Back to Forum

Us vs Mariners - 16:00 Sun - match Fred

705 replies · 24,503 views
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
yes shes just gone back to have the sprog for whatever reason. Maybe they have better doctors over there.
 
anyways - I want us to throw caution to the wind on Sunday and play the Steve-O/Thompson six up front formation including Chen and Costa.

Founder

Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
SiNZ wrote:
+1 LG. Actually +1 x2; I've had the spouse with me too.
 
Tigers has avatar-envy
 
i must admit it adds a certain class to the board - i may even reconsider my minimalist approach - but probably not
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
el grapadura wrote:
Didn't Daniel get fast-tracked for citizenship? Pretty sure he's a NZ citizen, but still ineligible to play for the AWs.
 
How did he manage that? Git. I had to wait three years, making business trips to Aussie a pain with returning resident visas, and it's changed so Daniel should have had to wait five. However, there is a NZ Herald news item that comes up on Google saying he did indeed manage to sweet talk the Immigration department in Dec'08.
 
Remind me again of the FIFA residence rules on second citizenships - it was two years, in which case Daniel qualifiies, but if I recall it changed. Certainly five years was being talked about, but did it pass into the statutes. I should look at the FIFA regulations again, but I figure you may have already done so? 
 
That same Herald article from December said he might get clearance in time for the Confed Cup, but that clearly was not the case.
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
wrong thread. old news. do your research

Founder

Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Feverish wrote:
yes shes just gone back to have the sprog for whatever reason. Maybe they have better doctors over there.
 
anyways - I want us to throw caution to the wind on Sunday and play the Steve-O/Thompson six up front formation including Chen and Costa.
 
Ah some excitement at last!
 
                              Paston
 
                    Durante    Sigmund
 
                          Lia     Brown
 
                               Ifill
 
     Hearfield   Bertos  Greenacre   Costa   Rojas
 
 
A 7-6 win and nobody will be complaining!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qe_B5CzbTJo - Caceres winning penalty v Perth - footage from the Fever Zone

Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
I would definitely be complaining about 6 goals against... but I'm a keeper.
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
As an aside there will be a few of us older buggers who remember the standard and only formation when we were kids was 2, 3, 5. Aside from miss matches I don't remember there being that many real spankings despite 5 forwards taking on 2 backs - you would think there would have been. Backs were the hardest, midfielders the fittest, wingers the quickest and inside rights and lefts the creators and the center forward the flash bugger who knew where the net was.
 
Simple game then ..... but I digress.
Whitby boy2009-09-23 21:15:20
He dribbles a lot and the opposition dont like it - you can see it all over their faces. (Ron Atkinson)
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Whitby boy wrote:
As an aside there will be a few of us�older buggers who remember the standard and only formation when we were kids was 2, 3, 5. Aside from miss matches I don't remember there being that many real spankings despite 5 forwards taking on 2 backs - you would think there would have been. Backs were the hardest, midfielders the fittest, wingers the quickest and inside rights and lefts the creators and the center forward the flash bugger who knew where the net was.


�

Simple game then ..... but I digress.


I was recalling the 2-3-5 formation of my youth to my son only last week. The memory is fading and for the life of me I couldn't think how the 2 fullbacks coped?
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
whitby fever wrote:
Whitby boy wrote:
As an aside there will be a few of us older buggers who remember the standard and only formation when we were kids was 2, 3, 5. Aside from miss matches I don't remember there being that many real spankings despite 5 forwards taking on 2 backs - you would think there would have been. Backs were the hardest, midfielders the fittest, wingers the quickest and inside rights and lefts the creators and the center forward the flash bugger who knew where the net was.
 
Simple game then ..... but I digress.


I was recalling the 2-3-5 formation of my youth to my son only last week. The memory is fading and for the life of me I couldn't think how the 2 fullbacks coped?
 
From memory it went something like;
 
If they came through the middle the nearest back took on the ball carrier the other dropped to sweep (that was before there were sweepers).
 
