Wellington Phoenix Men

Phoenix Ownership - Rob says FTFFA

4003 replies · 795,143 views
over 10 years ago

Warwick Hunt wrote:

Tegal wrote:

yeah we've always had more of a walk up croud. I honestly think that is partially to do with weather. Easier to commit to a season of games when you live in a warmer climate. 



Supporters commit to a club, on a game by game basis or for a season for many reasons, but a warmer clime in terms of commitment is only relevant to fair-weather visitors.  

Sadly the majority of people at any sporting event in NZ, with an admission price, are attenders or pot hunters not supporters/fans.

The walk-up croud is another myth propagated by the majority of the NZ media, who will not recognise that most people in NZ prefer to watch sport from home on a big screen. Other excuses include ticket prices, beer prices, food prices, quality of food and quality of beer  

[ btw: preaching to the converted, not having a pop :-) ]

You forgot stadium shape and length of weekend.

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

God those membership numbers are frustrating.

Perth has 2 million people, just over 5000 members.

Wellington 400k ish 3600 members.

Surely anyone with half a brain cell can see Wellnix isn't the weakness that a picture of a half empty stadium implies.

Maybe the A League is losing money hand over fist and we are their scapegoats while they try to fix the mismanagement.  Then if they fix the mismanagement they can say it was the Nix the whole time.

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

Oska wrote:

This, I would much rather A-Rod and Roly in their early 20s than someone who played for a big European club but is on the way down. Right now our imports are all good A-League players who are costing a fraction of a Romario, Fowler, Del Piero, Heskey or Kewell. Also, this is yet another criticism that you could level at every other club in the league. Clubs have figured out that you can get a way better result on the field for a lower price and have sell-on value by signing good quality imports in their 20s who don't have the price tag a big name brings. The biggest foreign name in the league last year was probably Janko. This year it's probably someone like Berisha, who made is name in the A-League, not before it.

Broich and Berisha for sure. Could argue that Bonevacia is another one (maybe not quite a 'big name' yet though). 
Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

Warwick Hunt wrote:

Tegal wrote:

yeah we've always had more of a walk up croud. I honestly think that is partially to do with weather. Easier to commit to a season of games when you live in a warmer climate. 

Supporters commit to a club, on a game by game basis or for a season for many reasons, but a warmer clime in terms of commitment is only relevant to fair-weather visitors.  

Sadly the majority of people at any sporting event in NZ, with an admission price, are attenders or pot hunters not supporters/fans.

The walk-up croud is another myth propagated by the majority of the NZ media, who will not recognise that most people in NZ prefer to watch sport from home on a big screen. Other excuses include ticket prices, beer prices, food prices, quality of food and quality of beer  

[ btw: preaching to the converted, not having a pop :-) ]

Beer, ticket and food prices aren't a myth to most.  It's what has kept me away from entertainment at the stadium until I was on an OK wage.

Why should I shell out a hundred bucks for a game when I paid for it live on TV anyway? Especially if the weather is shark.

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

Drunk_Monk wrote:

Warwick Hunt wrote:

Tegal wrote:

yeah we've always had more of a walk up croud. I honestly think that is partially to do with weather. Easier to commit to a season of games when you live in a warmer climate. 

Supporters commit to a club, on a game by game basis or for a season for many reasons, but a warmer clime in terms of commitment is only relevant to fair-weather visitors.  

Sadly the majority of people at any sporting event in NZ, with an admission price, are attenders or pot hunters not supporters/fans.

The walk-up croud is another myth propagated by the majority of the NZ media, who will not recognise that most people in NZ prefer to watch sport from home on a big screen. Other excuses include ticket prices, beer prices, food prices, quality of food and quality of beer  

[ btw: preaching to the converted, not having a pop :-) ]

Beer, ticket and food prices aren't a myth to most.  It's what has kept me away from entertainment at the stadium until I was on an OK wage.

Why should I shell out a hundred bucks for a game when I paid for it live on TV anyway? Especially if the weather is shark.

Because if everyone thought like you we wouldn't have a club?

Normo's coming home

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago · edited over 10 years ago · History

Even Ifill - who arguably had his best years behind him when he left Crystal Palace - had an immense "Indian Summer" with the Nix. He came here early enough.  

I actually think people are a bit unfair on del Piero - a failure on the pitch? At least in his in his first year Down Under he showed us some excellent skills, and he never behaved like a pompous ass. A true gentleman off the pitch (despite milking penalties on the pitch, but then he's an Italian football star after all).

Actually, getting outplayed quite a bit these days

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

Ryan wrote:

Warwick Hunt wrote:

Tegal wrote:

yeah we've always had more of a walk up croud. I honestly think that is partially to do with weather. Easier to commit to a season of games when you live in a warmer climate. 



