As a fall back option playing in the NZFC might work for everyone though.
Incredible stamina. No shame. Yellow Fever.
As a fall back option playing in the NZFC might work for everyone though.
There is possibly one way that the Phoenix could consistently play other NZFC sides and that would have to be as a friendly. No points on the line, no league placing therefore not really breaking any transfer rules as such. Hey teams travel all over the world to play friendlies, how do they do it?
Get a 9 team NZFC league and when the Phoenix are at home, the NZFC team with a bye plays the Phoenix 'Youth/reserves' as a curtain raiser at ROF. The only drawback would be for the Phoenix franchise to pay for travel and accom of the team playing them but what NZFC wouldn't want to play a friendly in front of a decent crowd (possibly on TV? Prime?) a night away and get to stick around after to see an A League game. I seriously doubt New Zealand Football would stand in the way of that.
This is possibly an easier option than trying to get a team in the NZFC or in the HAL YL. The costs, well would they differ that greatly? (13 or 14 games)
I think its worth a look...
(EDIT: Assuming we have an NZFC)
Agent 472009-02-15 21:15:58
As a fall back option playing in the NZFC might work for everyone though.
Think he's covering his bases, but fair call. I remember it being discussed a while back and didn't realise he'd brought it up again.
It's ME that's out of date!
Incredible stamina. No shame. Yellow Fever.
As a fall back option playing in the NZFC might work for everyone though.
Think he's covering his bases, but fair call. I remember it being discussed a while back and didn't realise he'd brought it up again.
It's ME that's out of date!
Just past your use by date more like.....(or is that me???)
The thing is Zinidane, you don't make them part of an NZF comp cause then you have to get around regulations. Just play friendlies. No points, no competion to be apart of and no regulations to get around.
The thing is Zinidane, you don't make them part of an NZF comp cause then you have to get around regulations. Just play friendlies. No points, no competion to be apart of and no regulations to get around.
They will certainly get game time which is great, and there'll be another game to watch at the ROF which is also fantastic (for NZFC teams as well), but the transfer is a stumbling block.
http://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/football/1998571/Phoenix-bid-for-reserve-side-in-NZFC
They will certainly get game time which is great, and there'll be another game to watch at the ROF which is also fantastic (for NZFC teams as well), but the transfer is a stumbling block.
http://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/football/1998571/Phoenix-bid-for-reserve-side-in-NZFC
I'm rather opposed to anything other than participating in the A-League NYL, but I trust in Tony P's judgement.
Ideal for me would be Phoenix U-20 in the NYL, and a Phoenix U-17/Academy team in the NZFC Youth League.
I think that mindset only sets in in friendly games where the players don't perceive they have a lot to gain with full exertion. Don't think such a scenario would apply in this case - NZFC players would be up against an effectively reserve team from a professional club, and as opportunity to show up players supposedly at a higher level than them would not, I would think, be taken lightly.
Pretty much the same situation as Ryan Nelsen skipping All Whites friendlies in the past.
I'm still not convinced.
While some coaches may have an approach like that, the amount of one-upsmanship that exists in NZ football in general makes me think it's unlikely it would be adopted widely. In fact, I'd say the Phoenix team would be a massive target for all the NZFC teams - for some out of spite, and others for pure competetive reasons. At any rate, I think it'd be good for everyone involved.
And the comparison with Nelsen doesn't stand, he has much more to lose by playing in a meaningless AWs friendly than the NZFC sides playing a friendly against Phoenix youth/reserve team.el grapadura2009-03-05 10:41:26
As for the second, the only difference I see is the risk of retribution from Blackburn/Norwich/whomever, but this still falls along the line of "Okay, Xavi Roca, we don't want to risk you getting injured so we'll sit you out against the Phoenix.". The scale is different but the problem remains. Waitakere fielded their youth team against Youngheart last weekend, as the result meant nothing to them. No points on friendly matches could see a season of matches against weakened squads.
This is all academic of course, but frankly I'd rather guarantee competitive fixtures rather than friendlies. The best way to ensure this is the Australian youth league.
Ideally, yes, but not at the expense of bankrupting the club.
As for Y-tak and Manawatu - again, a different situation IMO. One thing to rest players against an NZFC side where there's nothing to be gained, but I think it'd be another to do the same against a Phoenix youth/reserve side.
Anyhoo, that's just what I think. I guess we'll see what happens if this gets off the ground.
+ Dewhurst.
Incredible stamina. No shame. Yellow Fever.
Queenslander 3x a year.
I would imagine that most of the youth players will come from north of wellington
Be an excellent vehicle for potential trialists to play in as well
+ Dewhurst.
Anyway, (back on topic) I hope that this seriously goes through. Bragging rights for anyone that beats the nix reserves thats for sure.
If you have a read of the article (listed on the front page News) Tony states quite clearly that there would be no point if the side were not competing for points which would make it as important as any other match for the NZFC sides.
isn't the transfer thing only an issue if the players register with the nix? from the way I read it the players brought in to the team would still be registered locally but on loan to the nix, as for the guys already registered with the nix I'm confused how that would work???@?
Queenslander 3x a year.
