Straya - A-League and State Leagues

Melbin Figtree vs Perth

88 replies · 5,528 views
over 13 years ago

Tegal wrote:

Leggy wrote:

el grapadura wrote:

Also fair to say that playing under Ange probably has a bit to do with it.



I was going to mention that but thought I might be branded a Ricki hater.

That has nothing to do with Ricki. Just because he is doing well under Ange, doesn't mean he wouldnt or didn't do well under Ricki.

We will never know if he would be the player he is today, had he not left?

If you are old and wise you were probably young and stupid

Permalink Permalink
over 13 years ago

It's all hypothetical. He could have been worse, better or manny could have broken his leg in training and ended his career. 


Allegedly

Permalink Permalink
over 13 years ago

He is playing very well with Ange, his coaching has to be a factor, and it is great to watch him.

Hard to know how well he would have gone if still here, RIcki didnt value him enough as he didnt keep him. Will be interesting how Ricki plays him for the All Whites.


Permalink Permalink
over 13 years ago

hepatitis wrote:

He is playing very well with Ange, his coaching has to be a factor, and it is great to watch him.

Hard to know how well he would have gone if still here, RIcki didnt value him enough as he didnt keep him. Will be interesting how Ricki plays him for the All Whites.



How exactly does Ricki go about keeping him when his contract expired?  And please don't say play him more, once he was fit he pretty much played full time.
Permalink Permalink
over 13 years ago

 One, pay him more. Two, promise him more. Three, Show him a future

Permalink Permalink
over 13 years ago

Not to mention Terry's money woes and not even knowing if the club will exist soon. That vs victree. Hmmm. 


Allegedly

Permalink Permalink
over 13 years ago

hepatitis wrote:

 One, pay him more. Two, promise him more. Three, Show him a future

1) From memory (I could be wrong) we offered him youth marquee spot
2) Not sure what this means?
3) Not sure what this means?
Also, as mentioned above, this was in the middle of the end of the Serepisos saga.  All in all, I just really struggle to see how this was an issue of Ricki not wanting him enough.  It seems to me more like Rojas didn't want to be here for whatever reason, and holding Herbert responsible for that seems crazy.
Permalink Permalink
over 13 years ago

yeah we did prety much everything to keep him apart from buying new training facilities


Permalink Permalink
over 13 years ago

I dont think it was clear that we offered him youth marquee, cant recall it being mentioned, but how much more or less that is from a normal contract for a top player I dont know.  I think they waited too long before getting to his contract, and didnt do enough to keep him, points 2 and 3, which I take as an opportunity missed. I may be wrong on the timing but the Serepisos stuff was later, or would have been if we had done enough earlier. 

I dont blame him going to Melbourne anyway, and will be interested to see where he goes from there.

Permalink Permalink
over 13 years ago · edited over 13 years ago · History

hepatitis wrote:
 I think they waited too long before getting to his contract, and didnt do enough to keep him, points 2 and 3, which I take as an opportunity missed. I may be wrong on the timing but the Serepisos stuff was later, or would have been if we had done enough earlier. 


You are wrong on the timing. The Terry saga was ongoing for that whole season (including the reports of players not being payed etc), and the future of the club was still up in the air when we played our last game at Westpac for the season. I remember Terry addressing the crowd straight after Vuka scored the penalty, and telling us that "The Phoenix are here to stay".


Yellow Fever - Misery loves company

Permalink Permalink
over 13 years ago

Also we tried to resign him from like december January, and it kept getting more ominous as the season drew to a close when he hadnt resigned.

There was definitely mention of offering him a big $$ contract. 

Im not sure if the terry thing was part of his decision.. but wouldnt surprise me


Permalink Permalink
over 13 years ago

 I dont think I am that wrong on the timing. People were being signed through the year as I recall, regardless of the rumours.

Permalink Permalink
over 13 years ago

But from his point of view, there is a lot of uncertainty around the club, players aren't getting paid etc. He is at a critical point in his career. 

He can either move to Melbourne and play for the leagues 'biggest' club, or stay here and maybe end up in obscurity within the year. 

No brainer. 


Allegedly

Permalink Permalink
over 13 years ago

There were times in that final year when he and other players were not paid on time. Not too bad if you are on $200k, but on a youth contract of $30k or whatever that would hurt. While he may have been offered a big money contract if I were him a big factor would have been the "will I actually get to see the dough"

As Tegal says.... a no brainer

Permalink Permalink
over 13 years ago

playwithFire wrote:

Also we tried to resign him from like december January, and it kept getting more ominous as the season drew to a close when he hadnt resigned.

There was definitely mention of offering him a big $$ contract. 

