Wellington Phoenix Men

R5 vs Newcastle Jets | Sat 4th Nov | 9:50pm | SS1

355 replies · 28,968 views
over 8 years ago

Leggy wrote:

Steve-O wrote:

Far too many passengers in the team - Vidosic, McGlinchey, Finkler the 3 main culprits.

Paracki had a bad game but he’s about the only one in the midfield with any energy. Defence is also a shambles at the moment.

Another season and we are not looking great. 2 points from 15 and I can’t see us winning next week with a depleted team.

You forgot Roy. For me he was one of the worst players on the pitch. His passing,first touch and shooting were abysmal.

I have never seen him play as poorly. 

Probably concentrating more on his hairstyle.

Had a good 10 minutes. Unfair to expect him to be the spark for the team every week.



Permalink Permalink
over 8 years ago

Blaming Roy is ridiculous considering our plan for 2 seasons has been to pass it to him and hope.

a.haak

Permalink Permalink
over 8 years ago

Just saw the result, couldn't get any reception or score updates last night. Very disappointed. Reading the forum and match updates online, and it sounds like it could have been even more!

Can't believe that Roy O'Donovan that smug cockhead, is leading the goal scoring charts after 5 rounds either... 

Permalink Permalink
over 8 years ago

I fudgeing hate football!

"Ive just re-visited this and once again realised that C-Diddy is a genius - a drunk, Newcastle bred disgrace - but a genius." - Hard News, 11:39am 4th June 2009

Permalink Permalink
over 8 years ago

C-Diddy wrote:

I fudgeing hate football!

Everytime it looks like I'm about to become a passionate Phoenix fan again they cash-out with the nonsense we saw last night.

Spain '82 is where it all really began for me. There were a few moments before, plenty of moments after, but that World Cup was the zeitgeist.
Permalink Permalink
over 8 years ago

Jaickin wrote:

nix nix wrote:

Next 5 games. 

3-1 win over Perth.

1-0 loss to WSW.

2-0 win over CCM.

1-0 win over Victory.

4-0 win over Roar.

You're predicting four clean sheets in a row? What about our defence's performance this season has shown the potential of that happening?

No that's 3 clean sheets 

Permalink Permalink
over 8 years ago

nix nix wrote:

Jaickin wrote:

nix nix wrote:

Next 5 games. 

3-1 win over Perth.

1-0 loss to WSW.

2-0 win over CCM.

1-0 win over Victory.

4-0 win over Roar.

You're predicting four clean sheets in a row? What about our defence's performance this season has shown the potential of that happening?

No that's 3 clean sheets 

I'd be happy with just one clean sheet...

As a side note, If you put a multi on that run of results, I'd suggest you'd probably come out pretty well off.

Permalink Permalink
over 8 years ago

Jets toyed with us, but what’s up with their fans? I could see more passion from the 10 Nix blokes at the stadium. Croud attendance?

Permalink Permalink
over 8 years ago

number8 wrote:

Jets toyed with us, but what’s up with their fans? I could see more passion from the 10 Nix blokes at the stadium. Croud attendance?

They were probably cautious not to get too carried away. They've been around and they know how easily things can go pearshape.

Actually, getting outplayed quite a bit these days

Permalink Permalink
over 8 years ago

valeo wrote:

Blaming Roy is ridiculous considering our plan for 2 seasons has been to pass it to him and hope.

Unless English is not you first language, I fail  to see where  I blamed Roy for the loss.

What I said was he had a very POOR  game.

If you are old and wise you were probably young and stupid

Permalink Permalink
over 8 years ago

Roy was poor but he isn't the type of player to spark a game on his own. He is good when he makes nice runs in behind - it is hard to make a good run if everyone else is standing there.

Permalink Permalink
over 8 years ago

I blame Ridenton, for not playing

Oi Oi Edgecumbe... lets have a clean sheet

Permalink Permalink
over 8 years ago

That awkward moment when the English club you have supported since childhood wins convincingly bit you can't get excited because the Phoenix were beaten by the club from the city of your birth.

???

"Ive just re-visited this and once again realised that C-Diddy is a genius - a drunk, Newcastle bred disgrace - but a genius." - Hard News, 11:39am 4th June 2009

Permalink Permalink
over 8 years ago

C-Diddy wrote:

That awkward moment when the English club you have supported since childhood wins convincingly bit you can't get excited because the Phoenix were beaten by the club from the city of your birth.

