Wellington Phoenix Men

What's really wrong with the Wellington Phoenix?

878 replies · 120,315 views
about 8 years ago

When was that comment written? Oh, not after this game but back after a game where Ridenton was motm. Form comes and goes.

Permalink Permalink
about 8 years ago

Really, when was he man of the match? I agree with  Bunter  regarding his  passing as he is just not accurate enough.

Permalink Permalink
about 8 years ago

whatever wrote:

Really, when was he man of the match? I agree with  Bunter  regarding his  passing as he is just not accurate enough.

he has been mom a couple of times . Try turning your attention to Burns who gives the ball away then doesnt even chase back

Oi Oi Edgecumbe... lets have a clean sheet

Permalink Permalink
about 8 years ago

When were the couple of times Ridenton was the  MOM? 

Yes Burns had a shocker last night, he does not seem interested. This has been a common theme with a number of players this year.

Permalink Permalink
about 8 years ago · edited about 8 years ago · History

burns and several others should be ashamed of themselves for their performance last night

a couple of others were unfortunately just passengers who were out of their depth

durante, fox, krishna and doyle stood up, but a team needs more than 4 players who are putting in a shift

360footballnews.com

Permalink Permalink
about 8 years ago

You do have to question why the players seem disinterested. At least under Ernie they appeared to be trying. Was pretty embarrassed with the effort last night. It’s  generally the manager who creates the culture therefore I wonder if the team aren’t buying what the coach is putting out? 

Permalink Permalink
about 8 years ago

You'd think for their own professional pride it would be 100%. Doesn't matter who the manager is. Anyone who doesn't chase back after he's given it away should be subbed immediately.

Oi Oi Edgecumbe... lets have a clean sheet

Permalink Permalink
about 8 years ago

exactly

at what point does a player take responsibility for his own professional conduct no matter what is happening around him?

burns arrived at the club fit and sharp. for his first couple of games, he was so much sharper than anything else we had. his decline may also be down to the training environment etc, but he himself is responsible for his performances and he is also free to make up for any deficiencies he see in how he is being trained by the club. as a pro, he should know by now that the only person he can rely upon to make sure he is properly prepared and his career is protected is himself

also, take out every motivation that a player could possibly have on match day, maybe they hate the coach and the club and the fans for that matter, and leave just one thing, self interest and surely you would still get a better effort than what we saw from burns and his pals last night

360footballnews.com

Permalink Permalink
about 8 years ago

How many of the phoneix team would make any other A league team?

Remember NZers take up a foreigner spot in other A league teams

Answer -Krishna -theres not another player at present that another A league team would take.

Thats why we are bottom.

Until the owners are prepared to invest in better quality players, the Phoneix will always be a bottom 4 team as it has been year after year. Being in the top 6 has been an exception. 

Better quality is not just skill level, but pride of performance, a determination to win, a personal motivation, conviction to succeed. We arent seeing that. 

Permalink Permalink
about 8 years ago

You'd think for their own professional pride it would be 100%. Doesn't matter who the manager is. Anyone who doesn't chase back after he's given it away should be subbed immediately.

He didn’t even sub players who passed more to the opposition.

Founder

Permalink Permalink
about 8 years ago

Feverish wrote:

You'd think for their own professional pride it would be 100%. Doesn't matter who the manager is. Anyone who doesn't chase back after he's given it away should be subbed immediately.

He didn’t even sub players who passed more to the opposition.

Maybe because the replacements he had did it even more often if thats possible. You really have to wonder what the problem is,its not a new issue and the lack of effort at times and seeming as if they dont dont give a stuff at times has been with us a while sadly.

GET YOUR SHIRTS OFF FOR THE BOYS

Permalink Permalink
about 8 years ago

1. Krishna

2. Burns [someone would take him because of his reputation]

3. Tando

4. Doyle

Permalink Permalink
about 8 years ago

Mullen, Fox,

You know we belong together...

Permalink Permalink
about 8 years ago

You wanna know what's wrong at the Phoenix at the moment???

She isn't really going out with him!

"Ive just re-visited this and once again realised that C-Diddy is a genius - a drunk, Newcastle bred disgrace - but a genius." - Hard News, 11:39am 4th June 2009

Permalink Permalink
about 8 years ago · edited about 8 years ago · History

bunter wrote:

The coach doesn't pick the best players - easy as that.

The team needs a coach who knows who the best players are.

The following players shouldn't even be in the squad

Worst first:

Patterson - no. 

Ridenton - gives the ball away.

Smith - too light

Rufer - not good enough.

Rogerson - has some ability but not A league level yet


The biggest problem is Ridenton.

I'll be blunt - starting Ridenton every week is like playing with 10 men vs 12. He gives the ball away. The opposition know this so they don't mark him - they want him to get the ball because he gives it back to them. He can't score open goals and loses the ball in dangerous positions. At times, plods aimlessly across the pitch - hides. Gives low quality passes to team mates. Good moves end when he gets the ball.

His team mates yell 'don't lose it' when he gets the ball.

