Off Topic

Warriors (The Fever NRL fred)

417 replies · 10,208 views
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago

VODAFONE WARRIORS v PARRAMATTA EELS

Parramatta Stadium, Parramatta

7.30pm, Saturday, September 6

VODAFONE WARRIORS

1

WADE McKINNON
2
AIDAN KIRK
3
BRENT TATE
4
JEROME ROPATI
5
MANU VATUVEI
6
MICHAEL WITT
7
NATHAN FIEN
8
RUBEN WIKI
9
IAN HENDERSON
10
STEVE PRICE (c)
11
SIMON MANNERING
12
BEN MATULINO
13
MICHEAL LUCK
  Interchange:
14
LANCE HOHAIA
15
EVARN TUIMAVAVE
16
SAM RAPIRA
17
LOGAN SWANN

COACH: IVAN CLEARY

Still naming McKinnon despite the charges.
Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Wade McKinnon is a f**king moron for doing what he did. Given his history with officials surely he ought to have known better. The look on Pricey's face when the touch judge said "....and Wade McKinnon spat at me" said it all.

I love the guy but if he gets banned for the rest of the season he deserves it.

Three for me, and two for them.

Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
If he's banned then the rest of the season may be a pretty short punishment.
Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Sorry i meant banned for the rest of this season and well into next season.

Three for me, and two for them.

Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Yeah, I heard something somewhere about 10 or so weeks/games. That'd be a bit of a problem for them next year.
Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
10 weeks! Bloody hell! I mean if he actually did do it... But still!
Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
4:00AM Thursday September 04, 2008
By Steve Jancetic

New Zealand Warriors fullback Wade McKinnon is seeking leave to appeal a three-match suspension handed down by the National Rugby League judiciary for spitting at NRL touch judge Brett Suttor on the weekend.

McKinnon's legal team is preparing a submission that will be held later tonight in what is proving to be a marathon night of hearings at NRL headquarters.

The judiciary panel's decision to suspend McKinnon for just three matches flew in the face of a recommendation from NRL prosecutor Peter Kite for a ban between nine and 11 weeks.

Kite argued the "reprehensible" act of spitting at an official had to be stamped out of the game and claimed McKinnon had history in abusing officials after he was found guilty of pushing a referee last year.

While McKinnon could miss this weekend's crucial match against Parramatta if the ban is upheld, the ban could amount to little more than a slap on the wrist if the Warriors are eliminated this weekend.

McKinnon would then be able to serve the other two matches in trial matches at the beginning of next season.

 
to beat the Eels and hope either Newcastle or Canberra lose their final round encounter to force their way into the finals.

McKinnon was alleged to have spat at Suttor as the touch judge made his way along the dead ball line to take up his position behind the posts after a try had been awarded to Penrith winger Luke Rooney during the Warriors' 42-20 win over the Panthers.

Suttor, who provided evidence at the hearing, claimed the spit missed him by only 30 centimetres.

While McKinnon did not deny spitting, he claimed it was simply something he did throughout the game as he cleared his throat due to the build up of saliva from a double mouthguard and a recent sinus problem which had required medication.

Suttor said McKinnon was abusing him over what he perceived was a missed forward pass in the lead-up to the try, but the Warriors fullback said it was teammate Micheal Luck who was delivering the verbal spray.

"I didn't say a word," McKinnon said.

The issue of physics was also brought up with McKinnon's legal representative Geoff Bellew claiming it would have been a "physical impossibility" for the livewire custodian to get within 30 centimetres of Suttor from six metres away.

Kite claimed the intent came from the fact McKinnon spat at head height and not directly into the ground.

Asked by Kite if he normally spat at head height, McKinnon replied: "I don't have a traditional way of spitting."

Earlier tonight Newcastle hooker Matt Hilder was cleared of spitting on Melbourne winger Anthony Quinn, leaving him free to play in Friday night's vital NRL match against Brisbane at Suncorp Stadium

Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Earlier Newcastle hooker Matt Hilder was cleared of spitting on Melbourne winger Anthony Quinn, leaving him free to play in Friday night's vital NRL match against Brisbane at Suncorp Stadium.

Hilder was let off despite video footage showing what looked like spittle hitting Quinn in the face.

Pitbull2008-09-04 07:00:16
Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago

I really don't want to go down the conspiracy theory route but it does look a bit 'suspicious', to say the least, that Hilder gets off when the video evidence looked more damning against him. Then again, maybe it's not surprising that a Newcastle player has been cleared to play in a game which, if they win, pretty much ends the Warrior's play-off hopes. Hmm.