Supporters commit to a club, on a game by game basis or for a season for many reasons, but a warmer clime in terms of commitment is only relevant to fair-weather visitors.  

Sadly the majority of people at any sporting event in NZ, with an admission price, are attenders or pot hunters not supporters/fans.

The walk-up croud is another myth propagated by the majority of the NZ media, who will not recognise that most people in NZ prefer to watch sport from home on a big screen. Other excuses include ticket prices, beer prices, food prices, quality of food and quality of beer  

[ btw: preaching to the converted, not having a pop :-) ]

You forgot stadium shape and length of weekend.



I agree that the timing of the fixture on Labour Day Weekend was unfortunate. This would have been an ideal weekend to repeat the Napier fixture of two years ago. Altho' there were a lot of complaints about taking an early season game away from Wellington, admittedly complicated by taking a second early season fixture away from the 'Tin 

Stadium shape, we're stuck with, unless the pitch is rotated by 90 degrees. Always thought this was an option worth investigation, which would require minor 'reconfiguration' of the stadium to vastly improve the venue fpr a croud of under 10,000
Tickets? Tickets? We talkin’ about tickets?

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

james dean wrote:

Drunk_Monk wrote:

Warwick Hunt wrote:

Tegal wrote:

yeah we've always had more of a walk up croud. I honestly think that is partially to do with weather. Easier to commit to a season of games when you live in a warmer climate. 

Supporters commit to a club, on a game by game basis or for a season for many reasons, but a warmer clime in terms of commitment is only relevant to fair-weather visitors.  

Sadly the majority of people at any sporting event in NZ, with an admission price, are attenders or pot hunters not supporters/fans.

The walk-up croud is another myth propagated by the majority of the NZ media, who will not recognise that most people in NZ prefer to watch sport from home on a big screen. Other excuses include ticket prices, beer prices, food prices, quality of food and quality of beer  

[ btw: preaching to the converted, not having a pop :-) ]

Beer, ticket and food prices aren't a myth to most.  It's what has kept me away from entertainment at the stadium until I was on an OK wage.

Why should I shell out a hundred bucks for a game when I paid for it live on TV anyway? Especially if the weather is shark.

Because if everyone thought like you we wouldn't have a club?

Unfortunately they don't take good thoughts at the gates as payment, they demand money, and so do the overpriced food stands.

I can afford it now, but couldn't back then.  Plenty of people can't afford it so picking on them for not being able to afford it is hardly fair.

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

Wow been our getting pissed at the demise of my club. Take a look and buggar we have support from all over. Ya go us. Talk about warm fuzzed. Shark it I'm still going to get pissed.


GET YOUR SHIRTS OFF FOR THE BOYS

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

Drunk_Monk wrote:

God those membership numbers are frustrating.

Perth has 2 million people, just over 5000 members.

Wellington 400k ish 3600 members.

Surely anyone with half a brain cell can see Wellnix isn't the weakness that a picture of a half empty stadium implies.

Maybe the A League is losing money hand over fist and we are their scapegoats while they try to fix the mismanagement.  Then if they fix the mismanagement they can say it was the Nix the whole time.

That was what I was trying to say with the population-adjusted croud comparisons....

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

Still got the timber from the Hutt Rec stadium?

Whack that up in the middle of the cake tin!

West Island - Central Coast Mariners

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago · edited over 10 years ago · History

james dean wrote:

Drunk_Monk wrote:

Warwick Hunt wrote:

Tegal wrote:

yeah we've always had more of a walk up croud. I honestly think that is partially to do with weather. Easier to commit to a season of games when you live in a warmer climate. 

Supporters commit to a club, on a game by game basis or for a season for many reasons, but a warmer clime in terms of commitment is only relevant to fair-weather visitors.  

Sadly the majority of people at any sporting event in NZ, with an admission price, are attenders or pot hunters not supporters/fans.

The walk-up croud is another myth propagated by the majority of the NZ media, who will not recognise that most people in NZ prefer to watch sport from home on a big screen. Other excuses include ticket prices, beer prices, food prices, quality of food and quality of beer  

[ btw: preaching to the converted, not having a pop :-) ]

Beer, ticket and food prices aren't a myth to most.  It's what has kept me away from entertainment at the stadium until I was on an OK wage.

Why should I shell out a hundred bucks for a game when I paid for it live on TV anyway? Especially if the weather is shark.

Because if everyone thought like you we wouldn't have a club?



Don't drink or eat at the stadium?

Tickets have been available for $10-$12 at 'Nix games at the Stadium in the Huawei Zone or in Aisle 30-something for several seasons, including the current one. 

btw: EPL doesn't allow drinking at your GBP 30+ seat, you have to be in a Season-ticket bar, no view of the pitch (I may be out of touch, as haven't been for several years)    
Tickets? Tickets? We talkin’ about tickets?

