Wellington Phoenix Men

2016/17 Phoenix Fixtures - Saturday Night Fever

472 replies · 54,039 views
almost 10 years ago

el grapadura wrote:

Hard News wrote:

...but by the same token the crowds for out of town games have decreased progressively every season and now we're diluting the value of a 'one off' game by going to the same market twice in a season.  

A city that last season in the middle of the #SaveTheNix hype managed under 11k in a market 4 times larger than Wellington.

But it's still more that the crowd they'd have got here, based on the evidence of the last few seasons.

But at the same time aren't the costs of going to another venue higher?  I kind of think that crowd attendance is a mute point.  The last few seasons have shown that there isn't a massive difference between Wellington crowds and other NZ venues (I think Adelaide at Auckland may have been the one exception).

I can only think this is more about what the sponsors want and perhaps increasing the viewership numbers on SKY through getting more people around the country interested.  To be honest I'm sort of fine with it if that's what the sponsors want, but I'm not wholly convinced if this is the right way to boost SKY numbers (have no info so can't really say I guess).

And while it is yet another excuse for the Wellington crowds - wasn't that last play-off game held the same time as the Cricket World Cup Final?  FFA screwed us there - we were never going to get a good crowd given the circumstances.

Huawei definitely want the club to have a presence in Auckland. That's a 'don't bite the hand that feeds' scenario.

Is it a good way of increasing Sky viewership numbers? Honestly, I have no idea. But I appreciate that the club have to do something about it one way or the other.

And yes, I think you're right about the Cricket World Cup final - it was definitely on while there was a game on at Westpac (know this because I remember seeing McCullum get a duck at the Stadium bar). Not sure if it was the play-off game though, I'd have thought that the cricket wouldn't have been on in April?

Permalink Permalink
almost 10 years ago

Global Game wrote:

I'd set up an Auckland franchise.

The only likely way there will be an Auckland franchise within the next six years will be if there isn't a Wellington one. Having neither is infinitely more likely.
E + R + O

Permalink Permalink
almost 10 years ago

sthn.jeff wrote:

el grapadura wrote:

sthn.jeff wrote:

el grapadura wrote:

sthn.jeff wrote:

el grapadura wrote:

Hard News wrote:

It's not like the out of town games drag in 20k per game any more either.  Is it worth all the trouble to get 1000 more punters in the gate for four games?

Wouldn't winning in Wellington get you that anyway without disenfranchising your core fans, without frustrating the players and support staff and with building a schedule so week to week people have some idea when the Phoenix will play a game in Wellington?

Did winning two years ago significantly increase the crowds? The biggest crowd two years ago was around 13k against Sydney (the game where with a win we'd have been one game away from the Grand final), and the play-off game drew 10k. 11k in Auckland that season was the second-highest crowd. The play-off game we played two years prior to that (when we finished 4th in Ricki's second to last season) also drew around 10k. I don't think 'win and crowds will immediately increase' argument is borne out through recent evidence. 

What were the average crowds leading up to the games mentioned. It is the increase in numbers that is probably relevant to tell the truth. Also look at the steady increase in crowds in the lead up to our first ever finals appearance. Yes it was the first time, but they built steadily due to the good run and the fact that we were winning and playing regularly at Westpac.

Most of the Wellington crowds in 2014/15 season were in the 6-8k range (there was a 9k one for the first Lower Hutt game). The only double-figures in Wellington were the play-off crunch time (i.e. the last regular season game, and the play-off game).

I think there are a couple of issues when using the first play-off season as an example of what could be done (and don't get me wrong, I'd love us to be able to replicate that). Firstly, it's the most distant play-off/winning season from right here, and right now, and the more recent pattern of those seasons has got nowhere near that level. Which bring me to the second point - that season was played in a very different context. This is the season in which we qualified for the World Cup (35k in Wellington against Bahrain early that season), so the football was at a possibly all-time high, with a lot of positive outlook for the All Whites and the World Cup, which also benefited the Phoenix, as a lot of people jumped on the Nix bandwagon, which led to those play-off crowds (there was probably a degree of excitement and hope in replicating the experiences of the World Cup play-off). It also helped that Phoenix were playing well and winning, and in Ifill we had one of the bext players in the league at the time. All of these factors combined together for an unforgettable season, but we've come nowhere near replicating it off the field, even though we've had seasons on the field that weren't far too off that season. We can't rely on the All Whites providing the same context again in the near future, so the Phoenix have to do this on their own this time around.