If they came down a wing the back on that side went across to the ball carriers wing. The other back drifted across to the middle.
 
Midfielders job was to track back and pick up spare players - I guess they were box to box midfielders and never even knew it  
Whitby boy2009-09-23 21:24:33
He dribbles a lot and the opposition dont like it - you can see it all over their faces. (Ron Atkinson)
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
whitby fever wrote:
Whitby boy wrote:
As an aside there will be a few of us older buggers who remember the standard and only formation when we were kids was 2, 3, 5. Aside from miss matches I don't remember there being that many real spankings despite 5 forwards taking on 2 backs - you would think there would have been. Backs were the hardest, midfielders the fittest, wingers the quickest and inside rights and lefts the creators and the center forward the flash bugger who knew where the net was.


 

Simple game then ..... but I digress.


I was recalling the 2-3-5 formation of my youth to my son only last week. The memory is fading and for the life of me I couldn't think how the 2 fullbacks coped?
Because us bloody wingers spent all day up and down the bloody sideline.

GET YOUR SHIRTS OFF FOR THE BOYS

Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
ballane wrote:

whitby fever wrote:
Whitby boy wrote:
As an aside there will be a few of us�older buggers who remember the standard and only formation when we were kids was 2, 3, 5. Aside from miss matches I don't remember there being that many real spankings despite 5 forwards taking on 2 backs - you would think there would have been. Backs were the hardest, midfielders the fittest, wingers the quickest and inside rights and lefts the creators and the center forward the flash bugger who knew where the net was.


�

Simple game then ..... but I digress.


I was recalling the 2-3-5 formation of my youth to my son only last week. The memory is fading and for the life of me I couldn't think how the 2 fullbacks coped?
Because us bloody wingers spent all day up and down the bloody sideline.


Like that - inside rights and lefts - the creators

"Phoenix till they lose"

Posting 97% bollox, 8% lies and 3.658% genuine opinion. 

Genuine opinion: FTFFA

Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
ballane wrote:
whitby fever wrote:
Whitby boy wrote:
As an aside there will be a few of us older buggers who remember the standard and only formation when we were kids was 2, 3, 5. Aside from miss matches I don't remember there being that many real spankings despite 5 forwards taking on 2 backs - you would think there would have been. Backs were the hardest, midfielders the fittest, wingers the quickest and inside rights and lefts the creators and the center forward the flash bugger who knew where the net was.


 

Simple game then ..... but I digress.


I was recalling the 2-3-5 formation of my youth to my son only last week. The memory is fading and for the life of me I couldn't think how the 2 fullbacks coped?
Because us bloody wingers spent all day up and down the bloody sideline.
 
Could that be the origin of the term Wing Back ?
 
 
Whitby boy2009-09-23 21:47:12
He dribbles a lot and the opposition dont like it - you can see it all over their faces. (Ron Atkinson)
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Steve-O wrote:
Feverish wrote:
yes shes just gone back to have the sprog for whatever reason. Maybe they have better doctors over there.
 
anyways - I want us to throw caution to the wind on Sunday and play the Steve-O/Thompson six up front formation including Chen and Costa.
 
Ah some excitement at last!
 
                              Paston
 
                    Durante    Sigmund
 
                          Lia     Brown
 
                               Ifill
 
     Hearfield   Bertos  Greenacre   Costa   Rojas
 
 
A 7-6 win and nobody will be complaining!
 
Not sure why you are going with a 2-2-1-5, I'd put Ifill in the front line as well.
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Whitby boy wrote:
ballane wrote:
whitby fever wrote:
Whitby boy wrote:
As an aside there will be a few of us older buggers who remember the standard and only formation when we were kids was 2, 3, 5. Aside from miss matches I don't remember there being that many real spankings despite 5 forwards taking on 2 backs - you would think there would have been. Backs were the hardest, midfielders the fittest, wingers the quickest and inside rights and lefts the creators and the center forward the flash bugger who knew where the net was.


 

Simple game then ..... but I digress.