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

Ryan wrote:

EXALDEAR wrote:

Glad to see Adelaide come out in support as well. If anyone from Victory comes out in support the FFA will have officially pissed of the golden boy at the table. If Kevin Muscat spraks out I will finally grudgingly have some respect for the man.

Never happen, Muscat is too much of a shark cod.

I would normally Agree with that, except for the Ernie factor. Support the man that supported you for seasons.

Be obscure clearly
Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

james dean wrote:

As more information comes to light, I am a little bit more optimistic that this can be turned around. I didn't realise that this decision was the last of the outgoing FFA board and while it was announced under the auspices of the new board, there is a chance that they might be swayed. It would certainly be easier for them to reverse or modify the decision than if it was them that made the decision and were involved in the build up to it. I'm certain, if there is a flicker of a chance in the short term, those that can will be manning the phones and gathering support in high places in Australian football,. I can envisage a 'counter offer' being tabled that provides some face saving by FFA and probably some concessions from Welnix. Welnix would have to decide if it was palatable or not to continue. Cockerill made some good comments about Welnix not really grasping the concept of being involved in the sports entertainment industry and he is possibly right. Maybe we should have signed a high profile Marquee a la Del Piero [or do so if we have a future] to generate more interest in the game on both sides of the Tasman. I've made special trips from Napier to see the likes of DP and Robbie Fowler and I'm sure plenty of others did the same thing when they played their own teams here or in Oz. Maybe this can be turned around by us making a few concessions and the FFA being harassed by the power brokers at other A League Clubs. 

I have to say I reckon that is complete BS analysis from Cockerill.  This is a sports team and you have to be judged by how your team does on the pitch.  I think we can use our import slots better and use transfers to sell the club and to sell memberships - I think for far too long the guys you see as the faces of the club have been Dura, Siggie, Manny and Vinnie which isn't exactly box office.  But in the end Fowler and Del Piero were failures on the pitch and that's not the way forward for the club

"staunch advocate of kiwi values", autocratic governance - traits that could bristle with those at FFA HQ.

This may be the identity of why an acceptable deal can't be agreed to.

A dislike of personalities - where the FFA, or Welnix for that matter, can't see things changing, more than any specific 'metric'.

A fan is a fan.

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

Gordinho wrote:

Drunk_Monk wrote:

God those membership numbers are frustrating.

Perth has 2 million people, just over 5000 members.

Wellington 400k ish 3600 members.

Surely anyone with half a brain cell can see Wellnix isn't the weakness that a picture of a half empty stadium implies.

Maybe the A League is losing money hand over fist and we are their scapegoats while they try to fix the mismanagement.  Then if they fix the mismanagement they can say it was the Nix the whole time.

That was what I was trying to say with the population-adjusted croud comparisons....

Yea those were awesome man, made an easy apples to apples comparison I thought.

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

Warwick Hunt wrote:

Ryan wrote:

Warwick Hunt wrote:

Tegal wrote:

yeah we've always had more of a walk up croud. I honestly think that is partially to do with weather. Easier to commit to a season of games when you live in a warmer climate. 

Supporters commit to a club, on a game by game basis or for a season for many reasons, but a warmer clime in terms of commitment is only relevant to fair-weather visitors.  

Sadly the majority of people at any sporting event in NZ, with an admission price, are attenders or pot hunters not supporters/fans.

The walk-up croud is another myth propagated by the majority of the NZ media, who will not recognise that most people in NZ prefer to watch sport from home on a big screen. Other excuses include ticket prices, beer prices, food prices, quality of food and quality of beer  

[ btw: preaching to the converted, not having a pop :-) ]

You forgot stadium shape and length of weekend.

I agree that the timing of the fixture on Labour Day Weekend was unfortunate. This would have been an ideal weekend to repeat the Napier fixture of two years ago. Altho' there were a lot of complaints about taking an early season game away from Wellington, admittedly complicated by taking a second early season fixture away from the 'Tin 

Stadium shape, we're stuck with, unless the pitch is rotated by 90 degrees. Always thought this was an option worth investigation, which would require minor 'reconfiguration' of the stadium to vastly improve the venue fpr a croud of under 10,000

I modeled this configuration in sketchup a while back, images on this forum if you can be bothered looking.

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

Any chance of the Fever Elite putting out a press release thanking the other clubs' fans for all their support? (a few trolls aside)

I've been genuinely stoked and a little surprised by just how much support we've got :)

This is a great idea. I'll get on to it tomorrow

End of an era.  Vinnie - It's over.

If anyone cares for my inane babbling follow @iluvnix17 on the Twitter.

