Kiwi Players Elsewhere

Michael McGlinchey (Weston FC | Australia)

1711 replies · 293,712 views
over 11 years ago

ACC should cover it if all else failed.

Permalink Permalink
over 11 years ago

-naz- wrote:

Love the time zone on this tweet from a repost on CCM fans site. 

  Supporter For Ever - Keep The Faith - Foundation Member - Never Lets FAX Get In The Way Of A Good Yarn

Permalink Permalink
over 11 years ago

Blew.2 wrote:

change WMc to WMc's Agent and you win the prize for best DocuDrama

Reversing the roles and the trope, Cuba Gooding Jr could be played by Paul Ifill and Tom Cruise by Michael McGlinchy.

He could be justified for saying "Show me the money!"

Actually, getting outplayed quite a bit these days

Permalink Permalink
over 11 years ago

Midfielder wrote:

If a player can because of a change of ownership claim I am free ... the reverse is also true a club could terminate a player on the same grounds...

Assume there was no offer on the table the PFA would say there is a contract in place...therefore the Mariners must pay his salary... 

Clubs change owners around the world and my understanding from FIFA is existing contracts cannot be ignored ...

This still has a long way to run ... 

When the Roar changed ownership, Ange didn't sign his new deal but he saw out the season, I assume he was still being paid the whole time. He used the fact he didn't sign the new contract to move to the Victory after the season had finished. So this is not the first time this issue has arisen in the A-League. The Roar just didn't try to dig their feet in over it.

The problem comparing the clubs from around the world to the A-League, is the way it is structured. Owners pay for the right to administer the clubs, I don't think they really own them. Both the Jets and Phoenix had licences taken back by the FFA and they then gave them to new 'owners' against the wishes of their current owners. You can't sell an A-League club afaik, you hand back your licence and the FFA then sell it to the new owner.

When Charlesworth took over, im sure the FFA probably would have included a condition that all players had to offered their contracts again, otherwise the PFA would be pissed. Whether a player wishes to sign his new contract is up to him.

When the Knights licence was taken off the owners midway through season two a raft of players left in this exact situation if you all remember.

Supporter world's best and worst football teams: Waikato/WaiBop, Kingz, Knights, Phoenix, The Argyle, The Whites & the All Whites

Permalink Permalink
over 11 years ago · edited over 11 years ago · History

Marto wrote:

Midfielder wrote:

If a player can because of a change of ownership claim I am free ... the reverse is also true a club could terminate a player on the same grounds...

Assume there was no offer on the table the PFA would say there is a contract in place...therefore the Mariners must pay his salary... 

Clubs change owners around the world and my understanding from FIFA is existing contracts cannot be ignored ...

This still has a long way to run ... 

When the Roar changed ownership, Ange didn't sign his new deal but he saw out the season, I assume he was still being paid the whole time. He used the fact he didn't sign the new contract to move to the Victory after the season had finished. So this is not the first time this issue has arisen in the A-League. The Roar just didn't try to dig their feet in over it.

The problem comparing the clubs from around the world to the A-League, is the way it is structured. Owners pay for the right to administer the clubs, I don't think they really own them. Both the Jets and Phoenix had licences taken back by the FFA and they then gave them to new 'owners' against the wishes of their current owners. You can't sell an A-League club afaik, you hand back your licence and the FFA then sell it to the new owner.

When Charlesworth took over, im sure the FFA probably would have included a condition that all players had to offered their contracts again, otherwise the PFA would be pissed. Whether a player wishes to sign his new contract is up to him.

When the Knights licence was taken off the owners midway through season two a raft of players left in this exact situation if you all remember.

No CCM was a transfer not a removal or withdrawal by FFA - NZF got the licence then and let Century Football use it. Think change to Welnix was withdrawal and reassignment . Most likely wrong. 

But key is  who is the agreement between. 

  Supporter For Ever - Keep The Faith - Foundation Member - Never Lets FAX Get In The Way Of A Good Yarn

Permalink Permalink
over 11 years ago

Blew.2 wrote:

Marto wrote:

Midfielder wrote:

If a player can because of a change of ownership claim I am free ... the reverse is also true a club could terminate a player on the same grounds...

Assume there was no offer on the table the PFA would say there is a contract in place...therefore the Mariners must pay his salary... 

