Closed for new posts
Surge
·
Can I have some lungs please miss
1.1K
·
7.5K
·
almost 17 years

horseshead21 wrote:

I think he need to bulk up anyway , the shoulder dislocations were dealt with so shouldn't be an ongoing cause for lack of confidence. So  I don't really buy that as the long term reason 

In the interests of cutting out the middle man and wasting anyone's time, can you outline what (if any) reason/s you will buy?
First Team Squad
130
·
1.4K
·
over 15 years

that I think he needed to bulk up regardless. You could be correct, but like anything other players have come back from far worse injuries (usually lower limb which are far more likely to effect your confidence as a player) and manage to play with confidence (albeit with time). I just don't think that is the only or main reason he's not confident/performing.

Stage Punch
2.1K
·
11K
·
almost 17 years

horseshead21 wrote:

that I think he needed to bulk up regardless. You could be correct, but like anything other players have come back from far worse injuries (usually lower limb which are far more likely to effect your confidence as a player) and manage to play with confidence (albeit with time). I just don't think that is the only or main reason he's not confident/performing.

 

What main reasons DO you think he's not confident/performing?

I don't think anyone (him, Ernie, anyone) knows what his best position is. That can't help.

First Team Squad
130
·
1.4K
·
over 15 years

Smithy wrote:

horseshead21 wrote:

that I think he needed to bulk up regardless. You could be correct, but like anything other players have come back from far worse injuries (usually lower limb which are far more likely to effect your confidence as a player) and manage to play with confidence (albeit with time). I just don't think that is the only or main reason he's not confident/performing.

 

What main reasons DO you think he's not confident/performing?

I don't think anyone (him, Ernie, anyone) knows what his best position is. That can't help.

no idea smithy, hence why I asked the original question. I dont't think you can blame it on a series of shoulder injuries that with dealt with over a year ago

Stage Punch
2.1K
·
11K
·
almost 17 years

horseshead21 wrote:

Smithy wrote:

horseshead21 wrote:

that I think he needed to bulk up regardless. You could be correct, but like anything other players have come back from far worse injuries (usually lower limb which are far more likely to effect your confidence as a player) and manage to play with confidence (albeit with time). I just don't think that is the only or main reason he's not confident/performing.

 

What main reasons DO you think he's not confident/performing?

I don't think anyone (him, Ernie, anyone) knows what his best position is. That can't help.

no idea smithy, hence why I asked the original question. I dont't think you can blame it on a series of shoulder injuries that with dealt with over a year ago

 

I dunno. Pretty plausible that a series of serious injuries would change your approach to the game I reckon. I'm no doctor though.

Marquee
5.3K
·
9.5K
·
almost 13 years

horseshead21 wrote:

that I think he needed to bulk up regardless. You could be correct, but like anything other players have come back from far worse injuries (usually lower limb which are far more likely to effect your confidence as a player) and manage to play with confidence (albeit with time). I just don't think that is the only or main reason he's not confident/performing.

Yeah but the difference is one injury vs recurring injuries. 

I don't think it's the main reason but I do think it's significant. The main reason seems to be that he was shuffled into a role he wasn't used to or really suited to and now he's lost on the pitch, which I think is pretty obvious. It hasn't helped that last season Ernie didn't seem to want his FBs overlapping and hugging the line, which is Fenton's natural game

Marquee
4.2K
·
5.6K
·
almost 12 years

I know there are a lot of comments now and previously about him needing confidence... so how much time do we give him?

I personally think his best position moving forward is RB because I just don't see him having the ability to take on and beat a player on the outside anymore, whereas he can still use his pace to create overlaps.

With McG, Kosta, Krishna playing attacking wide roles he's not going to see meaningful time realistically anyway.

JBoyd
·
Phoenix Academy
88
·
350
·
about 8 years

MetalLegNZ wrote:

I know there are a lot of comments now and previously about him needing confidence... so how much time do we give him?

I personally think his best position moving forward is RB because I just don't see him having the ability to take on and beat a player on the outside anymore, whereas he can still use his pace to create overlaps.

