Wellington Phoenix Men

Coaching Angst - ZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

2374 replies · 72,193 views Locked
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago

"But former All Whites centre back Herbert was at his defensive best yesterday, pinning the poor results on a lack of finishing, rather than negative tactics."

 
Get stuffed Worth(less)ington.  What is he meant to say "Yes Sam, despite what the stats say we are playing far too defensive".
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
how do people rate this season to season 1 where we basically gave Felipe and Daniel a free role and Lochy was overlapping - and we got the wooden spoon?

Founder

Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
irnbru14 wrote:
james dean wrote:
British players and fans do tend to have an in built bias towards 4-4-2 beacuse most of their sides have traditionally played that way.  It's not the ONLY way to line up a football team though!!
 
It is a tried and trusted and fairly straightforward way to set up a team though, and players should have a fairly good unerstanding of their roles and responsibilities within it.
 
Introducing more complicated formations, like the fluid 4514231433 variant we are doing takes time for people to understand what the should be doing, and even longer for them to naturally know what they should be doing without thinking about it.  A 442 formation for most is a straightforward way of playing with almost pre-defined roles.
 
Asking footballers to think about things on the pitch is always asking for trouble!
 
4-4-2 is one in a long line of 'in vogue' formations.  It is certainly not "the" formation or even "the traditional" formation.  It is just a formation that came to prominence because some teams using it won some things, but that is the same way most formations come to prominence.
 
4-3-3 is probably the most common formation in the world today, and most professionals would have spent some time playing in it.

Incredible stamina. No shame. Yellow Fever.

Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Feverish wrote:
how do people rate this season to season 1 where we basically gave Felipe and Daniel a free role and Lochy was overlapping - and we got the wooden spoon?
 
I think the better question is do people think we are playing and achieving to the potential of the current squad and if not, what are the solutions. Some supporters think the answer is no and those supporters have a range of solutions from; it will come right, just persevere through to major changes required. The views are often strongly held and I don't think many, if any, minds are going to be changed despite the flood of posts.
 
Personally I think the debate is way past its best by date and I'll leave you to it. Suggest we should now focus on building up for Sunday and making sure we get as many along as possible. Taking a group of 20 newbies down so hopefully Wellington and the Nix turn on a great day and we get a few more converts to the cause.
 
Go the Nix !!!
 
Whitby boy2009-09-24 09:39:03
He dribbles a lot and the opposition dont like it - you can see it all over their faces. (Ron Atkinson)
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Smithy wrote:
irnbru14 wrote:
james dean wrote:
British players and fans do tend to have an in built bias towards 4-4-2 beacuse most of their sides have traditionally played that way.  It's not the ONLY way to line up a football team though!!
 
It is a tried and trusted and fairly straightforward way to set up a team though, and players should have a fairly good unerstanding of their roles and responsibilities within it.
 
Introducing more complicated formations, like the fluid 4514231433 variant we are doing takes time for people to understand what the should be doing, and even longer for them to naturally know what they should be doing without thinking about it.  A 442 formation for most is a straightforward way of playing with almost pre-defined roles.
 
Asking footballers to think about things on the pitch is always asking for trouble!
 
4-4-2 is one in a long line of 'in vogue' formations.  It is certainly not "the" formation or even "the traditional" formation.  It is just a formation that came to prominence because some teams using it won some things, but that is the same way most formations come to prominence.
 
4-3-3 is probably the most common formation in the world today, and most professionals would have spent some time playing in it.
 
I said straightforward formation that most professionals brought up on UK based coaching should be very familiar with.  Not "the"or "the traditional" formation, just the easiest one for them to understand and the one they are probably most familiar with.
 
Of course our players who didn't grow up on british derived training and playing may be more familiar with a 433.
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
WOW.
28 pages of
blah blah blah "Its falling apart",
blah blah blah "steady as she goes"
blah blah blah "NO! It's falling apart!"
blah blah blah "NO! Steady as she goes!"
 