But that first game at Lower Hutt, came at a time we were on a pretty good run. I distinctly remember Dome saying they would have sold more if it was at Westpac. That season, on several ocassions he be-moaned the fact we were here there and everywhere and could not get a solid run of home games.

Undoubtedly the All Whites played a big part in some of those crowds but you can't attribute all the success to that. We were playing an ok brand of football, were scoring goals, had a relative Superstar in Ifill and more importantly imo were winning.

I recall somewhere in the past Dale produced some graphs or spreadsheets showing the relationship between winning and the following weeks crowds. Again I seem to recall Dome saying the best way to boost crowds was to win the previous week at home

Clearly it's not all down to the All Whites, but I don't think the context can be ignored, especially since we've come nowhere near replicating that level of interest since, despite having seasons that were almost as successful since.

I don't think I'm saying that winning doesn't improve the crowds - I'm sure it does, but I guess the issue is that the recent evidence does not indicate that it's a marked, or significant, improvement in the short run. Now it may be in the long run, but like I've been trying to say, what constitutes the long-run, and how to keep the club afloat in the meantime is the big issue that the club has to resolve right now.

Again agreed. I just don't think the travelling circus is the way to do it either. As News has said, Home away games have drawn declining numbers since the first one in Auckland and I would say in recent times the club would have to have been disappointed in every away game we have played. Everytime we go to Auckland Dome grizzles and threatens to make it the last, Dunedin was a bust,  They wouldn't have been happy with Napier, Palmy or last years visit to Christchurch and even Auckland would have been a marginal pass mark at the very best.

I don't disagree with any of that - guess it just goes to show that it's not exactly an enviable situation to be in, and that Welnix are trying their best to make sure we continue to have a club in this competition. Whether those efforts are misguided only time will tell.

Permalink Permalink
almost 10 years ago

Surge wrote:

Global Game wrote:

I'd set up an Auckland franchise.

The only likely way there will be an Auckland franchise within the next six years will be if there isn't a Wellington one. Having neither is infinitely more likely.

You're on fire Surge!

Permalink Permalink
almost 10 years ago

el grapadura wrote:

You're on fire Surge!

E + R + O

Permalink Permalink
almost 10 years ago · edited almost 10 years ago · History

el grapadura wrote:

Surge wrote:

Global Game wrote:

I'd set up an Auckland franchise.

The only likely way there will be an Auckland franchise within the next six years will be if there isn't a Wellington one. Having neither is infinitely more likely.

You're on fire Surge!

Gallop wants derbies and markets in the millions, not hundreds of thousands. More sense Auckland than splitting Brisbane, or a 3rd Sydney/Melbourne team. Nothing left, except old NSL clubs. Would love that, but think it's less likely than Auckland.

Kotahitanga. We are one.

Permalink Permalink
almost 10 years ago

But at the same time aren't the costs of going to another venue higher?  I kind of think that crowd attendance is a mute point.  The last few seasons have shown that there isn't a massive difference between Wellington crowds and other NZ venues (I think Adelaide at Auckland may have been the one exception).

Not necessarily. Eden park - yes. Which is why they moved to NHS.

But most of the time a local council is underwriting the operation. So the Phoenix don't lose money on those Christchurch/Napier/Dunedin games. Which you can see why they could be attractive.

Permalink Permalink
almost 10 years ago

Auckland franchise is good for Wellington Phoenix:

= Kiwi derby

= more reason/easier/more efficient for FFA to spend their marketing $ promoting the league in national market than regional market

= fresh ownership >>> new marketing approach in Auckland market could/should boost game more than current efforts from grassroots clubs, ASBP, All Whites/Ferns

= nationwide/media interest in at least 3 games a year

= biggest immigrant population growth area and overwhelming proportion of that population has football as their first game

= Nix keep all games at home (or at least south of the bombays)

Alternatively, 'NZ Nix' failing in Auckland will fudge chance of Auckland franchise in my lifetime.

Kotahitanga. We are one.

Permalink Permalink
almost 10 years ago

Global Game wrote:

Auckland franchise is good for Wellington Phoenix:

You do realise the Phoenix don't run the A-league. Don't you?
E + R + O

Permalink Permalink
almost 10 years ago

Surge wrote:

Global Game wrote:

Auckland franchise is good for Wellington Phoenix:

You do realise the Phoenix don't run the A-league. Don't you?