With McG, Kosta, Krishna playing attacking wide roles he's not going to see meaningful time realistically anyway.

But if things go to plan, he won't get meaningful time at RB either. We're in the market for a RB, and I would be shocked if we didn't get one.

The other thing is, he may well still get time as a winger. Of the three you mention, WeeMac plays on the left, or through the middle and Krishna will surely operate as a central striker this season (It's not like we're going to start Watson). If he has only Kosta to contend with, fine. I want him to play the Appiah role, coming off the bench late on to use his pace, but with the added bonus of being a competent fullback.

Woof Woof
2.7K
·
19K
·
almost 17 years

QBoyd wrote:

MetalLegNZ wrote:

I know there are a lot of comments now and previously about him needing confidence... so how much time do we give him?

I personally think his best position moving forward is RB because I just don't see him having the ability to take on and beat a player on the outside anymore, whereas he can still use his pace to create overlaps.

With McG, Kosta, Krishna playing attacking wide roles he's not going to see meaningful time realistically anyway.

.

The other thing is, he may well still get time as a winger. Of the three you mention, WeeMac plays on the left, or through the middle and Krishna will surely operate as a central striker this season (It's not like we're going to start Watson). If he has only Kosta to contend with, fine. I want him to play the Appiah role, coming off the bench late on to use his pace, but with the added bonus of being a competent fullback.

Don't see us playing with a central striker - I think it'll be two wide forwards (Kosta and Krishna), and Finkler as a false 9.

Marquee
5.3K
·
9.5K
·
almost 13 years
QBoyd wrote:
MetalLegNZ wrote:

I know there are a lot of comments now and previously about him needing confidence... so how much time do we give him?

I personally think his best position moving forward is RB because I just don't see him having the ability to take on and beat a player on the outside anymore, whereas he can still use his pace to create overlaps.

With McG, Kosta, Krishna playing attacking wide roles he's not going to see meaningful time realistically anyway.

But if things go to plan, he won't get meaningful time at RB either. We're in the market for a RB, and I would be shocked if we didn't get one.

The other thing is, he may well still get time as a winger. Of the three you mention, WeeMac plays on the left, or through the middle and Krishna will surely operate as a central striker this season (It's not like we're going to start Watson). If he has only Kosta to contend with, fine. I want him to play the Appiah role, coming off the bench late on to use his pace, but with the added bonus of being a competent fullback.

I don't think we will have a central striker as such for most games - maybe as a plan b with Watson in the role but I think Ernie's preferred formation will be a 4-1-2-1-2 like we played with Burns. The two attackers will be small fast qinger-types, so Kosta and Krishna with Finkler behind them. Fenton could be a backup for the attacker role as well as for RB. I sure hope we don't see him at CM again though. He really doesn't have the passing or vision for it.
Marquee
5.3K
·
9.5K
·
almost 13 years

Aw shark EG, maybe I am your Tyler Durden

Stage Punch
2.1K
·
11K
·
almost 17 years

Has anyone got any evidence at all that McGlinchey is any kind of a left winger? I've seen no evidence myself.

I think we'll see Kosta and Finkler as the wide players and Krishna as the 9. With Roly the 10 and some combo of WeeMac/A-Rod/Vinnie in behind.

We won't score enough goals, and we'll concede loads. Assuming we don't sign anyone more of any significance we'll fight it out for 5/6/7/8 again.

Marquee
2.1K
·
6.4K
·
over 14 years

Smithy wrote:

Has anyone got any evidence at all that McGlinchey is any kind of a left winger? I've seen no evidence myself.

I think we'll see Kosta and Finkler as the wide players and Krishna as the 9. With Roly the 10 and some combo of WeeMac/A-Rod/Vinnie in behind.

We won't score enough goals, and we'll concede loads. Assuming we don't sign anyone more of any significance we'll fight it out for 5/6/7/8 again.

Tend to agree unfortunately. 