 
 
 
 
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
UberGunner wrote:
WOW.
28 pages of
blah blah blah "Its falling apart",
blah blah blah "steady as she goes"
blah blah blah "NO! It's falling apart!"
blah blah blah "NO! It's falling apart!"
blah blah blah "NO! It's falling apart!"
blah blah blah "NO! It's falling apart!"
blah blah blah "NO! It's falling apart!"
blah blah blah "NO! It's falling apart!"
blah blah blah "NO! It's falling apart!"
blah blah blah "NO! It's falling apart!"
blah blah blah "NO! It's falling apart!"
blah blah blah "NO! It's falling apart!"
blah blah blah "NO! It's falling apart!"
blah blah blah "NO! It's falling apart!"
blah blah blah "NO! It's falling apart!"
blah blah blah "NO! It's falling apart!"
blah blah blah "NO! It's falling apart!"
blah blah blah "NO! It's falling apart!"
blah blah blah "NO! It's falling apart!"

Fixed.

How's my driving? - Whine here

Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
This whole thread =
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
UberGunner wrote:
WOW.
28 pages of
blah blah blah "Its falling apart",
blah blah blah "steady as she goes"
blah blah blah "NO! It's falling apart!"
blah blah blah "NO! Steady as she goes!"
 
 
 
 
 
 
Best post of the whole 28 pages. 
Jag2009-09-24 10:07:29

Apparently I'm apathetic, but I couldn't care less.

"Being a Partick Thistle fan sets you apart. It means youre a free thinker. It also means your team has no money." Tim Luckhurst, The Independent, 4th December 2003

Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Does anyone else think that the articles in the paper over the last couple of days was entirely due to what has been written in this thread.
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
2ndBest wrote:
Does anyone else think that the articles in the paper over the last couple of days was entirely due to what has been written in this thread.
 

Founder

Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
I agree with Whitby Boy this debate is way past its use by date, we have what we have.

Lets get on with it, with the injuries, those overseas on maternity leave etc it looks like the team this week may have somewhat of a change over.

Lets get back to supporting OUR team lets get the 3 points which ever way.

Absolutely Positively Wellington

GO THE NIX
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
in order to drag this out just a biut longer, ive stuck a poll up now on the front page
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
How about you qualify it some Marius... or as always do I see you playing your PR game ?

If you are asking about in the entire history of the Phoenix the answer could well be different to how people view this season.  My answer could well be different.
Hard News2009-09-24 11:43:22

How's my driving? - Whine here

Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Meh, fixed it myself.  If you had voted, you will need to vote again on the new more tightly defined proposition.
Hard News2009-09-24 12:11:21

How's my driving? - Whine here

Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Hard News wrote:
Meh, fixed it myself.  If you had voted, you will need to vote again on the new more tightly defined proposition.

What about a
"Don't know" or "Too soon to say"
option?
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago

I was actually interested in views about his coaching of the phoenix throughout our franchise existence. But, still a worthy question if limited to this year.

Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
The picture is also suggestive towards a particular answer

Allegedly

Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
2ndBest wrote:
Does anyone else think that the articles in the paper over the last couple of days was entirely due to what has been written in this thread.
 
I knew I should've copyrighted my argument...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qe_B5CzbTJo - Caceres winning penalty v Perth - footage from the Fever Zone

Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
2ndBest wrote:
Does anyone else think that the articles in the paper over the last couple of days was entirely due to what has been written in this thread.


Nope. Had a brief chin wag with Thommo on our last match of the season a few weeks ago and some of these views were being aired back then. That's before he ruptured his achilles - ouch!

LOLat the Yes/No angst - which makes the new poll on the homepage all the more duff. It's the 'You're either for us, or against us' football poll - where are the in betweens?   HarryHotspur2009-09-24 20:25:39
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
HarryHotspur wrote:
2ndBest wrote:
Does anyone else think that the articles in the paper over the last couple of days was entirely due to what has been written in this thread.


