All Whites, Ferns, and other international teams

World Cup Media Angst

609 replies · 23,263 views
almost 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
It's nonsense like this which made me give up reading this forum in the first place.  The first thing that comes to your mind, despite us running six football stories from South Africa this week, and offering more comprehensive tv coverage on the All Whites than anywhere else is to run tvnz down.  Mate we're putting a bit of effort to show the real South Africa.  No credit, just the good old kiwi knocking machine. 

And to essentially wish out loud that it would have been good if we got attacked is actually pretty disgusting.


Ahhh, the great Kiwi knocking machine! Nice dodge.

So how about addressing the comments of your colleagues in journalism - Richard Boock, Andrew Mulligan and Rikki Swannell - on Deaker on Sport last night? Or are they just part of the knocking machine also?

Exactly what was the news value of that segment in the township? It seemed to me like a classic case of the news becoming the news. A white film crew drives into a black township creating a stir and then broadcasting it as "news". Look! Scary black people! The "real South Africa"!

Oh, and I never said it would be good if you got attacked, just that it seemed like that's what you were after.

Why don't you show that piece to one of the many black South African journalists you will no doubt meet over there and see if they consider it a balanced view of the "real South Africa"?

EDIT: and yeah, reading some of the above, I do not mean to attack you personally Craig but I still think that piece was racist.

terminator_x2010-06-10 21:22:04

Permalink Permalink
almost 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
From left to right; Stanaway, 2ndBest, Gourdie.
You know we belong together...

Permalink Permalink
almost 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
IMO Craig was exploring the parts of the city that the AWs were based in. Seriously, nothing wrong with that at all! I go exploring all the time when I go to a new place. I don't do the tour bus thing. Man, I'm not even white and I didn't see ANYTHING remotely racist in that piece.

Seriously!

Permalink Permalink
almost 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
I have been a strong critic of media coverage of football in recent times (on this website and beyond), and I've been realy disappointed with TVNZ for a long time.
 
But, at the moment TVNZ is doing a great job with its World Cup coverage. Everybody will have differences of opinon and preference re journalistic style, but they are giving the All Whites a good run at the moment and treating the World Cup with the respect it warrants. The fact Stanaway is on the ground in South Africa is ensuring AWs lead the sports news every night.
 
By comparision its very disappointing TV3 isnt on deck yet. That absence has seriously hindered its coverage of the AWs this week. There are only so many times you can revisit Tim Brown's hospital and only so long you can get away with borrowing ITV feeds. Presence matters. No doubt Gourdie will do a good job once he gets to SA, although it will be interesting to see whether the lack of "rights" is a major obstacle.
 
Q. Is TV3 without rights bc it decided not to buy them or bc TVNZ is the broadcast rights holder and decided not to onsell to its rival??? (Craig or Andrew might want to answer).
 
Anyway, fair's fair. I have bagged TVNZ in the past. Now, its my turn to pat them on the back.
Permalink Permalink
almost 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Keep up the good work Craig,Ive been pleasently suprised by the amount of coverage the WC has been getting.
 
 
Im just thought when New Zealand beat Serbia,it would   of actually lead  the news that night (not just the sports news).
 
Im guessing if we win a game at the WC this will happen.
brettdale2010-06-10 22:13:40
Permalink Permalink
almost 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
It's just that I am already getting sick of the almost constant and complete presentation by the media of South Africa, and particularly black South Africa, as nothing more than a dangerous place full of criminals. Craig Stanaway's piece did nothing except reinforce this negative view. It seems like the only counter-point to this at the moment is FIFA themselves, who are just as bad with simplistic rhetoric about how football is bringing the rainbow nation together blah blah.

This blog by a South African freelance journalist does a pretty good job of explaining what I'm trying to say.

Permalink Permalink
almost 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
terminator_x wrote:
It's just that I am already getting sick of the almost constant and complete presentation by the media of South Africa, and particularly black South Africa, as nothing more than a dangerous place full of criminals.


Well you must admit that popularising the vuvuzela is pretty criminal.

Right up there with cowbells.

"Phoenix till they lose"

Posting 97% bollox, 8% lies and 3.658% genuine opinion. 

Genuine opinion: FTFFA

Permalink Permalink
almost 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
I read that blog (and Im a pretty liberal guy) and thought it confused, contradictory and without any clear point.
Permalink Permalink
almost 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
terminator_x wrote:
It's just that I am already getting sick of the almost constant and complete presentation by the media of South Africa, and particularly black South Africa, as nothing more than a dangerous place full of criminals.