Is this a bit of lance chance saloon for Ernie this year? He (apparently) has the budget available, This will be his fourth Season in charge.

Will the board be happy with another mediocre finish? Will Ernie be happy with another mediocre finish? Will the fans be happy with another mediocre finish?

First Team Squad
1.2K
·
1.6K
·
almost 15 years

Smithy wrote:

Has anyone got any evidence at all that McGlinchey is any kind of a left winger? I've seen no evidence myself.

I may be wrong but I recall his best years at CCM were playing wide on the left.

Winger is probably the wrong term though. Maybe more of a wide playmaker.

Marquee
7.4K
·
9.5K
·
almost 14 years

Ernie's played Fenton in the mid field a couple of times. 

Marquee
5.3K
·
9.5K
·
almost 13 years

Ryan wrote:

Ernie's played Fenton in the mid field a couple of times. 

And he's looked awful there
Cock
2.7K
·
16K
·
almost 15 years

Smithy wrote:

Has anyone got any evidence at all that McGlinchey is any kind of a left winger? I've seen no evidence myself.

I think we'll see Kosta and Finkler as the wide players and Krishna as the 9. With Roly the 10 and some combo of WeeMac/A-Rod/Vinnie in behind.

We won't score enough goals, and we'll concede loads. Assuming we don't sign anyone more of any significance we'll fight it out for 5/6/7/8 again.

Well at least you have hung your colours out their early.

I would not mind waiting until we sign a full squad. Our other CB *could* be special.

First Team Squad
530
·
1K
·
almost 11 years

Ryan wrote:

Ernie's played Fenton in the mid field a couple of times. 

And he's looked awful there

Winger/rb/lb is were fenton will be this season.
Phoenix Academy
39
·
430
·
almost 15 years

QBoyd wrote:

MetalLegNZ wrote:

I know there are a lot of comments now and previously about him needing confidence... so how much time do we give him?

I personally think his best position moving forward is RB because I just don't see him having the ability to take on and beat a player on the outside anymore, whereas he can still use his pace to create overlaps.

With McG, Kosta, Krishna playing attacking wide roles he's not going to see meaningful time realistically anyway.

But if things go to plan, he won't get meaningful time at RB either. We're in the market for a RB, and I would be shocked if we didn't get one.

The other thing is, he may well still get time as a winger. Of the three you mention, WeeMac plays on the left, or through the middle and Krishna will surely operate as a central striker this season (It's not like we're going to start Watson). If he has only Kosta to contend with, fine. I want him to play the Appiah role, coming off the bench late on to use his pace, but with the added bonus of being a competent fullback.

You'd be shocked? We've been looking for a right back for years!

Legend
7.5K
·
15K
·
almost 17 years

el grapadura wrote:

Everyone just take a chill pill. Seriously. These are early pre-season games for the Nix with absolutely nothing at stake for anyone involved, really not worth getting worked up over.

Dammit I was enjoying reading this. Off season is so boring

Marquee
420
·
6.3K
·
about 17 years

horseshead21 wrote:

back to the football, can anyone tell me what us happened to Louis fenton as a player? They guy looks to have no confidence,

Looks confused in possession of the ball. I don't think he knows what his best position is, he sure is shark is not a left back. What happened to the guy who looked unreal early on in his debut season?


he's just not very good?

Stage Punch
2.1K
·
11K
·
almost 17 years

Jeff Vader wrote:

Smithy wrote:

Has anyone got any evidence at all that McGlinchey is any kind of a left winger? I've seen no evidence myself.

I think we'll see Kosta and Finkler as the wide players and Krishna as the 9. With Roly the 10 and some combo of WeeMac/A-Rod/Vinnie in behind.

We won't score enough goals, and we'll concede loads. Assuming we don't sign anyone more of any significance we'll fight it out for 5/6/7/8 again.

Well at least you have hung your colours out their early.

I would not mind waiting until we sign a full squad. Our other CB *could* be special.