???

Lucky to not have that problem. I am currently supporting West Ham

Oi Oi Edgecumbe... lets have a clean sheet

Permalink Permalink
over 8 years ago

C-Diddy wrote:

That awkward moment when the English club you have supported since childhood wins convincingly bit you can't get excited because the Phoenix were beaten by the club from the city of your birth.

???


Omg I fudgeing feel you. Thanks for easing the pain a bit though Liverpool
Permalink Permalink
over 8 years ago

nufc_nz wrote:

I still don't see what Finkler or Watson offers us. They need to go.


Watson gets brought on as a sub to change the game. But hwen was the last time that we scored when he was on the pitch - I know he hasn't scored or assisted since last year

Normo's coming home

Permalink Permalink
over 8 years ago

That was one of the worst Phoenix displays in recent memory.

Overall I struggled to see what we were trying to do (as opposed to other matches this season where clear plans and coaching have been completely clear on-field).  We picked a very attacking lineup but then sat very deep.  Although we were sitting deep we also didn't seem to try and break quickly even though Newcastle had a pretty averagely executed high press going.  When we did beat in in the first half we were able to create chances.

Paracki looked awful and by the end his confidence was completely shot but he was the only outlet for the defence for much of the game and he was constantly being shut down.  Finkler and Kaluderovic need to offer us so much more in games like this, actually hold the ball and draw a foul to keep the pressure off us.  I'd be looking to get shot of Finkler as soon as possible.  I know this sytem suits a no. 10 but he's just not doing enough.

Losing Rossi is a huge blow as it throws our whole defence out.  I'd actually like to see us start a game with both Doyle and Abbas in front of him for a bit of solidity.  Abbas also had a shocker and by the end basically couldn't pass the ball 5 yards.  Mullen isn't a right back (not sure he's a centre back either).  We badly need the academy to produce a full back!

Keegan Smith had a great game, he probably had more touches than any Phoenix keeper ever.  

Very off day but I think with some tweaks to the system actually we can do things.  But we need a win to breed some confidence.

Normo's coming home

Permalink Permalink
over 8 years ago

james dean wrote:

nufc_nz wrote:

I still don't see what Finkler or Watson offers us. They need to go.


Watson gets brought on as a sub to change the game. But hwen was the last time that we scored when he was on the pitch - I know he hasn't scored or assisted since last year

Last time we scored while Watson was on was when we demolished the Jets 5 - 0 in Round 25 last season (March 26). Watson started and we scored 4 before he was pulled for Rogerson. Since then he has been subbed on in 6 of our 8 games for a total of 90 minutes. Last season he scored twice (November and December) in 765 minutes, a goal every 383 minutes (or every 4.25 games).

Interestingly of his 5 goals for the nix, he has never scored later than the 57th minute!

Permalink Permalink
over 8 years ago

Maaaaaaatt wrote:

james dean wrote:

nufc_nz wrote:

I still don't see what Finkler or Watson offers us. They need to go.


Watson gets brought on as a sub to change the game. But hwen was the last time that we scored when he was on the pitch - I know he hasn't scored or assisted since last year

Last time we scored while Watson was on was when we demolished the Jets 5 - 0 in Round 25 last season (March 26). Watson started and we scored 4 before he was pulled for Rogerson. Since then he has been subbed on in 6 of our 8 games for a total of 90 minutes. Last season he scored twice (November and December) in 765 minutes, a goal every 383 minutes (or every 4.25 games).

Interestingly of his 5 goals for the nix, he has never scored later than the 57th minute!

That's great statchat.  So he has never come off the bench to score or assist, says it all really

Normo's coming home

Permalink Permalink
over 8 years ago

I actually don't think this was the fault of Finkler. For the record, I am not a fan of Finkler and I would not keep him but he is better than Ridenton (whom I would jettison today along with Watson and Rogerson). I would count the games until he is gone and did question why we signed him last year but I fail to see why he was at fault. If he is at fault, then you can throw in AK9 as well. They were told to stay high that much is obvious so why they get blamed for problems at the back half is beyond me.