I was at the game and was fairly close to where it was all happening. I don't believe McKinnon gobbed at him, it also looked to me like Luck was the one giving the touchie a load of (deserved) abuse. Still, Wade's brought this on himself. Once you get a reputation............just ask Feverish
 
"McKinnon replied: "I don't have a traditional way of spitting." That's a quality response
 
Jag2008-09-04 08:34:16

Apparently I'm apathetic, but I couldn't care less.

"Being a Partick Thistle fan sets you apart. It means youre a free thinker. It also means your team has no money." Tim Luckhurst, The Independent, 4th December 2003

Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Yeah I mean I think both players are lucky. I don't think either of them playing or not playing changes too much, Newcastle still have to lose and we still have to win. Hohiaia is a decent replacement at fullback if he's needed there. I don't see a conspiracy myself. Interesting to see how the appeal goes.
 
I'm not even considering the Dogs beating the Raiders
Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
I think we'll miss Wade more than they would miss Hilder. Still can't see how they can prove 'intent'. Interesting that they only gave him 3 weeks when the prosecutor was asking for a lot more. Makes you think they weren't entirely convinced?
 
It's definitely up to the Broncos to do us a favour. Mind you, we'll still have to beat the Eels. The Dogs haven't got a sh*t show of beating the Raiders.

Apparently I'm apathetic, but I couldn't care less.

"Being a Partick Thistle fan sets you apart. It means youre a free thinker. It also means your team has no money." Tim Luckhurst, The Independent, 4th December 2003

Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
this is typical of the NRL, one guy supposedly spits at a touchy and there is veery little video of the incident and gets three weeks, the aussie player gets off cous it didn't look like a pit, and yet the video clearly shows it hitting the ref. utter sh*te, no aplogies made for the consiracy theories. McKinnon is a muppet for getting into the position but I don't think he spat at the blind touchy who couldn't call a forward pass, nor does he deserve a suspension especially given they let the other fella off!!!!!

Queenslander 3x a year.

Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
So much for 10 weeks!
Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
brisbane 24-2 knights, warriors win and are in
Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Who's playing fullback for McKinnon?
Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Lance Hohaia.  Well the Broncos have done their bit, now we just have to do ours.

Apparently I'm apathetic, but I couldn't care less.

"Being a Partick Thistle fan sets you apart. It means youre a free thinker. It also means your team has no money." Tim Luckhurst, The Independent, 4th December 2003

Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Broncos were very very good last night. I believe they will play the Roosters first week of the finals? Can't see the Chooks having a show to be honest.
 
Come on the Warriors tonight!
Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
yep roosters will have home advantage, mason out for the season after doing his acl
Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
NRL standings     P W D L B F A Diff Points Streak 1 Sea Eagles 23 16 - 7 2 611 339 +272 36 Won 2 2 Storm 23 16 - 7 2 542 278 +266 36 Lost 1 3 Sharks 23 16 - 7 2 423 362 +61 36 Won 2 4 Roosters 24 15 - 9 2 511 446 +65 34 Won 2 5

Broncos

24 14 1 9 2 560 452 +108 33 Won 3 6 Dragons 24 13 - 11 2 489 378 +111 30 Lost 1 7 Raiders 23 12 - 11 2 588 493 +95 28 Lost 1 8 Knights 24 12 - 12 2 516 486 +30 28 Lost 1 9 Warriors 23 12 - 11 2 474 561 -87 28 Won 1 10 Eels 23 11 - 12 2 495 519 -24 26 Lost 1 11 Panthers 23 10 1 12 2 488 577 -89 25 Lost 2 12 Tigers 23 10 - 13 2 500 548 -48 24 Lost 3 13 Titans 23 10 - 13 2 472 558 -94 24 Lost 2 14 Rabbitohs 23 8 - 15 2 449 624 -175 20 Lost 2 15 Cowboys 23 5 - 18 2 452 610 -158 14 Won 1 16 Bulldogs 23 5 - 18 2 399 730 -331 14 Lost 7
My finals picks for the first round: (winner in bold)
Storm v Warriors
Sea Eagles v Raiders
Sharks v Dragons
Roosters v Broncos
Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Wouldn't surprise me to see the Raiders smash the dogs and jump into 6th

www.kiwifromthecouch.blogspot.com

Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago

Warriors win 28-6, great performance from start to finish; manu exercised his demons from last year, first win at parra since 1995, in2 the playoffs we go

Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Brilliant performance from the lads. Not sure who i'd rather face between the Eagles and the Storm. Probably go for the Storm just based on recent head-to-head against them.

Three for me, and two for them.

Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
I ask this every year....

Can someone explain the how the finals work?
Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Errrm, ill try.

Week 1:

1st vs 8th
2nd vs 7th
3rd vs 6th
4th vs 5th

Top 2 placed winners recieve bye to Week 3. Bottom 2 placed losers eliminated. All remaining teams through to Week 2.

