Wellington Phoenix Men

Time For Action!

123 replies · 3,299 views
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Hard News wrote:
axmfc wrote:
What makes it worse is that the A-League (namely, the other A-League clubs) are progressively improving and we're not keeping up with the pace.


I see this again and again, but no one has yet convinced me of it.

Gold Coast - Yes
Perth - Yes
Sydney - A little.

Who else has improved greatly ?


I think some may be looking at things off the field, such as the NYL (and now academies), which is out of our hands really no matter how hard we try. Some of the talent coming through in some squads due to the NYL is quite staggering, and probably cheap compared to seasoned pro's. Sydney have 7 players u21, like Danning, Grant, Gan, Payne. If we had a NYL squad we would start seeing talented players getting full contracts on the cheap allowing money to be spent on quality.

It was interesting to read that one of the reasons Moss decided on Melbourne was their professional setup with a fulltime goalkeeper coach, it's a shame that Jonathan Gould was not around earlier.

I think overall we are progressing well as a team, we have managed to learn from mistakes in the past. It is just unfortunate that we are not competing on a level playing field.
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Hard News wrote:
I'd go further on those EG.  Owusu has been banging around at the same level as Greenacre for years and hardly set the world alight.  They have lost Ognenovski and replaced him with Fyfe and lost the depth Diego, Costanzo, Valkanis and Salley gave them to have them mainly replaced with youth players.

Last year Sydney had no centre backs apart from Fyfe and now he's gone to Adelaide.

Melbourne have aThai international, but reports are that he's not any better than what they already had, and they have lost a Costa Rican international in return.

Somewhat concerningly I think there is a future for Mully as well.

If he's motivated (which i get the impression is up for debate) then he could be a creative attacking midfield force like he was 10 years ago.

Positionally he's been a disaster at right back, and he looks like he is short on 'give a sh*t' but if anyone can get his head back on the job  the my 'way outside the box' call for the season is for him to re-invent himself as a quality midfielder.

Big 'IF' though.
 
You're sinking to new depths HN.  Now I know we're in trouble and desperate.
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
I must admit to being slightly worried about this upcoming season, at this stage at least.
 
Last season, I thought we were unlucky at times and there was potential to go on and do something this season, however I am a bit disappointed at what has transpired so far.
 
What about the central defensive issue as well? With Dodd gone, what happens when there are the inevitable injuries/suspensions? I don't feel we have enough cover in this area, and obviously up front where it seems we have one out and out striker in the entire squad?
 
Also, I think success this season largely depends on if the likes of Daniel steps up to the plate. The ability is there, but is the attitude?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qe_B5CzbTJo - Caceres winning penalty v Perth - footage from the Fever Zone

Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Steve-O wrote:
I must admit to being slightly worried about this upcoming season, at this stage at least.
 
Last season, I thought we were unlucky at times and there was potential to go on and do something this season, however I am a bit disappointed at what has transpired so far.
 
What about the central defensive issue as well? With Dodd gone, what happens when there are the inevitable injuries/suspensions? I don't feel we have enough cover in this area, and obviously up front where it seems we have one out and out striker in the entire squad?
 
Also, I think success this season largely depends on if the likes of Daniel steps up to the plate. The ability is there, but is the attitude?


I think its the other way round, he defintely has the atitude, he loves the club, im not sure about his ability... he used to work well with felipe, hopefully that can be reignited with diego.
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
I have been a bit glass half empty during the off season but a look at our current squad gives me cause for optimism for the upcoming season. 
Yes, we need another striker and I also believe that another defender would be useful to add balance to the squad. 
However our squad is full of a-league experience, as well as players who have done well in lower league English football.  We have two exciting youngsters, one at least who is ready for regular first team football in my opinion.  We have in Diego and Daniel two players who bring flair and quality ball play to the team.  Leo is an exciting winger, who is prepared to run at defenders and we all know defenders don't like that, especially the level we see in the a-league.  It would be great to see someone take that role on the other side as well and I think there are the players to do that.
Our squad has 11 players coming into their age peak (26-29) as well as Paston at 32 who as a goalkeeper should now be in his best years.
The greatest interest that has been generated for the Phoenix is when local youngsters are signed.  I believe that is what people want to see.  How excited are we when Costa is on the team sheet.  Look at the response when Leo was signed.  Wellington lads playing for a Wellington team in front of kids who believe that could be them one day.  Marquee players are the quickest way to throw money away.  Simply if they were that good they would not be looking at the a-league as an option and certainly not the Phoenix given our limitations in playing beyond the a-league.
One of the reasons people are so nervous about the squad is because most of us haven't seen them this year.  The pre-season has been a PR disaster for the club and I hope lessons have been learnt.  You generate interest in your team by playing in front of your regular supporters and make the product interesting and inexpensive enough for casuals to be persuaded to come.  I hope next year the club will have many meaningful (a-league standard and above) games in the Wellington area.  If only they were playing locally over the three weekends of the school holidays!

Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
I'm not too concerned about things. I really don't thnk the grand gesture is necessary. From memory the success ratio of big name star signings in the A League has been about 50-50, maybe even less than that. Why risk a sh*t load of dollars on an aging player who might be a cripple for most of the season, or who might have all the moves but deep down just be there for the pay cheque?
 
