Wellington Phoenix Men

WPM R7 vs Adelaide | Sat 1st January | 9:45pm | SS7

160 replies · 23,808 views
about 4 years ago
Fudge VAR. 
Permalink Permalink
about 4 years ago
Lol this is woeful, both our play and the officiating
Permalink Permalink
about 4 years ago
Thats it, very hard to play against 12 players, the reds extra VAR!!!
Permalink Permalink
about 4 years ago
Wtf


Permalink Permalink
about 4 years ago
thats the game gone, and whats up with the blue uniform so yuk
Permalink Permalink
about 4 years ago · edited about 4 years ago · History
You can see why they give it, there's clear & obvious contact on their player without Payne touching the ball. Though also it's just a softer penalty than what most people want VAR to be giving.
Permalink Permalink
about 4 years ago
There weren’t even any appeals from Adelaide ffs


Permalink Permalink
about 4 years ago
yeah but the ref on the field said no pen, not clear and obvious error with that decision so why over rule it? Contact or not, the no pen call wasnt an error.

Queenslander 3x a year.

Permalink Permalink
about 4 years ago
Here comes the total capitulation of our boys on the field and om the sideline. And also another baseless apology form the League about the ref standards.
Permalink Permalink
about 4 years ago
siac
That's not clear and obvious...
And they don't even show us a replay of the one at the other end...
 Just rewound it. Definite foul (surprise, the ref missed it) but contact was outside the box, so no VAR. 
Permalink Permalink
about 4 years ago
Diabolical defending by Payne regardless of views about decision. Misjudged ball to let player behind him then stretched out & contacted player in the box.
Permalink Permalink
about 4 years ago
This ref is so bad with advantages 
Permalink Permalink
about 4 years ago
Colvinator
You can see why they give it, there's clear & obvious contact on their player without touching the ball
Though also it's just a softer penalty than what most people want VAR to be giving.

It has to be a clear and obvious wrong decision by the ref though. He initially waived it away. 


Permalink Permalink
about 4 years ago
Mauk is such a thug!

Queenslander 3x a year.

Permalink Permalink
about 4 years ago
nufc_nz
Colvinator
You can see why they give it, there's clear & obvious contact on their player without touching the ball
Though also it's just a softer penalty than what most people want VAR to be giving.

It has to be a clear and obvious wrong decision by the ref though. He initially waived it away. 
What part of it wasn't clear & obvious for you?
Permalink Permalink
about 4 years ago
This is just getting beyond the pale. Swear the whistle is needing to be blown every 20 seconds
Permalink Permalink
about 4 years ago
Oh for fudges sake!!!
Permalink Permalink
about 4 years ago
Thats it, goodnight
Permalink Permalink
about 4 years ago · edited about 4 years ago · History
Farkin McGarry!!!
should have been replaced 10 minutes earlier.

Queenslander 3x a year.

Permalink Permalink
about 4 years ago
Ffs McGarry that’s poor as fudge. Immediately subbed off.


Permalink Permalink
about 4 years ago
Off you get James that was so unnecessary. Definitely a result of all the frustration and tension on the field finally releasing after being bottled up for an hour.
Permalink Permalink
about 4 years ago
That Fenton sub was 5 min too late.
Permalink Permalink
about 4 years ago
Time for a Fenton masterclass
Permalink Permalink
about 4 years ago
That's just stupid defending from McGarry... really not smart.
Permalink Permalink
about 4 years ago
Colvinator
nufc_nz
Colvinator
You can see why they give it, there's clear & obvious contact on their player without touching the ball
Though also it's just a softer penalty than what most people want VAR to be giving.

It has to be a clear and obvious wrong decision by the ref though. He initially waived it away. 
What part of it wasn't clear & obvious for you?
 
Well for one the ref literally took a whole minute watching it on the screen to change his mind.


Permalink Permalink
about 4 years ago
LOL 
Permalink Permalink
about 4 years ago
What’s happened to Sutton?


Permalink Permalink
about 4 years ago
Ffs, the wank3r penalty taker is hard to stomach.

Eastbourne Football Club - we're  gonna take the Chatham Cup this year.

Permalink Permalink
about 4 years ago
That's a pretty good indication it wasn't clear and obvious. 

Eastbourne Football Club - we're  gonna take the Chatham Cup this year.

Permalink Permalink
about 4 years ago
Packboy
Ffs, the wank3r penalty taker is hard to stomach.
 

Yeah Goodwin is a cod.


Permalink Permalink
about 4 years ago
Hard watching.
But I think we have had better attitude this second half after the subs.
I hope we can at least score
Permalink Permalink
about 4 years ago
Both the mens and womens teams have been getting awful results recently but the differences in their on-field attitudes/approaches are pretty stark.
Permalink Permalink
about 4 years ago
nufc_nz
Colvinator
nufc_nz
Colvinator
You can see why they give it, there's clear & obvious contact on their player without touching the ball
Though also it's just a softer penalty than what most people want VAR to be giving.

It has to be a clear and obvious wrong decision by the ref though. He initially waived it away. 
What part of it wasn't clear & obvious for you?
 
Well for one the ref literally took a whole minute watching it on the screen to change his mind.
I believe they look at it in different angles etc to make sure it's clear & obvious. Clear & obvious doesn't mean it only takes one look to see the error, the amount of time they take looking at it is irrelevant. They might take some time to check defender definitely didn't touch the ball for example, it may only become clear after checking all angles and in slow motion.
Permalink Permalink
about 4 years ago
As bad as our defending is I think we can fix it, what is most concerning is our utter lack of attacking creativity. The two up front have absolutely no quality service.
Permalink Permalink
about 4 years ago
sigh!

Queenslander 3x a year.

Permalink Permalink
about 4 years ago

need that new winger asap!

Queenslander 3x a year.

Permalink Permalink
about 4 years ago
Shambles
Permalink Permalink
about 4 years ago
Sutton just backed off rather than go for the ball. 
Permalink Permalink
about 4 years ago
Colvinator
nufc_nz
Colvinator
nufc_nz
Colvinator
You can see why they give it, there's clear & obvious contact on their player without touching the ball
Though also it's just a softer penalty than what most people want VAR to be giving.

It has to be a clear and obvious wrong decision by the ref though. He initially waived it away. 
What part of it wasn't clear & obvious for you?
 
Well for one the ref literally took a whole minute watching it on the screen to change his mind.
I believe they look at it in different angles etc to make sure it's clear & obvious. Clear & obvious doesn't mean it only takes one look to see the error, the amount of time they take looking at it is irrelevant. They might take some time to check defender definitely didn't touch the ball for example, it may only become clear after checking all angles and in slow motion.
 the time they took stuffing around looking at it from all angles is a pretty good indication it wasn't clear and obvious and that were hellbent on finding a foul.  

Eastbourne Football Club - we're  gonna take the Chatham Cup this year.

Permalink Permalink
about 4 years ago
Fullback looked like a statue!
Permalink Permalink