Wellington Phoenix Men

Phoenix Transfer Speculation 2013/14

4835 replies · 677,025 views
almost 13 years ago
Yes to Thompson and elrich



Auckland will rise once more

Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago
Luis Garcia wrote:

I've heard from a former team-mate of his that Aaron Clapham makes close to $30,000 from playing for Canterbury United. Probably just a rumour, but sounds like it's enough to make a living.


If he was working a 40 hour week, that would be 14 bucks an hour. Don't know if he has kids but I think that would be pretty tough even for a single man


Isn't the ASB Prem just 14 weeks? Anyway I'm sure that figure can't be accurate, my argument was that at least he's making a living playing football
Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago

How about Flores and Carlos as a midfield pairing? Seems a bit light in the tackling department..




Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago
Luis Garcia wrote:
Luis Garcia wrote:

I've heard from a former team-mate of his that Aaron Clapham makes close to $30,000 from playing for Canterbury United. Probably just a rumour, but sounds like it's enough to make a living.


If he was working a 40 hour week, that would be 14 bucks an hour. Don't know if he has kids but I think that would be pretty tough even for a single man


Isn't the ASB Prem just 14 weeks? Anyway I'm sure that figure can't be accurate, my argument was that at least he's making a living playing football



Yeah he does make a fair bit of coin playing for Canterbury considering it's a few trainings a week and a game. Also does a bit of TV work for a couple of shitty kids shows based in Chch. Last year he was on What Now, not sure if he's still there. I know a few players from Canterbury were making some money playing for their club sides as well. I heard Russell Kamo was playing games for Ferrymead Bays for about $200-300 I think it was.
Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago

In all seriousness though, if we signed Clapham as a squad player on the minimum. Would everyone be opposed?

Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago
Sackofspuds wrote:

In all seriousness though, if we signed Clapham as a squad player on the minimum. Would everyone be opposed?

Yes

Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago

Clapham talk has jumped the shark now


Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago
tonya wrote:
Sackofspuds wrote:

In all seriousness though, if we signed Clapham as a squad player on the minimum. Would everyone be opposed?

Yes

NO RANGAS!

"Ive just re-visited this and once again realised that C-Diddy is a genius - a drunk, Newcastle bred disgrace - but a genius." - Hard News, 11:39am 4th June 2009

Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago


No baldies, no blondes, no rats tails, no mohawks . . . . .

Oi Oi Edgecumbe... lets have a clean sheet

Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago
tonya wrote:
Sackofspuds wrote:

In all seriousness though, if we signed Clapham as a squad player on the minimum. Would everyone be opposed?

Yes


If we wanted to squad fillers we would have kept Jimmy Downey.
Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago · edited almost 13 years ago · History


No baldies, no blondes, no rats tails, no mohawks . . . . .


So basically hasidic jews then?


Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago
Sackofspuds wrote:

In all seriousness though, if we signed Clapham as a squad player on the minimum. Would everyone be opposed?

Yes

I have no problems with him playing for the Phoenix but a: he is not our saviour as some make out and b: if we are signing squad fillers, can it be young Kiwis that we can develop and will benefit from being that environment? 

Grumpy old bastard alert

Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago

I'm with Jeff, yes opposed to him as a squad player as I would rather see a youngster (Maybe from the U20s) signed into the place as they can have a development chance, are in the professional environment.

Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago


No baldies, no blondes, no rats tails, no mohawks . . . . .

Huysegems?

Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago
Luis Garcia wrote:

I've heard from a former team-mate of his that Aaron Clapham makes close to $30,000 from playing for Canterbury United. Probably just a rumour, but sounds like it's enough to make a living.


If he was working a 40 hour week, that would be 14 bucks an hour. Don't know if he has kids but I think that would be pretty tough even for a single man


If an international footballer aspires to be earning $30k pa, they should be looking for a new career
Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago
JonoNewton wrote:

I'm with Jeff, yes opposed to him as a squad player as I would rather see a youngster (Maybe from the U20s) signed into the place as they can have a development chance, are in the professional environment.


Whose likely to be offered youth contracts? Matthew Ridenton or Alex Rufer could be two options though I'm guessing Fenton, Boyd and Basalaj if signed fill those roles?
Also Bill Tuiloma might be a good investment at RB. 
Call me crazy though but if Payne or Howieson don't break into Blackburn/Burnley respectively this year...loan deal???


Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago
Sackofspuds wrote:

In all seriousness though, if we signed Clapham as a squad player on the minimum. Would everyone be opposed?

If you don't think he is good enough to make a match squad you should be opposed even if it is only 50k. That 50k is the difference between getting a player for 100k or 150k. It's significant and could result in a good player coming here or not.
Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago

Clapham - let's not and say we did


Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago

Happy to continue the Clapham conversation solely on the basis that it annoys TV!!!

Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago
sthn.jeff wrote:

Happy to continue the Clapham conversation solely on the basis that it annoys TV!!!




Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago

Clapham Common used to stage the Alternative Miss Universe contest.

The 178 bus goes from Clapham to Knightsbridge.

Clapham suffered badly in the riots of a coupla years ago.

Clapham: gateway to the South (almost)

"At the end of the drive the lawmen arrive...

I'll take my chance because luck is on my side or something...

Her name is Rio, she don't need to understand...

Oh Rio, Rio, hear them shout across the land..."

Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago

Clapham Common home of the Wombles.... No wait that was Wimbledon Common

Clapham Common the proposed home of Short Range Nukes in the 80's.... No wait that was Greenham Common

Bugger!

Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago

Clapham Rovers FC won the FA Cup in 1880, the year after falling at the final hurdle in 1879.