To me, this game was lost in the coaching department. Newcastle were well schooled on our tactics of playing out from the back. After 10 mins, they adjusted to shut it off and yet we still persisted with it. You could see it when Smith put the ball down in the box at goal kicks and Newcastle kept the front 3 forward with 1 central and 2 covering the wings. Yet we still played that way. I felt we made no real adjustment and it reminded me of Ernie last year in that we had no 'plan b' once a team figured out what we do. Is Kalezic the same? I just expected him to go more with 'I'd rather lose the ball at half way in a lottery than give it to them close to the 18y box' and just struggled at why he persisted with that tactic.  I was not impressed by any player and it was that, combined with the coaching and tactics made it a bad loss that could have easily been more.

If I were Kenny Lowe, I would keep my front three players forward and split 2 of them wide to cover the wide channel outlets. See if Phoenix play the same way or adjust cause I swear that will kill our ability to build possession from the back. but lets see what happens next week.

Also to nufc - how was it without Galloway? I can tell you Mullen got fudgeing owned all match. Care to reconsider that?

Grumpy old bastard alert

Permalink Permalink
over 8 years ago

Lachyloolaa wrote:

C-Diddy wrote:

That awkward moment when the English club you have supported since childhood wins convincingly bit you can't get excited because the Phoenix were beaten by the club from the city of your birth.

???


<SNIP>Omg I fudgeing feel you.</SNIP>

I wondered what that was...

"Ive just re-visited this and once again realised that C-Diddy is a genius - a drunk, Newcastle bred disgrace - but a genius." - Hard News, 11:39am 4th June 2009

Permalink Permalink
over 8 years ago

Jeff Vader wrote:

I actually don't think this was the fault of Finkler. For the record, I am not a fan of Finkler and I would not keep him but he is better than Ridenton (whom I would jettison today along with Watson and Rogerson). I would count the games until he is gone and did question why we signed him last year but I fail to see why he was at fault. If he is at fault, then you can throw in AK9 as well. They were told to stay high that much is obvious so why they get blamed for problems at the back half is beyond me.

To me, this game was lost in the coaching department. Newcastle were well schooled on our tactics of playing out from the back. After 10 mins, they adjusted to shut it off and yet we still persisted with it. You could see it when Smith put the ball down in the box at goal kicks and Newcastle kept the front 3 forward with 1 central and 2 covering the wings. Yet we still played that way. I felt we made no real adjustment and it reminded me of Ernie last year in that we had no 'plan b' once a team figured out what we do. Is Kalezic the same? I just expected him to go more with 'I'd rather lose the ball at half way in a lottery than give it to them close to the 18y box' and just struggled at why he persisted with that tactic.  I was not impressed by any player and it was that, combined with the coaching and tactics made it a bad loss that could have easily been more.

If I were Kenny Lowe, I would keep my front three players forward and split 2 of them wide to cover the wide channel outlets. See if Phoenix play the same way or adjust cause I swear that will kill our ability to build possession from the back. but lets see what happens next week.

Also to nufc - how was it without Galloway? I can tell you Mullen got fudgeing owned all match. Care to reconsider that?

I think we are entitled to expect more from our highest paid player (a) it took at least 30 minutes before he started to properly show for the ball and (b) he was as guilty as anyone of losing it.

I thought Ridenton showed for some decent balls when he came on, I think he is worth persisting with.

Normo's coming home

Permalink Permalink
over 8 years ago

Ridenton is prone to the occasional unforced error but generally has been doing a great job in that distributing/recycling the ball role most of this season IMO

People like Coldplay and voted for the Nazis. You can't trust people.

Permalink Permalink
over 8 years ago

This is where I suspect A-Rod would have been perfect along side Paracki

Grumpy old bastard alert

Permalink Permalink
over 8 years ago

james dean wrote:

Jeff Vader wrote:

I actually don't think this was the fault of Finkler. For the record, I am not a fan of Finkler and I would not keep him but he is better than Ridenton (whom I would jettison today along with Watson and Rogerson). I would count the games until he is gone and did question why we signed him last year but I fail to see why he was at fault. If he is at fault, then you can throw in AK9 as well. They were told to stay high that much is obvious so why they get blamed for problems at the back half is beyond me.