Nope. Had a brief chin wag with Thommo on our last match of the season a few weeks ago and some of these views were being aired back then. That's before he ruptured his achilles - ouch!

LOLat the Yes/No angst - which makes the new poll on the homepage all the more duff. It's the 'You're either for us, or against us' football poll - where are the in betweens?   
 
I can just see it - after a big win (this weekend) Herbert standing on the decks of Te Kaha under a big "Mission Accomplished" banner

14/11/09

Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Hard News wrote:
Meh, fixed it myself.  If you had voted, you will need to vote again on the new more tightly defined proposition.
 
just checked the poll. gotta laugh.
 
you planning to start over a third time News?
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
One may point to the stats and say that we had less chances at goal compare to the same time in the previous seasons and you will be right. But you then have to consider that the other team has less chances at our goal as well compared to previous seasons, in fact they were very dominating with their attempts compared to our attempts in the previous seasons.

Right now the improvement for our team this season is that the other team are not dominating as the seasons before and that we are (per game) roughly similar in the attempts and so are competitive statistically even tho we are slightly behind in the attempts.

One has to point to the change in possession % to realise that we have, for large period of match time, controlled the game and moving the ball around. In fact there are many comments and observations is that we constantly have the ball and that the opposition hasn't touched the ball hardly for long periods.

However, we have lapsed in the late middle period and sometimes in the end period and allowed the opposition to get right back. This time period is where we need to improve on. It will increase our goal attempts and possessions if we are able to get on top this time period. The sub bench has had a mixed impact during this time as well. This has being addressed a bit with Carecre on board. The rest of the bench is a bit of a worry.

Generally;

In the earlier games, Bertos tends to drop down a gear later in the game but had a strong presence at the beginning of the game., Ifill had fitness issues, Daniel was off the bench as a very late impact, Greenache was just starting to be familar with the set up. Mckain was in the midfield to hold down it all down with varied results.

After a few games in, Bertos was on fire, Ifill was having a more stronger influence the game but fades half way through the second half because of fitness, Daniel gets on eariler as sub, McKain is still in the midfield but ineffective and Lia starts to get some time off the bench. Brown getting to his normal self.

Recently, Bertos had given way to Daniel, Lia who both has been given gametime because of good form and Ifill is stamping his presence even more in the game and lasting longer. Greenache still working hard and McKain has performed better as CB rather than Midfield. However in the second half the performance of Daniel, Ifill on occasions and Bertos has faded all of a sudden, probably due to fitness. Daniel is still trying to get to full match fitness to perform the whole match. Ifill is getting frustrated with of not having the support he had before with Bertos and Daniel fading and Bertos has faded due to peaking too early in a game by trying too much and not pacing for the middle period. This lets in the opposition midfield to control the game in the second half. Brown is getting confident on the odd attack but he has been on and off in the second half.

In the last game after Ifill had to be subbed, Daniel was tried and subbed, Bertos was tired subbed and the midfield opposition got a long enough time to get back in. However besides Careare, we have a very tamed bench.

The fitness of the three of our key attacking players have faded at the same time without similar quality players to replace them from the bench.

I wonder if we are trying too much all at once with key attacking players buzzing all over the field but not pacing themselves or rotating among themselves in long enough chunks. Are the players aware of their own current limits? We must ask ourselves, is the microrest between the players are too short in the game? Is it better to have one of the three key attackers take the back seat for 20-30 minutes by being a supportive player rather than all three taking rapid turns as the on and off again pivot of attack during the whole match, as it helps us to control the whole game and not run out of steam and let the other team in?

Consistent Game Fitness is key for these players and longer endurance helps but it takes the whole season before everyone are sprinting full throttle during the whole game like the South Koreans national team players.

What measures are they doing to combat this low point of the match during the season as well as building up to the end of the season thrust?

I can think of some game drills with players having a secret playing role given to them and do a couple of changed roles throughout the game and applied different pressured situations that can help them learn to adapt smoothly without losing overall team pressure. But I have found such drills are useful but can be hard to read for some players, regardless how good they are, to get a smooth and quicker transition that will take some time to master.