I was recalling the 2-3-5 formation of my youth to my son only last week. The memory is fading and for the life of me I couldn't think how the 2 fullbacks coped?
Because us bloody wingers spent all day up and down the bloody sideline.
 
Could that be the origin of the term Wing Back ?
 
 
Not sure about that,but if my coach had anyting to do with what they were to be called it would have been  you lazy bastard.

GET YOUR SHIRTS OFF FOR THE BOYS

Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
ballane wrote:

Whitby boy wrote:
ballane wrote:
whitby fever wrote:
Whitby boy wrote:
As an aside there will be a few of us�older buggers who remember the standard and only formation when we were kids was 2, 3, 5. Aside from miss matches I don't remember there being that many real spankings despite 5 forwards taking on 2 backs - you would think there would have been. Backs were the hardest, midfielders the fittest, wingers the quickest and inside rights and lefts the creators and the center forward the flash bugger who knew where the net was.


�

Simple game then ..... but I digress.
I was recalling the 2-3-5 formation of my youth to my son only last week. The memory is fading and for the life of me I couldn't think how the 2 fullbacks coped?
Because us bloody wingers spent all day up and down the bloody sideline.





�

Could that be the origin of the term Wing Back ?

�

�
Not sure about that,but if my coach had anyting to do with what they were to be called it would have been� you lazy bastard.


Not right whingers?

"Phoenix till they lose"

Posting 97% bollox, 8% lies and 3.658% genuine opinion. 

Genuine opinion: FTFFA

Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Daniel isn't playing - that should improve the team. 
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Give Costa a start up front with Greenacre
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Sneaky Butler 2 wrote:
Give Costa a start up front with Greenacre


Another baseless left field suggestion...

Grumpy old bastard alert

Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
I dunno - Costa scored two ithe other night for our 'reserves' and apparently outshone Chen. If Ifill is out injured, then Costa would seem a tangible option up front to me. 


Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
ballane wrote:
whitby fever wrote:
Whitby boy wrote:
As an aside there will be a few of us older buggers who remember the standard and only formation when we were kids was 2, 3, 5. Aside from miss matches I don't remember there being that many real spankings despite 5 forwards taking on 2 backs - you would think there would have been. Backs were the hardest, midfielders the fittest, wingers the quickest and inside rights and lefts the creators and the center forward the flash bugger who knew where the net was.


 

Simple game then ..... but I digress.


I was recalling the 2-3-5 formation of my youth to my son only last week. The memory is fading and for the life of me I couldn't think how the 2 fullbacks coped?
Because us bloody wingers spent all day up and down the bloody sideline.

Yes we did.And if my coach had named us it would have been..^*#@ Cross NOWs!!!
RedGed2009-09-24 08:42:57

  Improving,,on the up, a work in progress from Italiano and the Nix. Bring on the bathroom bling in '24! COYN!

Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
SiNZ wrote:
el grapadura wrote:
Didn't Daniel get fast-tracked for citizenship? Pretty sure he's a NZ citizen, but still ineligible to play for the AWs.





�

How did he manage that? Git. I had to wait three years, making business trips to Aussie a pain with returning resident visas, and it's changed so Daniel should have had to wait five. However, there is a NZ Herald news item that comes up on Google saying he did indeed manage to sweet talk the Immigration department in Dec'08.

�

Remind me again of the FIFA residence rules on second citizenships - it was two years, in which case Daniel qualifiies, but if I recall it changed. Certainly five years was being talked about, but did it pass into the statutes. I should look at the FIFA regulations�again, but I figure you may have already done so?�

�

That same Herald article from December said he might get clearance in time for the Confed Cup, but that clearly was not the case.


At the risk of incurring the wrath of Feverish...

The FIFA rule was changed from 2 to 5 years last year, maybe in May? There was a bit of confusion at the time as to what rule would apply to Daniel (resident in NZ before the rule change, but became citizen after the change), and it would seem that FIFA take it from the time of citizenship, making Daniel ineligible for AWs until 2013 presumably.
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
would Daniel get into the AW's now though? I'm not so sure, certainly wouldn't in a few years.....he barely makes it into the starting line up for the nix, even less chance now with Caceras playing.