Better to get a couple of decent, motivated strikers and make our big statement of intent on the field. If we are winning the crowds will definitely be there and everyone will be happy.
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
topiary wrote:
How many goals has Greenacre scored so far this pre-season?



Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Steve-O wrote:
What about the central defensive issue as well? With Dodd gone, what happens when there are the inevitable injuries/suspensions? I don't feel we have enough cover in this area...

We have McKain as cover (and there are plenty of midfielders to cover for his move to the back). In the unlikely event both Durante and Sigmund are suspended or injured, then Muscat can also play central defence.

A young defender wouldn't be a bad option as cover; Aaron Scott could prove useful here.
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
StopOut wrote:
I'm not too concerned about things. I really don't thnk the grand gesture is necessary. From memory the success ratio of big name star signings in the A League has been about 50-50, maybe even less than that. Why risk a sh*t load of dollars on an aging player who might be a cripple for most of the season, or who might have all the moves but deep down just be there for the pay cheque?
 
Better to get a couple of decent, motivated strikers and make our big statement of intent on the field. If we are winning the crowds will definitely be there and everyone will be happy.


Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
I don't really think there is a great need to throw money around to try and fix all the problems we supposedly have (low attendences, no flair, etc).
 
If we signed Fowler on massive money it would generate a couple of weeks worth of interest and hype.  The first few games would get bigger crowds and everyone would be happy.  A month into the season, when he still hasn't scored and we are sitting in mid table, we would quickly become the laughing stock - TV1 would take the piss,  Paul Henry would take the piss, all the rugby heads would take the piss, and then all the undecideds would follow suit.  Same crowd size but with more people laughing at us and Terry massively out of pocket.
 
Also, what is more likely to get our license renewed - finishing mid table but with sound finances, or finishing upper-mid table but living hand-to-mouth?
 
Bottom line - Fowler will be a flop, and many players of his ilk will be as well.  This makes signing a player like him on massive money a waste of time.  If we are going to sign players on massive coin, at least carry on down the Fred path - players in the peak, not players like Fowler who peaked about 10 years ago.
 
The club needs sensible progress - season 1 finish last, season 2 not finish last, season 3 push for play-offs, season 4 play-offs, season 5 semis, season 6 win it.  Lets not go - season 1 finish last, season 2 not finish last, season 3 spunk all our money on has-beens in an attempt to win it and end up going out of business.

All I do is make the stuff I would've liked
Reference things I wanna watch, reference girls I wanna bite
Now I'm firefly like a burning kite
And yousa fake fuck like a fleshlight

Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
StopOut wrote:
I'm not too concerned about things. I really don't thnk the grand gesture is necessary. From memory the success ratio of big name star signings in the A League has been about 50-50, maybe even less than that. Why risk a sh*t load of dollars Won an aging player who might be a cripple for most of the season, or who might have all the moves but deep down just be there for the pay cheque?
 
Better to get a couple of decent, motivated strikers and make our big statement of intent on the field. If we are winning the crowds will definitely be there and everyone will be happy.
 
I forgot it's only the older players that get injured...

"Ive just re-visited this and once again realised that C-Diddy is a genius - a drunk, Newcastle bred disgrace - but a genius." - Hard News, 11:39am 4th June 2009

Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
C-Diddy wrote:
StopOut wrote:
I'm not too concerned about things. I really don't thnk the grand gesture is necessary. From memory the success ratio of big name star signings in the A League has been about 50-50, maybe even less than that. Why risk a sh*t load of dollars Won an aging player who might be a cripple for most of the season, or who might have all the moves but deep down just be there for the pay cheque?
 
Better to get a couple of decent, motivated strikers and make our big statement of intent on the field. If we are winning the crowds will definitely be there and everyone will be happy.
 
I forgot it's only the older players that get injured...
 
But unfortunately for us the only high profile players we might get are going to be older. What big name from Europe under the age of 30 could we seriously hope to sign?
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
I think you missed C-Diddy's point.

I think he was being sarcastic suggesting that plenty of younger players get crocked as well.

Someone mentioned Morientes as an example somewhere here.  There is someone who is 33, that has had few injury concerns through his whole career, is currently unemployed (and probably beyond our price range).

He'd tick a stack of boxes though, world reputation, Played in the premier League - for the Premier League snobs, played in Spain - for the anti-Premier League snobs, played for Liverpool - for the Liverpool snobs.

There must be others like him as well.

How's my driving? - Whine here

Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
But Morientes' last salary (I am going to guess) would have been in the region of �30,000 per week.
 
Why is going to want to come to Wellington for, what, NZ$1 million (if we can even offer him that much)?  That is less than a third of what he was getting paid, and a sh*tload less than what he could earn in the States/Quatar/etc.
 
It is not going to happen.
 
Even if it does, do you think he is going to make that much of a difference?  All that will happen is you will get comments on TV1 news, Breakfast, Millmow, etc that we paid $1 million for a guy who has only scored 3 goals in 6 games (or whatever the stats will be).  And the shame is all the neutrals who don't know much about football will think to themselves "yeah - I went to a game and he didn't score any bicycle kicks from the halfway line - what a waste of money.  Phoenix are a f**king joke."

