Wellington Phoenix Men

Crowds - The thread of Australian whining

4604 replies · 379,731 views
12 Jan 05:58

If you are holding a special promotion to attract Mormons, you don't hold that promotion on a Sunday do you? Likewise if you holf a promotion for kids, it needs to be at a time that suits kids [or the parents that would be bringing them]

And there you go again, using common sense to discuss FFA decisions. Will you never learn?

Actually, getting outplayed quite a bit these days

12 Jan 06:18

Didn't all clubs do the kids free thing this weekend? I'm pretty sure Victory did.

If so then its out of the clubs hands and in the realm of the FFA - or actually that man in Canada that Dome said does all the scheduling.

12 Jan 06:27

Ryan54 wrote:

ballane wrote:

As a matter of interest is anyone aware if any of the clubs in Aussie have a 7pm kickoff on a Sunday as a regular time slot. Yes im aware 7 here is mostly 5 or earlier over there.Im aware they use it on a Friday and Saturday but think Perth might be the only ones who have used it on a Sunday.

They generally have Perth play at 5pm on Sunday, which is 7pm eastern. So generally no games at 7 on the east coast.

As i suspected NO teams in Aussie are expected to kick off at 7 on a Sunday on aregualar basis,yet not only are we given that time but we get a number of them. Then again must help the FFA throw at us that we are failing in our metrics.I just dont get how people can think 7pm on a Sunday is a good time schedule a game of football.

GET YOUR SHIRTS OFF FOR THE BOYS

12 Jan 08:54

Ryan wrote:

Didn't all clubs do the kids free thing this weekend? I'm pretty sure Victory did.

If so then its out of the clubs hands and in the realm of the FFA - or actually that man in Canada that Dome said does all the scheduling.

Was a HAL wide promotion. pretty sure it was the first time it's been done

12 Jan 09:26

Fail on our situation. Everyone knows it is a fail on a Sunday nitht for us and I suspect the FFA know that too going on previous experience. We had one game at an earlier time on a Saturday once and there were kids everywhere so to speak. A really good attendence.

Proud to have attended the first 175 Consecutive "Home" Wellington Phoenix "A League" Games !!

The Ruf, The Ruf, The Ruf is on Fire!!

12 Jan 09:46

Ryan wrote:

Didn't all clubs do the kids free thing this weekend? I'm pretty sure Victory did.

If so then its out of the clubs hands and in the realm of the FFA - or actually that man in Canada that Dome said does all the scheduling.

It was an FFA promotion - given that the Phoenix charge just $2 for kids, it was hardly the bargain of the century and doubt it did much for getting more families along. 

The higher numbers were more likely due to it being the school holidays. I took my 7 year old nephew (who has yet to see the Phoenix lose, this was his 4th game) but had it being during school time, his parents wouldn't have let him go

https://thejourneyfan.blogspot.co.nz/

New Zealand Football Media Association Website of the year 2015 & 2016

12 Jan 10:10

Ryan54 wrote:

ballane wrote:

As a matter of interest is anyone aware if any of the clubs in Aussie have a 7pm kickoff on a Sunday as a regular time slot. Yes im aware 7 here is mostly 5 or earlier over there.Im aware they use it on a Friday and Saturday but think Perth might be the only ones who have used it on a Sunday.

They generally have Perth play at 5pm on Sunday, which is 7pm eastern. So generally no games at 7 on the east coast.

Not necessarily, IIRC Brisbane it would be 7pm but Sydney would be 8pm.

12 Jan 10:23

liberty_nz wrote:

Ryan54 wrote:

ballane wrote:

As a matter of interest is anyone aware if any of the clubs in Aussie have a 7pm kickoff on a Sunday as a regular time slot. Yes im aware 7 here is mostly 5 or earlier over there.Im aware they use it on a Friday and Saturday but think Perth might be the only ones who have used it on a Sunday.

They generally have Perth play at 5pm on Sunday, which is 7pm eastern. So generally no games at 7 on the east coast.

Not necessarily, IIRC Brisbane it would be 7pm but Sydney would be 8pm.

Never on a Sunday though.

Yellow Fever - Misery loves company

12 Jan 02:41

Got sent here:

So interesting article by Liam here saying that the Nix are counting higher crowds than what Westpac does

http://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/football/a-league/882...

"The gap between the home attendances reported by the Wellington Phoenix and Westpac Stadium is widening, although the football club says the explanation is simple.

Across four seasons from 2011 to 2015, the Phoenix's reported average home attendances for each season at the Cake Tin were between 2.2 and 4.5 per cent higher than what the stadium reported.