Clubs change owners around the world and my understanding from FIFA is existing contracts cannot be ignored ...

This still has a long way to run ... 

When the Roar changed ownership, Ange didn't sign his new deal but he saw out the season, I assume he was still being paid the whole time. He used the fact he didn't sign the new contract to move to the Victory after the season had finished. So this is not the first time this issue has arisen in the A-League. The Roar just didn't try to dig their feet in over it.

The problem comparing the clubs from around the world to the A-League, is the way it is structured. Owners pay for the right to administer the clubs, I don't think they really own them. Both the Jets and Phoenix had licences taken back by the FFA and they then gave them to new 'owners' against the wishes of their current owners. You can't sell an A-League club afaik, you hand back your licence and the FFA then sell it to the new owner.

When Charlesworth took over, im sure the FFA probably would have included a condition that all players had to offered their contracts again, otherwise the PFA would be pissed. Whether a player wishes to sign his new contract is up to him.

When the Knights licence was taken off the owners midway through season two a raft of players left in this exact situation if you all remember.

No CCM was a transfer not a removal or withdrawal by FFA - NZF got the licence then and let Century Football use it. Think change to Welnix was withdrawal and reassignment . Most likely wrong. 

But key is  who is the agreement between. 

I'm ignoring Terry and the Nix, just looking at what happened part way through season two when the Knights owners handed the club back to the FFA and NZF (Soccer then?) taking over with Mr. Herbert in charge.

Supporter world's best and worst football teams: Waikato/WaiBop, Kingz, Knights, Phoenix, The Argyle, The Whites & the All Whites

Permalink Permalink
over 11 years ago

When Ffa seized the license off Clive Palmer, it apparently took a lot of work to convince the GCU players to sign contracts to with the FFA so that GCU could play out the rest of the season. Key thing there is that they had to sign new contracts.


Yellow Fever - Misery loves company

Permalink Permalink
over 11 years ago · edited over 11 years ago · History

He said the decision had nothing to do with the contract dispute surrounding the player - both the Phoenix and A-League rivals Central Coast Mariners claim to hold valid contracts for the Wellington-born playmaker.

"Ernie wants to give him a couple more days and not rush him into contact," Dome said.

"He'll play an intrasquad game later this week. Nothing to do with arbitration, it's purely to do with the fact that Ernie doesn't want to rush him. He's been on holiday for a while so he's got to ease him back into it."

A Mariners spokesman said the McGlinchey dispute was in mediation again yesterday.

Professional Footballers Australia is backing McGlinchey's right to play for the Phoenix, while Football Federation Australia is yet to make a ruling on the player's status.

It is understood that a teleconference took place last night between the Phoenix, Mariners, PFA, FFA and an independent arbitrator

Permalink Permalink
over 11 years ago · edited over 11 years ago · History

Further complicating matters apparently the signatory to the contract on McGlinchey's side was "Michael McGlinchey Football Enterprises (2011) Ltd" a shell company set up in the Bahamas for tax reasons. Shareholders in the company are "Michael McGlinchey Holdings (1999) Ltd", "McGlinchey Media Properties Pty", "WeeMac Corporation (in liquidation)", "McGlinchinberger GmbH" and Sony Records.

The person Michael McGlinchey does not actually exist. The man you see playing football as "Michael McGlinchey" is actually the well known performance capture actor Andy Serkis wearing prosthetic make-up, who is an independent contractor to Michael McGlinchey Football Enterprises (2011) Ltd.

Permalink Permalink
over 11 years ago

You had me until I saw the word Sony.

Grumpy old bastard alert

Permalink Permalink
over 11 years ago

terminator_x wrote:

Further complicating matters apparently the signatory to the contract on McGlinchey's side was "Michael McGlinchey Football Enterprises (2011) Ltd" a shell company set up in the Bahamas for tax reasons. Shareholders in the company are "Michael McGlinchey Holdings (1999) Ltd", "McGlinchey Media Properties Pty", "WeeMac Corporation (in liquidation)", "McGlinchinberger GmbH" and Sony Records.

The person Michael McGlinchey does not actually exist. The man you see playing football as "Michael McGlinchey" is actually the well known performance capture actor Andy Serkis wearing prosthetic make-up, who is an independent contractor to Michael McGlinchey Football Enterprises (2011) Ltd.

