Off Topic

Hiding other members...

229 replies · 5,924 views
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Championship side Liverpoolfan1 wrote:
whooooooo wrote:
what ?

I don't think you understand what we are saying...........

if users are blocked, then quotes ect will be effd up. you won't know what's going on.

what do you mean "dredge out all the sh*t" ?
 
I understand completely what you're saying.  Yes, the quotes thing would be an issue, but to be honest, someone else commenting on a post from someone I'd block wouldn't be of that much interest to me anyway.
 
By dredging out the sh*t, I mean just that. You obviously think this idea is sh*t, so if I were you, I'd block me.  Then you wouldn't have to get all steamed up about my posts because you'd never see them.


well lets just block everyone and have the forum all to yourself ?

mate, I wouldn't be on a forum if I didn't want to read other peoples thoughts.

and you know, if you don't like what I post, don't read it. Just scroll past it.

Jesus, someone comes onto a public forum complaining about what some of the public are posting ? WTF ?

deal with it.

move on I'm sure you have better things to worry about.

Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Something like this exists on the Croatian forum I'm on. There's an 'ignore' button, and clicking this means that none of the posts by that particular user show up when you're reading the forum. However, if someone who's not on your ignore list quotes them, they do show then.

Don't know how technically feasible this is for the YF site, I'm a complete numpty when it comes to those kind of things.
Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Colvinator wrote:
I don't like the idea of people not knowing the context of the conversation that is going on because they aren't seeing certain posts.
 
Then - if this system was ever enabled - you'd solve that problem by not blocking anyone.
 
TBH, like I said yesterday, I really didn't expect so much discussion over this.  It was just an idea to avoid having to put up with posts from people I know will add nothing for me.  I'm not making judgments any wider than my own personal forum experience.  I certainly wouldn't advocate a mass-blocking of someone....you'd just personally block people you didn't care to read opinions from.
 
I'm certain my posts will have no value to others so I'd expect them to block me.  No dramas at all.
 
Facebook does it - you can block those Farmville things that people play.  I know this is slightly different, but that's actually where I got the idea from.
Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
whooooooo wrote:
Championship side Championship side Liverpoolfan1 wrote:
whooooooo wrote:
what ?

I don't think you understand what we are saying...........

if users are blocked, then quotes ect will be effd up. you won't know what's going on.

what do you mean "dredge out all the sh*t" ?
 
I understand completely what you're saying.  Yes, the quotes thing would be an issue, but to be honest, someone else commenting on a post from someone I'd block wouldn't be of that much interest to me anyway.
 
By dredging out the sh*t, I mean just that. You obviously think this idea is sh*t, so if I were you, I'd block me.  Then you wouldn't have to get all steamed up about my posts because you'd never see them.


well lets just block everyone and have the forum all to yourself ?

mate, I wouldn't be on a forum if I didn't want to read other peoples thoughts.

and you know, if you don't like what I post, don't read it. Just scroll past it.

Jesus, someone comes onto a public forum complaining about what some of the public are posting ? WTF ?

deal with it.

move on I'm sure you have better things to worry about.

Don't block people then. I on the hand would find this forum a lot better if I could block people if they're annoying me.
If the option is there, you can choose whether you use it or not, everyone's happy.
You know we belong together...

Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
whooooooo wrote:
Championship side Championship side Liverpoolfan1 wrote:
whooooooo wrote:
what ?

I don't think you understand what we are saying...........

if users are blocked, then quotes ect will be effd up. you won't know what's going on.

what do you mean "dredge out all the sh*t" ?
 
I understand completely what you're saying.  Yes, the quotes thing would be an issue, but to be honest, someone else commenting on a post from someone I'd block wouldn't be of that much interest to me anyway.
 
By dredging out the sh*t, I mean just that. You obviously think this idea is sh*t, so if I were you, I'd block me.  Then you wouldn't have to get all steamed up about my posts because you'd never see them.


well lets just block everyone and have the forum all to yourself ?

mate, I wouldn't be on a forum if I didn't want to read other peoples thoughts.

and you know, if you don't like what I post, don't read it. Just scroll past it.