But last season the gap was 13.8 per cent, with the Phoenix reporting an average Westpac Stadium attendance of 7748 and the stadium saying it was 6807. This season the gap was 7.2 per cent in the first three games, excluding the New Year's Day match against Adelaide United."

I'm an optimistic pessimist. 
I'm positive things will go wrong.
12 Jan 03:39

Best game I saw at Westpac (in 2010) when we won in front of 24,000 was from memory a Sunday 4pm kick-off.

"At the end of the drive the lawmen arrive...

I'll take my chance because luck is on my side or something...

Her name is Rio, she don't need to understand...

Oh Rio, Rio, hear them shout across the land..."

12 Jan 03:41

Perth? We got a penalty?

Proud to have attended the first 175 Consecutive "Home" Wellington Phoenix "A League" Games !!

The Ruf, The Ruf, The Ruf is on Fire!!

12 Jan 03:44

Lonegunmen wrote:

Perth? We got a penalty?

I was thinking v Newcastle. Game before Perth.

"At the end of the drive the lawmen arrive...

I'll take my chance because luck is on my side or something...

Her name is Rio, she don't need to understand...

Oh Rio, Rio, hear them shout across the land..."

12 Jan 04:02 · edited 12 Jan 04:03 · History

Yakcall wrote:

Got sent here:

So interesting article by Liam here saying that the Nix are counting higher crowds than what Westpac does

http://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/football/a-league/882...

"The gap between the home attendances reported by the Wellington Phoenix and Westpac Stadium is widening, although the football club says the explanation is simple.

Across four seasons from 2011 to 2015, the Phoenix's reported average home attendances for each season at the Cake Tin were between 2.2 and 4.5 per cent higher than what the stadium reported.

But last season the gap was 13.8 per cent, with the Phoenix reporting an average Westpac Stadium attendance of 7748 and the stadium saying it was 6807. This season the gap was 7.2 per cent in the first three games, excluding the New Year's Day match against Adelaide United."

It's a beat up over nothing. Dome explained why it happens, the article also said that the Warriors had a 28% discrepancy and other teams in the A-League also have a bigger discrepancy than the Phoenix. 

Another way of writing the article would be "Phoenix have most accurate crowd reporting statistics"

12 Jan 04:06

Jerzy Merino wrote:

Lonegunmen wrote:

Perth? We got a penalty?

I was thinking v Newcastle. Game before Perth.

You've got them the wrong way around.

Yellow Fever - Misery loves company

12 Jan 04:09

Ryan wrote:

Yakcall wrote:

Got sent here:

So interesting article by Liam here saying that the Nix are counting higher crowds than what Westpac does

http://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/football/a-league/882...

"The gap between the home attendances reported by the Wellington Phoenix and Westpac Stadium is widening, although the football club says the explanation is simple.

Across four seasons from 2011 to 2015, the Phoenix's reported average home attendances for each season at the Cake Tin were between 2.2 and 4.5 per cent higher than what the stadium reported.

But last season the gap was 13.8 per cent, with the Phoenix reporting an average Westpac Stadium attendance of 7748 and the stadium saying it was 6807. This season the gap was 7.2 per cent in the first three games, excluding the New Year's Day match against Adelaide United."

It's a beat up over nothing. Dome explained why it happens, the article also said that the Warriors had a 28% discrepancy and other teams in the A-League also have a bigger discrepancy than the Phoenix. 

Another way of writing the article would be "Phoenix have most accurate crowd reporting statistics"

I don't understand how the two groups (in every case) can have different numbers. Surely there's just one number.

12 Jan 04:13

inafoxhole wrote:

Ryan wrote:

Yakcall wrote:

Got sent here:

So interesting article by Liam here saying that the Nix are counting higher crowds than what Westpac does

http://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/football/a-league/882...

"The gap between the home attendances reported by the Wellington Phoenix and Westpac Stadium is widening, although the football club says the explanation is simple.

Across four seasons from 2011 to 2015, the Phoenix's reported average home attendances for each season at the Cake Tin were between 2.2 and 4.5 per cent higher than what the stadium reported.

But last season the gap was 13.8 per cent, with the Phoenix reporting an average Westpac Stadium attendance of 7748 and the stadium saying it was 6807. This season the gap was 7.2 per cent in the first three games, excluding the New Year's Day match against Adelaide United."

It's a beat up over nothing. Dome explained why it happens, the article also said that the Warriors had a 28% discrepancy and other teams in the A-League also have a bigger discrepancy than the Phoenix. 

Another way of writing the article would be "Phoenix have most accurate crowd reporting statistics"

I don't understand how the two groups (in every case) can have different numbers. Surely there's just one number.

Did you even read the article?

Yellow Fever - Misery loves company

12 Jan 04:50

inafoxhole wrote:

I don't understand how the two groups (in every case) can have different numbers. Surely there's just one number.