I think the tone for this is set by the thousands of white SA expats in New Zealand, who deliberately exaggerate these stories of "out of control crime" because it sounds better than "I didn't want to live in a country run by blacks". And this narrative is gradually seeping into mainstream Pakeha discourse, unfortunately.


Ramming liberal dribble down your throat since 2009
This forum needs less angst and more Kate Bush threads



Permalink Permalink
almost 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Doloras wrote:
terminator_x wrote:
It's just that I am already getting sick of the almost constant and complete presentation by the media of South Africa, and particularly black South Africa, as nothing more than a dangerous place full of criminals.


I think the tone for this is set by the thousands of white SA expats in New Zealand, who deliberately exaggerate these stories of "out of control crime" because it sounds better than "I didn't want to live in a country run by blacks". And this narrative is gradually seeping into mainstream Pakeha discourse, unfortunately.



To be fair to a lot of those who have fled South Africa, many experienced some horrific things that most New Zealanders cannot imagine. On the other hand, many who immigrated are straight up racist. I had a lot of SA friends when I lived on the North Shore and some were disgustingly racist but many were very liberal tolerant people, despite seeing traumatic things. I don't think many of us can appreciate that.

I think while it is fair to criticise the media if football coverage is lacking, give credit when it is due. Both channels have upped their games, as have the newspapers. They really have to be all over the world cup because the interest is so high. But while games aren't being played, reporters have to come up with related stories, such as Stanaway's the other night.

Reporters work very hard for very little credit!
Permalink Permalink
almost 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
I could possibly understand such lazy and uninformed reporting from countries that have never really had any contact with South Africa before but in NZ we should really know better. Our rugby teams have been regularly going to SA for years, and while I'm sure they are careful about security, I am struggling to think of even one bad news story from all those visits (apart from when it's been our guys being naughty!).

The way they are largely being portrayed at the moment you would think that all black South Africans are members of the Taleban.



Permalink Permalink
almost 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Maybe some of the people touring can tell us how they found SA when they return.

Fuck this stupid game

Permalink Permalink
almost 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
I know pictures can lie but that news footage suggested to me that in a similar situation I would feel threatened too!

NOT BECAUSE THEY WERE BLACK.

Crowds like that go off with any tiny spark. It wasn't about how dangerous blacks are  And coming from safe old New Zealand we aren't always used to such situations (speaking for myself at least).

Oh man, I really really don't get this at all. And Murray's lost almost any respect I had for him recently. Haden's "darkie" comments aren't racist (because Murray says so) but Craig's piece was racist.

I've said all I have to say on this matter.
ahmad2010-06-10 22:37:05

Permalink Permalink
almost 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Doloras wrote:

terminator_x wrote:
It's just that I am already getting sick of the almost constant and complete presentation by the media of South Africa, and particularly black South Africa, as nothing more than a dangerous place full of criminals.
I think the tone for this is set by the thousands of white SA expats in New Zealand, who deliberately exaggerate these stories of "out of control crime" because it sounds better than "I didn't want to live in a country run by blacks". And this narrative is gradually seeping into mainstream Pakeha discourse, unfortunately.


I am sure that some do exaggerate, but you do not know what you are talking about.

If you are old and wise you were probably young and stupid

Permalink Permalink
almost 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Was there TV coverage on TV1 or TV3 for Steve Sumner's Order of Merit Award??
Permalink Permalink
almost 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
ahmad wrote:
And Murray's lost almost any respect I had for him recently. Haden's "darkie" comments aren't racist (because Murray says so) but Craig's piece was racist.


To be fair to Deaker I don't really remember what his personal view was, it was his three guests who highlighted Stanaway's piece as a poor piece of journalism. Don't worry, I suspect Deaker has been consistent on this by sticking his head in the sand both times.

terminator_x2010-06-10 23:09:59

Permalink Permalink
almost 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
darkhorse wrote:
Was there TV coverage on TV1 or TV3 for Steve Sumner's Order of Merit Award??


Don't think so, nor did Prime. I did hear it on Radio Sport though.

Craig is there a story coming?

Oh and please more shots of Mossy preferably without his shirt on, Thanks
Permalink Permalink
almost 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
That wasn't racist.
Permalink Permalink
almost 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
It was sh*tty journalism.

"Sharing rewards the weak"- Steven Colbert

Permalink Permalink
almost 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Traitor wrote:
It was sh*tty journalism.

How so though? It was a fair enough human interest story. It wasn't a sports story. It was a backgrounder to the World Cup, trying to at least give us some taste of the local culture.

When I visit new places I never use tour buses as a rule. I just walk the streets and markets. Walk and talk with people. In that piece, I saw a little bit of me in Craig to be perfectly honest.