It's quite clear that no-one is running the A league.

Kotahitanga. We are one.

Permalink Permalink
almost 10 years ago

Mega lolz

Permalink Permalink
almost 10 years ago

el grapadura wrote:

And while it is yet another excuse for the Wellington crowds - wasn't that last play-off game held the same time as the Cricket World Cup Final?  FFA screwed us there - we were never going to get a good crowd given the circumstances.

And yes, I think you're right about the Cricket World Cup final - it was definitely on while there was a game on at Westpac (know this because I remember seeing McCullum get a duck at the Stadium bar). Not sure if it was the play-off game though, I'd have thought that the cricket wouldn't have been on in April?

Nah it was a regular season game.  I remember because it was the one Nix regular season game in Wellington I missed because it was our first time in the World Cup final.  It may have even been the last game of the regular season, any A league team would have been fudgeed though because of it being a NZ AU final.

Permalink Permalink
almost 10 years ago

What if the entire country was renamed "Wellington"?

ALL home games would then be played in Wellington making this argument fudge off once and for all!!!

"Ive just re-visited this and once again realised that C-Diddy is a genius - a drunk, Newcastle bred disgrace - but a genius." - Hard News, 11:39am 4th June 2009

Permalink Permalink
almost 10 years ago

I'd be interested if the club broke even last season?

Bet we wont find out.

A fan is a fan.

Permalink Permalink
almost 10 years ago · edited almost 10 years ago · History

C-Diddy wrote:

What if the entire country was renamed "Wellington"?

ALL home games would then be played in Wellington making this argument fudge off once and for all!!!

What if the entire country joined "Australia"? 

ALL A-League teams would be in the same country making these license-related issues fudge off once and for all!!!

Also, never again could one take offence at being mistaken for an Ozzie when abroad.

Permalink Permalink
almost 10 years ago

QBoyd wrote:

C-Diddy wrote:

What if the entire country was renamed "Wellington"?

ALL home games would then be played in Wellington making this argument fudge off once and for all!!!

What if the entire country joined "Australia"? 

ALL A-League teams would be in the same country making these license-related issues fudge off once and for all!!!

Also, never again could one take offence at being mistaken for an Ozzie when abroad.

I think the Scots take offence if called Brits.
Permalink Permalink
almost 10 years ago

The Huawei Auckland Rangers v The Wellington Phoenix.  Derby game. If our sponsors love Auckland that much, easy, set up an application for another go with the ffa and getting one up there. To quote another brand...... Just do it.

Proud to have attended the first 175 Consecutive "Home" Wellington Phoenix "A League" Games !!

The Ruf, The Ruf, The Ruf is on Fire!!

Permalink Permalink
almost 10 years ago

Didnt they say Auckland games basically dont cost them to run so anything they sell is all for the club.In saying that they seem to shtye loads of tickets away or sell them bloody cheap would ne nice if they repeated this for Wellington games.

Dont care what they say the effort they have put into promoting games in Wellington is poor.Bet Ernie is going to be rapt that in an important year the team is going to be kept away from home again.


GET YOUR SHIRTS OFF FOR THE BOYS

Permalink Permalink
almost 10 years ago

Ryan wrote:

QBoyd wrote:

C-Diddy wrote:

What if the entire country was renamed "Wellington"?

ALL home games would then be played in Wellington making this argument fudge off once and for all!!!

What if the entire country joined "Australia"? 

ALL A-League teams would be in the same country making these license-related issues fudge off once and for all!!!

Also, never again could one take offence at being mistaken for an Ozzie when abroad.

I think the Scots take offence if called Brits.

Not the same country though? Oh wait they wanted to stay.

No, seriously though, the U.K. isn't a country.

Permalink Permalink
almost 10 years ago

QBoyd wrote:

Ryan wrote:

QBoyd wrote:

C-Diddy wrote:

What if the entire country was renamed "Wellington"?

ALL home games would then be played in Wellington making this argument fudge off once and for all!!!

What if the entire country joined "Australia"? 

ALL A-League teams would be in the same country making these license-related issues fudge off once and for all!!!

Also, never again could one take offence at being mistaken for an Ozzie when abroad.