Yes, but what's Pepe Silvia's role in all this?

People like Coldplay and voted for the Nazis. You can't trust people.

Permalink Permalink
over 11 years ago

Does Ricki get a cut of any transfer deal?

Proud to have attended the first 175 Consecutive "Home" Wellington Phoenix "A League" Games !!

The Ruf, The Ruf, The Ruf is on Fire!!

Permalink Permalink
over 11 years ago

Jeff Vader wrote:

You had me until I saw the word Sony.

make.believe. JV


  Improving,,on the up, a work in progress from Italiano and the Nix. Bring on the bathroom bling in '24! COYN!

Permalink Permalink
over 11 years ago

From the Telie .. http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/sport/football/central-coast-mariners-players-given-a-taste-of-the-flip-side-of-life-after-initiative-by-coach-phil-moss/story-fnk6rl6i-1226991516941

MICHAEL McGlinchey’s hopes of playing against Eng­lish Premier League opponents West Ham and Newcastle United have suffered a blow after his contract dispute ­entered arbitration.

The Central Coast Mariners maintain McGlinchey is contracted to the club until January, but the Kiwi international opted to join rival A-League club Wellington Phoenix after returning early from Japan, where he was on loan to Vegalta Sendai.

Both clubs claim to hold valid contracts for the 27-year-old midfielder. The confusing situation has left Football Federation Australia little choice but to start a confidential arbitration process with both clubs and McGlinchey.

And it’s unlikely to be resolved before Wellington take on West Ham, Newcastle and Sydney FC in the Football United Tour, to be played in New Zealand next week.

McGlinchey has been training with the Phoenix and was expected to play a pre-season game for them on Monday night. But coach Ernie Merrick had a late change of heart and pulled him from the match.

He claimed that the decision had nothing to do with the dispute, but rather that McGlinchey wasn’t physically ready to play.

Mariners coach Phil Moss was unable to comment on the process, but is hoping for a quick resolution.

“It’s before the PFA (Professional Footballers Association), the FFA and the clubs,” Moss said.

“It has to be resolved soon — it can’t drag on any longer. It’s an unfortunate situation, but the sooner it’s determined, the better.”

McGlinchey has been with the Mariners since 2009 and has made 121 appearances for the club.

Last season he followed former Mariners coach Graham Arnold to Vegalta, but lost his place in the team when Arnold left the club.

Socceroo/ Mariner / Whangarei

Permalink Permalink
over 11 years ago

Midfielder, that article tells us nothing we already knew and mentions nothing that would stop Wee Mac playing next Wednesday.


Ramming liberal dribble down your throat since 2009
This forum needs less angst and more Kate Bush threads



Permalink Permalink
over 11 years ago · edited over 11 years ago · History

Doloras wrote:

Midfielder, that article tells us nothing we already knew and mentions nothing that would stop Wee Mac playing next Wednesday.

Sorry was simply posting what was in the Telie ... again sorry if its old news ... maybe you could email News and express your concern about them being so far behind ... 

Just for interest it was the main back page story and that is like WOW do a double take as we approach the NRL finals... 

Socceroo/ Mariner / Whangarei

Permalink Permalink
over 11 years ago · edited over 11 years ago · History

Doloras wrote:

Midfielder, that article tells us nothing we already knew and mentions nothing that would stop Wee Mac playing next Wednesday.

Fuck me some of you lot are pedantic...

[edited to please everyone who cares so much for bad spelling]

Permalink Permalink
over 11 years ago

You missed out a "c". Hope this helps.


Ramming liberal dribble down your throat since 2009
This forum needs less angst and more Kate Bush threads



Permalink Permalink
over 11 years ago

Lol well played.

Permalink Permalink
over 11 years ago

Arf! 

That was good

Permalink Permalink
over 11 years ago

In the Football United Tour 2014 App which came out today (very similar to the recent FIFA WC app which was very good I thought), McGlinchey is listed under the Phoenix squad as the number 10. Stirring the pot? 

Permalink Permalink
over 11 years ago · edited over 11 years ago · History

Does it list Tim Krul as the Toon's number 1?

"Phoenix till they lose"

Posting 97% bollox, 8% lies and 3.658% genuine opinion. 

Genuine opinion: FTFFA

Permalink Permalink
over 11 years ago

Quiet a good thing or bad thing? I'm thinking bad.