The rest (and Cacache) are all decent players, some excellent ones.

My starting 11 FWIW:

I was with you until here. And then you went full retard.

never go full retard.

Grumpy old bastard alert

Permalink Permalink
about 8 years ago

You'd think for their own professional pride it would be 100%. Doesn't matter who the manager is. Anyone who doesn't chase back after he's given it away should be subbed immediately.

Reminds me of the Ricky Horror Show season when even the great Paul Ifill, who never gave less than 100%, turned into a frustrated and disinterested player because of all the crap going on with the coaching issue. Even the very best and most whole hearted players can lose the plot if they aren't happy. Seems to me to be a fair bit of unhappiness in the team right now.

It was very odd watching us against CCM. We were like a zombie football team, doing a lethargic muscle-memory approximation of what a real, live team does. At no stage did we appear to have a clue how to win or a desire to win. If we'd been shambling around and moaning "brains, brains!" I would've only been slightly more surprised. 

Never thought I'd say this but apart from the slight pleasure of watching a few of the younger players' progress there is literally nothing about the Nix that makes me want to engage with them at the moment. Hopefully someone can fix this broken club soon but I'm not holding my breath.

Permalink Permalink
about 8 years ago

With all that is wrong at the nix people would be better off supporting their nearest National League team than the nix. Not saying the nix players are bad but the team as a whole is really bad. Bunch of 2nd rate players in a 4th rate team, yet I still give my cash over for a season membership. I'll be giving that to Team Wellington at this rate and getting tickets to the odd nix game when I can

Permalink Permalink
about 8 years ago

Hard News wrote:

Some people have always done both.  They aren't mutually exclusive.


I normally get the nix membership and attend the odd Team Welly game but I'll switch it over next year.
Paying for both memberships?  Yea maybe one day when I'm not a student sometimes you have to prioritise where the money goes, mediocrity VS comedy VS rent and food etc. The nix playing this way is not making it easy for me or many others to continue. Maybe I'll convince myself again next year that will be the year of the Phoenix
Permalink Permalink
about 8 years ago

Good to see the club announced Darije's departure via email before we had to find out about it from Stuff.

I'm impressed tbh.

Permalink Permalink
about 8 years ago

Outpost wrote:

(---)

Reminds me of the Ricky Horror Show season when even the great Paul Ifill, who never gave less than 100%, turned into a frustrated and disinterested player because of all the crap going on with the coaching issue. Even the very best and most whole hearted players can lose the plot if they aren't happy. Seems to me to be a fair bit of unhappiness in the team right now.

It was very odd watching us against CCM. We were like a zombie football team, doing a lethargic muscle-memory approximation of what a real, live team does. At no stage did we appear to have a clue how to win or a desire to win. If we'd been shambling around and moaning "brains, brains!" I would've only been slightly more surprised. 

Never thought I'd say this but apart from the slight pleasure of watching a few of the younger players' progress there is literally nothing about the Nix that makes me want to engage with them at the moment. Hopefully someone can fix this broken club soon but I'm not holding my breath.

That is probably the most accurate description, ever. I take my hat off to you, sir.

Actually, getting outplayed quite a bit these days

Permalink Permalink
about 8 years ago

Good to see the club announced Darije's departure via email before we had to find out about it from Stuff.

I'm impressed tbh.

I guess they sent him the email too

Oi Oi Edgecumbe... lets have a clean sheet

Permalink Permalink
about 8 years ago

This Darije debacle epitomises what is wrong with the club. 

Permalink Permalink
about 8 years ago

Whiners: "Sort this shark out Phoenix, we're horrid"

Phoenix: "Okay we've sacked the coach"

Whiners: "Sacking the coach is everything that is wrong with this club"

Jesus wept.


Permalink Permalink
about 8 years ago

Baiter wrote:

Whiners: "Sort this shark out Phoenix, we're horrid"

Phoenix: "Okay we've sacked the coach"

Whiners: "Sacking the coach is everything that is wrong with this club"

Jesus wept.

The did not sack him, he resigned. The only coach that got sacked was Ricky, Ernie and Darije gave up.

Permalink Permalink
about 8 years ago

Baiter wrote:

Whiners: "Sort this shark out Phoenix, we're horrid"

Phoenix: "Okay we've sacked the coach"

Whiners: "Sacking the coach is everything that is wrong with this club"

Jesus wept.

but its so accurate - what's wrong with the club? Every fudgeing thing!

we have one coach leave mid season due to poor results, we then re-sign a players to keep them here and then hire a coach to bring in change, changes are suggested and we sack the coach (or allow him to leave)

so what's wrong - the management making shark deicisions and expecting great results.

Queenslander 3x a year.

Permalink Permalink
about 8 years ago

He didn't fudgeing resign.  That is 100% clear from this situation.  100%

Even on these forums it's been clear that they have been trying to sack him for a month. It has nothing to do with him wanting to implement plans it has to do with him being a shark coach. 

Yes the club could put their hand up and say we fudgeed up appointing him but realistically they don't need to because their behaviour has made that clear.