I think the Scots take offence if called Brits.

Not the same country though? Oh wait they wanted to stay.

No, seriously though, the U.K. isn't a country.

It's similar to a state based system though with each state having it's own parliament and ability to make laws.

Permalink Permalink
almost 10 years ago

Ryan wrote:

QBoyd wrote:

Ryan wrote:

QBoyd wrote:

C-Diddy wrote:

What if the entire country was renamed "Wellington"?

ALL home games would then be played in Wellington making this argument fudge off once and for all!!!

What if the entire country joined "Australia"? 

ALL A-League teams would be in the same country making these license-related issues fudge off once and for all!!!

Also, never again could one take offence at being mistaken for an Ozzie when abroad.

I think the Scots take offence if called Brits.

Not the same country though? Oh wait they wanted to stay.

No, seriously though, the U.K. isn't a country.

It's similar to a state based system though with each state having it's own parliament and ability to make laws.

From Wikipedia:

The UK consists of four countries: England, Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland.[14]

Although Wikipedia could be wrong as I don't think Northern Ireland is a country anyway.

Permalink Permalink
almost 10 years ago · edited almost 10 years ago · History

QBoyd wrote:

Ryan wrote:

QBoyd wrote:

Ryan wrote:

QBoyd wrote:

C-Diddy wrote:

What if the entire country was renamed "Wellington"?

ALL home games would then be played in Wellington making this argument fudge off once and for all!!!

What if the entire country joined "Australia"? 

ALL A-League teams would be in the same country making these license-related issues fudge off once and for all!!!

Also, never again could one take offence at being mistaken for an Ozzie when abroad.

I think the Scots take offence if called Brits.

Not the same country though? Oh wait they wanted to stay.

No, seriously though, the U.K. isn't a country.

It's similar to a state based system though with each state having it's own parliament and ability to make laws.

From Wikipedia:

The UK consists of four countries: England, Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland.[14]

Although Wikipedia could be wrong as I don't think Northern Ireland is a country anyway.

I don't really know what your point is... but from the same wikipedia article: 

Although the United Kingdom, as a sovereign state, is a country, England, Scotland, Wales, and to a lesser degree, Northern Ireland, are also regarded as countries, though they are not sovereign states.

The point is that if NZ ever joined Australia we would still hold our identity and would want to be considered Kiwi's and not Australians.

Permalink Permalink
almost 10 years ago

yellowsite wrote:

I'd be interested if the club broke even last season?

Bet we wont find out.

The Nix have provided this information in the past for premium season ticket who attend the annual club members meeting. Can't see why they wouldn't do it this time around.


Yellow Fever - Misery loves company

Permalink Permalink
almost 10 years ago

Ryan wrote:

QBoyd wrote:

Ryan wrote:

QBoyd wrote:

Ryan wrote:

QBoyd wrote:

C-Diddy wrote:

What if the entire country was renamed "Wellington"?

ALL home games would then be played in Wellington making this argument fudge off once and for all!!!

What if the entire country joined "Australia"? 

ALL A-League teams would be in the same country making these license-related issues fudge off once and for all!!!

Also, never again could one take offence at being mistaken for an Ozzie when abroad.

I think the Scots take offence if called Brits.

Not the same country though? Oh wait they wanted to stay.

No, seriously though, the U.K. isn't a country.

It's similar to a state based system though with each state having it's own parliament and ability to make laws.

From Wikipedia:

The UK consists of four countries: England, Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland.[14]

Although Wikipedia could be wrong as I don't think Northern Ireland is a country anyway.

I don't really know what your point is... but from the same wikipedia article: 

Although the United Kingdom, as a sovereign state, is a country, England, Scotland, Wales, and to a lesser degree, Northern Ireland, are also regarded as countries, though they are not sovereign states.

The point is that if NZ ever joined Australia we would still hold our identity and would want to be considered Kiwi's and not Australians.

Point conceded, I don't really know what my point is either.

Permalink Permalink
almost 10 years ago

Nice one Dave (Hatter) will be sending mine off this afternoon i sure hope others who have voiced their objection to the increase in home away games do the same. For good measure will also be voicing my thoughts to Huawei  on their support for a WELLINGTON sports team and insisting they play in Auckland. Will be saying i look forward to their insistence that the Canberra Raiders also move some of their home games.


