RR
·
Bossi Insider
11K
·
34K
·
about 16 years

liberty_nz wrote:

how many of those are kiwi or Aussie?

None, only notable Aussies out of contract atm are:

James Holland

Brett Holman

Adam Sarota

Luke Wilkshire

Marquee
4.5K
·
6.8K
·
about 14 years

RR wrote:

liberty_nz wrote:

how many of those are kiwi or Aussie?

None, only notable Aussies out of contract atm are:

James Holland

Brett Holman

Adam Sarota

Luke Wilkshire

I would imagine James Holland would like to return to Victoria, and Melbourne City can still obviously accommodate tons of new players in their squad if they feel like it.

First Team Squad
1.8K
·
1.9K
·
over 13 years

RR wrote:

liberty_nz wrote:

how many of those are kiwi or Aussie?

None, only notable Aussies out of contract atm are:

James Holland

Brett Holman

Adam Sarota

Luke Wilkshire

We can cross off Holman, off to Brisbane

Marquee
4.5K
·
6.8K
·
about 14 years
dunnix wrote:
RR wrote:
liberty_nz wrote:

how many of those are kiwi or Aussie?

None, only notable Aussies out of contract atm are:

James Holland

Brett Holman

Adam Sarota

Luke Wilkshire

We can cross off Holman, off to Brisbane

That leaves Holland. By Phoenix standards he would be a good acquisition if he is willing to consider our offers.

On the other hand, he is not a defender.

Marquee
5.3K
·
9.5K
·
almost 13 years

Mainland FC wrote:

That leaves Holland. he is not a defender.

he would fit right in then
JBoyd
·
Phoenix Academy
88
·
350
·
over 8 years

Mainland FC wrote:

dunnix wrote:

RR wrote:

liberty_nz wrote:

how many of those are kiwi or Aussie?

None, only notable Aussies out of contract atm are:

James Holland

Brett Holman

Adam Sarota

Luke Wilkshire

We can cross off Holman, off to Brisbane

That leaves Holland. By Phoenix standards he would be a good acquisition if he is willing to consider our offers.

On the other hand, he is not a defender.

#NotADefender

One in a million
4.4K
·
9.6K
·
over 17 years

Our whole team are really wingers!

GK
Phoenix Academy
100
·
410
·
about 11 years

The top 6 Play-off formula

11 wins, 7 Draws and a positive goal difference.  = 40 points.

It will be interesting to see how close we get to this target this season with the squad we have. And, if 40 pts will be enough.

The teams with either 0 goal difference or negative goal difference missed the cut last year, even with only 10 teams.

I've been staring at the table for months now, every time I log on,  so I thought I might as well interpret it.

2015/16 for the record was 7 wins, 4 draws and 16 losses at -20 goal difference for a total of 25 points.

Looks like stopping the goals going in will be the first job. Then trying to win 5 more games than last year.

Starting XI
2.5K
·
3.2K
·
about 12 years

Defenders looking for Jobs: 

Constant Djakpa

Sebastian Boenisch

I guess not in our price range

RR
·
Bossi Insider
11K
·
34K
·
about 16 years

number8 wrote:

Defenders looking for Jobs: 

Constant Djakpa

Sebastian Boenisch

I guess not in our price range

We only have room for Aussie/Kiwis, so they could be willing to play for Maccas coupons and we wouldn't be able to sign them.
Starting XI
2.5K
·
3.2K
·
about 12 years

RR wrote:

number8 wrote:

Defenders looking for Jobs: 

Constant Djakpa

Sebastian Boenisch

I guess not in our price range

We only have room for Aussie/Kiwis, so they could be willing to play for Maccas coupons and we wouldn't be able to sign them.

;-(

Marquee
7.8K
·
9.7K
·
almost 14 years

GK wrote:

The top 6 Play-off formula

11 wins, 7 Draws and a positive goal difference.  = 40 points.

It will be interesting to see how close we get to this target this season with the squad we have. And, if 40 pts will be enough.

The teams with either 0 goal difference or negative goal difference missed the cut last year, even with only 10 teams.

I've been staring at the table for months now, every time I log on,  so I thought I might as well interpret it.

2015/16 for the record was 7 wins, 4 draws and 16 losses at -20 goal difference for a total of 25 points.

Looks like stopping the goals going in will be the first job. Then trying to win 5 more games than last year.

Making the playoffs is a failure IMHO, we need to be aiming for a home semi.

Moar stars
2.1K
·
4.8K
·
over 12 years

Ryan wrote:

GK wrote:

The top 6 Play-off formula

11 wins, 7 Draws and a positive goal difference.  = 40 points.

It will be interesting to see how close we get to this target this season with the squad we have. And, if 40 pts will be enough.

The teams with either 0 goal difference or negative goal difference missed the cut last year, even with only 10 teams.

I've been staring at the table for months now, every time I log on,  so I thought I might as well interpret it.

2015/16 for the record was 7 wins, 4 draws and 16 losses at -20 goal difference for a total of 25 points.

Looks like stopping the goals going in will be the first job. Then trying to win 5 more games than last year.