However I assume that at professional level, there are better linkage between players which solve the varied playing roles and how that help them to be quicker in adapting to the conditions and improving their on-field awareness.

Anyway basically, it is the bench and that low point of the match that is frustrating and it affects the outcome. However having said that, the attacks that we have been doing have been done with effective and varied attacks based on good possession and control. Something that we didn't have a full grip of last season.
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
any chance of summarising that post into a couple of clear statements?

Oi Oi Edgecumbe... lets have a clean sheet

Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
any chance of summarising that post into a couple of clear statements?
 
Pace yourselves
Get fitter
Stronger bench

Apparently I'm apathetic, but I couldn't care less.

"Being a Partick Thistle fan sets you apart. It means youre a free thinker. It also means your team has no money." Tim Luckhurst, The Independent, 4th December 2003

Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
HarryHotspur wrote:
2ndBest wrote:
Does anyone else think that the articles in the paper over the last couple of days was entirely due to what has been written in this thread.


Nope. Had a brief chin wag with Thommo on our last match of the season a few weeks ago and some of these views were being aired back then. That's before he ruptured his achilles - ouch!

LOLat the Yes/No angst - which makes the new poll on the homepage all the more duff. It's the 'You're either for us, or against us' football poll - where are the in betweens?   
 
Actually I was think more that the editor saw this kind of talk here and, thinking it is a good story, went through their football contacts to find someone who agreed with it to write the story.
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Fair Nuff. Still not sure a thread would command such attention but then the idea has to spring from somewhere...HarryHotspur2009-09-25 12:31:26
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
I don't get this...in the last 3-4 games we've had the bulk of the chances. The biggest problem has not been converting those chances. (and that has to fall at the likes of Greenacre and Brown's feet)
valeo2009-09-26 00:14:13

a.haak

Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Brown maybe, but Greenacre hasn't manufactured, or been presented with (depending on your viewpoint), more than one or two half chances in the last 4 games.
 
Anyway the coaching game is one of  fine lines. Look at David Mitchell's Perth tonight: hopelessly lethargic, hardly a shot on goal, yet they grab a late penalty to win against the run of play and Mitchell is able to boast that his team has two away wins in a row since god knows when. Ricki must be green with envy....
StopOut2009-09-26 00:30:45
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Sack Ricki.

Just messin'.
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
This thread should be fun over the next few days.

Three for me, and two for them.

Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Blaming Ricki = Automatic loss of credibility
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
ScoobyD wrote:
Blaming Ricki = Automatic loss of credibility

for some. It's the easy option. Because nobody wants to touch the team.
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago

No one is playing close enough to Greenacre

Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Stefan wrote:
ScoobyD wrote:
Blaming Ricki = Automatic loss of credibility

for some. It's the easy option. Because nobody wants to touch the team.
 
Doesn't exactly seem to be a shortage of player criticism from week to week though.
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
2 moments summed it up for me today -
 
Lochhead getting into a good position 2nd half to cross, put a low ball across, went behind Greenacre who ran towards front post, and landed at the feet of...yep, nobody, because nobody else was up front.
 
Another was when we defended a corner second half, it was cleared up to halfway, but since we insist on having EVERYONE back for corners, they got the ball again and we invited another attack immediately after clearing the danger from the corner!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qe_B5CzbTJo - Caceres winning penalty v Perth - footage from the Fever Zone

Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Giving the ball away via the hoof was a strong feature of the game. Thought Siggy was culpable in particular, but because he is my hero I'm ok for it to happen once.HarryHotspur2009-09-27 20:32:15
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
bringing costa and marco on was a good attacking option although im not sure what Hearfield brought to the mix

" If you only have a hammer you tend to see every problem as a nail" - maslow

Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Yup, I thought Ifill was really trying to get Costa involved.
Permalink Permalink

This topic is locked.