...but by the same token the crowds for out of town games have decreased progressively every season and now we're diluting the value of a 'one off' game by going to the same market twice in a season.
A city that last season in the middle of the #SaveTheNix hype managed under 11k in a market 4 times larger than Wellington.
But it's still more that the crowd they'd have got here, based on the evidence of the last few seasons.
But at the same time aren't the costs of going to another venue higher? I kind of think that crowd attendance is a mute point. The last few seasons have shown that there isn't a massive difference between Wellington crowds and other NZ venues (I think Adelaide at Auckland may have been the one exception).
I can only think this is more about what the sponsors want and perhaps increasing the viewership numbers on SKY through getting more people around the country interested. To be honest I'm sort of fine with it if that's what the sponsors want, but I'm not wholly convinced if this is the right way to boost SKY numbers (have no info so can't really say I guess).
And while it is yet another excuse for the Wellington crowds - wasn't that last play-off game held the same time as the Cricket World Cup Final? FFA screwed us there - we were never going to get a good crowd given the circumstances.
Huawei definitely want the club to have a presence in Auckland. That's a 'don't bite the hand that feeds' scenario.
Is it a good way of increasing Sky viewership numbers? Honestly, I have no idea. But I appreciate that the club have to do something about it one way or the other.
And yes, I think you're right about the Cricket World Cup final - it was definitely on while there was a game on at Westpac (know this because I remember seeing McCullum get a duck at the Stadium bar). Not sure if it was the play-off game though, I'd have thought that the cricket wouldn't have been on in April?