Permalink Permalink
almost 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
ahmad wrote:
 I saw a little bit of me in Craig to be perfectly honest.
 
Too much information.

"Phoenix till they lose"

Posting 97% bollox, 8% lies and 3.658% genuine opinion. 

Genuine opinion: FTFFA

Permalink Permalink
almost 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Junior82 wrote:
ahmad wrote:
 I saw a little bit of me in Craig to be perfectly honest.
 
Too much information.

LOL I think you've been watching too many in-hotel room porn movies today

Permalink Permalink
almost 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Hey, I'm a red-blooded guy!
 
Junior822010-06-11 00:06:20

"Phoenix till they lose"

Posting 97% bollox, 8% lies and 3.658% genuine opinion. 

Genuine opinion: FTFFA

Permalink Permalink
almost 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Gourdietv3 wrote:
bopman wrote:
Gourdietv3 wrote:

Now i know you're all upset about tv3's coverage etc ... I leave for SA on Friday. Lets just say broadcasting from the world cup is not a cheap exercise

cheers
Are you able to tell us what you are and aren't allowed to do as a non-rights holder?
 
Example was Stanaway being allowed into the AWs base because he was a rights holder or because he asked nicely?
 
Essentially, as non rights holders we're not able to enter any "FIFA zones" i.e. stadiums and team hotels.
 
Basically we're unable to attend the captain's run and press conference at the stadium the day before the match, and can't take a camera into the ground on the day of the match.
 
My understanding though is that we WILL be allowed entry to where the All Whites are staying in Johannesburg because it's not a FIFA hotel - it was sourced by NZF themselves. So as far as i'm aware, TVNZ shouldn't have "exclusive" access to Serengeti.
 
Andrew... you know I respect you enormously.  I just think though this is a defeatist attitude by TV3... it is the only major New Zealand news organisation that does not have a presence over here at the moment and its noticable.  Even Crowd Goes Wild is here.  Despite being rights holders, we have really, really struggled to do things.  We are working extremely hard.... probably harder than we should be because of this "expectation we are rights holders so it's easier for us to deliver"  We can't just rely on being rights holders to deliver the stories because it doesn't happen.  A hell of a lot of hard work is going on behind the scenes.  But it is true, One News is the only organisatation that will broadcast live from the All Whites training base for the duration of the tournament. 
 
On One News tonight we will have Simon Elliott live with reaction to Tim Brown.... we will also show you all the different central midfield combinations Ricki Herbert employed during the Chile game.  Tv3 would have had no problem getting into this morning's game.  But they weren't there.  Neither was CGW.  We could have saved ourselves the 4+ hour drive going there and back and found something else to do knowing our major competitor was not going to be there but we still did it.  We're committed.
 
Regarding getting into the AW base camp.... security is incredible.  Everyone else has been thrown out and has been told not to come back.  We have worked extremely hard to build a relationship with Serengetti to bring those live crosses to our audience.  Around 3 months work's gone into it.
 
That being said, it's not the same without you here at the moment. I look forward to seeing you and Billy when you come over.
 
Lets not start the backslapping too early - you guys still dropped the ball by not sending anyone to Bahrain as it wasn't "newsworthy" enough
 
Tournament coverage hass been excellent so far, lets hope everyone travelling to South Africa can stay out of trouble

Normo's coming home

Permalink Permalink
almost 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
terminator_x wrote:
I could possibly understand such lazy and uninformed reporting from countries that have never really had any contact with South Africa before but in NZ we should really know better. Our rugby teams have been regularly going to SA for years, and while I'm sure they are careful about security, I am struggling to think of even one bad news story from all those visits (apart from when it's been our guys being naughty!).

The way they are largely being portrayed at the moment you would think that all black South Africans are members of the Taleban.



You've been there often then?

Allegedly

Permalink Permalink
almost 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Tegal wrote:
terminator_x wrote:
I could possibly understand such lazy and uninformed reporting from countries that have never really had any contact with South Africa before but in NZ we should really know better. Our rugby teams have been regularly going to SA for years, and while I'm sure they are careful about security, I am struggling to think of even one bad news story from all those visits (apart from when it's been our guys being naughty!).

The way they are largely being portrayed at the moment you would think that all black South Africans are members of the Taleban.



You've been there often then?
 
That's not really relevant is it?
 
Major sporting events have been going on in Sth Africa for years (although of course not on this scale) - a lot of the reporting makes out like we're going to a country that no white man has ever visited.  Bit of perspective is all

Normo's coming home

Permalink Permalink
almost 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Id trust someone who has been there and saying that it is a dangerous place in parts,over someone who hasnt been there and says it is perfectly safe,is all I'm saying.
 