All I do is make the stuff I would've liked
Reference things I wanna watch, reference girls I wanna bite
Now I'm firefly like a burning kite
And yousa fake fuck like a fleshlight

Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Frankie Mac wrote:
 
Also, what is more likely to get our license renewed - finishing mid table but with sound finances, or finishing upper-mid table but living hand-to-mouth?
 
 
The club needs sensible progress - season 1 finish last, season 2 not finish last, season 3 push for play-offs, season 4 play-offs, season 5 semis, season 6 win it.  Lets not go - season 1 finish last, season 2 not finish last, season 3 spunk all our money on has-beens in an attempt to win it and end up going out of business.
 
Absolutely positively agree.  There are so many factors stacked against the Nix this season (no youth team, no major sponsor yet, other sponsor(s) not renewing, not much to be gained from the pre-season matches to date it would seem... still need a striker, general lack of money all-round and people opting to save the shekels and stay at home).  So a pretty firm hand in making sure the team performs to the best of its abilities and keeping the bean counters happy with the club finances is a must.
 
The "let's max out the budget and get a crowd-puller" approach is pretty high risk in terms of delivering lots of goals and propelling us into the play-offs (e.g. injury, doesn't like our wonderful weather, doesn't gel with the players around him).
 
It's good to be ambitious but as a Wgtn team it might be realistic to expect to aim for the play-offs and avoid the wooden spoon and the plastic spoon/fork.  What would disappoint me is if we played boring football and lost (but would quite happily take boring football and wins).
 
  
 
 

"Phoenix till they lose"

Posting 97% bollox, 8% lies and 3.658% genuine opinion. 

Genuine opinion: FTFFA

Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Frankie Mac wrote:
But Morientes' last salary (I am going to guess) would have been in the region of �30,000 per week.
 
Why is going to want to come to Wellington for, what, NZ$1 million (if we can even offer him that much)?  That is less than a third of what he was getting paid, and a sh*tload less than what he could earn in the States/Quatar/etc.
 
It is not going to happen.
 
Even if it does, do you think he is going to make that much of a difference?  All that will happen is you will get comments on TV1 news, Breakfast, Millmow, etc that we paid $1 million for a guy who has only scored 3 goals in 6 games (or whatever the stats will be).  And the shame is all the neutrals who don't know much about football will think to themselves "yeah - I went to a game and he didn't score any bicycle kicks from the halfway line - what a waste of money.  Phoenix are a f**king joke."


Sounds like what Fowler will be for NQF
playwithFire2009-07-09 23:39:49


Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
playwithFire wrote:
Frankie Mac wrote:
But Morientes' last salary (I am going to guess) would have been in the region of �30,000 per week.
 
Why is going to want to come to Wellington for, what, NZ$1 million (if we can even offer him that much)?  That is less than a third of what he was getting paid, and a sh*tload less than what he could earn in the States/Quatar/etc.
 
It is not going to happen.
 
Even if it does, do you think he is going to make that much of a difference?  All that will happen is you will get comments on TV1 news, Breakfast, Millmow, etc that we paid $1 million for a guy who has only scored 3 goals in 6 games (or whatever the stats will be).  And the shame is all the neutrals who don't know much about football will think to themselves "yeah - I went to a game and he didn't score any bicycle kicks from the halfway line - what a waste of money.  Phoenix are a f**king joke."


Sounds like what Fowler will be for NQF




if he does score wonder if he'll do his "trademark" snort
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Hard News wrote:
I think you missed C-Diddy's point.

I think he was being sarcastic suggesting that plenty of younger players get crocked as well.

Someone mentioned Morientes as an example somewhere here.  There is someone who is 33, that has had few injury concerns through his whole career, is currently unemployed (and probably beyond our price range).

He'd tick a stack of boxes though, world reputation, Played in the premier League - for the Premier League snobs, played in Spain - for the anti-Premier League snobs, played for Liverpool - for the Liverpool snobs.

There must be others like him as well.
 
I get his point OK, but CD's argument is that we need to sign a big gun to wow the media and excite the pundits: such a player is inevitably going to be of more mature years, shall we say, and all the more fragile for it. Better to get two younger players, who, yes, may also get crocked if our luck is horribly out, but who offer better percentages overall. 
 
As others have pointed out it's about weighing up the risk, and the risk isn't worth it imo. After all the club is a business, and for every business that stakes everything on the big play and succeeds there are another ten that go down the gurgler.
 
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
I seriously doubt the viability of bringing in a big name guest or marquee player unless they are going to have an ongoing positive effect on the playing side (maybe like Fred was supposed to do). While I'm talking about a different era here, I remember going to see Trevor Brooking, Mick Channon and (I think) Paul Mariner when they played guest spots with national league teams and the crowds weren't much bigger than normal at those games. Heck I saw Brooking play at the Epsom Showgrounds.....
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
I just feel like Perth is doing something right in this transfer season,  if they succeed will be another thing.

They are making ambitious signings and getting rejected by some big names. But that still shows their ambition. And it means they have also signed some quality players.