Making the playoffs is a failure IMHO, we need to be aiming for a home semi.

That's also a failure. We need to with the league and the toilet set you cods. COYN. FIRE UP FARKEN!!!!!!!!!

Marquee
620
·
6.3K
·
about 17 years

Ryan wrote:

GK wrote:

The top 6 Play-off formula

11 wins, 7 Draws and a positive goal difference.  = 40 points.

It will be interesting to see how close we get to this target this season with the squad we have. And, if 40 pts will be enough.

The teams with either 0 goal difference or negative goal difference missed the cut last year, even with only 10 teams.

I've been staring at the table for months now, every time I log on,  so I thought I might as well interpret it.

2015/16 for the record was 7 wins, 4 draws and 16 losses at -20 goal difference for a total of 25 points.

Looks like stopping the goals going in will be the first job. Then trying to win 5 more games than last year.

Making the playoffs is a failure IMHO, we need to be aiming for a home semi.

I can only speculate that if we don't lose to CCM as much that will help.

GK
Phoenix Academy
100
·
410
·
about 11 years

Boro4eva wrote:

[quote=Ryan]

[quote=GK]

The top 6 Play-off formula

I can only speculate that if we don't lose to CCM as much that will help.

Laugh out loud! Good point. The battle of Trafalgar mark2 will be a benchmark for the season to come.

Marquee
7.8K
·
9.7K
·
almost 14 years

nufc_nz wrote:

Ryan wrote:

GK wrote:

The top 6 Play-off formula

11 wins, 7 Draws and a positive goal difference.  = 40 points.

It will be interesting to see how close we get to this target this season with the squad we have. And, if 40 pts will be enough.

The teams with either 0 goal difference or negative goal difference missed the cut last year, even with only 10 teams.

I've been staring at the table for months now, every time I log on,  so I thought I might as well interpret it.

2015/16 for the record was 7 wins, 4 draws and 16 losses at -20 goal difference for a total of 25 points.

Looks like stopping the goals going in will be the first job. Then trying to win 5 more games than last year.

Making the playoffs is a failure IMHO, we need to be aiming for a home semi.

That's also a failure. We need to with the league and the toilet set you cods. COYN. FIRE UP FARKEN!!!!!!!!!

I'm not really a fan of a finals series, excepting that it adds a couple of extra games to a short season, because it rewards a team that peaks at the end and not a team that is consistent across a season. And yes, I know that historically the top two teams win it every year but that will change at some point. So personally I want to win the league first and the toilet seat second, preferably we'll win the double this year and the treble next.

LG
Legend
5.9K
·
24K
·
about 17 years

Have 16 teams and have 15 home games and 15 away games every season. Top teams wins it. Have a team based in Auckland and abandon these travelling road show comedies. A pipe dream I know.

Marquee
5.3K
·
9.5K
·
almost 13 years

I think with a 23 man squad you would hope we have the right mix of players to put out 2 different XIs with every position covered by someone who is comfortable in their role. 

So our 1st XI might look like:

                     Moss

Fenton  Dura       Rossi  Doyle

                        Lia

                Roly     Finkler 

       Kosta   Krishna   WeeMac

2nd XI:

                    Italiano

????        Fox          ????    McGarry*

                     A-Rod

           Ridenton     ????

     Rogerson Watson Parkhouse 

*McGarry is out for months with a knee injury. Might not even still be contracted? Released for winter club football?

Now this is just indicative, obviously the 1st XI might be different. But still, we need a RB, a CB, a CM and probably another LB (at least as injury cover for the first half of the season). There's a few young guys in the setup who could fill some of those spots - Gulley, Rufer, Singh, maybe some more I haven't thought of. Still though it's obvious that we need defensive cover. And for all the talk of a RB we could actually use another LB and another CB still too, even if they're only young guys who are there for worst case scenarios like heaps of injuries and suspensions coinciding with an AWs game. I imagine Rufer or Singh will fill the last CM role.

Budgie lover
620
·
2.2K
·
about 17 years

I thought gulley was alright last year at right back. at least worth another shot.

Marquee
5.3K
·
9.5K
·
almost 13 years

liberty_nz wrote:

I thought gulley was alright last year at right back. at least worth another shot.

I agree but it sounds like Ernie is after someone more experienced.

IMO Gulley is a better RB than Fenton 

Marquee
7.8K
·
9.7K
·
almost 14 years
Marquee
1.2K
·
5.5K
·
almost 14 years

And is Mcgarry? 

Marquee
5.3K
·
9.5K
·
almost 13 years

I think Rufer's contract expired at the end of last season and is yet to be renewed. And McGarry was on a longer contract but was technically released from it to get around restrictions on pro players in the Central League over winter. So I don't think either of them are currently contracted. 

RR
·
Bossi Insider
11K
·
34K
·
about 16 years

Global Game wrote:

And is Mcgarry? 

He has been listed as a contracted player on the A-League website for weeks.

http://www.a-league.com.au/article/your-hyundai-a-league-clubs-contracted-players/oadsanctb2dg1bz3g410xumnp

Marquee
3.3K
·
5.2K
·
over 13 years

Global Game wrote:

And is Mcgarry? 