Jesus, someone comes onto a public forum complaining about what some of the public are posting ? WTF ?

deal with it.

move on I'm sure you have better things to worry about.

 
Whoooooooo (hope I've got the right number of o's there) - you have spectacularly missed the point here.  You would still have the ability to read everyone's posts, because you wouldn't be blocking anyone.
 
Why does it matter to you so much that others absolutely must read your opinions?
 
Ironically, your postings on this thread would completely justify having this mechanism available.
 
Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Championship side Liverpoolfan1 wrote:
Colvinator wrote:
I don't like the idea of people not knowing the context of the conversation that is going on because they aren't seeing certain posts.
 
Then - if this system was ever enabled - you'd solve that problem by not blocking anyone.
 
TBH, like I said yesterday, I really didn't expect so much discussion over this.  It was just an idea to avoid having to put up with posts from people I know will add nothing for me.  I'm not making judgments any wider than my own personal forum experience.  I certainly wouldn't advocate a mass-blocking of someone....you'd just personally block people you didn't care to read opinions from.
 
I'm certain my posts will have no value to others so I'd expect them to block me.  No dramas at all.
 
Facebook does it - you can block those Farmville things that people play.  I know this is slightly different, but that's actually where I got the idea from.


Well, let us be the judge of that.

I mean, if I think some of your lot's posts are nonsense, I don't lose sleep over it. FFS "oh I don't like how this guy speaks about that topic , BRING OUT THE VIOLINS, PASS ME SOME TISSUES, OH HOW I WISH I COULD BLOCK THIS GUY" cry cry.....

jesus christ.

Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
This thread beats Sydney CCM at the moment.
Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Get a grip folks..this is a local football website.
 
hardly wikileaks.
 
why don't we all harden the fuxx up and get on with robust internet debate without getting too precious about ours or others opinions.
Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Championship side Championship side Championship side Liverpoolfan1 wrote:
Colvinator wrote:
I don't like the idea of people not knowing the context of the conversation that is going on because they aren't seeing certain posts.
 
Then - if this system was ever enabled - you'd solve that problem by not blocking anyone.
 
 
Yea, but I'm speculating that it could lead to more people repeating stuff / not realising what is going on in a thread because they have missed what is being said by blocked people. Personally, I don't think I'd block anyone, and wouldn't care if people blocked me. I can imagine threads where I'm reading everyone, could get messy because people aren't seeing what others are seeing.
 
On the other hand, maybe it'd stop some people being idiotic to the same extent because they could be concerned about getting blocked. Anyway, not a bad idea to raise.
Colvinator2010-08-28 22:28:37
Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
all i'm going to say is if you have to resort to a 'block' button, you must have an easy cruisey life for this to be a worry to you.

oh LF1, how do you make it through the day ? it must be a real grind having to come home to the yellow fever website only to find me posting my opinion. f**k. Just how do you cope ?

the thought of people wanting this is just sad. build a f**king bridge and get over it.

Ah you know what ???????????????????????

f**king do it.

see what I care.

just don't come crawling back to me when you can't claim your prize because you blocked me.

Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Championship side Liverpoolfan1 wrote:
whooooooo wrote:
Championship side Championship side Championship side Liverpoolfan1 wrote:
whooooooo wrote:
what ?I don't think you understand what we are saying...........if users are blocked, then quotes ect will be effd up. you won't know what's going on.what do you mean "dredge out all the sh*t" ?

�

I understand completely what you're saying.� Yes, the quotes thing would be an issue, but to be honest, someone else commenting on a post from someone I'd block wouldn't be of that much interest to me anyway.

�

By dredging out the sh*t, I mean just that.�You obviously think this idea is sh*t, so if I were you, I'd block me.� Then you wouldn't have to get all steamed up about my posts because you'd never see them.
well lets just block everyone and have the forum all to yourself ?mate, I wouldn't be on a forum if I didn't want to read other peoples thoughts.and you know, if you don't like what I post, don't read it. Just scroll past it.Jesus, someone comes onto a public forum complaining about what some of the public are posting ? WTF ?deal with it.move on I'm sure you have better things to worry about.

�

Whoooooooo (hope I've got the right number of o's there) - you have spectacularly missed the point here.� You would still have the ability to read everyone's posts, because you wouldn't be blocking anyone.