 

Like any good lawyer I've left myself plenty of room to move. Dura is superb but ageing (sorry Dura). Fox is promising but inexperienced. Doyle will be excellent (I reckon he's got loads of assists in him) but we don't have a right back of any kind.

But another major signing could change things.

Marquee
3.7K
·
5.8K
·
over 17 years

Smithy wrote:

Jeff Vader wrote:

Smithy wrote:

Has anyone got any evidence at all that McGlinchey is any kind of a left winger? I've seen no evidence myself.

I think we'll see Kosta and Finkler as the wide players and Krishna as the 9. With Roly the 10 and some combo of WeeMac/A-Rod/Vinnie in behind.

We won't score enough goals, and we'll concede loads. Assuming we don't sign anyone more of any significance we'll fight it out for 5/6/7/8 again.

Well at least you have hung your colours out their early.

I would not mind waiting until we sign a full squad. Our other CB *could* be special.

 

Like any BENT lawyer I've left myself plenty of room to move. Dura is superb but ageing (sorry Dura). Fox is promising but inexperienced. Doyle will be excellent (I reckon he's got loads of assists in him) but we don't have a right back of any kind.

But another major signing could change things.

Fixed
JBoyd
·
Phoenix Academy
88
·
350
·
about 8 years

S.O.N wrote:

QBoyd wrote:

MetalLegNZ wrote:

I know there are a lot of comments now and previously about him needing confidence... so how much time do we give him?

I personally think his best position moving forward is RB because I just don't see him having the ability to take on and beat a player on the outside anymore, whereas he can still use his pace to create overlaps.

With McG, Kosta, Krishna playing attacking wide roles he's not going to see meaningful time realistically anyway.

But if things go to plan, he won't get meaningful time at RB either. We're in the market for a RB, and I would be shocked if we didn't get one.

The other thing is, he may well still get time as a winger. Of the three you mention, WeeMac plays on the left, or through the middle and Krishna will surely operate as a central striker this season (It's not like we're going to start Watson). If he has only Kosta to contend with, fine. I want him to play the Appiah role, coming off the bench late on to use his pace, but with the added bonus of being a competent fullback.

You'd be shocked? We've been looking for a right back for years!

More blind hope than expectation. But we're fudged if we don't get one. Like, now.

Marquee
5.3K
·
9.5K
·
almost 13 years

Smithy wrote:

Has anyone got any evidence at all that McGlinchey is any kind of a left winger? I've seen no evidence myself.

I think we'll see Kosta and Finkler as the wide players and Krishna as the 9. With Roly the 10 and some combo of WeeMac/A-Rod/Vinnie in behind.

We won't score enough goals, and we'll concede loads. Assuming we don't sign anyone more of any significance we'll fight it out for 5/6/7/8 again.

I agree with the last paragraph but I want to know why you think we will switch to having actual wingers when we haven't since Ernie has been here, and why you think Finkler will be out wide? I think our mids/attack will be:

              A-Rod 

     Roly            WeeMac

             Finkler

     Krishna      Kosta 

Which is a bit light defensively but should be devastating breaking at pace. Hopefully we do that rather than attempting patient tiki taka around halfway for a while before losing the ball.

First Team Squad
530
·
1K
·
almost 11 years

What formation have we been playing in pre - season??

Stage Punch
2.1K
·
11K
·
almost 17 years

Smithy wrote:

Has anyone got any evidence at all that McGlinchey is any kind of a left winger? I've seen no evidence myself.

I think we'll see Kosta and Finkler as the wide players and Krishna as the 9. With Roly the 10 and some combo of WeeMac/A-Rod/Vinnie in behind.

We won't score enough goals, and we'll concede loads. Assuming we don't sign anyone more of any significance we'll fight it out for 5/6/7/8 again.

I agree with the last paragraph but I want to know why you think we will switch to having actual wingers when we haven't since Ernie has been here, and why you think Finkler will be out wide? I think our mids/attack will be:

              A-Rod 

     Roly            WeeMac

             Finkler

     Krishna      Kosta 

Which is a bit light defensively but should be devastating breaking at pace. Hopefully we do that rather than attempting patient tiki taka around halfway for a while before losing the ball.

