Regional Football - powered by Park Life

Grant Williams

200 replies · 15,601 views
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
I think you need to judge Petone, and the other clubs involved in the light of society at the time.

I have had it put to me that Mr Williams was removed from his rep coaching role and involvement at Lower Hutt, because Ivan England was prepared to do so, without any evidence of any criminal wrongdoing, but on the basis of rumours.  Lots of people told Ivan he couldn't do that without evidence, and Ivan is reputed to have said "let him sue me!"

I understand he then went off to Stop Out where there were, again, a lot of rumours, but no legal intervention, and after a while the rumours became overpoiweringly sufficient for Stop Out to break ties.  He then ended up at Petone.

It strikes me that this was just a sign of the times, where people didn't want to think the worst, and lose the innocence from the game.  It was the attitude of both secular and religious organisations to sweep this sort of thing under the carpet, and it is only in recent years that society has rebelled against this "look the other way" attitude. 

Many people rightly criticise the Catholic Church  for putting their heads in the sand and moving offenders on, but I am very aware that it was also happening in State Schools in the 60's and 70s.  Should we be surprised that volunteer organisations did the same.
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
.petone12009-10-13 10:28:46
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Part of me takes the opposite view.

If Lower Hutt and Stop Out had voiced their fears to the authorities at the time, instead of just having a NIMBY attitude, perhaps the rumours could have been investigated, and brought to legal action at the time, instead of a historical case, next month.

But it didn't happen, so we just move on...

I don't know full details, so I am possibly up a tree without a paddle or canoe here, but if GW never had a conviction, a police check would not have removed him from the Petone scene.
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
I do understand where you are coming from and I think it is good people are talking and thinking about this , so hopefully it never happens again ( in a perfect world )
 
It sounds like Lower Hutt and Stop Out did as much as they could at the time , the problem is getting people to come forward to tell there story and to go through the whole police procedure.
 
I just find it hard to understand Petone taking on Williams after Lower hutt and Stop Out getting rid of him.
 
Unfortunatly some of us dont get to  " just move on ".
 
Im sure more will come out in time and the people that turned a blind eye or ignored the rumours should be VERY ashamed of themselves.
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Petone1 you are treading on thin ice.
 
Please do not string up the volunteers of that time with the 20/20 vision of hindsight.  It's unhelpful, unfair, and uncalled for.
 
It's a difficult topic and we won't tolerate inferred or actual accusations on here.  The discussion about prevention is fine.  Let's leave the allegations from the past to the Courts.
 
Thanks.

Incredible stamina. No shame. Yellow Fever.

Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
.petone12009-10-13 10:29:48
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
And that's enough of that.  What a shame some people don't have the self control to have a sensible discussion about a difficult topic.
 
Lock down.
Smithy2009-06-26 15:40:02

Incredible stamina. No shame. Yellow Fever.

Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
i will open this as this forum could serve to help some people.
I do agree that at least one sentence of what was blocked was out of order. So last chance. Stick to topic if you want to comment. No mentioning randoms or voicing personal opinion that could be contrued as unjustified. Sensible pls

Founder

Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Thank you very much . Good call Feverish
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
As a manager of a team for many years I was left in the awkward position one night after training when the father of one of the players (female) forgot to collect her from training. Waited half an hour and then had to bundle her in the car and take her home - luckily my daughter was still at training. Parents of young kids (11 years old) also have to take some responsibility to look after their kids and protect coaches/managers, who, after all, are volunteers and are doing it because no one else put their collective hands up. That's my raive for the day
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago

Very good point

Parents have to remember that training is not a baby sitting service. Which I have seen parents do many times.
I also think that unfortunatly Managers and Coaches that give there time for free take on the responcibility of protecting the kids when they are placed in there care.
 
I am pretty sure in this case Williams was a paid Manager and therefore is paid by players subs etc. So you would expect him to be doing the job he was paid for and part of that job is the walfare of the children of the club.
 
 
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
The other thing coaches need to remember is that they have to protect themselves.

Incredible stamina. No shame. Yellow Fever.

Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
You dont really hear any false accusations against coaches and managers. But you are correct you should make sure you cant get accused of something.
 
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
having been involved with female only teams for a number of years you have to be super careful-never be alone with just 1 of them, especially when they are young and can get the wrong impression. Always have a chaperone!!
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
One thought, having gone through this whole saga, is perhaps for Clubs to approach the  Police and request a member of the local Child abuse team to attend a Coaches meeting and give a short talk of problems in his area,things to be aware of, what Clubs can, and can't do, and most importantly who to talk to if there are concerns.   They are the experts in the field, and I am sure would oblige.
  In my experience talking to the local uniformed part of the force is a waste of time.
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Williams attended court again today and further charges were laid. The complainants now are from 4 decades, 60's,70,s 80's and 90's. The total number of charges are 18 and he has been remanded for a full depositions hearing on August 20th at Lower Hutt. The Complainants come from more than one Hutt Valley Club. 
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago

.

petone12009-10-13 10:30:22
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago

Once again, email me lbsutherland@clear.net.nz and I can talk to or point anyone in the right direction regarding this topic, this forum has been helpful and appreciated, one proviso, if you tell me I pass the information on, no secrets, thats how they continue doing it. 

Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
.
petone12009-10-13 10:31:43
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Another person has laid charges against Williams
I think it is disgusting him pleading not guilty and getting it dragged out for ages. As I find it hard to think hes innocent after all the rumours that have been around for so many years and then for 6 people to lay charges from 4 different decades. It must be so hard for t hose boys to have to go through it all again in detail in front of the court.
If he was a real man he would take it on the chin and take his punishment and save the boys from further pain.
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
As sick as it seems paedophiles think they have done nothing wrong, and this, along with animal cunning, predatorial instincts and an ability to infiltrate families and groups seemingly at will makes there kind so very very dangerous.
When the pressure goes on they switch to survival mode using tactics and behaviour, anything at there disposal just to gain sympathy or time.
All along, the innocent must wait for justice to take its course, as hard as it is sometimes in such cases, believe me I know, one false move or action could be the "out" that these parasites   are searching and hoping for.
The professionals who today handle such cases are very capable, I have faith.
 
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Christchurch recidivist paedophile Alf Vincent, 71, was sentenced to preventive detention in 1968 after being convicted on seven charges of performing indecencies on five boys aged 12-14, including two brothers, over about a year.
Has just been denied parole , Grant if you are reading this , you are going away for a whlie. You should just man up and accept your punishment for playing with little boys.
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Very interesting article, I have heard on the grapevine that there are similar things being talked about locally and one person has put his hand up to help with the process, that in my mind is the right guy for the job, and I wish him and the team well, My thoughts.....if they want to have any input fom someone who has experienced this first hand well they know who I am, and perhaps I may be able to talk a couple of victims to have some input into the discussion as well, they more than anyone must be given the chance to have there say in any future  policy, listening to them is the bottom line for any future policy.
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago

..

 
petone12009-10-13 10:32:27
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
I think everyone has to agree that New Zealand is well behind the rest of the world in the child protection stakes.
 
I like the particular approach being taken in WA where they're using child protection issues to re-engage parents with sports clubs.  A very positive spin-off benefit in that it increases volunteer labour at the same time as reducing the burden on clubs of getting police checks.
 
Certainly worth considering here imho.

Incredible stamina. No shame. Yellow Fever.

Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
just saw his name pop up in a NZ footy book I picked up at the library. Reckoned Barry Truman who was with Petone back in the day was the best thing to happen to NZ footy in 25 yrs

Founder

Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago

.

petone12009-10-13 10:32:41
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
CLUB-"you are a great coach, BUT you got done for D I C, shoplifting and smoking pot when you were young. sorry you can't be involved"
 and
 PARENT-"where are all the kids today coach?"
 COACH-" had to send 4 home cos their parents didn't come, and another 4 texted saying they had work till evening, so their kids won't come for the remainder of season at all!"
 P- "oh that's a bummer. my joey was so looking forward to having a kick around mid-week to develop his skills!"
C- "yeah, sorry about that. new regs and all, can't be helped.I've planned a session for 10 kids, can't be bothered now, see you saturday instead. but once again we may have to cancel if half the parents don't turn up. sorry joey maybe you'd like to play rugby instead"
 
 this is what my crystal ball showed me today (along with when the world will end).....wots wrong with my suggested 1 rostered parent with 1 coach, same thing and  more practical. surely you don't expect a parent with other kids in their care, to stand on a field for 1-2 hours with them, do you? wot about their other kids training/playing at same time somewhere else? don't be impractible when seeking a solution to this problem or it WILL be at a cost to football.!!!!
 as i mentioned previously who pays for checks, and as a result volunteers would surely be seeking reward for their efforts, as there would be a reduced number elligable and hence held more accountable. can't wait for the subs to triple so we can accomadate this legislation, if and when it comes here.
 the kids will be the losers here !!!
 
 
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Wow.  I always thought I was a cup half empty kind of guy, but pizda you take the cake.
 
Don't want to pay for checks, but don't want parents to have to stay around either.  That, my friend, is a catch of the 22 variety.  And from someone who was moaning hard core earlier in the thread about allegedly being touched up by someone back in the day. 
 
I think you need a brain-straightening.

Incredible stamina. No shame. Yellow Fever.

Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Feverish wrote:
just saw his name pop up in a NZ footy book I picked up at the library. Reckoned Barry Truman who was with Petone back in the day was the best thing to happen to NZ footy in 25 yrs
 
will you be editing his name or club again this time ?
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
pizda wrote:
Feverish wrote:
just saw his name pop up in a NZ footy book I picked up at the library. Reckoned Barry Truman who was with Petone back in the day was the best thing to happen to NZ footy in 25 yrs
 
will you be editing his name or club again this time ?
 
Yes.  We'll be referring to him as Berry Troutman.
 
What the f**k?

Incredible stamina. No shame. Yellow Fever.

Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
c'mon smithy, don't take things out of context now will you. if you recall i suggested another parent present always WITH the coach would have prevented this situation, regardless of his criminal record, for which he had NONE. it don't need to be the whole bloody squads parents there as well!!!! why don't you have kids someday smithy so you can have some informed opinions relating to them, seeing as u getting nasty now!!
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
 wot these then!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! hypocrite u are
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago

I was just saying it had quotes from GW in a PUBLISHED BOOK

Founder

Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
oh sorry YOU are. don't tell me capitals are unethical again either.
you should get hip with the language of today so you can relate also.
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
exactly my point, my quote wasn't in a book , mentioned no pedo names , however you chose to edit it. why are you covering it up when the referance i made was to highlight the era concerned like GW did. 
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
From memory you were blatantly implicating certain people

Founder

Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
incorrect, just to affirm, was using as referance to" era" only of individual, not that he was involved, which he wasn't. thanks.
Permalink Permalink