Queenslander 3x a year.

Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
theprof wrote:
would Daniel get into the AW's now though? I'm not so sure, certainly wouldn't in a few years.....he barely makes it into the starting line up for the nix, even less chance now with Caceras playing.

Not playing for the Nix didn't stop Mulligan and Christie playing for the All Whites

Not sure what this all has to do with the game this weekend other than Daniel is not here
Royal2009-09-24 13:26:48
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
                      paston
muscat  sigmund  durante  lochhead
bertos         lia        brown    caceres
                greenacre   ifill
 
Bench I would like to see:
//Crowther // Rojas // Hearfield // Costa
 
but think it will more likely be Ferrante there.
Ricki has to have striker cover on the bench this week. HAS TO.
If Ifill does play, we still want cover and Costa has got to be there in stead of having Ferrante on bench. It does mean we have little defensive cover though.
 
If Ifill is out, then Costa to start and Chen on bench for me


Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
playwithFire wrote:
                      paston
muscat  sigmund  durante  lochhead
bertos         lia        brown    caceres
                greenacre   ifill
 
Bench I would like to see:
//Crowther // Rojas // Hearfield // Costa
 
but think it will more likely be Ferrante there.
Ricki has to have striker cover on the bench this week. HAS TO.
If Ifill does play, we still want cover and Costa has got to be there in stead of having Ferrante on bench. It does mean we have little defensive cover though.
 
If Ifill is out, then Costa to start and Chen on bench for me
+1, but keep the shape the same as the last few weeks if Ifill is starting, hopefully he'll make the bench at least.
You know we belong together...

Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
I think Heafield would start ahead of costa. Costa hasnt even made the bench at any point this season,why would he suddenly start

Allegedly

Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
We'd be much better off switching to 4-4-2 and playing Siggie up front with Our Troy so we can both attack and defend from the front.
 
Sorry.  Relapse.

Incredible stamina. No shame. Yellow Fever.

Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Banstick yourself...NOW

Allegedly

Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
could be our very own harnwell :L
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
playwithFire wrote:
I dunno - Costa scored two ithe other night for our 'reserves' and apparently outshone Chen. If Ifill is out injured, then Costa would seem a tangible option up front to me. 
 
Without having checked other threads yet, did anyone see this reserves game?
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
SC03 wrote:
playwithFire wrote:
I dunno - Costa scored two ithe other night for our 'reserves' and apparently outshone Chen. If Ifill is out injured, then Costa would seem a tangible option up front to me. 
 
Without having checked other threads yet, did anyone see this reserves game?


Game here

http://www.yellowfever.co.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=10266
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
thanks, I'd missed that.
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
It appears there are only 5000 people at the stadium watching the egg ball game Wellington vs Southland.

So it looks like the Phoenix are pulling in decent crowds at the moment, in comparison :)
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Ard Righ wrote:
It appears there are only 5000 people at the stadium watching the egg ball game Wellington vs Southland.

So it looks like the Phoenix are pulling in decent crowds at the moment, in comparison :)


Consider that the weather is really crap tonight. That put me off going (I was offered a free ticket as well)
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Erm yeah thats actually a good crowd. A fair comparison would be the wednesday night game vs newcastle,if the weather is rubbish. Even that is unfair as its in the school holidays.

Allegedly

Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Torne wrote:
Ard Righ wrote:
It appears there are only 5000 people at the stadium watching the egg ball game Wellington vs Southland.

So it looks like the Phoenix are pulling in decent crowds at the moment, in comparison :)


Consider that the weather is really crap tonight. That put me off going (I was offered a free ticket as well)


Meh, harden up :P

The crowd at the earlier home game was bigger, and the weather then was crap too :)
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Thursday night wouldve put people off too

Allegedly

Permalink Permalink
Back to Wellington Phoenix Men Forum Home Back to top