 

Because Kosta isn't a left forward, for a start. Kosta is a touchline-hugging wide player. I think he'll play right wing. He certainly has been in preseason. I don't know why we would sign the best right wing in the league and play him at left forward? 

I agree my Finkler on the left call is a bit odd. But for me he goes head to head with Roly for the #10 and loses. I'm basing this on my hope and expectation that we'll play two deeper-lying midfielders to protect our back four. Finkler's an odd signing in that respect. I reckon maybe we grabbed him when we were worried that Roly would leave.

I think Roly will win the battle for #10, and so we have to fit Finkler in somewhere. I don't think we'll push Roly back into a defensive role he doesn't want and probably can't do, just to play Finkler in front of him. Instead, I think Finkler will be squeezed out wide.

But, another possibility is that Finkler will play deeper or that he and Roly will both play in advanced roles with just one holding midfielder. That's sort of what we tried to do with Roly and Weeman/A Rod last year though, and it didn't really work. 

Stage Punch
2.1K
·
11K
·
almost 17 years

Cbo wrote:

What formation have we been playing in pre - season??

 

Essentially 4-3-3 in the two games I've watched.

Marquee
5.3K
·
9.5K
·
almost 13 years

Smithy wrote:

Smithy wrote:

Has anyone got any evidence at all that McGlinchey is any kind of a left winger? I've seen no evidence myself.

I think we'll see Kosta and Finkler as the wide players and Krishna as the 9. With Roly the 10 and some combo of WeeMac/A-Rod/Vinnie in behind.

We won't score enough goals, and we'll concede loads. Assuming we don't sign anyone more of any significance we'll fight it out for 5/6/7/8 again.

I agree with the last paragraph but I want to know why you think we will switch to having actual wingers when we haven't since Ernie has been here, and why you think Finkler will be out wide? I think our mids/attack will be:

              A-Rod 

     Roly            WeeMac

             Finkler

     Krishna      Kosta 

Which is a bit light defensively but should be devastating breaking at pace. Hopefully we do that rather than attempting patient tiki taka around halfway for a while before losing the ball.

 

Because Kosta isn't a left forward, for a start. Kosta is a touchline-hugging wide player. I think he'll play right wing. He certainly has been in preseason. I don't know why we would sign the best right wing in the league and play him at left forward? 

I agree my Finkler on the left call is a bit odd. But for me he goes head to head with Roly for the #10 and loses. I'm basing this on my hope and expectation that we'll play two deeper-lying midfielders to protect our back four. Finkler's an odd signing in that respect. I reckon maybe we grabbed him when we were worried that Roly would leave.

I think Roly will win the battle for #10, and so we have to fit Finkler in somewhere. I don't think we'll push Roly back into a defensive role he doesn't want and probably can't do, just to play Finkler in front of him. Instead, I think Finkler will be squeezed out wide.

But, another possibility is that Finkler will play deeper or that he and Roly will both play in advanced roles with just one holding midfielder. That's sort of what we tried to do with Roly and Weeman/A Rod last year though, and it didn't really work. 

No one in our squad is a left forward or winger though, and Ernie has shied away from playing touchline hugging wide players in their natural roles. I think he's going to try to make Kosta into the new Burns. I've put Kosta on the left there but I'd imagine him and Krishna would swap regularly throughout games to make them harder to mark.

I don't think Roly is creative enough or quick enough to get a pass off to play as a 10 and I think he would be more in a box to box role.

Of course, this is why a lot of people , myself included, questioned the Finkler signing. It's hard to fit all these CMs and attackers on the pitch at once, while at the other end of the park we have literally no defensive cover. Seems like a waste of money/squad space in the context of our squad.

Woof Woof
2.7K
·
19K
·
almost 17 years

Smithy wrote:

Smithy wrote:

Has anyone got any evidence at all that McGlinchey is any kind of a left winger? I've seen no evidence myself.

