Aha. That is much better! And I immediately respect more the opinion of anyone who can correctly use the word "conflate".
I don't necessarily disagree with what you're saying, but my point is that while all that might be nice and good it's not going likely to result in a much greater outcome (= more really good players) than what they are doing. It will, however, cost sh1t loads of money and disrupt the "market" hugely.
I also think you have some inaccuracies in there. You say that APFA etc aren't "professional environments" but, if the Nix started their own Academy and signed all of APFA players (maybe not all, but it doesn't change the point) how does the fact that it has a Nix badge on it make it a more professional environment?
In my view APFA offers as good a solution as anything the Nix could throw up. So to would Ole, if everyone could get along with them.
Your point about cost is very valid though. There shouldn't be a cost if you're a good enough player. APFA have for ages doled out scholarships, Ole do to but keep it pretty quiet. I'd like to think, although it hasn't been said, that if the Phoenix wanted a player to attend APFA but he couldn't afford it that they would stump up.
Assuming that is the case, I don't think there's a better (= more pragmatic) solution in the offing.
Good chat though.
I think all of this makes sense. I'm very interested in this because I think we actually have a quite large advantage here, NZ has produced some decent young players in the past 5 years and withut spending above the cap we're going to have to rely on younger players if we want to do something in this league.
What I don't quite get is what's actually changing? What does the partnership actually involve if these academies continue charging players to attend and the Phoenix aren't actually involved with coaching? I don't actually see how these partnerships are going to produce any more quality players
The Phoenix will still be aware of who the good players in NZ are at different levels so not sure they need to enter into partnerships purely to identify talent (it's in academies interests to identify players to pro clubs anyway because having a record of producing pro players surely means that their programme will be more popular - hence Wyners claiming every NZ player who turned up there once). I can see what's in it for the academy, suddenly your "Offical Development Partner of the Phoenix" and who wouldn't want to send young Jonny along there then.
Or is the plan that the Phoenix will pay for players to attend, or be able to send kids there who couldn't afford to attend otherwise? That would make more sense to me...