General Football Discussion

England World Cup thread - the thread of certain disappointment

296 replies · 56,848 views
almost 12 years ago

Jeff Vader wrote:

Actually how many LFC players were on the pitch? The commentator mentioned that LFC had also pitched for Barkley and Lallana?

The Liverpool continent that are used to playing together was supposed to be the saviour of England yeah? Meanwhile, Wilshere sits on the bench. If I was an England fan I'd be mad.

Permalink Permalink
almost 12 years ago

It makes Brendan Rodgers look like a fucking rockstar that's for sure.

I thought Henderson for Wilshere starting was a better option. Mind you, when has any England fan collective gone 'yep, the boss has picked the right players there'

Grumpy old bastard alert

Permalink Permalink
almost 12 years ago

Gerrard terrible game against Italy looked out and out of it, today hands Suarez a goal.

Should've taken Carrick.

Permalink Permalink
almost 12 years ago

Permalink Permalink
almost 12 years ago

Jeff Vader wrote:

Actually how many LFC players were on the pitch? The commentator mentioned that LFC had also pitched for Barkley and Lallana?

Six. 5 playing for England, 1 for Uruguay. The Uruguayan had 2 shots on goal and scored from both - this after having had keyhole surgery 1 month ago and not having trained at all with the team leading up to this game.

"At the end of the drive the lawmen arrive...

I'll take my chance because luck is on my side or something...

Her name is Rio, she don't need to understand...

Oh Rio, Rio, hear them shout across the land..."

Permalink Permalink
almost 12 years ago

Sanday wrote:

And now for a moment of pedantry, you've got the expression wrong there Sanday. It's clutching at straw, not clutching at straws.

Permalink Permalink
almost 12 years ago

Jerzy Merino wrote:

Jeff Vader wrote:

Actually how many LFC players were on the pitch? The commentator mentioned that LFC had also pitched for Barkley and Lallana?

Six. 5 playing for England, 1 for Uruguay. The Uruguayan had 2 shots on goal and scored from both - this after having had keyhole surgery 1 month ago and not having trained at all with the team leading up to this game.

7 if you include Lambert.

Permalink Permalink
almost 12 years ago

So it's all Liverpools fault.

Permalink Permalink
almost 12 years ago · edited almost 12 years ago · History

Fitzy wrote:

Sanday wrote:

And now for a moment of pedantry, you've got the expression wrong there Sanday. It's clutching at straw, not clutching at straws.

Is it? I've never heard it as clutching at straw... And google gives 16,000 hits for "clutching at straw" and 500,000 for "clutching at straws"...

People like Coldplay and voted for the Nazis. You can't trust people.

Permalink Permalink
almost 12 years ago

Fitzy wrote:

Sanday wrote:

And now for a moment of pedantry, you've got the expression wrong there Sanday. It's clutching at straw, not clutching at straws.

Is it? I've never heard it as clutching at straw... And google gives 16,000 hits for "clutching at straw" and 500,000 for "clutching at straws"...

Yep, because the full saying is "a drowning man will clutch at straw." As in dried grass. Which makes much more sense than a drowning man clutching at straws.

Permalink Permalink
almost 12 years ago

Fitzy wrote:

Jerzy Merino wrote:

Jeff Vader wrote:

Actually how many LFC players were on the pitch? The commentator mentioned that LFC had also pitched for Barkley and Lallana?

Six. 5 playing for England, 1 for Uruguay. The Uruguayan had 2 shots on goal and scored from both - this after having had keyhole surgery 1 month ago and not having trained at all with the team leading up to this game.

7 if you include Lambert.

8 if you count Coates for URU.

UNDERDOG: One that is expected to lose a contest or struggle 

Permalink Permalink
almost 12 years ago

Is straw not a plural in its own right like geese is?

Grumpy old bastard alert

Permalink Permalink
almost 12 years ago

Jeff Vader wrote:

Is straw not a plural in its own right like geese is?

Yes, if you're referring to dried grass, that's why "straws" is incorrect.

Permalink Permalink
almost 12 years ago

footballnut wrote:

Fitzy wrote:

Jerzy Merino wrote:

Jeff Vader wrote:

Actually how many LFC players were on the pitch? The commentator mentioned that LFC had also pitched for Barkley and Lallana?

Six. 5 playing for England, 1 for Uruguay. The Uruguayan had 2 shots on goal and scored from both - this after having had keyhole surgery 1 month ago and not having trained at all with the team leading up to this game.

7 if you include Lambert.

8 if you count Coates for URU.

I thought Liverpool had released him but turns out he was just on loan, so yes that makes 8.