The article states variations, like people let in free/early that dont go through the gates, and he said people who are let in when the barcode scanners don't work.

I just wonder where they get accurate numbers of people not being scanned through.

12 Jan 09:42

Bananas wrote:

inafoxhole wrote:

I don't understand how the two groups (in every case) can have different numbers. Surely there's just one number.

The article states variations, like people let in free/early that dont go through the gates, and he said people who are let in when the barcode scanners don't work.

I just wonder where they get accurate numbers of people not being scanned through.

Dome said in the article that sometimes they have people counting, other times they have clickers, and sometimes they just have to estimate.

12 Jan 10:06

that sounded like a load of rubbish from Dome to me

Founder

12 Jan 17:55

So can I assume we are all in agreement on one thing? That the Bar Code readers & or  the Tickets/Season Tickets are crap when it comes to admitting one into a game? And therein lays the problem.

Proud to have attended the first 175 Consecutive "Home" Wellington Phoenix "A League" Games !!

The Ruf, The Ruf, The Ruf is on Fire!!

12 Jan 22:10

The discrepancy has been for longer than just this year though. I wasn't totally convinced with Dome's explanation and saw one set of figures where there were a couple of hundred difference and thought - could be, then another of about 1000 difference and thought - no way.

If this is widespread and AFA know about it, then not really a problem, if its not and AFA suspect skulduggery it won't help the Nix case in their fight for survival.

I'd think that everyone does it and wants give the impression to everyone but the tax man that they have more people watching than actually are.

12 Jan 22:17

The discrepancy has been for longer than just this year though. I wasn't totally convinced with Dome's explanation and saw one set of figures where there were a couple of hundred difference and thought - could be, then another of about 1000 difference and thought - no way.

If this is widespread and AFA know about it, then not really a problem, if its not and AFA suspect skulduggery it won't help the Nix case in their fight for survival.

I'd think that everyone does it and wants give the impression to everyone but the tax man that they have more people watching than actually are.

Every club does it in the A-League. Super Rugby/Breaker/Warriors/ITM Cup all do it too. 

It's a complete non-story.


Yellow Fever - Misery loves company

12 Jan 22:39

Ryan wrote:

Another way of writing the article would be "Phoenix have most accurate crowd reporting statistics"

Ryan summed it up best here.

Silly sensationilist headlines.

12 Jan 23:01

The other clubs A, didn't have a change in the size of discrepancies take place last year at B, a time when their metrics became extra important.

12 Jan 23:01

Bananas wrote:

Ryan wrote:

Another way of writing the article would be "Phoenix have most accurate crowd reporting statistics"

Ryan summed it up best here.

Silly sensationilist headlines.

Slow season

Actually, getting outplayed quite a bit these days

13 Jan 01:40

patrick478 wrote:

Jerzy Merino wrote:

Lonegunmen wrote:

Perth? We got a penalty?

I was thinking v Newcastle. Game before Perth.

You've got them the wrong way around.

You're right. All these play-off games... 

"At the end of the drive the lawmen arrive...

I'll take my chance because luck is on my side or something...

Her name is Rio, she don't need to understand...

Oh Rio, Rio, hear them shout across the land..."

13 Jan 04:28

patrick478 wrote:

The discrepancy has been for longer than just this year though. I wasn't totally convinced with Dome's explanation and saw one set of figures where there were a couple of hundred difference and thought - could be, then another of about 1000 difference and thought - no way.

If this is widespread and AFA know about it, then not really a problem, if its not and AFA suspect skulduggery it won't help the Nix case in their fight for survival.

I'd think that everyone does it and wants give the impression to everyone but the tax man that they have more people watching than actually are.

Every club does it in the A-League. Super Rugby/Breaker/Warriors/ITM Cup all do it too. 

It's a complete non-story.

No its not, just because all A League clubs 'do it' doesn't mean its a non story. If its done for more than just because a couple of 100 per game get let in the back door to attend functions in the hospitality suite - you're right but we are talking thousands here sometimes. What is the purpose of counting attendance? it must have a reason other wise they wouldn't do it. Of course, because attendence numbers drive sponsorship and media revenue, at a stretch, if its an orchestrated plan, its fraudulent. Also mentioned, attendance is one of our metrics for staying in the A League. Of course its a fudgeing story.
13 Jan 04:43

patrick478 wrote:

The discrepancy has been for longer than just this year though. I wasn't totally convinced with Dome's explanation and saw one set of figures where there were a couple of hundred difference and thought - could be, then another of about 1000 difference and thought - no way.

If this is widespread and AFA know about it, then not really a problem, if its not and AFA suspect skulduggery it won't help the Nix case in their fight for survival.

