Wellington Phoenix Men

Crowds - The thread of Australian whining

4604 replies · 379,731 views
14 Jan 23:13

Jaickin wrote:

patrick478 wrote:

If you want a story - there's a much bigger and more relevant one than this about the club that one could report on if they did a little digging.

Ok is it a good or bad story for the club? 

Nixie sex tape.

Good or bad probably depends on your point of view.

By golly, I never knew I was a deviant until now. Must see. 

14 Jan 23:18

Jaickin wrote:

Jaickin wrote:

patrick478 wrote:

If you want a story - there's a much bigger and more relevant one than this about the club that one could report on if they did a little digging.

Ok is it a good or bad story for the club? 

Nixie sex tape.

Good or bad probably depends on your point of view.

By golly, I never knew I was a deviant until now. Must see. 

The number of views it gets is one of our metrics, so click away!

People like Coldplay and voted for the Nazis. You can't trust people.

15 Jan 04:01 · edited 15 Jan 04:01 · History

patrick478 wrote:

The Phoenix are a private entity that have no obligation to report crowd figures.

They can just stop reporting crowd figures publicly completely and this issue goes away entirely. Is that what you want AP?

Why not then, if, as you say, the numbers mean nothing.
15 Jan 04:03

patrick478 wrote:

patrick478 wrote:

The discrepancy has been for longer than just this year though. I wasn't totally convinced with Dome's explanation and saw one set of figures where there were a couple of hundred difference and thought - could be, then another of about 1000 difference and thought - no way.

If this is widespread and AFA know about it, then not really a problem, if its not and AFA suspect skulduggery it won't help the Nix case in their fight for survival.

I'd think that everyone does it and wants give the impression to everyone but the tax man that they have more people watching than actually are.

Every club does it in the A-League. Super Rugby/Breaker/Warriors/ITM Cup all do it too. 

It's a complete non-story.

No its not, just because all A League clubs 'do it' doesn't mean its a non story. If its done for more than just because a couple of 100 per game get let in the back door to attend functions in the hospitality suite - you're right but we are talking thousands here sometimes. What is the purpose of counting attendance? it must have a reason other wise they wouldn't do it. Of course, because attendence numbers drive sponsorship and media revenue, at a stretch, if its an orchestrated plan, its fraudulent. Also mentioned, attendance is one of our metrics for staying in the A League. Of course its a fudgeing story.

Show me where there are discrepancies of over 2000 people please (you said thousands)

There was in the article I saw but I'm not going to bother searching for it
15 Jan 04:08

patrick478 wrote:

The discrepancy has been for longer than just this year though. I wasn't totally convinced with Dome's explanation and saw one set of figures where there were a couple of hundred difference and thought - could be, then another of about 1000 difference and thought - no way.

If this is widespread and AFA know about it, then not really a problem, if its not and AFA suspect skulduggery it won't help the Nix case in their fight for survival.

I'd think that everyone does it and wants give the impression to everyone but the tax man that they have more people watching than actually are.

Every club does it in the A-League. Super Rugby/Breaker/Warriors/ITM Cup all do it too. 

It's a complete non-story.

No its not, just because all A League clubs 'do it' doesn't mean its a non story. If its done for more than just because a couple of 100 per game get let in the back door to attend functions in the hospitality suite - you're right but we are talking thousands here sometimes. What is the purpose of counting attendance? it must have a reason other wise they wouldn't do it. Of course, because attendence numbers drive sponsorship and media revenue, at a stretch, if its an orchestrated plan, its fraudulent. Also mentioned, attendance is one of our metrics for staying in the A League. Of course its a fudgeing story.

How could it be fraudulent? Stadium attendance numbers are purely a count from the ticket scanners, if there's 100s of people entering who aren't scanning tickets for whatever reason then even a rough estimate which includes them is bound to be more accurate than the scanned ticket count? Short of facial recognition or RFIDs embedded in every possible attendees skull or something how else can you count attendance?