To me, this game was lost in the coaching department. Newcastle were well schooled on our tactics of playing out from the back. After 10 mins, they adjusted to shut it off and yet we still persisted with it. You could see it when Smith put the ball down in the box at goal kicks and Newcastle kept the front 3 forward with 1 central and 2 covering the wings. Yet we still played that way. I felt we made no real adjustment and it reminded me of Ernie last year in that we had no 'plan b' once a team figured out what we do. Is Kalezic the same? I just expected him to go more with 'I'd rather lose the ball at half way in a lottery than give it to them close to the 18y box' and just struggled at why he persisted with that tactic.  I was not impressed by any player and it was that, combined with the coaching and tactics made it a bad loss that could have easily been more.

If I were Kenny Lowe, I would keep my front three players forward and split 2 of them wide to cover the wide channel outlets. See if Phoenix play the same way or adjust cause I swear that will kill our ability to build possession from the back. but lets see what happens next week.

Also to nufc - how was it without Galloway? I can tell you Mullen got fudgeing owned all match. Care to reconsider that?

I think we are entitled to expect more from our highest paid player (a) it took at least 30 minutes before he started to properly show for the ball and (b) he was as guilty as anyone of losing it.

I thought Ridenton showed for some decent balls when he came on, I think he is worth persisting with.

Don't disagree with your position there in the 1st paragraph.It was strange he was signed when he had Roly and McGlinchey in that space by Ernie but whatever. Right now, you could let McGlinchey play in that 10 role and replace Finkler with a more box to box type - A-Rod or even Lia would probably have been better in that role.

I think Ridenton lacks awareness of whats going on around him and also is very slow on the ball.

Grumpy old bastard alert

Permalink Permalink
over 8 years ago

Just think the balance was wrong on the weekend

Normo's coming home

Permalink Permalink
over 8 years ago

james dean wrote:

Just think the balance was wrong on the weekend

I agree. Jets had way too much possession, too much aggression, and scored too many goals, for this to be well balanced.

Actually, getting outplayed quite a bit these days

Permalink Permalink
over 8 years ago · edited over 8 years ago · History

Jeff Vader wrote:

I actually don't think this was the fault of Finkler. For the record, I am not a fan of Finkler and I would not keep him but he is better than Ridenton (whom I would jettison today along with Watson and Rogerson). I would count the games until he is gone and did question why we signed him last year but I fail to see why he was at fault. If he is at fault, then you can throw in AK9 as well. They were told to stay high that much is obvious so why they get blamed for problems at the back half is beyond me.

To me, this game was lost in the coaching department. Newcastle were well schooled on our tactics of playing out from the back. After 10 mins, they adjusted to shut it off and yet we still persisted with it. You could see it when Smith put the ball down in the box at goal kicks and Newcastle kept the front 3 forward with 1 central and 2 covering the wings. Yet we still played that way. I felt we made no real adjustment and it reminded me of Ernie last year in that we had no 'plan b' once a team figured out what we do. Is Kalezic the same? I just expected him to go more with 'I'd rather lose the ball at half way in a lottery than give it to them close to the 18y box' and just struggled at why he persisted with that tactic.  I was not impressed by any player and it was that, combined with the coaching and tactics made it a bad loss that could have easily been more.

If I were Kenny Lowe, I would keep my front three players forward and split 2 of them wide to cover the wide channel outlets. See if Phoenix play the same way or adjust cause I swear that will kill our ability to build possession from the back. but lets see what happens next week.

Also to nufc - howthe  was it without Galloway? I can tell you Mullen got fudgeing owned all match. Care to reconsider that?

Agree, whilst prior to the Jets game we had competed well, we have shown no variation to playing the ball out from the back so it was easy for any opposition coach to work out a strategy to nullify us. What makes it worse is that Smith struggles to punt the ball to half way and his goal kicks are appalling.

As a result we were constantly on the back foot as the Jets pressed up on us trying to play out  and we surrendered the ball easily

Permalink Permalink
over 8 years ago

Was skeptical before the game, but if Keegan Smith plays like that for the rest of the season then I'd be happy to call him our best keeper. Far fewer errors than other games and some stunning saves, first time I can't say Italiano would have done better tbh

Permalink Permalink
over 8 years ago · edited over 8 years ago · History

mrsmiis wrote:

Was skeptical before the game, but if Keegan Smith plays like that for the rest of the season then I'd be happy to call him our best keeper. Far fewer errors than other games and some stunning saves, first time I can't say Italiano would have done better tbh

Keegan Smith did as well (or better) as expected, and was not the worst player on the park.