GET YOUR SHIRTS OFF FOR THE BOYS

Permalink Permalink
almost 10 years ago

ballane wrote:
Will be saying I look forward to their insistence that the Canberra Raiders also move some of their home games.

I'd expect them to point out that the Raiders already play in their biggest national market multiple (8) times this season - excluding finals. Though you can counter by pointing out they're not playing in Melbourne this year (unless finals). Good luck.
E + R + O

Permalink Permalink
almost 10 years ago

2ndBest wrote:

But at the same time aren't the costs of going to another venue higher?  I kind of think that crowd attendance is a mute point.  The last few seasons have shown that there isn't a massive difference between Wellington crowds and other NZ venues (I think Adelaide at Auckland may have been the one exception).

Not necessarily. Eden park - yes. Which is why they moved to NHS.

But most of the time a local council is underwriting the operation. So the Phoenix don't lose money on those Christchurch/Napier/Dunedin games. Which you can see why they could be attractive.

I don't see the problem with Mt Smart which would be a far smarter option if you ask me. At least there is public transport (train) to it.

Grumpy old bastard alert

Permalink Permalink
almost 10 years ago

Plus Mt Smart is actually a decent ground - the NHS is just a sharkshow.

Express Football Special Calling At

Fratton Park - Champion Hill - Kiwitea St

And all away grounds inbetween.

Permalink Permalink
almost 10 years ago

Surge wrote:

ballane wrote:
Will be saying I look forward to their insistence that the Canberra Raiders also move some of their home games.

I'd expect them to point out that the Raiders already play in their biggest national market multiple (8) times this season - excluding finals. Though you can counter by pointing out they're not playing in Melbourne this year (unless finals). Good luck.

Really dosnt matter what you counter with i wouldnt mind betting we are probably one of the only sports teams they sponsor or partner with who move fixtures to suit them.Despite what may be claimed they get pretty good exposure into the Aussie market for their brand for what is pretty modest outlay compared to some sponsorships.

Yeah maybe wrong comparing different markets but sorry dont agree just because we are smaller market we should be moving games to suit them.

 


GET YOUR SHIRTS OFF FOR THE BOYS

Permalink Permalink
almost 10 years ago

ballane wrote:
Really dosnt matter what you counter with

Thanks Captain.
E + R + O

Permalink Permalink
almost 10 years ago

Come on Surge you can make anything out of any number of posts if you choose to only select bits in isolation


GET YOUR SHIRTS OFF FOR THE BOYS

Permalink Permalink
almost 10 years ago

I sometimes wonder if the FFA and the Welnix guys have actually spent time and looked at attendance figure for other sports fixtures in NZ.I just dfont get why they both expect us to be pulling much larger crowds on what we have been served up at times.Seems they under value the support that has stayed loyal to club despite what has been served up both on and off pitch.

It seems at times as if they just think all they have to do is put a Football on and people should turn up.They dont seem to give any thought at times to game time and other events that might be on or the poor form of the team.There just seems to be they this expectation that by the both of them that people should turn up.

It does seem at time over the years that we have had a few things happen that have sadly had an affect despite what people say.It could be bad timing weather turning to shark.Or as it was at the Hutt Rec a combination of weather and the team playing like shyte,dont get why people expect the casuals to turn out on the back of some of the rubbish we have been served up.

Also dont get why they dont run the specials at home on a regular basis  like they do for the away games.There seems to be heaps of tickets given away and specials run on Grab One etc that just dont get repeated at home.


GET YOUR SHIRTS OFF FOR THE BOYS

Permalink Permalink
almost 10 years ago

ballane wrote:

Also dont get why they dont run the specials at home on a regular basis  like they do for the away games.There seems to be heaps of tickets given away and specials run on Grab One etc that just dont get repeated at home.

I feel like they usually do throughout the year.

Permalink Permalink
almost 10 years ago

ballane wrote:

Also dont get why they dont run the specials at home on a regular basis  like they do for the away games.There seems to be heaps of tickets given away and specials run on Grab One etc that just dont get repeated at home.

Someone who knows better/has paid actual attention to this may correct me, but I've been under the impression that there have been quite a few giveaways/special deals/cheap tickets for Wellington games over the last few years?