Permalink Permalink
about 8 years ago

So Kalezić wanted to spend more money and the club said no......... I can see why he left.

Mr Positive

Permalink Permalink
about 8 years ago

Royz wrote:

So Kalezić wanted to spend more money and the club said no......... I can see why he left.

This take intrigues me. The Darije signings we saw certainly weren't big money options and I can't recall seeing him talking about needing a war chest. As a guy that didn't tend to pull his punches when dealing with media I would have expected to see some strong comments about that. 

He talked about thinking his players weren't up to it but I don't recall him saying he didn't think he had the funds to fix that.

"He's operating a turnstile down the left flank"

Permalink Permalink
about 8 years ago

Also lost Gui and Dario who would have been a fair amount of Salary cap space and replaced them with Burns and what you would suspect were low price options in Ljujic, Patterson, Velaphi.  

Like you I don't see much (any) evidence of money being the problem.

How's my driving? - Whine here

Permalink Permalink
about 8 years ago

I bet he just didn't like the sticky grass.

"He's operating a turnstile down the left flank"

Permalink Permalink
about 8 years ago

Nz_Dave wrote:

Royz wrote:

So Kalezić wanted to spend more money and the club said no......... I can see why he left.

This take intrigues me. The Darije signings we saw certainly weren't big money options and I can't recall seeing him talking about needing a war chest. As a guy that didn't tend to pull his punches when dealing with media I would have expected to see some strong comments about that. 

He talked about thinking his players weren't up to it but I don't recall him saying he didn't think he had the funds to fix that.

Why would he go public about funds? He needed better players for next season, club said no your stuck with Singh and he walks.

Mr Positive

Permalink Permalink
about 8 years ago

Royz wrote:

Nz_Dave wrote:

Royz wrote:

So Kalezić wanted to spend more money and the club said no......... I can see why he left.

This take intrigues me. The Darije signings we saw certainly weren't big money options and I can't recall seeing him talking about needing a war chest. As a guy that didn't tend to pull his punches when dealing with media I would have expected to see some strong comments about that. 

He talked about thinking his players weren't up to it but I don't recall him saying he didn't think he had the funds to fix that.

Why would he go public about funds? He needed better players for next season, club said no your stuck with Singh and he walks.

He hasn't shied away from going public attacking his players why would a legit concern like funds be a thing he would be afraid of discussing publicly?

Heck WelNix and the club often discuss money in public forums.

Also you can't actually think a future star like Singh on min wage is the problem here?

"He's operating a turnstile down the left flank"

Permalink Permalink
about 8 years ago

Royz wrote:

Nz_Dave wrote:

Royz wrote:

So Kalezić wanted to spend more money and the club said no......... I can see why he left.

This take intrigues me. The Darije signings we saw certainly weren't big money options and I can't recall seeing him talking about needing a war chest. As a guy that didn't tend to pull his punches when dealing with media I would have expected to see some strong comments about that. 

He talked about thinking his players weren't up to it but I don't recall him saying he didn't think he had the funds to fix that.

Why would he go public about funds? He needed better players for next season, club said no your stuck with Singh and he walks.

That's an assumption but there is absolutely not evidence of it. Despite Ljujic, etc. being cheaper players it's probably quite expensive to buy out players contracts and move them on.

Permalink Permalink
about 8 years ago · edited about 8 years ago · History

Because he's been sacked (well un-renewed) and is trying hard to make it seem like he walked because it looks better on his CV. 

Sacked

Sacked

Sackeddy sack sack sacked.

The same reason he's not going now but is being difficult and saying he's staying until the end of the season even though no one wants him to.  It looks better on his CV.

Suspect he's working on his Wikipedia page as we speak.


Permalink Permalink
about 8 years ago

Baiter wrote:

Because he's been sacked (well un-renewed) and is trying hard to make it seem like he walked because it looks better on his CV. 

Sacked

Sacked

Sackeddy sack sack sacked.

The same reason he's not going now but is being difficult and saying he's staying until the end of the season even though no one wants him to.  It looks better on his CV.

Suspect he's working on his Wikipedia page as we speak.

Not necessarily. There might be a plan in place to ensure managed transition. Well, I bloody hope so.

Why else would they be making noises already, about Aurelio Vidmar being approached, instead of saying the usual "we're interviewing the right candidates and we have been fielding enquiries from far and wide and we'll make the announcement when we're ready or when the next of kin have been notified and had a chance to grieve in private" bullshark.

Actually, getting outplayed quite a bit these days

Permalink Permalink
about 8 years ago

The Phoenix as starting to head down the same track that the Kingz and Knights went down. It may not get there but there are similarities....

Grumpy old bastard alert

Permalink Permalink
about 8 years ago

shambles no matter how you look at it. to hire a coach as part of a rebrand and new vision and fire him before the season is over is an utter embarrassment.

Queenslander 3x a year.

Permalink Permalink
about 8 years ago

Jeff Vader wrote:

The Phoenix as starting to head down the same track that the Kingz and Knights went down. It may not get there but there are similarities....

Key differences Id say



Permalink Permalink