I have just re-watched the Jets action before their third goal and noticed that Dura was all the way to the left flank, leaving Paracki stranded in a major hole in the middle, where the attack then went through.  They were simply a faster team, and seem to have better passing accuracy than us. We seemed somehow jetlagged (pun intended).

Also, is it just me, or did we often play all ineffectively crowded together in a small area? No control over the wings./ flanks at least not until Parkhouse was brought on.

Actually, getting outplayed quite a bit these days

Permalink Permalink
over 8 years ago

Mainland FC wrote:

mrsmiis wrote:

Was skeptical before the game, but if Keegan Smith plays like that for the rest of the season then I'd be happy to call him our best keeper. Far fewer errors than other games and some stunning saves, first time I can't say Italiano would have done better tbh

I have just re-watched the Jets action before their third goal and noticed that Dura was all the way to the left flank, and we had a major hole in the middle, where the attack wen through.  They were simply a faster team, and seem to have better passing accuracy. Keegan Smith did as well (or better) as expected, and was not the worst player on the park.

Also, is it just me, or did we often play all ineffectively crowded together in a small area? No control over the wings./ flanks at least not until Parkhouse was brought on.

I thought our passing was far too slow to break through the centre of the park - constantly breaking down in there

Normo's coming home

Permalink Permalink
over 8 years ago · edited over 8 years ago · History

Mainland FC wrote:

mrsmiis wrote:

Was skeptical before the game, but if Keegan Smith plays like that for the rest of the season then I'd be happy to call him our best keeper. Far fewer errors than other games and some stunning saves, first time I can't say Italiano would have done better tbh

Keegan Smith did as well (or better) as expected, and was not the worst player on the park.

I have just re-watched the Jets action before their third goal and noticed that Dura was all the way to the left flank, leaving Paracki stranded in a major hole in the middle, where the attack then went through.  They were simply a faster team, and seem to have better passing accuracy than us. We seemed somehow jetlagged (pun intended).

Also, is it just me, or did we often play all ineffectively crowded together in a small area? No control over the wings./ flanks at least not until Parkhouse was brought on.

Jets were pretty good I think, but agree with your comemnt on Paracki being stranded for the second goal.  I posted (rhetorically) during the game, did anyone think Paracki deserved to have a FB and CB behind him.

In hindsight, for me, it's no wonder Paracki looked bewildered and demoralised at the end of the game.

He got exposed by what I think was the attempt to get Finkler into some sort of form ahead of the AWs weekends and for the new coach to see what his quasi marquee player could do.  My guess is Darije is stunned at how ineffective Finkler is and how McG can't do the sort of role that Ridenton's been doing.  The Finkler-McG-Paracki chemistry was a mess compared to McG-Ridenton-Paracki.  

I think Paracki also suffered from Mullen's limited ability to get forward and back on the right side.  That left him short of another outlet option and made him more vulnerable to being caught exposed from the right. 

---

I just think we've held together pretty well against some good sides with a varying depleted defense, and finally buckled against a weaker side against Brisbane, without either starting CB for any of that game.  But the loss of Galloway, as well, and not having Ridenton working the mid, just tipped the balance too far.  Even with Dura back.  And we broke.  

It'll be interesting how Darije looks to adjust.

I still think, with a fit squad, the team can play well, and handle the best.  But probably another tough couple of weeks ahead. A lot of season to go, so hopefully Darije's learnt a few things and we can get clear of the injuries and build again.

Permalink Permalink
over 8 years ago

Who will defend this weekend??

Oi Oi Edgecumbe... lets have a clean sheet

Permalink Permalink
over 8 years ago

Who will defend this weekend??

Smith will have a go. Not sure about anyone else.

Permalink Permalink
over 8 years ago

mjp2 wrote:
  The Finkler-McG-Paracki chemistry was a mess compared to McG-Ridenton-Paracki.  

This!

Kotahitanga. We are one.

Permalink Permalink