Week 2:

Bottom 2 winners vs Top 2 losers in both matches. Winners through to Week 3. Losers eliminated.

Week 3:

Top 2 winners from Week 1 vs Winners of Week 2 in both matches. Winners through to Grand Final. Losers eliminated.

Week 4:

GRAND FINAL.


Sorry if that's poor but i think that's how it goes and it's the best i can do off the top of my head.

Three for me, and two for them.

Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
So if we lose were out, cause we'll ever be 7 or 8?
Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Yep. We have no lifelines or home matches.

Three for me, and two for them.

Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Ah, Understood now.
Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Raiders up 44-28 with 20 or so to go, they need to win by 17 points to get 6th I think and send us down to 8th.
Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Looking back on the Warriors last two seasons, imagine how good they could have been with better halves and to carry on the wat-ifs, imagine if we had beaten souths in both those games we should have won. that would have us easy in 6th maybe in 5th(without looking at a points table)

On an aside what do people think of the MacIntyre system for the playoffs? the lads on the sunday roast were talking about it today. I always thought it was quite a good system but i probably like more the afl system they have
Week 1
Top 4 play each other, winners get week 2 off, losers play in week 2
Bottom 4 play each other, losers out, winners go through to the next week
Week 2
Top 2 losers play bottom 2 winners
Week 3
Winners from week 2 play winners from week one for a spot in the gf

I think that is quite a good system, not to sure which one i preferbopman2008-09-07 17:42:42

www.kiwifromthecouch.blogspot.com

Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago

1-8       Storm               vs.        warriors            Sunday              6

2-7       Manly                vs.        Dragons            Saturday           8.30

3-6       Sharks              vs.        Raiders             Saturday           10.30

4-5       Roosters            vs.        Brisbane            Friday               10

 

Not sure if these times are correct

Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
THE WARRIORS GAME CLASHES WITH THE NIX GAME!

Gah I really don't know what to do, whether to go to the Nix game and then run to a tv afterwards for the second half of the Warriors or stay at home and flick between the two on Sky. If only I had MySky already...

Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Go to the Nix game and take a radio and a set of earphones. Watch the Nix win while listening to the Warriors winning. Problem solved!

Apparently I'm apathetic, but I couldn't care less.

"Being a Partick Thistle fan sets you apart. It means youre a free thinker. It also means your team has no money." Tim Luckhurst, The Independent, 4th December 2003

Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
We thought of this while at 4kings yesterday, Matt will show the warriors game on the screens after the nix game. Problem solved

www.kiwifromthecouch.blogspot.com

Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Excellent!

Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
straight to the four kings after the nix win!!!

Queenslander 3x a year.

Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Yeah I've heard they've thought about changing to the AFL playoff system, because 8th has never beaten 1st... Hope that changes this weekend though. We have a really good chance for mine.
Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago

VODAFONE WARRIORS v MELBOURNE STORM

Olympic Park, Melbourne
4.00pm, Sunday, September 14
Referee: Jason Robinson

VODAFONE WARRIORS

1
LANCE HOHAIA
2
AIDAN KIRK
3
BRENT TATE
4
JEROME ROPATI
5
MANU VATUVEI
6
MICHAEL WITT
7
NATHAN FIEN
8
RUBEN WIKI
9
IAN HENDERSON
10
STEVE PRICE (c)
11
SIMON MANNERING
12
BEN MATULINO
13
MICHEAL LUCK
  Interchange (one to be omitted):
14
GRANT ROVELLI
15
EVARN TUIMAVAVE
16
SAM RAPIRA
17
LOGAN SWANN
18
EPALAHAME LAUAKI
Unchanged team for this weekend, big performance from the boys, knock over Melbourne before we meet them again in the grand final.
U-20's have a good chance of making the Grand Final as well, playing St-George, Jnr Warriors were third after the regular season.
Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Does that mean the juniors are playing at Mt Smart? Without the big boys playing it would be hard to get any sort of crowd in...
 
Massive day Sunday! Phoenix then to the kings for the Warriors!
Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Anyone coming over for this game?
Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Paulinho wrote:
Does that mean the juniors are playing at Mt Smart? Without the big boys playing it would be hard to get any sort of crowd in...
 
Massive day Sunday! Phoenix then to the kings for the Warriors!
 
Under 20s are playing St. George in Melbourne as curtain-raiser for the Warriors v Storm game

Apparently I'm apathetic, but I couldn't care less.

"Being a Partick Thistle fan sets you apart. It means youre a free thinker. It also means your team has no money." Tim Luckhurst, The Independent, 4th December 2003

Permalink Permalink