On the basis of what exactly?

Its no longer a problem.
Three for me, and two for them.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qe_B5CzbTJo - Caceres winning penalty v Perth - footage from the Fever Zone
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qe_B5CzbTJo - Caceres winning penalty v Perth - footage from the Fever Zone
Apparently I'm apathetic, but I couldn't care less.
"Being a Partick Thistle fan sets you apart. It means youre a free thinker. It also means your team has no money." Tim Luckhurst, The Independent, 4th December 2003
Because there's a litany of other players who have done exactly the same thing and never been punished.
And for Celtic players needed to have dived about 6 times in the Arsenal box to have a chance of winning. And I sincerely doubt that they got to the Arasenal box that many times in 180 minutes of the tie.
Btw, I'm not an Arsenal fan.
I know Jag, unfortunately had to generalise there since most of the noise is coming from Scottish FA and media.
Because there's a litany of other players who have done exactly the same thing and never been punished.
And for Celtic players needed to have dived about 6 times in the Arsenal box to have a chance of winning. And I sincerely doubt that they got to the Arasenal box that many times in 180 minutes of the tie.
Btw, I'm not an Arsenal fan.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qe_B5CzbTJo - Caceres winning penalty v Perth - footage from the Fever Zone
I know Jag, unfortunately had to generalise there since most of the noise is coming from Scottish FA and media.
Apparently I'm apathetic, but I couldn't care less.
"Being a Partick Thistle fan sets you apart. It means youre a free thinker. It also means your team has no money." Tim Luckhurst, The Independent, 4th December 2003
The point being, if UEFA came out at the start of the season saying they'll take a harsh stance on proven 'simulations', then I'd have no problem with it. But now one incident has turned into the biggest problem the game's facing, when it's been a problem (and nowhere near as pervasive one as everyone seems to think) for a good number of years. Either deal with it in a systematic manner, or stop witch-hunting in some cases, and turning the other way in other cases.
And for Celtic players needed to have dived about 6 times in the Arsenal box to have a chance of winning. And I sincerely doubt that they got to the Arasenal box that many times in 180 minutes of the tie.



The point being, if UEFA came out at the start of the season saying they'll take a harsh stance on proven 'simulations', then I'd have no problem with it. But now one incident has turned into the biggest problem the game's facing, when it's been a problem (and nowhere near as pervasive one as everyone seems to think) for a good number of years. Either deal with it in a systematic manner, or stop witch-hunting in some cases, and turning the other way in other cases.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qe_B5CzbTJo - Caceres winning penalty v Perth - footage from the Fever Zone
UEFA/FIFA/Premier League - kind of beside the point now. It's not UEFA coming out swinging on this, but Scottish FA and media getting on their case.
Of course UEFA shouldn't have to say don't cheat, but when pretty much all the major football organisations and associations have dealt with most cases of simulation fairly leniently in the past, it's a extremely harsh to shift the goal-posts on players without any advance warning. Particualrly when bowing under pressure.
UEFA/FIFA/Premier League - kind of beside the point now. It's not UEFA coming out swinging on this, but Scottish FA and media getting on their case.
Of course UEFA shouldn't have to say don't cheat, but when pretty much all the major football organisations and associations have dealt with most cases of simulation fairly leniently in the past, it's a extremely harsh to shift the goal-posts on players without any advance warning. Particualrly when bowing under pressure.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qe_B5CzbTJo - Caceres winning penalty v Perth - footage from the Fever Zone
But it makes it inherently unfair. And that's no way to set standards.
But it makes it inherently unfair. And that's no way to set standards.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qe_B5CzbTJo - Caceres winning penalty v Perth - footage from the Fever Zone
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qe_B5CzbTJo - Caceres winning penalty v Perth - footage from the Fever Zone
Apparently I'm apathetic, but I couldn't care less.
"Being a Partick Thistle fan sets you apart. It means youre a free thinker. It also means your team has no money." Tim Luckhurst, The Independent, 4th December 2003
Apparently I'm apathetic, but I couldn't care less.
"Being a Partick Thistle fan sets you apart. It means youre a free thinker. It also means your team has no money." Tim Luckhurst, The Independent, 4th December 2003
And there goes my point - either everyone, or no-one. You can't selectively pick and choose when to punish 'divers', especially if you haven't set any off-field parameters for dealing with it in the first place.
Exactly.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qe_B5CzbTJo - Caceres winning penalty v Perth - footage from the Fever Zone
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qe_B5CzbTJo - Caceres winning penalty v Perth - footage from the Fever Zone
What was it somebody said "Don't hate the player, hate the game". Why not have a pop at the system which, while not actively encouraging it, doesn't actually do an awful lot to stamp this rubbish out of the game. If something isn't being policed then people will abuse it.
Apparently I'm apathetic, but I couldn't care less.
"Being a Partick Thistle fan sets you apart. It means youre a free thinker. It also means your team has no money." Tim Luckhurst, The Independent, 4th December 2003
Apparently I'm apathetic, but I couldn't care less.
"Being a Partick Thistle fan sets you apart. It means youre a free thinker. It also means your team has no money." Tim Luckhurst, The Independent, 4th December 2003