Permalink Permalink
almost 12 years ago

Fitzy wrote:

Fitzy wrote:

Sanday wrote:

And now for a moment of pedantry, you've got the expression wrong there Sanday. It's clutching at straw, not clutching at straws.

Is it? I've never heard it as clutching at straw... And google gives 16,000 hits for "clutching at straw" and 500,000 for "clutching at straws"...

Yep, because the full saying is "a drowning man will clutch at straw." As in dried grass. Which makes much more sense than a drowning man clutching at straws.

Unless it's a party boat sinking and there's lots of straws for all the cocktails :P

People like Coldplay and voted for the Nazis. You can't trust people.

Permalink Permalink
almost 12 years ago

Lol in that case it's spot on

Permalink Permalink
almost 12 years ago · edited almost 12 years ago · History

Rooney - The face of Benson & Hedges

Made me chuckle when I read it on the Guardian site.

Permalink Permalink
almost 12 years ago

Fitzy wrote:

Fitzy wrote:

Sanday wrote:

And now for a moment of pedantry, you've got the expression wrong there Sanday. It's clutching at straw, not clutching at straws.

Is it? I've never heard it as clutching at straw... And google gives 16,000 hits for "clutching at straw" and 500,000 for "clutching at straws"...

Yep, because the full saying is "a drowning man will clutch at straw." As in dried grass. Which makes much more sense than a drowning man clutching at straws.

but if it was a long straw and the water was shallow, you could lie on your back on the sea bed - of the tidal flats - until the tide went out or rescuers came buy and saw your brightly coloured party straw sticking out (as it were)

Permalink Permalink
almost 12 years ago

Without watching an awful lot of Everton I've always just assumed Baines was really good mostly because he keeps getting goals and assists, but that's just because he takes corners, free kicks and penalties. He has been way out of his depth in these 2 games.

Permalink Permalink
almost 12 years ago

Fitzy wrote:

Sanday wrote:

And now for a moment of pedantry, you've got the expression wrong there Sanday. It's clutching at straw, not clutching at straws.

Is it? I've never heard it as clutching at straw... And google gives 16,000 hits for "clutching at straw" and 500,000 for "clutching at straws"...

Grass straws, not drinking straws! Bloomin' heck

Permalink Permalink
almost 12 years ago

ForteanTimes wrote:

Junior82 wrote:

ForteanTimes wrote:

Come on JV I got to go home and have my tea soon.

Grow a cock v@ginaboy. We don't call it tea here, it's dinner.

From fourth Ars*nal is one point.

Ha Ha I knew someone would respond to that. Dinner is at midday you heathen!!!

OK My native Pommy b@stard mate.  What's the difference between tea and supper then?

I wish you Brits would speak proper English like we do.

"Phoenix till they lose"

Posting 97% bollox, 8% lies and 3.658% genuine opinion. 

Genuine opinion: FTFFA

Permalink Permalink
almost 12 years ago

Breakfast

Dinner (Docky is also acceptable) Midday

Tea 18:00ish

Supper after 20:00, cup of cocoa and a couple of biscuits. 

what have you got?

Permalink Permalink
almost 12 years ago

ForteanTimes wrote:

Breakfast  Breakfast

Dinner (Docky is also acceptable) Midday F*ckin LUNCH!!

Tea 18:00ish Bl**dy DINNER!!! (between 18:00 and 19:00 - not late like those Euro backpackers)

Supper after 20:00, cup of cocoa and a couple of biscuits. Leftovers

what have you got?

"Phoenix till they lose"

Posting 97% bollox, 8% lies and 3.658% genuine opinion. 

Genuine opinion: FTFFA

Permalink Permalink
almost 12 years ago · edited almost 12 years ago · History

Junior82 wrote:

ForteanTimes wrote:

Breakfast  Breakfast

Dinner (Docky is also acceptable) Midday F*ckin LUNCH!!

Tea 18:00ish Bl**dy DINNER!!! (between 18:00 and 19:00 - not late like those Euro backpackers)

Supper after 20:00, cup of cocoa and a couple of biscuits. Leftovers

what have you got?

Lunch? where are you from Knightsbridge?

Permalink Permalink
almost 12 years ago

K-Town 4 life (*sigh*) - close enough?

Actually South K-Town, coalface Wgtn, not like the nobs at City End and Kelburn.

"Phoenix till they lose"

Posting 97% bollox, 8% lies and 3.658% genuine opinion. 