I think we'll see Kosta and Finkler as the wide players and Krishna as the 9. With Roly the 10 and some combo of WeeMac/A-Rod/Vinnie in behind.

We won't score enough goals, and we'll concede loads. Assuming we don't sign anyone more of any significance we'll fight it out for 5/6/7/8 again.

I agree with the last paragraph but I want to know why you think we will switch to having actual wingers when we haven't since Ernie has been here, and why you think Finkler will be out wide? I think our mids/attack will be:

              A-Rod 

     Roly            WeeMac

             Finkler

     Krishna      Kosta 

Which is a bit light defensively but should be devastating breaking at pace. Hopefully we do that rather than attempting patient tiki taka around halfway for a while before losing the ball.

 

Because Kosta isn't a left forward, for a start. Kosta is a touchline-hugging wide player. I think he'll play right wing. He certainly has been in preseason. I don't know why we would sign the best right wing in the league and play him at left forward? 

I agree my Finkler on the left call is a bit odd. But for me he goes head to head with Roly for the #10 and loses. I'm basing this on my hope and expectation that we'll play two deeper-lying midfielders to protect our back four. Finkler's an odd signing in that respect. I reckon maybe we grabbed him when we were worried that Roly would leave.

I think Roly will win the battle for #10, and so we have to fit Finkler in somewhere. I don't think we'll push Roly back into a defensive role he doesn't want and probably can't do, just to play Finkler in front of him. Instead, I think Finkler will be squeezed out wide.

But, another possibility is that Finkler will play deeper or that he and Roly will both play in advanced roles with just one holding midfielder. That's sort of what we tried to do with Roly and Weeman/A Rod last year though, and it didn't really work. 

I think you're right that we'll probably end up playing with two deeper midfielders, but I agree with Conan that Kosta and Krishna will play as wide forwards (or at least it's what I think is Ernie's plan). It's really the kind of set-up he favoured when he was at Victory, and now he seemingly has players to employ that kind of set-up here.

I don't think we'll have a #10 - as I said in a previous post, I think Finkler will be a false 9 (although that's stupid terminology, and I hate using it). Guess what I'm trying to say, I think that Finkler will be a quasi-forward tasked with some 'play-making' duties, and we'll rely on getting one of the 'wide' forwards and midfielders into the box to be goal-scoring threats. 

The problem that Ernie has right now (leaving the backline aside) is that it's hard to find 3 starting spots for Finkler, Roly, and WeeMac, without asking one of them to a) either play a position they're uncomfortable with, or b) where their ability isn't best utilised. Example A would be WeeMac being asked to play a deeper, more defensive role, and example B would be Roly filling that role. That could potentially be solved by playing a flatter three in the middle of the park (with A-Rod in the middle of that three), but we'd probably need to spend a decent chunk of the pre-season working on that. 

First Team Squad
1.2K
·
1.6K
·
almost 15 years

Smithy wrote:

Because Kosta isn't a left forward, for a start. Kosta is a touchline-hugging wide player. I think he'll play right wing. He certainly has been in preseason. I don't know why we would sign the best right wing in the league and play him at left forward? 

I agree my Finkler on the left call is a bit odd. But for me he goes head to head with Roly for the #10 and loses. I'm basing this on my hope and expectation that we'll play two deeper-lying midfielders to protect our back four. Finkler's an odd signing in that respect. I reckon maybe we grabbed him when we were worried that Roly would leave.

I think Roly will win the battle for #10, and so we have to fit Finkler in somewhere. I don't think we'll push Roly back into a defensive role he doesn't want and probably can't do, just to play Finkler in front of him. Instead, I think Finkler will be squeezed out wide.

But, another possibility is that Finkler will play deeper or that he and Roly will both play in advanced roles with just one holding midfielder. That's sort of what we tried to do with Roly and Weeman/A Rod last year though, and it didn't really work. 

I'm pretty sure that when Kosta had his best season in terms of goals (for the Roar) he was playing wider than a central striker, but certainly not touch-line hugging. He's a better player now too.