Serjovski may not be the huge name that is Robbie Fowler. But he will undoubtedly be a huge danger in this league, and along with Culina for GCU, will be the heart of their teams this season.

Perth have also gone in for fringe Socceroos too and this is what is going to make them sucessful in my opinion. Their ambition to sign big names has paid off and this is a good example of where big names and big money could help a lowly Wellington Phoenix this year.


Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
I seriously doubt the viability of bringing in a big name guest or marquee player unless they are going to have an ongoing positive effect on the playing side (maybe like Fred was supposed to do). While I'm talking about a different era here, I remember going to see Trevor Brooking, Mick Channon and (I think) Paul Mariner when they played guest spots with national league teams and the crowds weren't much bigger than normal at those games. Heck I saw Brooking play at the Epsom Showgrounds.....
 
Agree to an extent.  Football is still a minor sport despite the amazing strides it has come since the Phoneix came on the scene
 
Back in your day (and mine too) football was only played by pommie imports and the funny kids who wdidn't make any rugby teams (and the smattering of other imports who didn't have a north English accent).
 
Today in the school ground you hear kids playing football saying they want to be Kaka or Ronaldinho (and Ronaldo and Roooney...funnily enough no ones says I want to be Lampard or Terry!).
 
I think a big name would draw the punters in the short-term.  I just don't think the nix are in a state this season to afford this as a gamble (not that I know anything about the club finances so maybe Terry P will surprise us all).
 
 

"Phoenix till they lose"

Posting 97% bollox, 8% lies and 3.658% genuine opinion. 

Genuine opinion: FTFFA

Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
SC03 wrote:
It seems there is a little panic starting to seep into the supporter base, but in his last radio interview Ricki did say they are negotiating with one potential striker who would be an automatic signing, and potentially taking another to China.
 
In the real world there is also a budget to operate with.
 
Are crowds really likely to drop to an average of only 5000?
 
 
NEVER !  Not at the home of NZ football !
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Ha should have read through....Great news now your season depends on Milligan being reborn as some sort of ...." midfield football player "
 
 
My moneys on the duck...
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Frankie Mac wrote:
I don't really think there is a great need to throw money around to try and fix all the problems we supposedly have (low attendences, no flair, etc).


�

If we signed Fowler on massive money�it would generate a couple of weeks worth of interest and hype.� The first few games would get bigger crowds and everyone would be happy.� A month into the season, when he still hasn't scored and we are sitting in mid table, we would quickly become the laughing stock - TV1 would take the piss,� Paul Henry would take the piss, all the rugby heads would take the piss, and then all the undecideds would follow suit.� Same crowd size but with more people laughing at us and Terry massively out of pocket.

�

Also, what is more likely to get our license renewed - finishing mid table but with sound finances, or finishing upper-mid table but living hand-to-mouth?

�

Bottom line - Fowler will be a flop, and many players of his ilk will be as well.� This makes signing a player like him on massive money a waste of time.��If we are going to sign players on massive coin, at least carry on down the Fred path - players in the peak, not players like Fowler who peaked about 10 years ago.

�

The club needs sensible progress - season 1 finish last, season 2 not finish last, season 3 push for play-offs, season 4 play-offs, season 5 semis, season 6 win it.� Lets not go�- season 1 finish last, season 2 not finish last, season 3 spunk all our money on has-beens in an attempt to win it and end up going out of business.


Sorry Frankie, but that's bollocks. You're not here and don't know the situation.

We have to make a statement to demonstrate we're bringing value to the league - otherwise our time may be up, and there won't be seasons 4/5/6 to execute your master plan. Bringing someone like Morientes (or with that kind of pedigree) would bring MAJOR interest from the fans and the media, and not just here, but in Australia and maybe Asia as well. It would be a positive step in marketing both the club and the league as well. Whether he would work out for us and bang in a sh*tload of goals? Who the f**k knows? Will Greenacre work out? Will Rojas? No-one knows, but the important thing to show is ambition to get better and go places, to help the league with its image and marketing.

The financial side of things is of course important, but there a few clubs right now in the sh*ts, and getting assistance from the FFA - they can help us, and will, if they percieve we bring value to the league and are worth keeping. Because if we're not creating any buzz on and off the field, if our crowds continue to dwindle and we fail to bring a big enough market for the league, they will get rid of us, especially considering there's a sh*tload of cities in Australia wanting in on A-league action, and considering that the FFA knows that they could get an extra CL spot from 2011 if we're not in the league, they may not have too many qualms about it.

This is the last year of our licence, and we have to make a statement. If we limp into the season and have an average time of it on and off the park (crowds, marketing, etc), it's gonna be a tough sell to get the licence extended. A very tough sell.el grapadura2009-07-10 18:39:54
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Here's the opportunity; there is huge latent support for the Nix in Wellington and surrounds and a lot of people are feed-up with the general doom and gloom and want something to be positive about and get in behind, cue the Nix.

 

Terry is the face of the Nix, has great charisma and infectious positivity and passion. Greater visibility from Terry together with a "make a difference" (on and off the park) signing and we can start to rebuild and realise the support base.