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

Mainland FC wrote:

Even Ifill - who arguably had his best years behind him when he left Crystal Palace - had an immense "Indian Summer" with the Nix. He came here early enough.  

I actually think people are a bit unfair on del Piero - a failure on the pitch? At least in his in his first year Down Under he showed us some excellent skills, and he never behaved like a pompous ass. A true gentleman off the pitch (despite milking penalties on the pitch, but then he's an Italian football star after all).

My biggest problem with "big name" marquees is that they look to shortcut creating clubs and the league their own identity. Remember the angst with all the Liverpool shirts in the RoF when Fowler came? And all our chants directed at him were Liverpool based. I'm gutted I never saw Del Piero live, but I know if I had a big part of me would have been hoping to see some magic from him. I much prefer a Berisha who I can hate unconditionally. I prefer us bringing the big names out when they are closer to their prime and still part of a big team - as part of friendlies. That avoids the novelty wearing off too.
You know we belong together...

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

Warwick Hunt wrote:

james dean wrote:

Drunk_Monk wrote:

Warwick Hunt wrote:

Tegal wrote:

yeah we've always had more of a walk up croud. I honestly think that is partially to do with weather. Easier to commit to a season of games when you live in a warmer climate. 

Supporters commit to a club, on a game by game basis or for a season for many reasons, but a warmer clime in terms of commitment is only relevant to fair-weather visitors.  

Sadly the majority of people at any sporting event in NZ, with an admission price, are attenders or pot hunters not supporters/fans.

The walk-up croud is another myth propagated by the majority of the NZ media, who will not recognise that most people in NZ prefer to watch sport from home on a big screen. Other excuses include ticket prices, beer prices, food prices, quality of food and quality of beer  

[ btw: preaching to the converted, not having a pop :-) ]

Beer, ticket and food prices aren't a myth to most.  It's what has kept me away from entertainment at the stadium until I was on an OK wage.

Why should I shell out a hundred bucks for a game when I paid for it live on TV anyway? Especially if the weather is shark.

Because if everyone thought like you we wouldn't have a club?

Don't drink or eat at the stadium?

Tickets have been available for $10-$12 at 'Nix games at the Stadium in the Huawei Zone or in Aisle 30-something for several seasons, including the current one. 

btw: EPL doesn't allow drinking at your GBP 30+ seat, you have to be in a Season-ticket bar (I may be out of touch, as haven't been for several years)    

Come on down to the stadium and smell the food and drink you can't afford, to experience telling your kids no they can't have a hotdog for acouple hours while you sit in the cheap seats.

Advertising campaign writes itself.

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

Drunk_Monk wrote:

Gordinho wrote:

Drunk_Monk wrote:

God those membership numbers are frustrating.

Perth has 2 million people, just over 5000 members.

Wellington 400k ish 3600 members.

Surely anyone with half a brain cell can see Wellnix isn't the weakness that a picture of a half empty stadium implies.

Maybe the A League is losing money hand over fist and we are their scapegoats while they try to fix the mismanagement.  Then if they fix the mismanagement they can say it was the Nix the whole time.

That was what I was trying to say with the population-adjusted croud comparisons....

Yea those were awesome man, made an easy apples to apples comparison I thought.

I still don't understand why when we have a core group of 6k fans we only have 3600 members.  It doesn't make sense to me!

The % of population numbers can be misleading.  You've got to be realistic about whether people on the North Shore in Sydney are realistically going to watch WSW for example - the Sydney metro area is massive and it's not really a fair comparison.  There are also so many other things to do in a city like Sydney - I understand the point of the stat but it's not as simple as people make out.

I still don't know why we couldn't get more than 6k on Saturday night.  It was a great day and there were plenty of people in town. 

Normo's coming home

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago · edited over 10 years ago · History

Ryan wrote:

Warwick Hunt wrote:

Tegal wrote:

yeah we've always had more of a walk up croud. I honestly think that is partially to do with weather. Easier to commit to a season of games when you live in a warmer climate. 



Supporters commit to a club, on a game by game basis or for a season for many reasons, but a warmer clime in terms of commitment is only relevant to fair-weather visitors.  

Sadly the majority of people at any sporting event in NZ, with an admission price, are attenders or pot hunters not supporters/fans.

The walk-up croud is another myth propagated by the majority of the NZ media, who will not recognise that most people in NZ prefer to watch sport from home on a big screen. Other excuses include ticket prices, beer prices, food prices, quality of food and quality of beer  

[ btw: preaching to the converted, not having a pop :-) ]

You forgot stadium shape and length of weekend.

The first part is a challenge I'm sure the owners are aware.