Im not sure if the terry thing was part of his decision.. but wouldnt surprise me


The club did try to re-sign him in December-January, but asked him to stay on the same money as he was on for his first contract. He was offered a better deal (which Terry probably couldn't have lived up to anyway) only once Melbourne arrived on the scene, and Marco's relationship with the club had been already seriously damaged.
Permalink Permalink
over 13 years ago

 ^^^ Which proves the point I think, not valued enough.

Permalink Permalink
over 13 years ago

was Ricki meant to pay him out of his own pocket?


Founder

Permalink Permalink
over 13 years ago

Feverish wrote:

was Ricki meant to pay him out of his own pocket?



When he wasn't even being paid himself.


Allegedly

Permalink Permalink
over 13 years ago

Tegal wrote:

Feverish wrote:

was Ricki meant to pay him out of his own pocket?



When he wasn't even being paid himself.


Umm no, and you know it

Permalink Permalink
over 13 years ago

So why is it rickis fault that terry could only offer him a crap deal then? He later offered youth marquee, but he clearly couldn't afford it. 


Allegedly

Permalink Permalink
over 13 years ago
You are clutching at straws Tegal. The recruitment is Rickis responsibility, and he lost him.

Permalink Permalink
over 13 years ago

Hardly. You are talking bollox mate

Founder

Permalink Permalink
over 13 years ago

 That's the truth of it.

Bollox back, mate

Permalink Permalink
over 13 years ago

Assume you are RH and I am Marco - convince me I should re-sign for the Nix. Go

Founder

Permalink Permalink
over 13 years ago · edited over 13 years ago · History

el grapadura wrote:

playwithFire wrote:

Also we tried to resign him from like december January, and it kept getting more ominous as the season drew to a close when he hadnt resigned.

There was definitely mention of offering him a big $$ contract. 

Im not sure if the terry thing was part of his decision.. but wouldnt surprise me


The club did try to re-sign him in December-January, but asked him to stay on the same money as he was on for his first contract. He was offered a better deal (which Terry probably couldn't have lived up to anyway) only once Melbourne arrived on the scene, and Marco's relationship with the club had been already seriously damaged.

Hadn't heard that El G.  Well that completely shuts down any possibility of it being Herberts fault that Rojas left.  Completely unstable evironment with no certainty offering either 
a) 20% of the salary Melbourne likely offered or 
b) A much higher, but almost certainly unreliable salary, 
either of which have little to no security due to the circumstances of the owner, for a young kid that (almost certainly) has his eyes set on gettting to europe and wouldn't want to waste time looking for desperate last minute deals if the club fell over.

Good luck selling that scenario Hep.
Permalink Permalink
over 13 years ago

Not sure why we are angsting over this again?

Yeah it sucks he left us, but now Ange is showcasing his talents to the world. He will eventually leave the Victory and the better he does now, the better club he will end up with. We still get to see him in the All Whites shirt, whilst Aussies have to look at how he is going and be jealous.

In 10-12 years after he has done the Europe thing, he can come back and right the wrong by playing for the Phoenix again.

Permalink Permalink
over 13 years ago

So are you saying that Herbert has no say in the amount offered ?? I reckon he would have.

My point is that he was not valued enough to be offered a decent new contract.

Regardless of how the club's possible finances were, they tried to get him on the same old rate, ie we dont value you any more than when you first came here, and we are prepared to pay other journeymen at the club more than you.  If that was me I would look around as well. Only later did they up the ante

Permalink Permalink
over 13 years ago

Not sure why we are angsting over this again?

Yeah it sucks he left us, but now Ange is showcasing his talents to the world. He will eventually leave the Victory and the better he does now, the better club he will end up with. We still get to see him in the All Whites shirt, whilst Aussies have to look at how he is going and be jealous.

In 10-12 years after he has done the Europe thing, he can come back and right the wrong by playing for the Phoenix again.



Just responding to something said earlier about fault.

I agree with what you have written, onwards for Marco, I love seeing him play wherever
Permalink Permalink
over 13 years ago

hepatitis wrote:

So are you saying that Herbert has no say in the amount offered ?? I reckon he would have.


Of course he does, but only within the parameters that the owner offers.  If you choose to believe that Herbert only valued Rojas at the youth minimum or close to it and chose not to offer more when funds were available, then you would of course blame Herbert.  Me, I don't believe Herbert is that dumb that he chose to offer him that without being practically forced into it.
Permalink Permalink
over 13 years ago

aitkenmike wrote:

hepatitis wrote:

So are you saying that Herbert has no say in the amount offered ?? I reckon he would have.


Of course he does, but only within the parameters that the owner offers.  If you choose to believe that Herbert only valued Rojas at the youth minimum or close to it and chose not to offer more when funds were available, then you would of course blame Herbert.  Me, I don't believe Herbert is that dumb that he chose to offer him that without being practically forced into it.
 This. You can't spend more than the budget your employer has set you. 

There is no way Herbert decided Marco wasn't worth more than he was first on at that point. End of.

