I think it would be better if the more serious offences where reviewed by a group of people that represented all the clubs in the Capital Football acted as the disciplinary tribunal. (say a board consisting of a member from every club)
From what Greenie has said it seems like the hearing was a joke and only Lower Hutt and CF were present.
I don't mean to offend individuals at CF but when only a few people make these decisions there is a far greater chance of personal biases affecting. Im confident that only Lower Hutt are the people who are satisfied by this ruling. NOT GOOD ENOUGH CF consider what the views of the football community you represent think.
"Phoenix till they lose"