I'd think that everyone does it and wants give the impression to everyone but the tax man that they have more people watching than actually are.

Every club does it in the A-League. Super Rugby/Breaker/Warriors/ITM Cup all do it too. 

It's a complete non-story.

No its not, just because all A League clubs 'do it' doesn't mean its a non story. If its done for more than just because a couple of 100 per game get let in the back door to attend functions in the hospitality suite - you're right but we are talking thousands here sometimes. What is the purpose of counting attendance? it must have a reason other wise they wouldn't do it. Of course, because attendence numbers drive sponsorship and media revenue, at a stretch, if its an orchestrated plan, its fraudulent. Also mentioned, attendance is one of our metrics for staying in the A League. Of course its a fudgeing story.

How could it be fraudulent? Stadium attendance numbers are purely a count from the ticket scanners, if there's 100s of people entering who aren't scanning tickets for whatever reason then even a rough estimate which includes them is bound to be more accurate than the scanned ticket count? Short of facial recognition or RFIDs embedded in every possible attendees skull or something how else can you count attendance?

People like Coldplay and voted for the Nazis. You can't trust people.

13 Jan 06:45 · edited 13 Jan 06:46 · History

It's not beyond the realm of reason that the team, sponsors, local government, etc. would up their support and bring in more people through the non ticketed entry ways during a save the nix campaign.

13 Jan 12:34

patrick478 wrote:

The discrepancy has been for longer than just this year though. I wasn't totally convinced with Dome's explanation and saw one set of figures where there were a couple of hundred difference and thought - could be, then another of about 1000 difference and thought - no way.

If this is widespread and AFA know about it, then not really a problem, if its not and AFA suspect skulduggery it won't help the Nix case in their fight for survival.

I'd think that everyone does it and wants give the impression to everyone but the tax man that they have more people watching than actually are.

Every club does it in the A-League. Super Rugby/Breaker/Warriors/ITM Cup all do it too. 

It's a complete non-story.

No its not, just because all A League clubs 'do it' doesn't mean its a non story. If its done for more than just because a couple of 100 per game get let in the back door to attend functions in the hospitality suite - you're right but we are talking thousands here sometimes. What is the purpose of counting attendance? it must have a reason other wise they wouldn't do it. Of course, because attendence numbers drive sponsorship and media revenue, at a stretch, if its an orchestrated plan, its fraudulent. Also mentioned, attendance is one of our metrics for staying in the A League. Of course its a fudgeing story.

Show me where there are discrepancies of over 2000 people please (you said thousands)

Yellow Fever - Misery loves company

13 Jan 12:36

The Phoenix are a private entity that have no obligation to report crowd figures.

They can just stop reporting crowd figures publicly completely and this issue goes away entirely. Is that what you want AP?


Yellow Fever - Misery loves company

13 Jan 12:40

If you want a story - there's a much bigger and more relevant one than this about the club that one could report on if they did a little digging.


Yellow Fever - Misery loves company

13 Jan 13:46

patrick478 wrote:

If you want a story - there's a much bigger and more relevant one than this about the club that one could report on if they did a little digging.

This sounds interesting.

13 Jan 17:00

patrick478 wrote:

If you want a story - there's a much bigger and more relevant one than this about the club that one could report on if they did a little digging.

People like Coldplay and voted for the Nazis. You can't trust people.

13 Jan 18:43

expecting a crowd of 30,000 tonight 

Founder

13 Jan 19:45

me and a friend coming down so make that 30,002

13 Jan 20:37

patrick478 wrote:

If you want a story - there's a much bigger and more relevant one than this about the club that one could report on if they did a little digging.

"Then dig it ...  "

"At the end of the drive the lawmen arrive...

I'll take my chance because luck is on my side or something...

Her name is Rio, she don't need to understand...

Oh Rio, Rio, hear them shout across the land..."

13 Jan 21:02

Feverish wrote:

expecting a crowd of 30,000 tonight 

If only. That really would be an awesome day.

Proud to have attended the first 175 Consecutive "Home" Wellington Phoenix "A League" Games !!

The Ruf, The Ruf, The Ruf is on Fire!!

14 Jan 22:44

patrick478 wrote:

If you want a story - there's a much bigger and more relevant one than this about the club that one could report on if they did a little digging.

Ok is it a good or bad story for the club? 

14 Jan 23:12

Jaickin wrote:

patrick478 wrote:

If you want a story - there's a much bigger and more relevant one than this about the club that one could report on if they did a little digging.

Ok is it a good or bad story for the club? 

Nixie sex tape.

Good or bad probably depends on your point of view.

People like Coldplay and voted for the Nazis. You can't trust people.