It shouldn't be an excuse. It's good to have TV viewer demand, more the better for the $'s

What doesn't help is the semi regular shark performances. The new punters goes to a couple of games of that in a 16-20 % full stadium where the players are dots, can't blame them for thinking, nah. 

This goes with the second part where are lot of those problems point to a better stadium for football and for the fans, supporters and entertainment seekers.

Maybe the owners should start stepping up to present and give as weight to a claim for 10+ years. Obviously the FFA want to see more and know they wouldn't accept relative croud figures or a warm fuzzy feeling as actual. 

An actual 5,000+ members, 10k+ plus crouds and consistent performance to get the average Joe to take a Sky look.

Australia is competitive and you have to be naive to think that other people aren't after yours. Especially larger targets like national football franchises. One usually has to be moving forward  faster than the kiwi average and one can't let ours be the easiest bar to jump over.

Now, I would be disappointed if the owners chucked it in. 

There two ways here to say F.U., that and the one with self belief and action.

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

Drunk_Monk wrote:

Warwick Hunt wrote:

james dean wrote:

Drunk_Monk wrote:

Warwick Hunt wrote:

Tegal wrote:

yeah we've always had more of a walk up croud. I honestly think that is partially to do with weather. Easier to commit to a season of games when you live in a warmer climate. 

Supporters commit to a club, on a game by game basis or for a season for many reasons, but a warmer clime in terms of commitment is only relevant to fair-weather visitors.  

Sadly the majority of people at any sporting event in NZ, with an admission price, are attenders or pot hunters not supporters/fans.

The walk-up croud is another myth propagated by the majority of the NZ media, who will not recognise that most people in NZ prefer to watch sport from home on a big screen. Other excuses include ticket prices, beer prices, food prices, quality of food and quality of beer  

[ btw: preaching to the converted, not having a pop :-) ]

Beer, ticket and food prices aren't a myth to most.  It's what has kept me away from entertainment at the stadium until I was on an OK wage.

Why should I shell out a hundred bucks for a game when I paid for it live on TV anyway? Especially if the weather is shark.

Because if everyone thought like you we wouldn't have a club?

Don't drink or eat at the stadium?

Tickets have been available for $10-$12 at 'Nix games at the Stadium in the Huawei Zone or in Aisle 30-something for several seasons, including the current one. 

btw: EPL doesn't allow drinking at your GBP 30+ seat, you have to be in a Season-ticket bar (I may be out of touch, as haven't been for several years)    

Come on down to the stadium and smell the food and drink you can't afford, to experience telling your kids no they can't have a hotdog for acouple hours while you sit in the cheap seats.

Advertising campaign writes itself.

you were lucky! You had a seat...
Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago · edited over 10 years ago · History

Drunk_Monk wrote:

Warwick Hunt wrote:

james dean wrote:

Drunk_Monk wrote:

Warwick Hunt wrote:

Tegal wrote:

yeah we've always had more of a walk up croud. I honestly think that is partially to do with weather. Easier to commit to a season of games when you live in a warmer climate. 

Supporters commit to a club, on a game by game basis or for a season for many reasons, but a warmer clime in terms of commitment is only relevant to fair-weather visitors.  

Sadly the majority of people at any sporting event in NZ, with an admission price, are attenders or pot hunters not supporters/fans.

The walk-up croud is another myth propagated by the majority of the NZ media, who will not recognise that most people in NZ prefer to watch sport from home on a big screen. Other excuses include ticket prices, beer prices, food prices, quality of food and quality of beer  

[ btw: preaching to the converted, not having a pop :-) ]

Beer, ticket and food prices aren't a myth to most.  It's what has kept me away from entertainment at the stadium until I was on an OK wage.

Why should I shell out a hundred bucks for a game when I paid for it live on TV anyway? Especially if the weather is shark.

Because if everyone thought like you we wouldn't have a club?

Don't drink or eat at the stadium?

Tickets have been available for $10-$12 at 'Nix games at the Stadium in the Huawei Zone or in Aisle 30-something for several seasons, including the current one. 

btw: EPL doesn't allow drinking at your GBP 30+ seat, you have to be in a Season-ticket bar (I may be out of touch, as haven't been for several years)    

Come on down to the stadium and smell the food and drink you can't afford, to experience telling your kids no they can't have a hotdog for acouple hours while you sit in the cheap seats.

Advertising campaign writes itself.

Personally I go to a game to experience live sport.This is a habit/affliction based on growing up in England at a time when going to the game involved minimal expense beyond the turnstile fee and half-time entertainment was someone peeing on the terraces, hopefully not on your jeans. 