Also Roly is not a #10. He's great with the ball at his feet but doesn't have the vision or the passing range to be the playmaker. Surely this has been obvious the last couple of seasons. This is where Finkler should shine.

Stage Punch
2.1K
·
11K
·
almost 17 years

el grapadura wrote:

Smithy wrote:

Smithy wrote:

Has anyone got any evidence at all that McGlinchey is any kind of a left winger? I've seen no evidence myself.

I think we'll see Kosta and Finkler as the wide players and Krishna as the 9. With Roly the 10 and some combo of WeeMac/A-Rod/Vinnie in behind.

We won't score enough goals, and we'll concede loads. Assuming we don't sign anyone more of any significance we'll fight it out for 5/6/7/8 again.

I agree with the last paragraph but I want to know why you think we will switch to having actual wingers when we haven't since Ernie has been here, and why you think Finkler will be out wide? I think our mids/attack will be:

              A-Rod 

     Roly            WeeMac

             Finkler

     Krishna      Kosta 

Which is a bit light defensively but should be devastating breaking at pace. Hopefully we do that rather than attempting patient tiki taka around halfway for a while before losing the ball.

 

Because Kosta isn't a left forward, for a start. Kosta is a touchline-hugging wide player. I think he'll play right wing. He certainly has been in preseason. I don't know why we would sign the best right wing in the league and play him at left forward? 

I agree my Finkler on the left call is a bit odd. But for me he goes head to head with Roly for the #10 and loses. I'm basing this on my hope and expectation that we'll play two deeper-lying midfielders to protect our back four. Finkler's an odd signing in that respect. I reckon maybe we grabbed him when we were worried that Roly would leave.

I think Roly will win the battle for #10, and so we have to fit Finkler in somewhere. I don't think we'll push Roly back into a defensive role he doesn't want and probably can't do, just to play Finkler in front of him. Instead, I think Finkler will be squeezed out wide.

But, another possibility is that Finkler will play deeper or that he and Roly will both play in advanced roles with just one holding midfielder. That's sort of what we tried to do with Roly and Weeman/A Rod last year though, and it didn't really work. 

I think you're right that we'll probably end up playing with two deeper midfielders, but I agree with Conan that Kosta and Krishna will play as wide forwards (or at least it's what I think is Ernie's plan). It's really the kind of set-up he favoured when he was at Victory, and now he seemingly has players to employ that kind of set-up here.

I don't think we'll have a #10 - as I said in a previous post, I think Finkler will be a false 9 (although that's stupid terminology, and I hate using it). Guess what I'm trying to say, I think that Finkler will be a quasi-forward tasked with some 'play-making' duties, and we'll rely on getting one of the 'wide' forwards and midfielders into the box to be goal-scoring threats. 

The problem that Ernie has right now (leaving the backline aside) is that it's hard to find 3 starting spots for Finkler, Roly, and WeeMac, without asking one of them to a) either play a position they're uncomfortable with, or b) where their ability isn't best utilised. Example A would be WeeMac being asked to play a deeper, more defensive role, and example B would be Roly filling that role. That could potentially be solved by playing a flatter three in the middle of the park (with A-Rod in the middle of that three), but we'd probably need to spend a decent chunk of the pre-season working on that. 

I can see that working. Sort of. It is in essence what I was talking about but with Finkler and Roy switched. I can see Roy playing off the opposition back four with the aim of giving him a line-breaking run up, and Gui pulling to the left to be a foil for that run. But yours is probably more likely I think.

It is bothersome that Ernie seems to prefer to fit players to his plan rather than his plan to his players. If we're going to ask Kosta to play up front, Roly to play deeper, WeeMac and ARod to be tackling midfielders and Krishna (or Kosta) to play on the left then I think we're hamstringing all of those players by not letting them do what they do.

Further evidence for this policy is poor old Louis. I don't like it much.

I also challenge anyone to give me any evidence that Roly wants to, or is capable of, playing 'box-to-box'. Tim Brown he most certainly is not.