The club was disqualified from the FA Cup in 1885/86 and never played in the competition again.


Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago

Clapham Clock Museum  in Whangarei is worth a look if you have time on your hands!


Clapham in South West London should not be confused with Clapham in North Yorkshire, a truly peaceful and beautiful base for all your exploration and adventures in the Yorkshire Dales National Park.

Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago
TV wrote:
JonoNewton wrote:

I'm with Jeff, yes opposed to him as a squad player as I would rather see a youngster (Maybe from the U20s) signed into the place as they can have a development chance, are in the professional environment.


Whose likely to be offered youth contracts? Matthew Ridenton or Alex Rufer could be two options though I'm guessing Fenton, Boyd and Basalaj if signed fill those roles?

Also Bill Tuiloma might be a good investment at RB. 

Call me crazy though but if Payne or Howieson don't break into Blackburn/Burnley respectively this year...loan deal???


We have 3 Youth players for next season already signed.
Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago
TV wrote:
JonoNewton wrote:

I'm with Jeff, yes opposed to him as a squad player as I would rather see a youngster (Maybe from the U20s) signed into the place as they can have a development chance, are in the professional environment.


Whose likely to be offered youth contracts? Matthew Ridenton or Alex Rufer could be two options though I'm guessing Fenton, Boyd and Basalaj if signed fill those roles?

Also Bill Tuiloma might be a good investment at RB. 

Call me crazy though but if Payne or Howieson don't break into Blackburn/Burnley respectively this year...loan deal???


We have 3 Youth players for next season already signed.

Fenton, Boyd &...? Lindsay? still?


Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago

I didn't realize Lindsay was still young enough, I guess that's a good thing then. 

Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago
sthn.jeff wrote:

Clapham in South West London should not be confused with Clapham in North Yorkshire, a truly peaceful and beautiful base for all your exploration and adventures in the Yorkshire Dales National Park.


"Phoenix till they lose"

Posting 97% bollox, 8% lies and 3.658% genuine opinion. 

Genuine opinion: FTFFA

Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago
TV wrote:
TV wrote:
JonoNewton wrote:

I'm with Jeff, yes opposed to him as a squad player as I would rather see a youngster (Maybe from the U20s) signed into the place as they can have a development chance, are in the professional environment.


Whose likely to be offered youth contracts? Matthew Ridenton or Alex Rufer could be two options though I'm guessing Fenton, Boyd and Basalaj if signed fill those roles?

Also Bill Tuiloma might be a good investment at RB. 

Call me crazy though but if Payne or Howieson don't break into Blackburn/Burnley respectively this year...loan deal???


We have 3 Youth players for next season already signed.


Fenton, Boyd &...? Lindsay? still?

'Players born no earlier than 1990 for the 2011/2012 A-League season"

So for 2013/2014 it should be 1992, Lindsay was born Dec 1992.
Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago
TV wrote:
TV wrote:
JonoNewton wrote:

I'm with Jeff, yes opposed to him as a squad player as I would rather see a youngster (Maybe from the U20s) signed into the place as they can have a development chance, are in the professional environment.


Whose likely to be offered youth contracts? Matthew Ridenton or Alex Rufer could be two options though I'm guessing Fenton, Boyd and Basalaj if signed fill those roles?

Also Bill Tuiloma might be a good investment at RB. 

Call me crazy though but if Payne or Howieson don't break into Blackburn/Burnley respectively this year...loan deal???


We have 3 Youth players for next season already signed.


Fenton, Boyd &...? Lindsay? still?

'Players born no earlier than 1990 for the 2011/2012 A-League season"

So for 2013/2014 it should be 1992, Lindsay was born Dec 1992.

You're all over it RR. Cheers


Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago
Luis Garcia wrote:

I've heard from a former team-mate of his that Aaron Clapham makes close to $30,000 from playing for Canterbury United. Probably just a rumour, but sounds like it's enough to make a living.


If he was working a 40 hour week, that would be 14 bucks an hour. Don't know if he has kids but I think that would be pretty tough even for a single man


i only get minimum wage and i can live on that and buy lots of phoenix merch so pretty sure someone could comfortably live on $30,000 a year if they had to.
Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago

No to mention that's only for a few months work. Good coin.


Allegedly

Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago

Few months so basically a short term contract - pretty good money for one of those

Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago

There is no direct quote but according to Sam Worthington...

"Merrick said the two "crucial" positions to fill were another striker and midfielder, and he would cast the net far and wide."

I am a bit surprised how determined he is to get another striker. I would have thought another midfielder and right back or two midfielders were a much higher priority given what we already have. I think Iffil, Brockie, Boyd, Hysugems and Totori will be collectively well down on game time this season. 

Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago · edited almost 13 years ago · History

Probably sees Brockie as more of a wide player - Stein is the only real out and out striker in that list. 

a.haak

Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago · edited almost 13 years ago · History
valeo wrote:

Probably sees Brockie as more of a wide player - Stein is the only real out and out striker in that list. 


didn't Stein play most of his life as a left winger ???



Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago

Our near golden boot winner isn't a striker?


Allegedly

Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago
Tegal wrote:

Our near golden boot winner isn't a striker?

Does nothing but score.
Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago

I thought brocke was technically our only striker, everyone else is a converted wide man....Stein, Ifill included.

Queenslander 3x a year.

Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago

Think i got it right from what  Merrick said on TV3 news tonite he has the his eyes on spending some good money on a striker and another midfielder.Maybe he wants to spend some decent money on them and will look for some who maybe  wont be so expensive for the other spots.


GET YOUR SHIRTS OFF FOR THE BOYS

Permalink Permalink