Of course taking children to the game is a different issue, one which you've only raised a few comments into the discussion 

My main point is that NZ is not a country of unconditional support, whatever the code. The Warriors and Breakers attendance, above the hardcore,  is hugely dependent on winning games.The Breakers didn't consider moving to the Vector until they'd won at least one Championship.
When I first came to NZ in the early 90s, Auckland held the Shield for ten years and still had attendance of under 5,000

I don't want to get into a 'slanging' match with a fellow supporter :-) COYN!

Tickets? Tickets? We talkin’ about tickets?

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

New Zealand First are pushing for Jonathan Coleman (Minister of Sport) to get in touch with his Australian counterparts to discuss how dropping the Phoenix goes against the Closer Economic Relations agreement between NZ and Aussie. 

Whether this happens remains to be seen, however if we can convince the Australian Government to look into it along side the support from the other A-League clubs and things start to look a little bit brighter.

Still surprises me why the FFA made the announcement 3 rounds into the season as it gives the Phoenix more time to rally support to put pressure back on the FFA but hey it might just be our saviour.

Pro football is like nuclear warfare. There are no winners, only survivors. -- Frank Gifford

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago · edited over 10 years ago · History

auskiwi wrote:

Ryan wrote:

Warwick Hunt wrote:

Tegal wrote:

yeah we've always had more of a walk up croud. I honestly think that is partially to do with weather. Easier to commit to a season of games when you live in a warmer climate. 



Supporters commit to a club, on a game by game basis or for a season for many reasons, but a warmer clime in terms of commitment is only relevant to fair-weather visitors.  

Sadly the majority of people at any sporting event in NZ, with an admission price, are attenders or pot hunters not supporters/fans.

The walk-up croud is another myth propagated by the majority of the NZ media, who will not recognise that most people in NZ prefer to watch sport from home on a big screen. Other excuses include ticket prices, beer prices, food prices, quality of food and quality of beer  

[ btw: preaching to the converted, not having a pop :-) ]

You forgot stadium shape and length of weekend.

The first part is the challenge I'm sure the owners are aware.

What doesn't help is the semi regular shark performances. The new punters goes to a couple of games of semi shark performances in a 16-20 % full stadium and the players are dots, can't blame them for thinking, nah. 

This goes with the second part where are lot of those problems point to a better stadium for football and for the fans, supporters and entertainment seekers.



There was a pre-season "Meet the Season-ticket holders" session at RNYC, where one of the 'shocking' statistics was, the majority of occasional stadium attenders to a Phoenix game only go if they think the Phoenix are going to win. That wasn't presented as a condemnation of those supporters, just a recognition of the NZ culture of reasons for attendance at a live game of a team they support 
Tickets? Tickets? We talkin’ about tickets?

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

Warwick Hunt wrote:

Drunk_Monk wrote:

Warwick Hunt wrote:

james dean wrote:

Drunk_Monk wrote:

Warwick Hunt wrote:

Tegal wrote:

yeah we've always had more of a walk up croud. I honestly think that is partially to do with weather. Easier to commit to a season of games when you live in a warmer climate. 

Supporters commit to a club, on a game by game basis or for a season for many reasons, but a warmer clime in terms of commitment is only relevant to fair-weather visitors.  

Sadly the majority of people at any sporting event in NZ, with an admission price, are attenders or pot hunters not supporters/fans.

The walk-up croud is another myth propagated by the majority of the NZ media, who will not recognise that most people in NZ prefer to watch sport from home on a big screen. Other excuses include ticket prices, beer prices, food prices, quality of food and quality of beer  

[ btw: preaching to the converted, not having a pop :-) ]

Beer, ticket and food prices aren't a myth to most.  It's what has kept me away from entertainment at the stadium until I was on an OK wage.

Why should I shell out a hundred bucks for a game when I paid for it live on TV anyway? Especially if the weather is shark.

Because if everyone thought like you we wouldn't have a club?

Don't drink or eat at the stadium?

Tickets have been available for $10-$12 at 'Nix games at the Stadium in the Huawei Zone or in Aisle 30-something for several seasons, including the current one. 

btw: EPL doesn't allow drinking at your GBP 30+ seat, you have to be in a Season-ticket bar (I may be out of touch, as haven't been for several years)    

Come on down to the stadium and smell the food and drink you can't afford, to experience telling your kids no they can't have a hotdog for acouple hours while you sit in the cheap seats.

Advertising campaign writes itself.

Personally I go to a game, to experience live sport.This is a habit/affliction based on growing up in England at a time when going to the game involved minimal expense beyond the turnstile fee and half-time entertainment was someone peeing on the terraces, hopefully not on your jeans. 

Of course taking children to the game is a different issue, one which you've only raised a few comments into the discussion 

My main point is that NZ is not a country of unconditional support, whatever the code. The Warriors and Breakers attendance, above the hardcore,  is hugely dependent on winning games.The Breakers didn't consider moving to the Vector until they'd won at least one Championship.
When I first came to NZ in the early 90s, Auckland held the Shield for ten years and still had attendance of under 5,000

I don't want to get into a 'slanging' match with a fellow supporter :-) COYN!