 

Terry personally announcing a "make a difference" signing and away we go.

 

P.S. I know things are tough in Terry�s line of business (and we can and will all do our bit in our own small way (buying season tickets, kit, getting friends to games etc) to help) but as someone has pointed out earlier times probably call for decisive action to turn around the slide � if anyone can do it Terry can.

 
 
 
He dribbles a lot and the opposition dont like it - you can see it all over their faces. (Ron Atkinson)
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
el grapadura wrote:
Frankie Mac wrote:
I don't really think there is a great need to throw money around to try and fix all the problems we supposedly have (low attendences, no flair, etc).


 

If we signed Fowler on massive money it would generate a couple of weeks worth of interest and hype.  The first few games would get bigger crowds and everyone would be happy.  A month into the season, when he still hasn't scored and we are sitting in mid table, we would quickly become the laughing stock - TV1 would take the piss,  Paul Henry would take the piss, all the rugby heads would take the piss, and then all the undecideds would follow suit.  Same crowd size but with more people laughing at us and Terry massively out of pocket.

 

Also, what is more likely to get our license renewed - finishing mid table but with sound finances, or finishing upper-mid table but living hand-to-mouth?

 

Bottom line - Fowler will be a flop, and many players of his ilk will be as well.  This makes signing a player like him on massive money a waste of time.  If we are going to sign players on massive coin, at least carry on down the Fred path - players in the peak, not players like Fowler who peaked about 10 years ago.

 

The club needs sensible progress - season 1 finish last, season 2 not finish last, season 3 push for play-offs, season 4 play-offs, season 5 semis, season 6 win it.  Lets not go - season 1 finish last, season 2 not finish last, season 3 spunk all our money on has-beens in an attempt to win it and end up going out of business.


Sorry Frankie, but that's bollocks. You're not here and don't know the situation.

We have to make a statement to demonstrate we're bringing value to the league - otherwise our time may be up, and there won't be seasone 4/5/6 to execute your master plan. Bringing someone like Morientes (or with that kind of pedigree) would bring MAJOR interest oth from the fans and the media, and not just here, but in Australia and maybe Asia as well. It would be a positive step in marketing both the club and the league as well. Whether he would work out for us and bang in a sh*tload of goals? Who the f**k knows? Will Greenacre work out? Will Rojas? No-one knows, but the important thing to show is ambition to get better and go places, to help the league with its image and marketing.

The financial side of things is of course important, but there a few clubs right now in the sh*ts, and getting assistance from the FFA - they can help us, and will, if they percieve we bring value to the league and are worth keeping. Because if we're not creating any buzz on and off the field, if our crowds continue to dwindle and we fail to bring a big enough market for the league, they will get rid of us, especially considering there's a sh*tload of cities in Australia wanting in on A-league action, and considering that the FFA knows that they could get an extra CL spot from 2011 if we're not in the league, they may not have too many qualms about it.

This is the last year of our licence, and we have to make a statement. If we limp into the season and have an average time of it on and off the park (crowds, marketing, etc), it's gonna be a tough sell to get the licence extended. A very tough sell.
 
An excellent, accurate summation el grap - right on the button.
 
I think Perth is an excellent example of where we need to head quickly if we're going to have any long-term future in the A-League.  In the doldrums for years, they've realised the only way to revitalise football in remote Western Australia, reverse the trend of declining crowds and poor results, and, indeed, ensure their future in the A-League, is by investing in a damn good squad and embarking on some real serious marketing (not least arranging the visits by Wolves and Fulham).  And they've done this without signing a single world-famous player and within the salary cap, except for Sterjovski, who is their marquee.  With the squad they've put together (and possibly a big-name guest player yet to be signed), Perth should get a good payback on their investment in this and future seasons. 
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Great point amxfc!
 
Do we want to be a proactive club like Perth Glory and not be afraid to take a few risks in order to achieve their goals which I should point out are the same as ours and thats to win the A-League, or do we model ourselves on a Club like Newcastle Jets who yes have won a Premiership in their 3rds season but they have also lost arguably one of the best managers in the League (love him or hate him!) to the AIS because their owner is a t**ser who is only investing in the club to boost his own business and corruption interests?
 
Question.  Which path do we want to go down...A-League or NSL?
C-Diddy2009-07-10 10:59:36

"Ive just re-visited this and once again realised that C-Diddy is a genius - a drunk, Newcastle bred disgrace - but a genius." - Hard News, 11:39am 4th June 2009

Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
el grapadura wrote:
Frankie Mac wrote:
I don't really think there is a great need to throw money around to try and fix all the problems we supposedly have (low attendences, no flair, etc).


 

If we signed Fowler on massive money it would generate a couple of weeks worth of interest and hype.  The first few games would get bigger crowds and everyone would be happy.  A month into the season, when he still hasn't scored and we are sitting in mid table, we would quickly become the laughing stock - TV1 would take the piss,  Paul Henry would take the piss, all the rugby heads would take the piss, and then all the undecideds would follow suit.  Same crowd size but with more people laughing at us and Terry massively out of pocket.

 

Also, what is more likely to get our license renewed - finishing mid table but with sound finances, or finishing upper-mid table but living hand-to-mouth?