If crowd attenance figures are used to substantiate a sponsorship amount, or assistance in a better media deal or used to support a proposal to stay in the A League and the numbers are delibrately fudged (actual word) to support any of those - it would be fraudulent. Clear?
15 Jan 04:18 · edited 15 Jan 05:52 · History

patrick478 wrote:

patrick478 wrote:

The discrepancy has been for longer than just this year though. I wasn't totally convinced with Dome's explanation and saw one set of figures where there were a couple of hundred difference and thought - could be, then another of about 1000 difference and thought - no way.

If this is widespread and AFA know about it, then not really a problem, if its not and AFA suspect skulduggery it won't help the Nix case in their fight for survival.

I'd think that everyone does it and wants give the impression to everyone but the tax man that they have more people watching than actually are.

Every club does it in the A-League. Super Rugby/Breaker/Warriors/ITM Cup all do it too.

It's a complete non-story.

No its not, just because all A League clubs 'do it' doesn't mean its a non story. If its done for more than just because a couple of 100 per game get let in the back door to attend functions in the hospitality suite - you're right but we are talking thousands here sometimes. What is the purpose of counting attendance? it must have a reason other wise they wouldn't do it. Of course, because attendence numbers drive sponsorship and media revenue, at a stretch, if its an orchestrated plan, its fraudulent. Also mentioned, attendance is one of our metrics for staying in the A League. Of course its a fudgeing story.

Show me where there are discrepancies of over 2000 people please (you said thousands)

There was in the article I saw but I'm not going to bother searching for it

The figure that they gave in the article was a difference of 941 last season per game, this season it's around 490.

The article states that last year it was 13.8%, this season its 7.2%, the article states that the Australian A-League teams are among the worst offenders, and also that the Warriors are at 28%.

The number is probably inflated because of the sponsors. Any sponsors (and the A-League) are going to do due diligence anyway, and the stadium figures are publicly available.

It's completely a non story.

I'm intrigued as to what this real story is though. I'm guessing Gui went to Brazil to try and convince his family to return.

15 Jan 04:41

Ryan wrote:

patrick478 wrote:

patrick478 wrote:

The discrepancy has been for longer than just this year though. I wasn't totally convinced with Dome's explanation and saw one set of figures where there were a couple of hundred difference and thought - could be, then another of about 1000 difference and thought - no way.

If this is widespread and AFA know about it, then not really a problem, if its not and AFA suspect skulduggery it won't help the Nix case in their fight for survival.

I'd think that everyone does it and wants give the impression to everyone but the tax man that they have more people watching than actually are.

Every club does it in the A-League. Super Rugby/Breaker/Warriors/ITM Cup all do it too.

It's a complete non-story.

No its not, just because all A League clubs 'do it' doesn't mean its a non story. If its done for more than just because a couple of 100 per game get let in the back door to attend functions in the hospitality suite - you're right but we are talking thousands here sometimes. What is the purpose of counting attendance? it must have a reason other wise they wouldn't do it. Of course, because attendence numbers drive sponsorship and media revenue, at a stretch, if its an orchestrated plan, its fraudulent. Also mentioned, attendance is one of our metrics for staying in the A League. Of course its a fudgeing story.

Show me where there are discrepancies of over 2000 people please (you said thousands)

There was in the article I saw but I'm not going to bother searching for it

The figure that they gave in the article was a difference of 941 last season, this season it's around 490.

The article states that last year it was 13.8%, this season its 7.2%, the article states that the Australian A-League teams are among the worst offenders, and also that the Warriors are at 28%.

The number is probably inflated because of the sponsors. Any sponsors (and the A-League) are going to do due diligence anyway, and the stadium figures are publicly available.

It's completely a non story.

I'm intrigued as to what this real story is though. I'm guessing Gui went to Brazil to try and convince his family to return.

#nixiesextape

People like Coldplay and voted for the Nazis. You can't trust people.

15 Jan 04:48

]If crowd attenance figures are used to substantiate a sponsorship amount, or assistance in a better media deal or used to support a proposal to stay in the A League and the numbers are delibrately fudged (actual word) to support any of those - it would be fraudulent. Clear?