�

Why does it matter to you so much that others absolutely must read your opinions?

�

Ironically, your postings on this thread would completely justify having this mechanism available.

�



loving all the angst

and i regard that last line LF1 as pretty much summing up the thread
Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
whoooo - i honestly don't know what you are getting upset about.

And you can ease up on the language while you are at it.
Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
I banned him, but had 2nd thoughts, but it's pretty damn close to happening.
Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
love ya the fever, promise i'll behave.

I apologize to the yellow fever community for my actions.

chris.
Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
This is a stupid idea.  Sometimes I wish there was a way to not have to read certain people's posts.  Some people only post rubbish, some are about 75% that way and others (most) kind of drift between sense and absolute tosh.  But the problems it rises would ultimately make YF worse off (I'm aware different people would have different people blocked, btw).  I mean, I'd like to think most wouldn't block me but I wouldn't lose any sleep over it at all.

Yes, I pretty much reiterated what's been said over 7 pages.
Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
whooooooo wrote:
love ya the fever, promise i'll behave.I apologize to the yellow fever community for my actions. chris.



surely, that isn't enough. Make a thread and apologise to everyone. or send everyone a PM.

ive got a song that wont take long, Adelaide are rubbish.. the second verse is same as the first.. ADELAIDE ARE RUBBISH

Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
whooooooo wrote:
all i'm going to say is if you have to resort to a 'block' button, you must have an easy cruisey life for this to be a worry to you.

oh LF1, how do you make it through the day ? it must be a real grind having to come home to the yellow fever website only to find me posting my opinion. f**k. Just how do you cope ?

the thought of people wanting this is just sad. build a f**king bridge and get over it.

Ah you know what ???????????????????????

f**king do it.

see what I care.

just don't come crawling back to me when you can't claim your prize because you blocked me.

 
I've been chuckling about that gem for the last hour.
Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
it would make things messy. even if i didnt block anyone,id have to read people repeating things,responding to things out of context etc. i never really expect this to be a serious thread as it shouldnt really happen. a nice idea,but in a somewhat conversational forum like this one it could just mess things up. the negative outweighs the positive especially when you can get round the negative by just scrolling down a couple of lines,as you said LF1.

Allegedly

Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Whooooo can be a dick (ok, often), but he's not offensive. I certainly don't need an apology. You guys must have read the huge amount of racist/deliberately offensive youtube comments. Hardly the same thing saying 'Paston is crap', although it seems stupid to me to have such an opinion, but maybe he actually believes it.

I don't like the constant angst on here, and I never read match threads after we lose, or draw, or sometimes when we win ( ) because a lot of it is so over the top it's just not fun. But if I read it and let it bother me, i'm just as bad for being sucked in. Me getting angsty about the angst isn't gonna change it, so I just have to deal with it or not read the forum. I like reading the match threads before the match starts, cos then people are like 'a draw would be good', and generally realistic, but then if we get a draw, or win poorly, it's usually knives out.

If the Nix lose or play badly, it sucks, but I don't take it personally, because that just seems childish. Maybe that makes me 'less of a fan', but I don't care. Life has enough serious crap in it to get depressed over such matters. That's just my take - if some of you want to slit your wrists over a poor performance, go right ahead.
Cosimo2010-08-29 11:26:01
I like tautologies because I like them.
Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
the
allow you to "ignore" posters.
All this means is when someone on your ignore list posts, the message that appears is
"you have chosen to ignore the post of this person" or something like that.
If someone quotes them, then the above message is what appears in the quote box.
Pretty simple really, and i think its a soon to be necessary tool on these forums.
 
While we are at it, how about enabling you-tube clips to be embedded in posts
Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
UberGunner wrote:
While we are at it, how about enabling you-tube clips to be embedded in posts
 
Just a thought - I often access the forum through my mobile phone and seem to be chewing through the data.
 
If the Youtube clip was a link - great. If it was automatically downloaded - not so keen.
 
I suspect some of the Avatars and photos are also data intensive but I'm sure someone more IT savvy than me (not a high threshold) could advise.
 
Please bear in mind those who access the site through mobile devices when setting upload parameters.
 