You're a better supporter than everyone else. We get it.


Allegedly

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

Warwick Hunt wrote:

[quote=Drunk_Monk]
Personally I go to a game, to experience live sport.This is a habit/affliction based on growing up in England at a time when going to the game involved minimal expense beyond the turnstile fee and half-time entertainment was someone peeing on the terraces, hopefully not on your jeans. 

Of course taking children to the game is a different issue, one which you've only raised a few comments into the discussion 

My main point is that NZ is not a country of unconditional support, whatever the code. The Warriors and Breakers attendance, above the hardcore,  is hugely dependent on winning games.The Breakers didn't consider moving to the Vector until they'dwon at least one Championship.
When I first came to NZ in the early 90s, Auckland held the Shield for ten years and still had attendance of under 5,000

I don't want to get into a 'slanging' match with a fellow supporter :-) COYN!

Yea all I'm pointing out is prices are a valid issue for a lot of people,  especially ones with families who live pay check to pay check.

I love my Nix and will go rain, or shine, winning or being spanked.

Hell the most fun I've had at a game was 2 years ago when we were fighting to not get the spoon in the last game of the season, and yellow fever was just having fun for the sake of having fun.

I was looking forward to turning my boy into a life member who held the same attitude, and it's terrifying that my plans could unravel in 6 months.

But the stadium is and always was an issue.  Expensive for the club, expensive for the sometimes fans, and there is no scarcity to tickets.  More people would buy tickets in advance if there wasn't going to be a guaranteed 25000 free seats.  And if you've bought the tickets then you had might aswell go.  Just the stadium killed most reasonable chances of a medium sized stadium in the region.

I'm still boiling under the surface at the #FTFFA and NZF for letting it get to this.

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

Crap, I'm on the same side of a political issue as NZ First, I am beginning to think maybe I should take up rugby.


Ramming liberal dribble down your throat since 2009
This forum needs less angst and more Kate Bush threads



Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

Tegal wrote:

Warwick Hunt wrote:

Drunk_Monk wrote:

Warwick Hunt wrote:

james dean wrote:

Drunk_Monk wrote:

Warwick Hunt wrote:

Tegal wrote:

yeah we've always had more of a walk up croud. I honestly think that is partially to do with weather. Easier to commit to a season of games when you live in a warmer climate. 

Supporters commit to a club, on a game by game basis or for a season for many reasons, but a warmer clime in terms of commitment is only relevant to fair-weather visitors.  

Sadly the majority of people at any sporting event in NZ, with an admission price, are attenders or pot hunters not supporters/fans.

The walk-up croud is another myth propagated by the majority of the NZ media, who will not recognise that most people in NZ prefer to watch sport from home on a big screen. Other excuses include ticket prices, beer prices, food prices, quality of food and quality of beer  

[ btw: preaching to the converted, not having a pop :-) ]

Beer, ticket and food prices aren't a myth to most.  It's what has kept me away from entertainment at the stadium until I was on an OK wage.

Why should I shell out a hundred bucks for a game when I paid for it live on TV anyway? Especially if the weather is shark.

Because if everyone thought like you we wouldn't have a club?

Don't drink or eat at the stadium?

Tickets have been available for $10-$12 at 'Nix games at the Stadium in the Huawei Zone or in Aisle 30-something for several seasons, including the current one. 

btw: EPL doesn't allow drinking at your GBP 30+ seat, you have to be in a Season-ticket bar (I may be out of touch, as haven't been for several years)    

Come on down to the stadium and smell the food and drink you can't afford, to experience telling your kids no they can't have a hotdog for acouple hours while you sit in the cheap seats.

Advertising campaign writes itself.

Personally I go to a game, to experience live sport.This is a habit/affliction based on growing up in England at a time when going to the game involved minimal expense beyond the turnstile fee and half-time entertainment was someone peeing on the terraces, hopefully not on your jeans. 

Of course taking children to the game is a different issue, one which you've only raised a few comments into the discussion 

My main point is that NZ is not a country of unconditional support, whatever the code. The Warriors and Breakers attendance, above the hardcore,  is hugely dependent on winning games.The Breakers didn't consider moving to the Vector until they'd won at least one Championship.
When I first came to NZ in the early 90s, Auckland held the Shield for ten years and still had attendance of under 5,000

I don't want to get into a 'slanging' match with a fellow supporter :-) COYN!

You're a better supporter than everyone else. We get it.


Well I'll admit to being a cod. After your comment I just think you're a bigger cod! 
Tickets? Tickets? We talkin’ about tickets?

