been thinking the same thing myself.
Permalink Permalink
about 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Jag wrote:
Ted, how are you. I thought you'd have been out celebrating..

Hopefully that will be next week after we beat Waitakare again

Do you know what nemesis means

Permalink Permalink
about 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
City Fan wrote:

You are what you are. If you play in an Aussie League you are ultimately an Asian club side no matter where you are based geographically. If you have accepted as part of your entry not to be able to compete in the ACL then I don't know why the rest of NZ needs to find a solution for you. Go and argue your case with the Aussies and the Asians.
 
Harsh, but true.
 
The simplest solution is to allow the Phoenix to enter the CWC by winning the A-League. Now, as a new team seemingly willing to do anything to get a bit of money and attention, it seems that the Phoenix agreed to sign away this right in order to get to play with the big boys. So that's that then. No CWC for us because we sold it away for the right to be in the A-league. Take it on the chin.
 
To be honest the arrogance displayed by some of the Phoenix fans is quite staggering as they genuinely seem to believe that they should be allowed to choose what games, cups and leagues they can play in because it will 'be good for NZ football'....because....hmmm...well, I'm not sure how, but it seems to stem from an untested belief that the Phoenix won't get their arses just as badly kicked by the African team on a wet Wednesday night in Tokyo, as happened to all of the other previous Kiwi 'ambassadors'.
 
It's been a good season for the Phoenix and they've worked wonders, but it would be a shame to throw away all the goodwill in both Australia and New Zealand by putting everybody's backs up just for a few days in Japan.
Permalink Permalink