Marquee
1.2K
·
5.5K
·
almost 14 years

RR wrote:

Global Game wrote:

And is Mcgarry? 

He has been listed as a contracted player on the A-League website for weeks.

http://www.a-league.com.au/article/your-hyundai-a-league-clubs-contracted-players/oadsanctb2dg1bz3g410xumnp

Thank goodness, given his injury. Merrick can call up a youth replacement if he needs.

Legend
7.8K
·
15K
·
about 17 years

liberty_nz wrote:

I thought gulley was alright last year at right back. at least worth another shot.

I agree but it sounds like Ernie is after someone more experienced.

IMO Gulley is a better RB than Fenton 

But not significantly, top four finish better.

Marquee
5.3K
·
9.5K
·
almost 13 years

martinb wrote:

liberty_nz wrote:

I thought gulley was alright last year at right back. at least worth another shot.

I agree but it sounds like Ernie is after someone more experienced.

IMO Gulley is a better RB than Fenton 

But not significantly, top four finish better.

Is there a significantly better RB who is available and would count as a local? 
Phoenix Academy
290
·
410
·
almost 10 years

has Gulley been on the team sheet (even on the bench) in any games recently? Didn't Fox play RB ahead of him and Fenton in the weekend?

For mine Fenton either makes it as a RB this year or gets released. He's lost his directness and sharpness that he had moving forward that he had as a teenager and isn't HAL league quality in the front third as a AM. 

TV
On probation
250
·
4.2K
·
over 13 years
We will go in for storm roux next season so fenton/gulley is fine by me.
RR
·
Bossi Insider
11K
·
34K
·
about 16 years

According to SST (so take with a pinch of salt) we are looking at Shayne D'Cunha, the former Wanderers player for the right back role.

TV
On probation
250
·
4.2K
·
over 13 years
Reece Caira all over again
Marquee
420
·
6.3K
·
over 17 years

It's like we're so close yet so far from being a good team

Starting XI
1.4K
·
4.5K
·
almost 17 years

Ryan wrote:

Is Rufer contracted?

Heard the other week via a Rufer that he was doing some training with the Phoenix but wasn't currently contracted.

Marquee
2.1K
·
8.2K
·
over 17 years

Cosimo wrote:

It's like we're so close yet so far from being a good team

I think the back half of the pitch is still quite a worry.  Both full backs below A-League standard, Durant creaking, no dominant defensive centre midfielder...

Marquee
2.1K
·
8.2K
·
over 17 years

JasperNix wrote:

has Gulley been on the team sheet (even on the bench) in any games recently? Didn't Fox play RB ahead of him and Fenton in the weekend?

For mine Fenton either makes it as a RB this year or gets released. He's lost his directness and sharpness that he had moving forward that he had as a teenager and isn't HAL league quality in the front third as a AM. 

I feel really sorry for Louis, I think he has been badly misused.  He was such an exciting prospect when he joined and trying to turn him into a right back has failed...

Marquee
5.3K
·
9.5K
·
almost 13 years

james dean wrote:

Cosimo wrote:

It's like we're so close yet so far from being a good team

I think the back half of the pitch is still quite a worry.  Both full backs below A-League standard, Durant creaking, no dominant defensive centre midfielder...

Yeah at the defensive end we've lost Siggy, Manny and Riera and have only added Rossi. And we conceded at least 10 more goals than anyone except the woeful Mariners last season. Relative to the other sides our defense was worse than our attack (8th in goals for, only 2 goals behind 7th)
First Team Squad
1.8K
·
1.9K
·
over 13 years

Lots of talk about Michael Essien possibly coming to the league - any chance of FFA giving us the special dispensation to sign him?

I would imagine he would be more 'high-profile' than Diamanti?

Dreams are free...

Legend
7.8K
·
15K
·
about 17 years

james dean wrote:

JasperNix wrote:

has Gulley been on the team sheet (even on the bench) in any games recently? Didn't Fox play RB ahead of him and Fenton in the weekend?

For mine Fenton either makes it as a RB this year or gets released. He's lost his directness and sharpness that he had moving forward that he had as a teenager and isn't HAL league quality in the front third as a AM. 

I feel really sorry for Louis, I think he has been badly misused.  He was such an exciting prospect when he joined and trying to turn him into a right back has failed...

Old conversation ( I know, but what're ya gunna do?), but I think he could have been a decent attacking fullback, but has been let down a bit by his injuries and the overall solidity of the team. If the rest of the team was solid he might have made it. Still might this year...

It's consistency I guess. Both he and Doyle have shown flashes of quality.

valeo
·
Legend
4.7K
·
18K
·
over 17 years

dunnix wrote:

Lots of talk about Michael Essien possibly coming to the league - any chance of FFA giving us the special dispensation to sign him?

I would imagine he would be more 'high-profile' than Diamanti?

Dreams are free...

Has been shipped around to A-League clubs for a good 3 or 4 years it feels like.

You’ll need an account to join the conversation!

Sign in Sign up