I heard that the two Otago goals were quite bad defensive errors, and apart from that they didnt have many chances... Is that right?
7 05/12/10 (Sun) 12:00 Memorial Park Otago 2 Manawatu 1
Grumpy old bastard alert
Love to hear a Waikato fan single out a footballer in that side on the weekend...
Why does Willy keep saying this is a young Waikato Team, it seems to me more like an aging East Coast Bays Team getting found out.
For what its worth, I thought Strom should have played, if only to give them that 'grit' because Zoghby and Branch don't have that. At least Nathan is not scared to kick a player and make him think twice about coming near him. I also thought that Mark Jones came on and was just bloody awful. He walked off whinging how they were cheated out of the game. By whom???? Him and Bresnahan shouldn't even have gotten near the changing rooms let alone the pitch. They were just an awful side including two goalkeeper howlers and City took full advantage of that. Carr to start next week.
Incidentally and while it was helped by the score line, I was impressed as to how much better City looked compared to early season. The main difference I think it the Spanish lad at the back. Doesn't do too much but he is class.
Jeff Vader2011-01-23 19:21:22
Grumpy old bastard alert
The Spanish would go close to being the best player in the league. I'm trying to think of others whom would be as good (Pearce on current form?) but not many.
They were spanked 5-1 and as much as I like what they are trying to do in Waikato, they were outclassed.
Grumpy old bastard alert
- John Fletcher
- Jack Beguely
- Ryan Zoghby
- Jason McKeown
So four players from the top team (by far last season) in the Northern Premier League made the Waikato FC starting lineup.
I know that the ASB Premiership is a different league, but you do have to get your players from somewhere. Surely getting 4 of your starting lineup from last years top NRFL team should't be such a bad thing?
Milkman you have named four players who shouldnt have started. Beguely gives 100% every week but not a footballer. McKeown i have watched twice this year, in 180 minutes of football i think he has touched the ball a total of 7 times and given it away atleast four of those times. The other two you've mentioned im not going to start on.
The Waikato board is half the problem in my opinion, they realy need a mass clear out and start all over again.
I wasn't at the after match speeches but if Gerdsen is making excuses then he should look at himself in the mirror.
Grumpy old bastard alert
Manko was the only Waikato player to show some bottle Sat, wasted in defense, should be midfield.
Gerdson's the problem, oh so negative. Subbing his skipper mid way through second half for an overweight unfit Bresnehan was a disgrace and only done to lay blame.!!??
Stated he had warned his squad there would be repercussions for a poor result in his aftermatch speech.
Waikato will be looking for a new coach again next season for sure.
Hicks ok when he is on the ball, you have to say hes ok because anyone with a left foot is of some value. However he goes missing in big games. Against teams like Auckland City and Waitakere he may as well stay in the sheds like the rest. Seems to play ok against the weaker teams and that is helping their position.
Not totally fair, as as I understand it conditions were placed on their offering to WFC by their 'agent'. Namely that they would not be playing for the youth team and that they had to be guaranteed to be playing/starting in the 1st team.
Both these lads could and should have been playing for WFC but their 'agent' is unrealistic and a block to their development in my humble opinion...
Yet another example of the appalling politics and personal battles that go on in the Waikato, more of which I am sure will come out after todays game...

hello there. Futbol raises a good discussion point.
Having a Waikato team comprised mainly of Aucklanders is one thing. But when it then advances to the not totally illogical position of the team also training north of the Bombays it is perhaps time to reconsider the whole raison d'etre of a Waikato team.
When does a Waikato team stop being a Waikato team and start being just a vague theory? And have we hit that tipping point?
In the US sports franchises switch bases. Are we in the early throes of seeing the same thing happen here?
Waikato has no facility it calls home, a glaring deficit of Waikato personnel, and no money. It would appear to attract marginal Waikato support both in terms of paying spectators and community sponsorship.
It might not be dead just yet, but it's on life support.
No single person or persons is to blame, in my view. Some of us volunteer administrators may have made errors of judgement over the years, but fundamentally the illness symptom here is not a case of "too many agendas", but the opposite -- not enough agendas. Not enough people out there in football land give a stuff.
The nub of the issue is Waikato FC has become incidental to too many stakeholders in the game. What does or doesn't happen at Waikato FC no longer appears to matter to most involved in the code here.
For the dwindling few for whom it still does matter, we perhaps need to re-examine the whole point of Waikato FC. I'm a founder member, and I for one am struggling to remember.
Welcome some views.
How much of him have you actually seen him play
Grumpy old bastard alert
Club wont be around next year, its a waste of time. Harsh but true. It does nothing for the region and certainly nothing for the game in NZ.
Grumpy old bastard alert