But if Term_X has been there,then it gives his criticisms a lot more strength.

Allegedly

Permalink Permalink
almost 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Don't be racist Frankie!

Allegedly

Permalink Permalink
almost 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Leggy wrote:

I am sure that some do exaggerate, but you do not know what you are talking about.


Well, let's put it this way - I'm not denying that there's a lot of violent crime in SA. There will be a lot of violent crime in any country where there are great disparities in income (cf USA). But the issue is, was crime really that much lower under apartheid? Or was it just that when the police were all white, and answered to an all-white government, the white population slept more soundly in their beds? As I'm not from SA, perhaps I don't know what I'm talking about, but these guys do.

As to ahmad: I don't know what things are like in Dunedin, but there are many parts of Auckland which are not "nice and safe".Doloras2010-06-11 10:55:04

Ramming liberal dribble down your throat since 2009
This forum needs less angst and more Kate Bush threads



Permalink Permalink
almost 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
terminator_x wrote:
ahmad wrote:
And Murray's lost almost any respect I had for him recently. Haden's "darkie" comments aren't racist (because Murray says so) but Craig's piece was racist.


To be fair to Deaker I don't really remember what his personal view was, it was his three guests who highlighted Stanaway's piece as a poor piece of journalism. Don't worry, I suspect Deaker has been consistent on this by sticking his head in the sand both times.

 
If you think that was poor journalism you are f**ked in the head.
 
I think you are the racist.  You saw Craig saying "there's a lot of people here and I feel unsafe" and what you heard was "there are a lot of BLACK people here and I feel unsafe" which is not what he said at all. 
 
Summary: you are probably f**ked in the head.
 
The only support you can find for your view that Craig's piece was in any way inappropriate is three talking heads on Deaker on Sport, hardly a paragon of investigative intellectual journalism.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Incredible stamina. No shame. Yellow Fever.

Permalink Permalink
almost 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Doloras wrote:
As to ahmad: I don't know what things are like in Dunedin, but there are many parts of Auckland which are not "nice and safe".

Just FYI I consider Dunedin safe except in the weekends in town where a mixture of alcohol and god knows what other drugs conspire to remove any ability to think rationally so therefore you can get involved in an assault without having even provoked it (not personal experience - I stay away).

Permalink Permalink
almost 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago

There is considerable crime in SA. Fact.

There is less crime here. Fact.

We are advised not to walk outside our hotel alone. Fact.

I couldn't even see a security guard when I went to get my rand from National Bank HQ on Featherston St yesterday. Fact.
 
Being concerned about cirme in SA and personal security is not racist and high murder/burglary rates are not just a travesty of cultural misunderstanding. And coming from NZ (the "most peaceful country in the world" as reported by that international outfit last week) i dont think its surprising we are more struck/interested in/concerned about the crime rate in SA.
 
I'm sure we will have a sensational time and meet truckloads of wonderful South Africans without event. But that doesnt mean there aren't real problems in SA.
 
And, no, I havent been there. This is my first trip to the Republic.
 
 
Permalink Permalink
almost 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Yeah, if everything is considered racist, then by the lack of binary opposition, nothing is racist, which is not good.
 
Conclusion: pick ye racism battles. There is far worse out there than this report.
Cosimo2010-06-11 11:18:46
I like tautologies because I like them.
Permalink Permalink
almost 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Smithy wrote:
If you think that was poor journalism you are f**ked in the head.
 
I think you are the racist.  You saw Craig saying "there's a lot of people here and I feel unsafe" and what you heard was "there are a lot of BLACK people here and I feel unsafe" which is not what he said at all. 
 
Summary: you are probably f**ked in the head.
 
The only support you can find for your view that Craig's piece was in any way inappropriate is three talking heads on Deaker on Sport, hardly a paragon of investigative intellectual journalism.
 
Smithy - those three "talking heads" (who happen to be media colleagues of Craig Stanaway) and I are simply expressing an opinion.
 
I can understand that as someone who quite obviously enjoys the doting patronage of the media through his association with YF it makes you uncomfortable to see those same journalists being subjected to any objective critique of their work.
 
I think you need to decide, however, whether that really excuses you from dismissing someone presenting another point of view to yours as being "f**ked in head".
 
By the way, if you really want to explore the issues around black representation in the media (or in fact any minorities - god knows muslims put up with enough sh*t) then just do a google search on those words. You will get literally thousands of hits, expressing opinions from every possible point of view. You can work out for yourself where you stand but please, at least acknowledge there is plenty of room for debate.
 
terminator_x2010-06-11 12:23:27

Permalink Permalink
almost 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Oceanic6 wrote:
darkhorse wrote:
Was there TV coverage on TV1 or TV3 for Steve Sumner's Order of Merit Award??


