play COv and let him put his money where his mouth is
Boo him from the Ring otherwise
[/QUOTE]
Precisely why we have him benched and not in the starting lineup. Then place Kwasnik ahead of him. You got to drum in the right hunger. Watching from the sidelines is worse than not being named for the match. Also if he has to sub on, then the crowd will give him a special boo mention to show him outcry was not in good form to club and the supporters.
Anyway Kwasnik is statistically a better goals on target per minutes on the field than Cov or Smeltz so I think he has much to offer. If we give him more completed games from start to finish, then he may be a Diamond in the rough for us.
[QUOTE=rodfarva]
not sure if this idea has been brought up but what about chucking daniel into CM? at least he can pass well and then he could play a whole game for a change.
�
Dodd simply is not a CM, it would�be�laughable to watch him flounder around in midfield if �i didn't actually support the phoenix. I'd chuck McKain and daniel at CM. McKain can be the defensive one and daniel the distributor.
�
My team:
�
-----------------Moss--------------------
�
sigmund---Dodd---Durante---Lochead
�
Kwasnik----Mckain---daniel----gao
�
-------someone*-----smeltz
�
*whoever they want to play as the other striker, whether that's coveny, hearfield (not convinced he'd be a decent striker though),�or giving one of the young guys a go.
Well as least I agree with you for having McKain as DCM and Daniel as ACM. Both are the players that can pass better than the others. And this is an important point of the midfield which we need to address now.
The backline is OK but it depends on who you have on the bench and what strategy you are thinking if the same thing goes to custard as in the previously weeks. e.g. RB being weak, Sigmund may not be up to it like the others but should be fine in RCB and that should be a given position that he can cope with. I personally think that RB is a position for the industrious player which i think Christie is rather than Sigmund. Sigmund debut game should be where he is in the position of strength, i.e. in CB. and not RB for competitive confidence sake. The debut game experience is very important as it can affect the long term thinking for the season. He must have the best possible experience on his debut. And should mean making a way with another person's problem in the short term. IMHO.
Dodd needs a clean break from midfield to be integrated back to the backline, it shouldn't be the short-term to chop him out of the midfield and thrown him back to the defence when the whole team has trained with siggy and christie in the backs and him in the midfields up to this point. Even though he is actually a defender, I doubt that he has been trained for long enough this season as yet. He could be easily shown up in at least the beginnings of the first half by Sydney. So I think not to confuse him for the next game and leave it for the game later. Considering the other defenders in their roles, Dodds may still be used in the midfield rather than defending again. So I leave that defending notion out straight away. Don't want to confuse him or unsettle the other players unnecessary until we explored better choices. It takes time to reintegrate back to their former positions, however at the moment I don't think we need to as yet. A match break can do the same wonders for him to tidy up his game and I think that what he really needs first and foremost.
Of course we have Hearfield where Kwasnik is. And chuck Kwasnik with Smeltz up front should be fine. Again, I wouldn't be in a hurry to place Cov upfront with Smeltz, simply because I wouldn't bow to his moanings and goanings. I would want to see hunger but not for himself but for the team.
So if I alter your team formation with some management to improve it, we end up with this;
Moss
Christie Sigmund Durrante Lochhead
McKain
Hearfield Gao
Daniel
Kwasnik Smeltz
Very much the same to one of my many tactical options off the bench if you read my post. I have explain why I would be cautious with dropping Dodd in the defence after being midfield so soon and why i prefer Sigmund as RCB and not the troublesome RB.
If Siggy is the answer to RB, then do it later on, but make his debut game his best first up before slotting him in a position that noone is grabbing tight on to. I would like to see him combined with Durrante and even McKain in front as DCM because it looks very soild from a central defence POV.
Christie will do OK, as I rather have someone that is proven a bit in that position first than place a potentially good CB player in the deep end of the RB. Sigmund may not have the speed for this level in RB but is OK for speed in the CB. Just ask a certain Brazilian CB from last year what it was like being turn inside out and what it did to his confidence. I wouldn't wish the same for Sigmund if we could help it.
So that is my reasoning for now and why I would change what you have to suit it.
Then you have a very doable formation IMHO
. . . probably because it is one of many tactical options with the bench players in my post.

AllWhitebelievr2008-09-22 19:06:14