He dribbles a lot and the opposition dont like it - you can see it all over their faces. (Ron Atkinson)
Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
The last 2 posts are the most sensible in the entire thread (EDIT before yours whitby_boy, no offence  not saying your post wasnt good,just a timing thing).
 
I agree Cosimo,reading these forums after a game is just no fun because people are over the top angsty no matter what the result. Its a shame because I'd like to not have to avoid them just because of a few idiots arguing over how crap we apparently were,and spurning out the same "sack ricki" "terrible subs - even though we only have a 3 man bench" "this player is crap" "a 1-0 loss is the end of the world,we are going to get the wooden spoon".
 
Ignoring certain people would cut down on me havong to trawl through pages of crap in some instances after games,and maybe ill start viewing the forums after the game again and giving my opinion on it.
 
I actually think it has gotten worse,because a lot of the reasonable people have taken to not viewing the forums after a game,meaning only those who think its the end of the world after a 1-0 loss (or even a 2-0 win) tend to post and argue amongst themselves.
Tegal2010-08-29 12:14:10

Allegedly

Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Tegal wrote:
The last 2 posts are the most sensible in the entire thread (EDIT before yours whitby_boy, no offence  not saying your post wasnt good,just a timing thing).
 
I agree Cosimo,reading these forums after a game is just no fun because people are over the top angsty no matter what the result. Its a shame because I'd like to not have to avoid them just because of a few idiots arguing over how crap we apparently were,and spurning out the same "sack ricki" "terrible subs - even though we only have a 3 man bench" "this player is crap" "a 1-0 loss is the end of the world,we are going to get the wooden spoon".
 
Ignoring certain people would cut down on me havong to trawl through pages of crap in some instances after games,and maybe ill start viewing the forums after the game again and giving my opinion on it.
 
I actually think it has gotten worse,because a lot of the reasonable people have taken to not viewing the forums after a game,meaning only those who think its the end of the world after a 1-0 loss (or even a 2-0 win) tend to post and argue amongst themselves.
 
This whole idea of this thread is poo.
If you don't like what someone has to say, counteract it or ignore it.
What is the point of a forum if there is only one point of view, yours.
Sounds commie and very precious.
That's is as lame as writting off any criticism as "angsty".
F**kin hate that word.
Suits soft c**ks who think any criticism is negative.
 
Reminds me of  religious types, while some don't mind hearing the truth while most will only listen to what backs their world of an imaginary sky daddy.
 
If you don't like the truth in other peoples ideas, go hide your head in the sand.
 
Tegal, you imply that people who think like you are the only one's who are "reasonable people".
Sound like your a perfect cult candidate
Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
auskiwi wrote:
Tegal wrote:
The last 2 posts are the most sensible in the entire thread (EDIT before yours whitby_boy, no offence  not saying your post wasnt good,just a timing thing).
 
I agree Cosimo,reading these forums after a game is just no fun because people are over the top angsty no matter what the result. Its a shame because I'd like to not have to avoid them just because of a few idiots arguing over how crap we apparently were,and spurning out the same "sack ricki" "terrible subs - even though we only have a 3 man bench" "this player is crap" "a 1-0 loss is the end of the world,we are going to get the wooden spoon".
 
Ignoring certain people would cut down on me havong to trawl through pages of crap in some instances after games,and maybe ill start viewing the forums after the game again and giving my opinion on it.
 
I actually think it has gotten worse,because a lot of the reasonable people have taken to not viewing the forums after a game,meaning only those who think its the end of the world after a 1-0 loss (or even a 2-0 win) tend to post and argue amongst themselves.
 
This whole idea of this thread is poo.
If you don't like what someone has to say, counteract it or ignore it.
What is the point of a forum if there is only one point of view, yours.
Sounds commie and very precious.
That's is as lame as writting off any criticism as "angsty".
F**kin hate that word.
Suits soft c**ks who think any criticism is negative.
 
Reminds me of  religious types, while some don't mind hearing the truth while most will only listen to what backs their world of an imaginary sky daddy.
 
If you don't like the truth in other peoples ideas, go hide your head in the sand.
 