Stage Punch
2.1K
·
11K
·
almost 17 years

I like your comparison to Ernie's Victory boxman. 

Krishna as our Archie?

Appiah without the pace
6.7K
·
19K
·
almost 17 years

Depends if he believes in vacinations

First Team Squad
1.2K
·
1.6K
·
almost 15 years

Smithy wrote:

I also challenge anyone to give me any evidence that Roly wants to, or is capable of, playing 'box-to-box'. Tim Brown he most certainly is not.

What makes you think he is not capable of playing box to box? Spent most of his time in the Eiredivisie either as CB or DM. He is capable of bringing the ball forward from deep, can play as an adequate attacking AM, can score goals and has a good engine. What else is needed to be an effective box to box player?

Stage Punch
2.1K
·
11K
·
almost 17 years

djtim3000 wrote:

Smithy wrote:

I also challenge anyone to give me any evidence that Roly wants to, or is capable of, playing 'box-to-box'. Tim Brown he most certainly is not.

What makes you think he is not capable of playing box to box? Spent most of his time in the Eiredivisie either as CB or DM. He is capable of bringing the ball forward from deep, can play as an adequate attacking AM, can score goals and has a good engine. What else is needed to be an effective box to box player?

 

I never saw him play in the Eredivisie, so I'm basing it on what I've seen of him in the A-League. Did you watch much of him in Holland? 

I haven't seen him come and get the ball off the back four for us. 

Trialist
17
·
32
·
almost 11 years

Looks to me to have been more of a 4-4-2 Diamond so far in pre-season. In my opinion that probably suits our personnel the most, more so than a 4-3-3. We have too many No. 10's that need to be shoehorned into the side to play with a natural CF

First Team Squad
1.2K
·
1.6K
·
almost 15 years

Smithy wrote:

djtim3000 wrote:

Smithy wrote:

I also challenge anyone to give me any evidence that Roly wants to, or is capable of, playing 'box-to-box'. Tim Brown he most certainly is not.

What makes you think he is not capable of playing box to box? Spent most of his time in the Eiredivisie either as CB or DM. He is capable of bringing the ball forward from deep, can play as an adequate attacking AM, can score goals and has a good engine. What else is needed to be an effective box to box player?

 

I never saw him play in the Eredivisie, so I'm basing it on what I've seen of him in the A-League. Did you watch much of him in Holland? 

I haven't seen him come and get the ball off the back four for us. 

I didn't watch, no. But the stats are easy to find. I guess he does not normally pick up the ball off the back four for the Nix because that was never his role. Based on his attributes (what I have actually seen) and playing experience I would say there is evidence he would be capable of playing a box to box role.

Stage Punch
2.1K
·
11K
·
almost 17 years

djtim3000 wrote:

Smithy wrote:

djtim3000 wrote:

Smithy wrote:

I also challenge anyone to give me any evidence that Roly wants to, or is capable of, playing 'box-to-box'. Tim Brown he most certainly is not.

What makes you think he is not capable of playing box to box? Spent most of his time in the Eiredivisie either as CB or DM. He is capable of bringing the ball forward from deep, can play as an adequate attacking AM, can score goals and has a good engine. What else is needed to be an effective box to box player?

 

I never saw him play in the Eredivisie, so I'm basing it on what I've seen of him in the A-League. Did you watch much of him in Holland? 

I haven't seen him come and get the ball off the back four for us. 

I didn't watch, no. But the stats are easy to find. I guess he does not normally pick up the ball off the back four for the Nix because that was never his role. Based on his attributes (what I have actually seen) and playing experience I would say there is evidence he would be capable of playing a box to box role.

So you're basing your opinion on what you haven't seen him do here, but what you think he could do by reading internet reports about the player he was a number of years ago. Fair enough. I guess we will find out!

Groundskeeper Willie
700
·
7.5K
·
over 16 years
I would question the call about Roly having a good engine too. I think he only just gets by with his more attacking role. That's based on watching him play in the HAL
Closed for new posts