But if the numbers reported by the club include all those not scanning in with barcodes etc, then surely they would be more accurate and therefore not fraudulent? 
15 Jan 09:00

Kyle1502 wrote:

]If crowd attenance figures are used to substantiate a sponsorship amount, or assistance in a better media deal or used to support a proposal to stay in the A League and the numbers are delibrately fudged (actual word) to support any of those - it would be fraudulent. Clear?

But if the numbers reported by the club include all those not scanning in with barcodes etc, then surely they would be more accurate and therefore not fraudulent? 

I think you mean higher, not more accurate lol
15 Jan 19:53

Ryan wrote:

I'm intrigued as to what this real story is though. I'm guessing Gui went to Brazil to try and convince his family to return.

#nixiesextape

Nixie and Gui sex tape which is why he needed to go get his family to come back?

15 Jan 22:50

Bananas wrote:

Ryan wrote:

I'm intrigued as to what this real story is though. I'm guessing Gui went to Brazil to try and convince his family to return.

#nixiesextape

Nixie and Gui sex tape which is why he needed to go get his family to come back?

I'm going to assume Litfin was involved too, which is why he's been released

People like Coldplay and voted for the Nazis. You can't trust people.

16 Jan 19:09

Bananas wrote:

Ryan wrote:

I'm intrigued as to what this real story is though. I'm guessing Gui went to Brazil to try and convince his family to return.

#nixiesextape

Nixie and Gui sex tape which is why he needed to go get his family to come back?

I'm going to assume Litfin was involved too, which is why he's been released

and Ernie

Oi Oi Edgecumbe... lets have a clean sheet

16 Jan 22:30

Bananas wrote:

Ryan wrote:

I'm intrigued as to what this real story is though. I'm guessing Gui went to Brazil to try and convince his family to return.

#nixiesextape

Nixie and Gui sex tape which is why he needed to go get his family to come back?

I'm going to assume Litfin was involved too, which is why he's been released

and Ernie

All of a sudden the off field changes this season are piecing together.

17 Jan 02:02

You can't drop a bomb like that and run away Patrick... dish it

17 Jan 20:43

A stupid thing for him to even say. He can't expect to remain a trusted insiders of the club when he dishes up that kind of bullshark.

20 Jan 01:00

A stupid thing for him to even say. He can't expect to remain a trusted insiders of the club when he dishes up that kind of bullshark.

Especially when Nixie's reputation is at stake.

Actually, getting outplayed quite a bit these days

19 Feb 06:37

Everyone keeps on saying, assemble a team that performs and wins and fan numbers will increase. This team has yet to really carve anyone up and frankly, I would be surprised now if they did. Despite lots of hope and seeing dreams get crushed. Saturday night said it all.

Proud to have attended the first 175 Consecutive "Home" Wellington Phoenix "A League" Games !!

The Ruf, The Ruf, The Ruf is on Fire!!

19 Feb 06:40

About 5 weeks before they are back at the ROF so hopefully they can improve things before then.


GET YOUR SHIRTS OFF FOR THE BOYS

19 Feb 08:22

ballane wrote:

About 5 weeks before they are back at the ROF so hopefully they can improve things before then.

Another long break before they play at ROF. 

Super egg ball and the NRL will be in full swing and the average sports fan will have forgotten about the Nix by than.

19 Feb 08:23 · edited 19 Feb 08:23 · History

ballane wrote:

About 5 weeks before they are back at the ROF so hopefully they can improve things before then.

That's quite soon, as far as this season goes!

Oi Oi Edgecumbe... lets have a clean sheet

19 Feb 08:29

At a time where we really need to get in there and support the team and they are not here. Still debating whether or not to miss my first Nix A League game up in North harbour. All that driving for another effort like that??

Proud to have attended the first 175 Consecutive "Home" Wellington Phoenix "A League" Games !!

The Ruf, The Ruf, The Ruf is on Fire!!