Tegal, you imply that people who think like you are the only one's who are "reasonable people".
Sound like your a perfect cult candidate
i think the point of the ignore option is to give people the freedom of choice.
It is hard to choose to ignore something that irritates or annoys you without reading it first.
The idea is for people to choose who and what they read in a completely impartial way. Ignoring someone effects no-one but you and the person you are ignoring is none the wiser.
By your argument you shouldn't be able to block people on twitter because you must take all input on board no matter how blatantly "spastic" or outright abusive it may be.
The mods can clean up stuff after the fact on these forums, but being able to block ignore someone would prevent you having to be subject to the abuse.
anyway my first point and most relevant one is:
I think the point of the ignore option is to give people the freedom of choice.
If you dont want to use it... dont.
 
UberGunner2010-08-29 13:09:37
Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
hmm auskiwi, read any match thread after a game,even a decent win. That is what im talking about.
 
You're just taking my words to extremes. Which is clever because it undermines what I'm saying,but not correct.
Tegal2010-08-29 13:03:52

Allegedly

Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
UberGunner wrote:
The mods can clean up stuff after the fact on these forums, but being able to block ignore someone would prevent you having to be subject to the abuse.
anyway my first point and most relevant one is:
I think the point of the ignore option is to give people the freedom of choice.
If you dont want to use it... dont.
 
 
You have freedom of choice now.
To block is to take away freedom of choice.
A thread is a thread. Blocking people will disjoint the thread completly.
This may suit people who only want to hear what agree's with them.
Think about the people who are open minded to allow themselves 100% of what people say.
Add to that people who only see half a thread = failed thread.
If you back this idea you are actually anti freedom of choice.
Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Whitby boy wrote:
UberGunner wrote:
While we are at it, how about enabling you-tube clips to be embedded in posts
 
Just a thought - I often access the forum through my mobile phone and seem to be chewing through the data.
 
If the Youtube clip was a link - great. If it was automatically downloaded - not so keen.
 
I suspect some of the Avatars and photos are also data intensive but I'm sure someone more IT savvy than me (not a high threshold) could advise.
 
Please bear in mind those who access the site through mobile devices when setting upload parameters.
 


Especially those of us who are on dial up at home!
Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Tegal wrote:
hmm auskiwi, read any match thread after a game,even a decent win. That is what im talking about.
 
You're just taking my words to extremes. Which is clever because it undermines what I'm saying,but not correct.
 
Yes I do. Before and after. 
Both criticism and praise is sometimes justified and sometimes just crap.
Thats what we adults do, make decisions.
I look at most criticism as constructive. Not "angsty".
Labelling comments "Angsty" is just a head in the sand write off.
If you block criticism your just doing the same and also risking the continuity of the thread.
Very presumptuous to call that all of one particular users coments are not worthy of your veiwing because they might not agree with you.
Way to make the forum a lame duck.
 
Ricki went missing on Friday night. That's the truth.
It was very obvious from about 10mins in that what we had on the field wasn't working, and yet it stayed that way. Like we where waiting for them to score.
Personally I think think Ricki is a good before match tactician but during the game he freezes.
E.G. Ifill was marked out of the game. He must have seen this as we all did, but Ricki still did nothing. Was he ok that our main man was marked out of the game?
 
P.S. Just using an example. I didn't mean to put you in the same class as delusional sky daddy christ cult believers. Its the same thought process though, to only listen to what agrees with you, but it was below the belt.  Sorry.
Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Some of the match thread angst is overly negative, but for the most part (particularly after a loss) it is constructive criticism. To be honest the team has not played particularly well in any of the three games so far this season, despite the win and the draw, and so surely anyone posting their thoughts on the game will reflect that. Everyone on here wants the team to do well, we're all passionate Nix fans, so when the team is poor forummers are bound to get "angsty".