Fuck this stupid game

Permalink Permalink
over 13 years ago

The facts have come out that they tried a cheapie and it didnt work. 

Funds didnt become available suddenly, they offered more to try and keep him after the first low shot wasnt accepted, and the stakes were raised by others who saw the value in him.

Not sure why this mistake is being so vigourously defended, it is ok for coaches to lose out, it happens, Ricki does make miscalculations. I believe I am calling it like it is (in hindsight I admit), and dont see him as blameless as others do.

Permalink Permalink
over 13 years ago

so now it's 'they' not Ricki?

Founder

Permalink Permalink
over 13 years ago

Oh, very good spotting.

Is Ricki in your they ??

Permalink Permalink
over 13 years ago

hepatitis wrote:

The facts have come out that they tried a cheapie and it didnt work. 

Funds didnt become available suddenly, they offered more to try and keep him after the first low shot wasnt accepted, and the stakes were raised by others who saw the value in him.

Not sure why this mistake is being so vigourously defended, it is ok for coaches to lose out, it happens, Ricki does make miscalculations. I believe I am calling it like it is (in hindsight I admit), and dont see him as blameless as others do.

Link?

Fuck this stupid game

Permalink Permalink
over 13 years ago

 Post no 55

Doesnt get more official than El G  :)

Permalink Permalink
over 13 years ago

hepatitis wrote:

The facts have come out that they tried a cheapie and it didnt work. 

Funds didnt become available suddenly, they offered more to try and keep him after the first low shot wasnt accepted, and the stakes were raised by others who saw the value in him.

Not sure why this mistake is being so vigourously defended, it is ok for coaches to lose out, it happens, Ricki does make miscalculations. I believe I am calling it like it is (in hindsight I admit), and dont see him as blameless as others do.

[/quote]
el grapadura wrote:

[quote=playwithFire]

Also we tried to resign him from like december January, and it kept getting more ominous as the season drew to a close when he hadnt resigned.

There was definitely mention of offering him a big $$ contract. 

Im not sure if the terry thing was part of his decision.. but wouldnt surprise me

The club did try to re-sign him in December-January, but asked him to stay on the same money as he was on for his first contract. He was offered a better deal (which Terry probably couldn't have lived up to anyway) only once Melbourne arrived on the scene, and Marco's relationship with the club had been already seriously damaged.
If it's this post from EG that you're basing your argument on then you can't assume Ricki is responsible for "undervaluing" him. Was desperate times for Terry and the club, Ricki couldn't pull money out of his arse to pay him. Get over it. 

Fuck this stupid game

Permalink Permalink
over 13 years ago

You do know EG talks more bollox than Hard News right?

Founder

Permalink Permalink
over 13 years ago

Tegal wrote:

Leggy wrote:

el grapadura wrote:

Also fair to say that playing under Ange probably has a bit to do with it.



I was going to mention that but thought I might be branded a Ricki hater.

That has nothing to do with Ricki. Just because he is doing well under Ange, doesn't mean he wouldnt or didn't do well under Ricki.
Personally I think his problem last year, other than the circus the Victory were, was that they were passing the ball to him when he was standing still. Under Ricki and Ange, he gets the ball put in front of him, so he can run on to. That gives the defenders less time to try and push him off the ball.

This, and he was deeper, and what's the point of him then.
The current system for them suits him perfectly. 
Permalink Permalink
over 13 years ago · edited over 13 years ago · History

Feverish wrote:

You do know EG talks more bollox than Hard News right?


Usually correct, but this is all fact.
Permalink Permalink
over 13 years ago

TopLeft07 wrote:

hepatitis wrote:

The facts have come out that they tried a cheapie and it didnt work. 

Funds didnt become available suddenly, they offered more to try and keep him after the first low shot wasnt accepted, and the stakes were raised by others who saw the value in him.

Not sure why this mistake is being so vigourously defended, it is ok for coaches to lose out, it happens, Ricki does make miscalculations. I believe I am calling it like it is (in hindsight I admit), and dont see him as blameless as others do.

[/quote] [quote=el grapadura]
The club did try to re-sign him in December-January, but asked him to stay on the same money as he was on for his first contract. He was offered a better deal (which Terry probably couldn't have lived up to anyway) only once Melbourne arrived on the scene, and Marco's relationship with the club had been already seriously damaged.
If it's this post from EG that you're basing your argument on then you can't assume Ricki is responsible for "undervaluing" him. Was desperate times for Terry and the club, Ricki couldn't pull money out of his arse to pay him. Get over it. 


No it isnt the only source, as I recall reading it elsewhere and I believe that came from his father, but I cant be bothered getting that to satisfy you. I doubt you could get your Ricki blinkers off to see the situation clearly - "it is all Terry's fault"

Permalink Permalink