19 Feb 21:50

I don't think the shift to Saturday nights has helped.

19 Feb 21:51

djtim3000 wrote:

About the crowds, my feeling is that there has never been a season where the weather has been as consistently terrible pretty much every single RoF game-day.

We might get away with that as an excuse but away in NP, Hamilton and Auckland the weather was nice.

Proud to have attended the first 175 Consecutive "Home" Wellington Phoenix "A League" Games !!

The Ruf, The Ruf, The Ruf is on Fire!!

19 Feb 22:16

Purely anecdotal but I feel like some of our best crowds last year were Friday nights.

Although I can drink on Friday night games so that may have affected my vision and I could be completely wrong.

19 Feb 22:32

I did an analysis on crowds at some point and think Friday games were our worst crowds :) 


Allegedly

20 Feb 00:10

2ndBest wrote:

I don't think the shift to Saturday nights has helped.

Dont think it really matters what nite its on at the moment until the team can turn in some consistent BETTER performances i cant see crowds improving much any time soon. That and our traveling circus  i dont think helps in any way in attracting a crowd.

GET YOUR SHIRTS OFF FOR THE BOYS

20 Feb 00:41

We've always (usually?) had  bad seasons but our crowds (in Wellington) aren't usually this low. Over the last 9 season we've tired to build community club to try get the family crowd in on Sunday afternoon. Which worked reasonably well because there isn't a lot of competition with other events in that time slot. But with all the Saturday crowd it certainly exposes you to a different market. And with that time slot you are competing with a lot of other things on. 

20 Feb 01:09

Tegal wrote:

I did an analysis on crowds at some point and think Friday games were our worst crowds :) 

My alternative facts are telling me that Friday nights get the highest crowds ever and are always sunny.

20 Feb 02:38

Fake news???

Proud to have attended the first 175 Consecutive "Home" Wellington Phoenix "A League" Games !!

The Ruf, The Ruf, The Ruf is on Fire!!

20 Feb 03:46

2ndBest wrote:

We've always (usually?) had  bad seasons but our crowds (in Wellington) aren't usually this low. Over the last 9 season we've tired to build community club to try get the family crowd in on Sunday afternoon. Which worked reasonably well because there isn't a lot of competition with other events in that time slot. But with all the Saturday crowd it certainly exposes you to a different market. And with that time slot you are competing with a lot of other things on. 

It's a shame the weather has been so bad at a number of games this season, makes it hard to definitively tell if the move to more Saturday games has had an effect. 

Our best crowds were Sunday afternoon iirc, so it likely does hurt having most games move to Saturday. Although selfishly, I'm not complaining. 


Allegedly

20 Feb 04:19

I think we can all agree that any time is better than Sunday night

People like Coldplay and voted for the Nazis. You can't trust people.

20 Feb 05:00

2ndBest wrote:

We've always (usually?) had  bad seasons but our crowds (in Wellington) aren't usually this low. Over the last 9 season we've tired to build community club to try get the family crowd in on Sunday afternoon. Which worked reasonably well because there isn't a lot of competition with other events in that time slot. But with all the Saturday crowd it certainly exposes you to a different market. And with that time slot you are competing with a lot of other things on. 

Continued bad seasons works like compounding interest in a savings account...only the wrong way round!

Was never much of a Sunday 5pm fan, but in retrospect that was probably our best time for crowds. I even remember quite a lot of good weather back in those good old days!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qe_B5CzbTJo - Caceres winning penalty v Perth - footage from the Fever Zone

20 Feb 07:28

Lonegunmen wrote:

djtim3000 wrote:

About the crowds, my feeling is that there has never been a season where the weather has been as consistently terrible pretty much every single RoF game-day.

We might get away with that as an excuse but away in NP, Hamilton and Auckland the weather was nice.

Hamilton was mainly rubbish until the weenix match had finished.

20 Feb 07:30

I think we can all agree that any time is better than Sunday night

Sunday nights are brutal for us useless Rapa fans with work on Monday.  Though no more so than those Tuesdays, the things we do for our club :)