Clearly this forum is different things for different people, so if people want to custom the site to suit them, so be it. For me, the Yellow Fever forum is somewhere to have discussions about football and the Phoenix which I wouldn't usually have in the real world. I enjoy reading a variety of opinions from people on here, even though I find some people's opinions not particularly well thought out and quite often too parochial. Most importantly, the site is another connection to a team and an experience which is all too distant for me up here in Thames.
Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
i understand constructive criticism and welcome it. but after a game theres a few people who post every 2nd post nothing more constructive than"brown sucks" "sack ricki" etc etc,and even after a win it descends into what seems like a teenage angst forum. its those people i would put on ignore. if theyve said something that warrants a reply from someone who isnt ignored,that person would usually quote it,so itd still make sense. or if something didnt make sense but was below an ignored post,id figure it was in reply to that. if i felt the need id click for that post to show. talk of there being confusion etc is valid,but a little exaggerated.

Allegedly

Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Footpaul wrote:
...even though I find some people's opinions not particularly well thought out and quite often too parochial.


Like i've said before, there is nothing wrong with parochialism.

Three for me, and two for them.

Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Footpaul wrote:
Whitby boy wrote:
UberGunner wrote:
While we are at it, how about enabling you-tube clips to be embedded in posts
 
Just a thought - I often access the forum through my mobile phone and seem to be chewing through the data.
 
If the Youtube clip was a link - great. If it was automatically downloaded - not so keen.
 
I suspect some of the Avatars and photos are also data intensive but I'm sure someone more IT savvy than me (not a high threshold) could advise.
 
Please bear in mind those who access the site through mobile devices when setting upload parameters.
 


Especially those of us who are on dial up at home!


Embedded YT videos don't load until you click the play button so thats not an issue
Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
auskiwi wrote:
 
Very presumptuous to call that all of one particular users coments are not worthy of your viewing because they might not agree with you.
 
[/QUOTE]
 
Auskiwi, I think you're missing the point of the OP, and some other posters. I'd say most of those in favour are not trying to block dissenting opinions, but ones they consider superficial and/or inane. And not even all of these. We all slip in to inanity and pointless drivel on here at some stage, but the point would be to block out those we consider persistent offenders.
 
 
auskiwi wrote:
 
Ricki went missing on Friday night. That's the truth.
It was very obvious from about 10mins in that what we had on the field wasn't working, and yet it stayed that way. Like we where waiting for them to score.
Personally I think think Ricki is a good before match tactician but during the game he freezes.
E.G. Ifill was marked out of the game. He must have seen this as we all did, but Ricki still did nothing. Was he ok that our main man was marked out of the game?
 
 
For example, IMHO this provokes discussion and debate. I wouldn't block you for this. 
 
[QUOTE=tegal]
 
"Brown sucks"
 
 
Again, my opinion only, this provokes pages of Python-esque
 
"No, doesn't"
"Yes, he does"
"No, doesn't"
"Yes, he does"
"No, doesn't"
"Yes, he does"
"We're not having an argument"
"Yes, we are"
"No we're not"
 
back and forth ending in 'the best part of you ran down your mother's leg' or something equally mature and constructive.
 
I would consider blocking posters who I felt were consistently doing this, although I probably wouldn't, just in case I missed out on the best prize ever. 
wolfman2010-08-29 16:02:06


Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
you could maybe make a rule that you cannot publically reveal who you have ignored. this would be to avoid unfair singling out or ganging up as i imagine would happen to whooo now.

Allegedly

Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
I swear I will wait until someone blocks me and then reveal the prize.

I've got an idea that everyone would like. 


Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Pitch it to us.

Three for me, and two for them.

Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
kudos from diegos son? a love letter to simon Elliott written by you?

Allegedly

Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
auskiwi wrote:
 
Ricki went missing on Friday night. That's the truth.
It was very obvious from about 10mins in that what we had on the field wasn't working, and yet it stayed that way. Like we where waiting for them to score.
Personally I think think Ricki is a good before match tactician but during the game he freezes.
E.G. Ifill was marked out of the game. He must have seen this as we all did, but Ricki still did nothing. Was he ok that our main man was marked out of the game?
 
P.S. Just using an example. I didn't mean to put you in the same class as delusional sky daddy christ cult believers. Its the same thought process though, to only listen to what agrees with you, but it was below the belt.  Sorry.

You still haven't outlined what you would have done.  Its easy to criticise, but much harder to provide a solution.
Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
well I can't reveal it now can I ?

just wait and see......
Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Go on. I for one am gagging to hear it.

Three for me, and two for them.

Permalink Permalink