 

Bottom line - Fowler will be a flop, and many players of his ilk will be as well.  This makes signing a player like him on massive money a waste of time.  If we are going to sign players on massive coin, at least carry on down the Fred path - players in the peak, not players like Fowler who peaked about 10 years ago.

 

The club needs sensible progress - season 1 finish last, season 2 not finish last, season 3 push for play-offs, season 4 play-offs, season 5 semis, season 6 win it.  Lets not go - season 1 finish last, season 2 not finish last, season 3 spunk all our money on has-beens in an attempt to win it and end up going out of business.


Sorry Frankie, but that's bollocks. You're not here and don't know the situation.

We have to make a statement to demonstrate we're bringing value to the league - otherwise our time may be up, and there won't be seasons 4/5/6 to execute your master plan. Bringing someone like Morientes (or with that kind of pedigree) would bring MAJOR interest from the fans and the media, and not just here, but in Australia and maybe Asia as well. It would be a positive step in marketing both the club and the league as well. Whether he would work out for us and bang in a sh*tload of goals? Who the f**k knows? Will Greenacre work out? Will Rojas? No-one knows, but the important thing to show is ambition to get better and go places, to help the league with its image and marketing.

The financial side of things is of course important, but there a few clubs right now in the sh*ts, and getting assistance from the FFA - they can help us, and will, if they percieve we bring value to the league and are worth keeping. Because if we're not creating any buzz on and off the field, if our crowds continue to dwindle and we fail to bring a big enough market for the league, they will get rid of us, especially considering there's a sh*tload of cities in Australia wanting in on A-league action, and considering that the FFA knows that they could get an extra CL spot from 2011 if we're not in the league, they may not have too many qualms about it.

This is the last year of our licence, and we have to make a statement. If we limp into the season and have an average time of it on and off the park (crowds, marketing, etc), it's gonna be a tough sell to get the licence extended. A very tough sell.
 
I am not really sure where I live has any relevance to knowledge about our chances of renewing our license, unless you are running into members of the FFA at Mr Chows on a regular basis.
 
I mentioned earlier that the chances of getting Morientes or someone like him are so f**king slim that I don't think that they are worth talking about.  We can offer him less money, a league with smaller attendances and worse weather than most of the other clubs that will be after him if he wants to keep playing.  On top of that, don't even get me started on the fact that he will also have to agree to live in Wellington.
 
The issue I have is that football is littered with clubs rotting and dying after chasing the dream.  Bradford City, Leeds United, Valencia (although I think that was more about financial mis-management than spunking money on players they could not afford).  British clubs have only just wised up to the fact that they have to be prudent (Newcastle aside) because so many of them have come close to hitting the wall, and these are clubs with history and a bigger fanbase (who are willing to dip into their pockets and help) than we have.
 
Wellington Phoenix is dependant on one man - Terry.  If the he starts losing money because we spunk a load of cash on one player who moves us from 7th to 5th in the table, but doesn't recoup the outlay back, he will leave.  If that happens, it doesn't matter if the club has a license or not - we will cease to exist.
 
On a side note, if the FFA decide to get rid of us because they want another Aussie team there, and an extra CL League spot, they will.  Doesn't matter if we have Fowler, Morientes or Pele playing in the hole for us.

All I do is make the stuff I would've liked
Reference things I wanna watch, reference girls I wanna bite
Now I'm firefly like a burning kite
And yousa fake fuck like a fleshlight

Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Frankie Mac wrote:
[QUOTE=el grapadura] [QUOTE=Frankie Mac]
On a side note, if the FFA decide to get rid of us because they want another Aussie team there, and an extra CL League spot, they will.  Doesn't matter if we have Fowler, Morientes or Pele playing in the hole for us.
 
Mind you Pele might be somewhat cheaper.  In fact as a goodwill ambassador he might do it for free!

"Phoenix till they lose"

Posting 97% bollox, 8% lies and 3.658% genuine opinion. 

Genuine opinion: FTFFA

Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Frankie Mac wrote:
The issue I have is that football is littered with clubs rotting and dying after chasing the dream.� Bradford City, Leeds United, Valencia (although I think that was more about financial mis-management than spunking money on players they could not afford).� British clubs have only just wised up to the fact that they have to be prudent (Newcastle aside) because so many of them have come close to hitting the wall, and these are clubs with history and a bigger fanbase (who are willing to dip into their pockets and help) than we have.

�

Wellington Phoenix is dependant on one man - Terry.� If the he starts losing money because we spunk a load of cash on one player who moves us from 7th to 5th in the table, but doesn't recoup�the outlay back, he will leave.� If that happens, it doesn't matter if the club has a license or not - we will cease to exist.

�

On a side note, if the FFA decide to get rid of us because they want another Aussie team there, and an extra CL League spot, they will.� Doesn't matter if we have Fowler, Morientes or Pele playing in the hole for us.


Terry's not going to be recouping the money he's already spent any time soon.

I guess it really all comes down to him - if he doesn't want to keep financing the club because he's losing money on this, that's his prerogative. It's his money after all, and we can't spend it for him. But he'll lose money with or without Morientes-like signing.