Don't think so, nor did Prime. I did hear it on Radio Sport though.

Craig is there a story coming?

Oh and please more shots of Mossy preferably without his shirt on, Thanks
 
there was a small item on the midday news on Sumners order of merit   Showed the medal too.  very shiney.
 
Permalink Permalink
almost 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
terminator_x wrote:
Smithy wrote:
If you think that was poor journalism you are f**ked in the head.
 
I think you are the racist.  You saw Craig saying "there's a lot of people here and I feel unsafe" and what you heard was "there are a lot of BLACK people here and I feel unsafe" which is not what he said at all. 
 
Summary: you are probably f**ked in the head.
 
The only support you can find for your view that Craig's piece was in any way inappropriate is three talking heads on Deaker on Sport, hardly a paragon of investigative intellectual journalism.
 
Smithy - those three "talking heads" (who happen to be media colleagues of Craig Stanaway) and I are simply expressing an opinion.
 
I can understand that as someone who quite obviously enjoys the doting patronage of the media through his association with YF it makes you uncomfortable to see those same journalists being subjected to any objective critique of their work.
 
I think you need to decide, however, whether that really excuses you from dismissing someone presenting another point of view to yours as being "f**ked in head".
 
By the way, if you really want to explore the issues around black representation in the media (or in fact any minorities - god knows muslims put up with enough sh*t) then just do a google search on those words. You will get literally thousands of hits, expressing opinions from every possible point of view. You can work out for yourself where you stand but please, at least acknowledge there is plenty of room for debate.
 
 
The doting patronage lavished on me by the media is not relevant.  I don't need an excuse to call you f**ked in the head.  Accusing someone of racism is not something you should do lightly, and certainly not from such a bollocks stand point as yours.
 
Your critique might be objective, but it is also misguided, uninformed, and ill considered. 
 
You are now trying to sidestep the fact that you've been comprehensively shot down by broadening the debate to the representation of black minorities in the media. 
 
Just give it away.  You should realise you're pissing into a strong breeze when liberal folks like Buckle and I are telling you to pull your head in.
 
 

Incredible stamina. No shame. Yellow Fever.

Permalink Permalink
almost 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Wow Smithy, you're on fire today. Just a couple of points of clarification...
 
First, I didn't accuse Stanaway of being racist, I said his piece was racist. I'm certainly not condemning Stanaway as a person for all time, something that I clarified in a later post.
 
I stand by the statement that his piece was racist, however, there is absolutely no side-stepping from me on that. I just thought it might help people understand why I said that by providing a wider context. There is a whole body of thought out there on these kinds of issues if you want to explore it. For instance, you might want to check out Professor Barbara Trepagnier's work on Silent Racism. I think Craig Stanaway's piece is quite a good example of this.
 
And I still honestly don't believe I qualify for being called "f**ked in the head"!
 

Permalink Permalink
almost 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
terminator_x wrote:
 
And I still honestly don't believe I qualify for being called "f**ked in the head"!
 
 
Well I guess you could say I'm simply expressing an opinion.

Incredible stamina. No shame. Yellow Fever.

Permalink Permalink
almost 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Smithy wrote:
terminator_x wrote:
ahmad wrote:
And Murray's lost almost any respect I had for him recently. Haden's "darkie" comments aren't racist (because Murray says so) but Craig's piece was racist.


To be fair to Deaker I don't really remember what his personal view was, it was his three guests who highlighted Stanaway's piece as a poor piece of journalism. Don't worry, I suspect Deaker has been consistent on this by sticking his head in the sand both times.

 
If you think that was poor journalism you are f**ked in the head.
 
I think you are the racist.  You saw Craig saying "there's a lot of people here and I feel unsafe" and what you heard was "there are a lot of BLACK people here and I feel unsafe" which is not what he said at all. 
 
Summary: you are probably f**ked in the head.
 
The only support you can find for your view that Craig's piece was in any way inappropriate is three talking heads on Deaker on Sport, hardly a paragon of investigative intellectual journalism.
 
 

If you think that was a good piece of journalism you are  ............wrong

I didnt see any attempt to connect with the people, to ask them how it felt to have the World Cup in their backyard. The people looked happy to me, and acting up like so many do in front of a camera. There are elements of racial steroetyping in that piece by Stanaway.

I am enjoying the coverage,  but that was a poor filler



Permalink Permalink