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

Still dont get why people place so much importance on the price of food and drink. I go to the stadium to watch a game of football  not waste my money on over priced booze and crap food. FFS some of you must have a real problem if you cant go without a drink for 2 hours.


GET YOUR SHIRTS OFF FOR THE BOYS

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

Doloras wrote:

Crap, I'm on the same side of a political issue as NZ First, I am beginning to think maybe I should take up rugby.

Don't do it, field hockey needs your support more than rugby.

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

Wow this has derailed. 

Very interested in this Closer Economic Relations idea. On that trend, the latest episode of Out Of Our A-League discuss the potential for the Phoenix to be replaced (in part) with Kiwis not being imports for A-League clubs based on our immigration arrangements. 

Lots of decent discussion on the whole issue: http://podcast882.podomatic.com/

You know we belong together...

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

in fact in portugal you cant actually buy alcohol at football matches, just alcohol free beer. but the fans dont mind at all.

wellingtonista and benfiquista 

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

j0n0b4k3r wrote:

in fact in portugal you cant actually buy alcohol at football matches, just alcohol free beer. but the fans dont mind at all.


Scotland it's just Bovril

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

ballane wrote:

Still dont get why people place so much importance on the price of food and drink. I go to the stadium to watch a game of football  not waste my money on over priced booze and crap food. FFS some of you must have a real problem if you cant go without a drink for 2 hours.

have you seen half the games?
Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

thatguynz wrote:

Yakcall wrote:

All quotes here from the Socceroos press conference. I am fudgeen angry now!!

http://www.foxsports.com.au/football/socceroos/soc...

Gallop: I think the ball is in (Phoenix's) court. We're ambitious for the growth of the A-League. You can't expect to squat on a license.

Gallop on Phoenix: If you want longevity in the competition you need to produce results. 

Gallop on Nix: On any metric they're not performing at a level we like for the growth of the competition

Gallop: No one is suggesting on field performance is poor, it's off the field where it is poor.

Gallop: We're ambitious for the growth of the league, at the moment their metrics doesn't support claim for 10 year license

Gallop: (Metrics are) Crouds, television ratings, membership - those are the ones that are going to make us sit up and take notice

Gallop: I'm on the record that growth in big metropolitan areas is the right move for us in terms of building metrics around the game

Gallop on expansion: We're not considering anything that would damage our other clubs

Gallop is so mindblowingly inept, out of touch and fudgeing thick.  Does he honestly expect people to believe the shark that he is spouting?  The league will never succeed or grow with fudgetards like him calling the shots.

Absolute imbecile.

It's interesting that the current Sydney team owners are spewing too as they feel there isn't the support in Sydney and would actually water their clubs and the darbies down.

Supporter world's best and worst football teams: Waikato/WaiBop, Kingz, Knights, Phoenix, The Argyle, The Whites & the All Whites

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

Oska wrote:

Wow this has derailed. 

Very interested in this Closer Economic Relations idea. On that trend, the latest episode of Out Of Our A-League discuss the potential for the Phoenix to be replaced (in part) with Kiwis not being imports for A-League clubs based on our immigration arrangements. 

Lots of decent discussion on the whole issue: http://podcast882.podomatic.com/

This was an outcome that I wondered about in the early hours after the FFA announcement. It is probably the only way I could stay really engaged with the league at all. The Champions League squad restrictions would be a big issue, especially since the FFA wants to move towards having the league in line with those regs.

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

Clubs tend to sign extra players for the Champions League anyway, it would be up to the clubs but it least it would give Kiwis a viable option. I also worry for the affect on the rest of OFC, we are the only club that has shown any interest in giving Island talent a chance. A guy I know in Fiji has said the Phoenix have done a lot for football in the Pacific and the way we've been headed (preseason trip to Fiji, giving islanders trials) only indicates that this would get better.

You know we belong together...

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

james dean wrote:

I still don't understand why when we have a core group of 6k fans we only have 3600 members.  It doesn't make sense to me!

Even if you do not watch the game live at the stadium, it only costs $50 a season to be a club member.

Does not give you game tickets, but it makes you part of the magic number of "paid up members" FFA seems to care about.

Actually, getting outplayed quite a bit these days

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

Oska wrote:

Clubs tend to sign extra players for the Champions League anyway, it would be up to the clubs but it least it would give Kiwis a viable option. I also worry for the affect on the rest of OFC, we are the only club that has shown any interest in giving Island talent a chance. A guy I know in Fiji has said the Phoenix have done a lot for football in the Pacific and the way we've been headed (preseason trip to Fiji, giving islanders trials) only indicates that this would get better.

Get them to sign the Petition and write to the FFA telling them how much the Phoenix have done for football in the Pacific

Permalink Permalink