I am not sure why people here expect the club to fork out money for a better coach than Chiefy if the club is not able to fork out money for some older experienced / better / players.
I can accept some of Chiefy's inexplicable team selections and player positionings if he still has players' respect and if he has a plan how to avoid the disaster season we've just had again. Overall, he is no worse a coach than Talay if there is a similar quality squad. Sydney FC has some excellent players this year and yet are barely scraping into the playoffs.
You could argue that a better coach than Chiefy could do more with the players we had this season. Chiefy did very well with good players last season. He is not able to do the same this season: presumably his tactics require better players (without us getting into a spat here over what "good" or "better" player means).
I could of course be wrong, but I would argue that a good quality replacement coach would ask for a budget for some good players to replace Sutton, Wootton, and those who left last season (Zawada, Pennington, Kraev), and those we lost for various reasons during this season (Colakovski, Al-Taay, Rojas, Ball). A good coach would ask for recruitment to support the kids currently on the park, and able to execute his game plan. And he would do that as a condition of coming here, if he is a decent coach. For that reason I am more interested in the budget the club will have next season (and how the drop in gate takings affected it) than who will be coaching the club.
Actually, getting outplayed quite a bit these days