As for the FFA, they want us in. They like the idea of having access to a 4-million market and the opportunities it presents. But they'll support us for only as long as they think we can do a job for them. If they don't, then we'll be gone.

At any rate, it's time to make a big call.
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
el grapadura wrote:
Frankie Mac wrote:
The issue I have is that football is littered with clubs rotting and dying after chasing the dream.  Bradford City, Leeds United, Valencia (although I think that was more about financial mis-management than spunking money on players they could not afford).  British clubs have only just wised up to the fact that they have to be prudent (Newcastle aside) because so many of them have come close to hitting the wall, and these are clubs with history and a bigger fanbase (who are willing to dip into their pockets and help) than we have.

 

Wellington Phoenix is dependant on one man - Terry.  If the he starts losing money because we spunk a load of cash on one player who moves us from 7th to 5th in the table, but doesn't recoup the outlay back, he will leave.  If that happens, it doesn't matter if the club has a license or not - we will cease to exist.

 

On a side note, if the FFA decide to get rid of us because they want another Aussie team there, and an extra CL League spot, they will.  Doesn't matter if we have Fowler, Morientes or Pele playing in the hole for us.


Terry's not going to be recouping the money he's already spent any time soon.

I guess it really all comes down to him - if he doesn't want to keep financing the club because he's losing money on this, that's his prerogative. It's his money after all, and we can't spend it for him. But he'll lose money with or without Morientes-like signing.

As for the FFA, they want us in. They like the idea of having access to a 4-million market and the opportunities it presents. But they'll support us for only as long as they think we can do a job for them. If they don't, then we'll be gone.

At any rate, it's time to make a big call.
 
are you saying what I think you're saying??
 
Bring back George???

Founder

Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Obviously he'd be too expensive, but one can only dream.
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
el grapadura wrote:
Frankie Mac wrote:
The issue I have is that football is littered with clubs rotting and dying after chasing the dream.  Bradford City, Leeds United, Valencia (although I think that was more about financial mis-management than spunking money on players they could not afford).  British clubs have only just wised up to the fact that they have to be prudent (Newcastle aside) because so many of them have come close to hitting the wall, and these are clubs with history and a bigger fanbase (who are willing to dip into their pockets and help) than we have.

 

Wellington Phoenix is dependant on one man - Terry.  If the he starts losing money because we spunk a load of cash on one player who moves us from 7th to 5th in the table, but doesn't recoup the outlay back, he will leave.  If that happens, it doesn't matter if the club has a license or not - we will cease to exist.

 

On a side note, if the FFA decide to get rid of us because they want another Aussie team there, and an extra CL League spot, they will.  Doesn't matter if we have Fowler, Morientes or Pele playing in the hole for us.


Terry's not going to be recouping the money he's already spent any time soon.

I guess it really all comes down to him - if he doesn't want to keep financing the club because he's losing money on this, that's his prerogative. It's his money after all, and we can't spend it for him. But he'll lose money with or without Morientes-like signing.

As for the FFA, they want us in. They like the idea of having access to a 4-million market and the opportunities it presents. But they'll support us for only as long as they think we can do a job for them. If they don't, then we'll be gone.

At any rate, it's time to make a big call.
 
and that is the issue I have with chasing the dream.  Terry is losing money on this and we love him for that.  He has more money than Greene and has budgeted to afford an amount every year (although I am sure as a businessman he is very keen to start making some money out of it very quickly).  If we start losing significantly more than what has been budgeted is the time he pulls the plug and the club goes down the drain.
 
The FFA want us in, so I am sure that a club that finishes mid table and is financially prudent is more attractive to them than an upper mid-table club that is financially on the edge.

All I do is make the stuff I would've liked
Reference things I wanna watch, reference girls I wanna bite
Now I'm firefly like a burning kite
And yousa fake fuck like a fleshlight

Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
But for me, a big part of the issue is how to become financially prudent. Spending modestly is still spending, and if you don't get the attendance, sponsorship and marketing opportunites to recoup the outlay, you just continue bleeding money with no end in sight.

But maybe, just maybe, you might be able to increase the crowd numbers, and improve sponsorship and marketing opportunities by making a bold signing. Does a bigger outlay mean a quicker potential return? That's a call for Terry to make.

And I'll go off now and try to find my happy place.
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
el grapadura wrote:
Obviously he'd be too expensive, but one can only dream.


As I said earlier, he told me on twitter he'd do it for $250k.

There's a heart of gold in that diminutive figure.

Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
I agree, we would all love to see a statement made, dramatic steps taken, bold initiatives in place to launch us into this crucial season.
Two top quality strikers signed would be awesome...there's still time! but...

I suspect the reality of this season will be somewhat different.

Its obvious Tony, Ricki and management are operating under tight budget constraints, compared to the free-spending, press-generating activities of several HAL clubs in this pre-season.
No, the Nix aren't grabbing the headlines,with no dramatic quality signings, (yet!) no Main Sponsor, no EPL or top flight pre-season home fixtures to drive season ticket sales up.
 Its all very low key,and there is almost no expectation from anyone other than the few of us hardcore supporters.Some would say Wellington Phoenix don't have a hope.