Genuine opinion: FTFFA

Permalink Permalink
almost 12 years ago

from Wiki:

High tea

High tea (also known as meat tea) is the evening meal or dinner of the working class, typically eaten between 5 pm and 7 pm.[13][14]

High tea typically consists of a hot dish, followed by cakes and bread, butter and jam. Occasionally there would be cold cuts of meat, such as ham salad. Traditionally, high tea was eaten by middle- to upper-class children (whose parents would have a more formal dinner later) or by workers when they came home from work.[citation needed] The term was first used around 1825, and high is used in the sense of well-advanced (like high noon, for example) to signify that it was taken later in the day.[15]

The term "high tea" was used as a way to distinguish it from afternoon tea, and was used predominantly by the working class and in certain British dialects of the North of England.[16][17]

Other uses

Lower-middle and working-class people traditionally call their midday meal dinner and their evening meal (served around 6 pm) tea, whereas the upper social classes would call the midday meal lunch (or luncheon), and the evening meal (served after 7 pm) dinner or supper (often eaten later in the evening).[citation needed] These class signifiers have diminished over time, particularly in the southeast of England

Permalink Permalink
almost 12 years ago · edited almost 12 years ago · History

From Immigration NZ:

New entrants - leave your class behind when you come to New Zild.  We have no class here.

"Phoenix till they lose"

Posting 97% bollox, 8% lies and 3.658% genuine opinion. 

Genuine opinion: FTFFA

Permalink Permalink
almost 12 years ago

Junior82 wrote:

From Immigration NZ:

New entrants - leave your class behind when you come to New Zild.  We have no class here.

Must admit not used dinner for ages. It's lunch now.

Permalink Permalink
almost 12 years ago

Same.

"Phoenix till they lose"

Posting 97% bollox, 8% lies and 3.658% genuine opinion. 

Genuine opinion: FTFFA

Permalink Permalink
almost 12 years ago

Junior82 wrote:

Do you go to the toilet or the lavatory?

I thought it was the dunny  or  the bog.

If you are old and wise you were probably young and stupid

Permalink Permalink
almost 12 years ago

Pants, keks, shreddies, trollies, undergarments?

I'm a pants man myself.

Permalink Permalink
almost 12 years ago · edited almost 12 years ago · History

Leggy wrote:

Junior82 wrote:

Do you go to the toilet or the lavatory?

I thought it was the dunny  or  the bog.

Nice of you to show up we could have done with you in the punch up in the Sponsorship thread. Me and J82 got told off.

Permalink Permalink
almost 12 years ago

Leggy wrote:

Junior82 wrote:

Do you go to the toilet or the lavatory?

I thought it was the dunny  or  the bog.

No we're talking about the thunderbox.  Not Dunedin and Christchurch.

"Phoenix till they lose"

Posting 97% bollox, 8% lies and 3.658% genuine opinion. 

Genuine opinion: FTFFA

Permalink Permalink
almost 12 years ago

Anyhoo I got 452/1000 for the posh test.

Probably puts me in the Hyacinth Bucket class.

"Phoenix till they lose"

Posting 97% bollox, 8% lies and 3.658% genuine opinion. 

Genuine opinion: FTFFA

Permalink Permalink
almost 12 years ago

Back to football.

Roy should drop these players for the next game. Baines,Jagielka, Stirling, Gerrard and Welbeck. There is enough talent on the bench that is far better than these guys. Nothing to lose, just go for it.

If you are old and wise you were probably young and stupid

Permalink Permalink
almost 12 years ago

ForteanTimes wrote:

Leggy wrote:

Junior82 wrote:

Do you go to the toilet or the lavatory?

I thought it was the dunny  or  the bog.

Nice of you to show up we could have done with you in the punch up in the Sponsorship thread. Me and J82 got told off.

Yep.  Hiding out in this little corner of Pommie-land.

"Phoenix till they lose"

Posting 97% bollox, 8% lies and 3.658% genuine opinion. 

Genuine opinion: FTFFA

Permalink Permalink
almost 12 years ago

Leggy wrote:

Back to football.

Roy should drop these players for the next game. Baines,Jagielka, Stirling, Gerrard and Welbeck. There is enough talent on the bench that is far better than these guys. Nothing to lose, just go for it.

Probably I'd have Stirling there but can't argue with the rest.

Permalink Permalink
almost 12 years ago

Leggy wrote:

Back to football.

Roy should drop these players for the next game. Baines,Jagielka, Stirling, Gerrard and Welbeck. There is enough talent on the bench that is far better than these guys. Nothing to lose, just go for it.

Oh right.  There's still another game to go. Start from the youngest and work up from there.

"Phoenix till they lose"

Posting 97% bollox, 8% lies and 3.658% genuine opinion. 

Genuine opinion: FTFFA

Permalink Permalink