Permalink Permalink
almost 10 years ago

ballane wrote:

I sometimes wonder if the FFA and the Welnix guys have actually spent time and looked at attendance figure for other sports fixtures in NZ.I just dfont get why they both expect us to be pulling much larger crowds on what we have been served up at times.Seems they under value the support that has stayed loyal to club despite what has been served up both on and off pitch.

It seems at times as if they just think all they have to do is put a Football on and people should turn up.They dont seem to give any thought at times to game time and other events that might be on or the poor form of the team.There just seems to be they this expectation that by the both of them that people should turn up.

It does seem at time over the years that we have had a few things happen that have sadly had an affect despite what people say.It could be bad timing weather turning to shark.Or as it was at the Hutt Rec a combination of weather and the team playing like shyte,dont get why people expect the casuals to turn out on the back of some of the rubbish we have been served up.

The thing is I feel like most people wouldn't disagree with you.  But would lay most of that blame on the FFA not Wellnix.  FFA give us fixtures, FFA demand more, FFA held our nads to the flame to the point where we had to take what we got, etc.

I think the bulk of the people that disagree with your overall sentiment is the people who accept that its probably this or nothing, and would rather have this.

If we still have the Nix in 10 years it could be any kind of a beast, but I still want the Nix to exist.  It would be sad to see the Nix become the NZ Nix (like the NZ warriors and the NZ breakers) but if it was a this or nothing again I'd take it, because I want me Nix to exist.

If we had huge TV numbers, then Huawei probably wouldn't ask for the 2 AKL games because enough eyeballs would be on their logo via the TV, but as it stands there aren't enough eyeballs on the TV for Sky to pay more than a pittance and for the large sum of cash they are putting into the club they want more of those eyeballs.  If either way we need to attain that then Huawei's "demands" may not be any different to what they would have tried anyway.  The roadshow is clearly to attract more viewers and fans, if we had those things then they probably wouldn't care.

Permalink Permalink
almost 10 years ago · edited almost 10 years ago · History

el grapadura wrote:

ballane wrote:

Also dont get why they dont run the specials at home on a regular basis  like they do for the away games.There seems to be heaps of tickets given away and specials run on Grab One etc that just dont get repeated at home.

Someone who knows better/has paid actual attention to this may correct me, but I've been under the impression that there have been quite a few giveaways/special deals/cheap tickets for Wellington games over the last few years?

last season you could buy $10.00 tickets after every home game for the next home game, not really sure how many of these were actually sold though

Permalink Permalink
almost 10 years ago

ballane wrote:

Come on Surge you can make anything out of any number of posts if you choose to only select bits in isolation

Come on what? I was making the point that they will spin it differently. You made it clear you don't care what anyone says and that's your choice. Obviously.
E + R + O

Permalink Permalink
almost 10 years ago

el grapadura wrote:

ballane wrote:

Also dont get why they dont run the specials at home on a regular basis  like they do for the away games.There seems to be heaps of tickets given away and specials run on Grab One etc that just dont get repeated at home.

Someone who knows better/has paid actual attention to this may correct me, but I've been under the impression that there have been quite a few giveaways/special deals/cheap tickets for Wellington games over the last few years?

Over the last couple of seasons I've got free tickets from Mojo, Adidas, as well as a couple of radio stations like ZM. Most of these places (and no doubt others) offer free tickets for most, if not all, home games. Not to mention the $10 tickets last season, as well as the free ones for the last home game. I'm not really sure how anyone can think that there aren't tickets given away and available on special deals in Wellington
Permalink Permalink
almost 10 years ago
Kyle, maybe support the club by buying a ticket, not searching out freebies, & not spending money on overpriced catering inside the stadium.

We're the WELLINGTON Phoenix

And this is our Home

Permalink Permalink
almost 10 years ago · edited almost 10 years ago · History

Kiwi Hatter wrote:
Kyle, maybe support the club by buying a ticket, not searching out freebies, & not spending money on overpriced catering inside the stadium.
I've had a season ticket the last 3 seasons. The two before that I had a Nix Six, as well as buying individual tickets to most of the other home games. So I'm sorry for trying to (and sometimes succeeding to)  get freebies to give to people who otherwise wouldn't have gone to the games to try and get them to become regulars. How dare I try and expand our fanbase. Instead of jumping to accuse me of not supporting the club, I would appreciate it if next time you took the time to find out what I've just mentioned
Permalink Permalink