In my books, this will work in our favour.

Ricki, Tony and the team, know what's at stake this season -this is crunch time.
They have clearly identified the types of players required.While all the attention's elsewhere with the glitz and  glamour, Ricki and co. can concentrate on getting the squad to bond, building on strong team spirit and extracting total commitment from each and every member.
Steadily improving  positive results will help attract bigger crowds and perhaps lock in a sponsor or two as well.
What will give the Nix the biggest breakthroughs this season will be a team and management united in purpose, focused on whats required this season, giving it their all....driven by fanatical,vocal support.   It has the potential to beat a team of star individuals anyday.

RedGed2009-07-11 01:50:22

  Improving,,on the up, a work in progress from Italiano and the Nix. Bring on the bathroom bling in '24! COYN!

Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
RedGed wrote:
I agree, we would all love to see a statement made, dramatic steps taken, bold initiatives in place to launch us into this crucial season.
...

Ricki, Tony and the team, know what's at stake this season -this is crunch time.
They have clearly identified the types of players required.While all the attention's elsewhere with the glitz and  glamour, Ricki and co. can concentrate on getting the squad to bond, building on strong team spirit and extracting total commitment from each and every member.
Steadily improving  positive results will help attract bigger crowds and perhaps lock in a sponsor or two as well.
What will give the Nix the biggest breakthroughs this season will be a team and management united in purpose, focused on whats required this season, giving it their all....driven by fanatical,vocal support.   It has the potential to beat a team of star individuals anyday.

 
Amen to that!
 
Especially the fanatical vocal support - that's one thing YF and the whole crowd can do well!
 
 

"Phoenix till they lose"

Posting 97% bollox, 8% lies and 3.658% genuine opinion. 

Genuine opinion: FTFFA

Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Hard News wrote:
I think you missed C-Diddy's point.

I think he was being sarcastic suggesting that plenty of younger players get crocked as well.

Someone mentioned Morientes as an example somewhere here.  There is someone who is 33, that has had few injury concerns through his whole career, is currently unemployed (and probably beyond our price range).

He'd tick a stack of boxes though, world reputation, Played in the premier League - for the Premier League snobs, played in Spain - for the anti-Premier League snobs, played for Liverpool - for the Liverpool snobs.

There must be others like him as well.


Morientes? Sorry but you are having a laugh, there are still  prem teams out there who would be interested signing him as well as other clubs around Europe. We'd have more chance signing Jari Litmanen at 38 than Morientes. Or did I miss sarcasm in this post? If so sorry.


I agree with FrankieMac I think Fowler will be a flop also and I don't think we should be throwing silly money around on ancient/injured big name players. Dwight Yorke worked to an extent as he could (a) still clearly play a bit and (b) had played for the highest profile club in the world.

How many casual fans have even heard of Morientes? Even a lot would struggle with telling you who Fowler was and why he was considered so great and it's the casual fans we want. The knowledgable fans already turn up in the YF zone.

In the long term it's all about getting the mums interested in bringing the kids along and getting the kids playing football. We need to be targeting Pacific island, Maori and Asian people as well.

In the short term it's about being more consistent on the pitch and cracking the problem of positive media support, something that has eluded us, that and remaining finacially solvent.


<!-- /* Style Definitions */ p.Msonormal, li.Msonormal, div.Msonormal {mso-style-parent:""; margin:0cm; margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:12.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";} span.EmailStyle15 {mso-style-:personal; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-ansi-font-size:10.0pt; mso-bidi-font-size:10.0pt; font-family:Arial; mso-ascii-font-family:Arial; mso-hansi-font-family:Arial; mso-bidi-font-family:Arial; color:text;} @page Section1 {size:612.0pt 792.0pt; margin:72.0pt 90.0pt 72.0pt 90.0pt; mso-er-margin:36.0pt; mso-footer-margin:36.0pt; mso-paper-source:0;} div.Section1 {page:Section1;} -->

ForteanTimes2009-07-11 12:37:49

Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
There is a difference in NZ betwween a big name player (eg Zidane) and one we have to explain to people (Morientes, Fowler to a leser extent). That is where age is not such a big barrier when trying to get people through the gates. A 40 yr old Fat Brazilian Ronaldo doing SFA would cause a lot more hype and make a better signing then a 33 yr old Morientes who plays a little better.
You know we belong together...

Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
You all seem to be forgetting that Terry paid quite a few million bucks to bring the LA Galaxy (incl that Dave guy) to town a few years back.
 
And what did that match bring with it?
 
Media Attention, Great Publicity, HUGE merchandise sales, Sponsors etc etc
 
All because Terry had the forsight to make it happen!
 
I understand that there's a snowballs chance in hell (or potentially Gisborne which I believe is a suburb of Hell!) of getting a huge name signing without parting with a moderately large sum of money but think of the interest that one man brought to the Phoenix and imagine that spread over the course of the season if we were to sign two players who have the potential to make a difference.
 
 
 
I like that thought!

"Ive just re-visited this and once again realised that C-Diddy is a genius - a drunk, Newcastle bred disgrace - but a genius." - Hard News, 11:39am 4th June 2009

Permalink Permalink