Permalink Permalink
over 11 years ago
Permalink Permalink
over 11 years ago

This whole subject has gone so dead. Will be of great importance to see if he takes the field on Wednesday 

  Supporter For Ever - Keep The Faith - Foundation Member - Never Lets FAX Get In The Way Of A Good Yarn

Permalink Permalink
over 11 years ago

Be good to see him have a run on Saturday.

Proud to have attended the first 175 Consecutive "Home" Wellington Phoenix "A League" Games !!

The Ruf, The Ruf, The Ruf is on Fire!!

Permalink Permalink
over 11 years ago

My understanding is both sides want a resolution given replacing him will become important to the club that looses ... 

I have heard [not from the strongest sauce ] the Mariners are very confident .... 

Socceroo/ Mariner / Whangarei

Permalink Permalink
over 11 years ago

So the PFA "lawyers don't know what their doing" 

  Supporter For Ever - Keep The Faith - Foundation Member - Never Lets FAX Get In The Way Of A Good Yarn

Permalink Permalink
over 11 years ago
Midfielder wrote:

My understanding is both sides want a resolution given replacing him will become important to the club that looses ... 

I have heard [not from the strongest sauce ] the Mariners are very confident .... 

Very confident of keeping a player who clearly wants to play for someone else?

Apparently I'm apathetic, but I couldn't care less.

"Being a Partick Thistle fan sets you apart. It means youre a free thinker. It also means your team has no money." Tim Luckhurst, The Independent, 4th December 2003

Permalink Permalink
over 11 years ago

Jag wrote:
Midfielder wrote:

My understanding is both sides want a resolution given replacing him will become important to the club that looses ... 

I have heard [not from the strongest sauce ] the Mariners are very confident .... 

Very confident of keeping a player who clearly wants to play for someone else?

Maybe but certainty on a longer contract and we can assume more money ... 

Socceroo/ Mariner / Whangarei

Permalink Permalink
over 11 years ago · edited over 11 years ago · History

Hard News wrote:

When, in this situation has a club ever gone - 'well, we're fucked'.

That's a fair point ... however I have never seen our club take things to this level .. and if this is a clear as the PPA say then FFA would have ruled on it a long time ago ... and to the best of my knowledge the Nix / weeJudas contract has not been signed off by FFA ... 

AS for the PPA over maybe 30 years of watching them I am yet to find one time when they sided with a club over a player ... 

I have no idea where it stands except to say the bush lawyers on this site should open up a practice as their knowledge and expertise seems to have no equal... 

Socceroo/ Mariner / Whangarei

Permalink Permalink
over 11 years ago

Midfielder wrote:

Hard News wrote:

When, in this situation has a club ever gone - 'well, we're fucked'.

I have no idea where it stands except to say the bush lawyers on this site should open up a practice as their knowledge and expertise seems to have no equal... 

Someone say they needed a lawyer?

Permalink Permalink
over 11 years ago

Ah the new Con Boutsianis saga...

"Who ate all the pies"

Permalink Permalink
over 11 years ago

Any idea how long arbitration takes?

Permalink Permalink
over 11 years ago

Tyler wrote:

Any idea how long arbitration takes?

That would depend on the size of the tree

"Ive just re-visited this and once again realised that C-Diddy is a genius - a drunk, Newcastle bred disgrace - but a genius." - Hard News, 11:39am 4th June 2009

Permalink Permalink
over 11 years ago

just cut him loose..

A small town in Europe........looking to bounce straight back up....well that aint going to happen

Permalink Permalink
over 11 years ago

Torne wrote:

In the Football United Tour 2014 App which came out today (very similar to the recent FIFA WC app which was very good I thought), McGlinchey is listed under the Phoenix squad as the number 10. Stirring the pot? 

This has come straight from the nix too


Permalink Permalink
over 11 years ago

Just what we need a number 10. Yes!

Oi Oi Edgecumbe... lets have a clean sheet

Permalink Permalink
over 11 years ago

Jag wrote:
Midfielder wrote:

My understanding is both sides want a resolution given replacing him will become important to the club that looses ... 

I have heard [not from the strongest sauce ] the Mariners are very confident .... 

Very confident of keeping a player who clearly wants to play for someone else?

They want him so much, but only from 1 January.  They don't want to pay him before that.

Permalink Permalink